Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Cadillac Ponders A Smaller Crossover

    William Maley

    Editor/Reporter - CheersandGears.com

    January 11, 2012

    Following on the heels of introducing the new ATS, Cadillac is thinking about adding a smaller crossover.

    “We’re looking at options there. I think it would go a little bit more head-to-head with like the X3,” said Kurt McNeil, Cadillac’s vice president of sales.

    BMW's redesigned X3 has been a hit in the North American market. The new X3 was built with North American consumers in mind, which is the opposite of what Cadillac would have to do in order to profitably expand its portfolio.

    “The fact that Cadillac is becoming more of a global brand will certainly play a role in that decision,” McNeil said.

    If the Cadillac small crossover was approved, it could go either on Alpha platform or the Theta platform.

    Source: Bloomberg

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    That would be stupid. I for one am tired of hearing about "small luxury" as a supposed segment. Garbage. Maybe in Europe, maybe some buyers here, but nothing that will draw in enough customers to be profitable. All I hear at my Buick dealer is people complaining about how small things are getting, no more large well optioned cars. They can't get a Lucerne so they either go up to an Enclave or go somewhere else to buy. It is enough.

    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    People keep forgetting about the bigger issue--the upcoming increase in CAFE standards..that alone is going to drive more and more subcompact and compact product and smaller, more efficient drivetrains across all the brands...

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That would be stupid. I for one am tired of hearing about "small luxury" as a supposed segment. Garbage. Maybe in Europe, maybe some buyers here, but nothing that will draw in enough customers to be profitable. All I hear at my Buick dealer is people complaining about how small things are getting, no more large well optioned cars. They can't get a Lucerne so they either go up to an Enclave or go somewhere else to buy. It is enough.

    The Lacrosse is nearly as large as the Lucerne, and has more available equipment. I haven't looked at the numbers, but my guess is interior volume on the LaCrosse is about the same as the Lucerne, since the Lucerne platform is pretty dated. And the Taurus/MKS is about all that is bigger, the Avalon is not, and GM has the XTS coming for a bigger, nicer Buick.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A smaller SUV can be a good idea, but the problem is the SRX has a lower price than the X3. Had the SRX stayed on Sigma and be priced where it used to be, it would allow for an X3 fighter under it. But by making the SRX cheaper than an X3, it doesn't give Cadillac much room to work with. Unless the new SUV is built on Alpha and the SRX goes back to RWD and a new platform for Generation 3. In which case the Gen 3 SRX would need V8 power as well as diesel power to compete with the M-class and X5.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Lacrosse is nearly as large as the Lucerne, and has more available equipment. I haven't looked at the numbers, but my guess is interior volume on the LaCrosse is about the same as the Lucerne, since the Lucerne platform is pretty dated. And the Taurus/MKS is about all that is bigger, the Avalon is not, and GM has the XTS coming for a bigger, nicer Buick.

    The XTS only has a 111 inch wheelbase, though, not really big car territory...and it is narrow.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Lacrosse is nearly as large as the Lucerne, and has more available equipment. I haven't looked at the numbers, but my guess is interior volume on the LaCrosse is about the same as the Lucerne, since the Lucerne platform is pretty dated. And the Taurus/MKS is about all that is bigger, the Avalon is not, and GM has the XTS coming for a bigger, nicer Buick.

    The XTS only has a 111 inch wheelbase, though, not really big car territory...and it is narrow.

    True it is a short wheelbase, but the car overall is 200+ inches long, and that is bigger than most of what is out there. The Taurus/MKS are 204 inches long, but even the Genesis and 300C are only about 196 inches long, granted they are roomy inside because of the RWD and width. Big car territory is now the LaCrosse/XTS and Taurus, unless you want to pony up the money for an S-class. Hyundai Equus is big, but still over $60k.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Lacrosse Lucerne

    Seating 5 5

    Front Headroom (in.) 38.00 39.50

    Rear Headroom (in.) 37.30 37.70

    Front Legroom (in.) 41.70 42.50

    Rear Legroom (in.) 40.50 41.40

    Front Shoulder Room (in.) 57.40 58.00

    Rear Shoulder Room (in.) 56.00 57.00

    Front Hip Room (in.) 55.20 56.10

    Rear Hip Room (in.) 53.90 57.00

    Wheelbase (in.) 111.70 115.60

    Length (in.) 196.90 203.20

    Width (in.) 73.10 73.80

    Height (in.) 59.20 58.00 Track Front (in.) 61.70 63.00

    Track Rear (in.) 62.00 62.50

    Passenger Volume (cu. ft.) 101.70 108.00

    Cargo Volume (cu. ft.) 13.30 17.00

    They are not in the same class. Period.

    Edited by thedriver
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Taurus only has 102 cubic feet of interior room, the Chrysler 300 and Toyota Avalon 106 cu ft and the Genesis has 109 cu ft. The Lacrosse isn't a small car, it just isn't as big on the inside as some of the competitors. GM cars are not all that space efficient. But for people that complain the LaCrosse is small, where else do they go really, to the Avalon for that extra 5 cu ft of room? It isn't like people shopping Buicks can go look at an S-class to get a huge car, unless they want a used S-class, which will no doubt last longer than a new Buick, so maybe that isn't such a bad idea.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "But for people that complain the LaCrosse is small, where else do they go really, to the Avalon for that extra 5 cu ft of room?"

    Exactly my point. The "large car" has gone away. There is a whole generation of Americans in their 50s to 80s with money to spend on a new car that cannot find a product they like. So they buy a large SUV. They aren't looking for more small crossovers. Not from GM, not from anyone. Without a Lucerne, a Crown Victoria, what do they do? In many cases keep their old car and complain they can't get what they want.

    Does anyone make a vehicle that seats 6 comfortably and gets around 30 MPG? That is what I would like, but those don't exist really either.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This one is more for Europe and China as they like the smaller SUV/CUV. It will not hurt here as small CUV are the rage right now.

    When we see new models we need to look at them globally and not just as North American buyers.

    If they are to make it globally they need to give them what they want too.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • Posts

    • I am not aware of travel cases for internal drives. Usually you have the drive and once you have made sure you own static electricity is discharged on your body, open the computer and unplug the power cable and data cable to the HD. Then you unscrew the screws holding the drive in. Put the drive into an Anti-Static bag and then usually into a box that has foam padding on all sides to protect the drive and then tape it up to close it.  With both drives in their proper storage bags, you can then have both drives in between foam insulation for handling any dropping of the box, etc. Pack them in a box and tape shut, should then easily handle going through your carry on or checked in luggage. To ship a hard drive, you need to: Secure the hard drive in its original packaging or anti-static bag. If you don't have an anti-static bag, place the drive into a zipped freezer bag to prevent any moisture getting into the drive during transit. Sandwich the drive between foam or wrap it in bubble wrap to absorb any minor shocks. Put the hard drive in a padded shipping box. Close and seal the box. Label your package. Amazon.com : hard drive shipping box This is pretty much all you need.
    • Either a co-pilot first time landing or something truly went wrong on the plane.
    • The incoming rectangular lamps on many GM cars in that era made them much more attractive.  They made a big difference. Now, as far the powerplant went, the notion of 500 cubic inches was mindboggling even during the malaise era.  If you want to see someone's jaw drop, tell a European that their engines have 8200 cc or 8.2 liters.  For those who aren't driving the occasional Mustang or Camaro you see, they freak out at anything over 2,500 or 3,000 cc.
    • Thank you for the response. I want to reinstall them into the computers, especially the "newer" one.  The old one has been a real champ.   The reason for not leaving them in the desktop is that the basic tower might have to be transported ... and not by me.  That means it will be out of my possession for a while.  Since the HDs would be traveling with me, they'll have to get scanned through airport security a time or two.  I'm guessing that shouldn't mess with the data.   I've already backed up the C drive on several large 1 TB portable hard drives.  I don't want to touch the basic functions and files on the computers since I don't know how that all works.  I stay away from the drives and files I am not familiar with. I tend to donate other things to charity.   I did give the Regal I once owned to charity.   A good friend told me that, about a month or two later, he saw it being driven around the city by its new owner and we had a good laugh. This is what I want to do.  I'm just trying to figure out if the guy or gal at Office Depot can size a case based on looking up the unit and the HD in it.  Any ideas on that part?  Or should I do that and approximate the size and weight of the part to get the cases?
    • I'm wondering about a lot of things related to this.  I am sure that, sadly, the passengers inside were jolted.  This is way different from a rough landing. Why was it even necessary to do it?  What was going on at the airport property at that time?  How does one even pull this off?  I've seen some vids of where they barely touch and then go off again, but this one looks way more complicated.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings