Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    New Bill To Offer A Billion Dollar Prize To 100 MPG Vehicle

    William Maley

    Editor/Reporter - CheersandGears.com

    February 6, 2012

    Do you want a billion dollars? Well, all you need to do is build 60,000 cars that get 100 MPG and the U.S. government will send a check your way if a new bill is passed.

    Representative Dan Lungren ® of California's 3rd Congressional District has introduced a bill into Congress called the Excellence in Energy Efficiency Act of 2012. If the bill is passed, the legislation would have the Secretary of Energy "establish a program to award a prize in the amount of $1,000,000,000 to the first automobile manufacturer incorporated in the United States to manufacture and sell in the United States 60,000 mid-sized sedan automobiles which operate on gasoline and can travel 100 miles per gallon."

    That's right, no compacts or any electric vehicles can be used. It's unclear whether plug-in hybrids can be used, but judging from this quote, "To provide a prize to the first manufacturer of highly-efficient mid-sized automobiles powered by gasoline," we doubt it.

    Source: The Hill

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Would be a great way for the car companie to work on and build a quality high milage car. We need to move the needle more, but I am not sure the hybrid is really the way to go.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    more incentives to cater to a small portion of the population....and somewhere manufacturers would have to divert resources to vie for for this 1 billion.

    while it's a lofty goal, it's just an opposite tactic of things like CAFE, instead of punishing, it's rewarding. but it's still a whip on manufactures that want to play that game.

    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Better idea than CAFE, but obviously written by the clueless - absurd goal that wishful thinking will not achieve,

    They'd do better to offer a similar reward for a viable new fuel, or a distribution network for the same.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It basically sounds like a governtment-sponsored extension of the Automotive X PRIZE, which already proved that 100+ MPG cars are feasible. This bill just takes it to the next step by requiring a full production run. I would expect several AXP competitors to go after this as well, since preliminary requirements were that entries had to be production-ready and have a credible business plan.

    Edited by §carlet §wordfish
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We don't need 100MPG cars, we need another fuel to power those we have now. Preferably one the is both domestic and renewable.

    Conservation of a finite resource will never solve the problem.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No, but it will give us a buffer while alternative fuel technologies are developed and ready to be mass marketed, and will still reduce our dependency on oil in the interim. And the designs and methods used to make a car that can get 100+ MPG on gas will be just as relevant to cars that run on other fuels to make them more efficient.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We don't need 100MPG cars, we need another fuel to power those we have now. Preferably one the is both domestic and renewable.

    Conservation of a finite resource will never solve the problem.

    Crude Oil needs competition. Not at current prices but for a price of $1.00/gal.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't buy that for a minute. This will be a huge boondoggle, someone will meet the minimum requirements and collect the money. Then they will have a fire sale on the undesireable cars they built and quietly end production.

    The premise of this is wholly wrong-headed.

    If the government wants to spend our money on research, the least we should expect is that they do it with an eye toward providing a real solution. 60,000 sedans for a billion dollars is no answer to anything. This is the La La Land thinking we have in public office today.

    We don't need 100MPG cars, we need another fuel to power those we have now. Preferably one the is both domestic and renewable.

    Conservation of a finite resource will never solve the problem.

    Crude Oil needs competition. Not at current prices but for a price of $1.00/gal.

    Yes!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That is precisely what came to my mind. No specifics of what size vehicle, what engine, what propulsion. Just throw a number off the congressional rear. Companies will just make a better nano and you can have 150 mpg. There should be some paradigms to adopt such as midsize 5 passenger sedan/coupe, etc.

    I don't buy that for a minute. This will be a huge boondoggle, someone will meet the minimum requirements and collect the money. Then they will have a fire sale on the undesireable cars they built and quietly end production.

    The premise of this is wholly wrong-headed.

    If the government wants to spend our money on research, the least we should expect is that they do it with an eye toward providing a real solution. 60,000 sedans for a billion dollars is no answer to anything. This is the La La Land thinking we have in public office today.

    We don't need 100MPG cars, we need another fuel to power those we have now. Preferably one the is both domestic and renewable.

    Conservation of a finite resource will never solve the problem.

    Crude Oil needs competition. Not at current prices but for a price of $1.00/gal.

    Yes!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Crude Oil needs competition. Not at current prices but for a price of $1.00/gal.

    That seems unrealistically cheap.

    Do you think oil companies will let a competitor in easy?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Crude Oil needs competition. Not at current prices but for a price of $1.00/gal.

    That seems unrealistically cheap.

    Do you think oil companies will let a competitor in easy?

    I can't imagine they would let any competitor in...any company that tried to compete would be destroyed rapidly by Big Oil companies..

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Crude Oil needs competition. Not at current prices but for a price of $1.00/gal.

    That seems unrealistically cheap.

    Do you think oil companies will let a competitor in easy?

    I can't imagine they would let any competitor in...any company that tried to compete would be destroyed rapidly by Big Oil companies..

    That is precisely my point. You have to survive and thrive in such a scenario.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Crude Oil needs competition. Not at current prices but for a price of $1.00/gal.

    That seems unrealistically cheap.

    If accomplished, imagine the impact on the economy!

    Especially if the supply is domestic.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Think it is time for the GOV to set a standard for connections and require all gas stations to have a pump for Propane, Pump for Naural Gas on top of having pumps for BIO-Fuel. This will then drive competition and reduce the oil need and price.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Think it is time for the GOV to set a standard for connections and require all gas stations to have a pump for Propane, Pump for Naural Gas on top of having pumps for BIO-Fuel. This will then drive competition and reduce the oil need and price.

    An infinitely more logical approach.

    And while they are at it, they should remove the roadblocks to simple conversions to these alt fuels. EPA regs hold what could be a great industry back in this regard. Very stupid.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    100 mpg city? 100 mpg highway? 100 mpg combined?

    And why no diesels or electrics? Why not use every available bit of technology there is out there? Diesel is the more efficient fuel per gallon. If they're worried about the NOx, they have urea filters for that.

    GM can get a Buick Lacrosse to go 36mpg highway using very mild electric boost. The Cruze Eco got me 51mpg. A Cruze Eco 1.4CDi with eAssist would likely put them very close to that 100mpg goal (highway). A 1 liter Volt diesel or HCCI Gasser would put them well over the top. HCCI would work very well in the Volt because the HCCI mode has a rather narrow rpm band it can operate in, but the Volt generator doesn't care as long as it is getting the RPMs it needs constantly.

    Limiting this contest to gasoline only vehicles is dumb dumb dumb.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Moltar, why does that seem unrealistic, gas was just $1 ~10 years ago. so, does the reality of 10 years ago, seem unrealistic?

    heck, gas used to be as cheap as $0.20.

    http://www1.eere.ene...vt_fotw364.html

    Well, it was 13 years ago. I remember buying gas for $1.07 in late '98/early '99 and thinking it was something of nirvana. Unfortunately, the reality of 1999 seems to have been distorted in way too many ways to get to 2012 that its hard to put it on a baseline with today's reality.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Moltar, why does that seem unrealistic, gas was just $1 ~10 years ago. so, does the reality of 10 years ago, seem unrealistic?

    heck, gas used to be as cheap as $0.20.

    http://www1.eere.ene...vt_fotw364.html

    Yes, gas was that cheap. In the past. Not likely it's going to get that cheap again in the future.

    What is not understood is when there is a competition to the livelihood (dominance) of gas manufacturers, will they keep the future price at current level knowing the future will be in trouble?

    What makes these manufacturers drop the price down in the future to the ones in past?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Moltar, why does that seem unrealistic, gas was just $1 ~10 years ago. so, does the reality of 10 years ago, seem unrealistic?

    heck, gas used to be as cheap as $0.20.

    http://www1.eere.ene...vt_fotw364.html

    Yes, gas was that cheap. In the past. Not likely it's going to get that cheap again in the future.

    What is not understood is when there is a competition to the livelihood (dominance) of gas manufacturers, will they keep the future price at current level knowing the future will be in trouble?

    What makes these manufacturers drop the price down in the future to the ones in past?

    <cynical-realist>

    Competition. But that isn't likely to happen, as corrupt oil companies (and the politicians they own) actively work to prevent competition. Not to mention instability in the Middle East is always a constant threat to oil prices.

    </cynical-realist>

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Moltar, why does that seem unrealistic, gas was just $1 ~10 years ago. so, does the reality of 10 years ago, seem unrealistic?

    heck, gas used to be as cheap as $0.20.

    http://www1.eere.ene...vt_fotw364.html

    Yes, gas was that cheap. In the past. Not likely it's going to get that cheap again in the future.

    What is not understood is when there is a competition to the livelihood (dominance) of gas manufacturers, will they keep the future price at current level knowing the future will be in trouble?

    What makes these manufacturers drop the price down in the future to the ones in past?

    <cynical-realist>

    Competition. But that isn't likely to happen, as corrupt oil companies (and the politicians they own) actively work to prevent competition. Not to mention instability in the Middle East is always a constant threat to oil prices.

    </cynical-realist>

    And even more reasons to replace it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Moltar, why does that seem unrealistic, gas was just $1 ~10 years ago. so, does the reality of 10 years ago, seem unrealistic?

    heck, gas used to be as cheap as $0.20.

    http://www1.eere.ene...vt_fotw364.html

    Yes, gas was that cheap. In the past. Not likely it's going to get that cheap again in the future.

    What is not understood is when there is a competition to the livelihood (dominance) of gas manufacturers, will they keep the future price at current level knowing the future will be in trouble?

    What makes these manufacturers drop the price down in the future to the ones in past?

    <shortsighted person>

    Competition. But that isn't likely to happen, as corrupt oil companies (and the politicians they own) actively work to prevent competition. Not to mention instability in the Middle East is always a constant threat to oil prices.

    </shortsighted person>

    Are you absolutely sure that no competition will exist because of the corrupt activities? May be not in US, but countries who do not have power or much vested interest in crude oil are already looking into that alternative. Aren't people in this country clamoring to end oil dependence? Armed forces have a huge initiative on the same. Once the revolution starts with a competitive product, government and corporations will not overtly support the activities of dominance then the oil industry will go into survival mode.

    Just like OPEC came together to unify and charge people more, what is preventing OPEC to come together and destroy an industry with higher costs in short term by slashing prices so that long term it maintains the status quo? That is the reality.

    When domination enters survival mode, all bets are off.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    <cynical-skeptic>

    Competition. But that isn't likely to happen, as corrupt oil companies (and the politicians they own) actively work to prevent competition. Not to mention instability in the Middle East is always a constant threat to oil prices.

    </cynical-skeptic>

    Are you absolutely sure that no competition will exist because of the corrupt activities? May be not in US, but countries who do not have power or much vested interest in crude oil are already looking into that alternative. Aren't people in this country clamoring to end oil dependence? Armed forces have a huge initiative on the same. Once the revolution starts with a competitive product, government and corporations will not overtly support the activities of dominance then the oil industry will go into survival mode.

    Just like OPEC came together to unify and charge people more, what is preventing OPEC to come together and destroy an industry with higher costs in short term by slashing prices so that long term it maintains the status quo? That is the reality.

    When domination enters survival mode, all bets are off.

    Oil companies have vast financial and political resources... I just can't see them allowing something to grow that threatens their existence.

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    <cynical-skeptic>

    Competition. But that isn't likely to happen, as corrupt oil companies (and the politicians they own) actively work to prevent competition. Not to mention instability in the Middle East is always a constant threat to oil prices.

    </cynical-skeptic>

    Are you absolutely sure that no competition will exist because of the corrupt activities? May be not in US, but countries who do not have power or much vested interest in crude oil are already looking into that alternative. Aren't people in this country clamoring to end oil dependence? Armed forces have a huge initiative on the same. Once the revolution starts with a competitive product, government and corporations will not overtly support the activities of dominance then the oil industry will go into survival mode.

    Just like OPEC came together to unify and charge people more, what is preventing OPEC to come together and destroy an industry with higher costs in short term by slashing prices so that long term it maintains the status quo? That is the reality.

    When domination enters survival mode, all bets are off.

    Oil companies have vast financial and political resources... I just can't see them allowing something to grow that threatens their existence.

    Allowing something not to grow is mutually exclusive to something will grow.

    Brazil already has something that is competing with oil industry.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    From 1983 to 1987 I worked for a chain call Pizza Haven here in the Seattle Area as a shirft manager in charge of deliveries. We had Chevy full size truck that had Hot Propane powered box's in the bed and the tank while huge as it filled the rest of the bed was also used to power the propane v8 engines.

    Those trucks were clean and really moved. I never had a problem driving them an it was easy to just drive up to a gass station and have them fill up the big tank.

    We need this option in vehicles but instead of having to open a trunk or get into the bed of a truck, should have the propane fill noze right where the gas tank filler is usually kept.

    I fail to see why they could not do this and get clean burning propane tanked auto's on the street now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Don't know what they use now, but when I lived in the Florida Keys n the '80s the local sherriff's department had a fleet of propane powered Dodge Diplomats. IIRC, they used propane in case fuel supplies from the mainland were cut due to hurricanes..

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    moltar, prices would reach that level again if the inflation of the last ~100 years was undone. a gallon of "gas" in the 1920's is the "same" as now(while being refined more) ...*include rant about commodity prices and our dollar doesn't function as a true commodity* even with taxes, gas is basically a silver dime per gallon. how's that for cheap?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    moltar, prices would reach that level again if the inflation of the last ~100 years was undone. a gallon of "gas" in the 1920's is the "same" as now(while being refined more) ...*include rant about commodity prices and our dollar doesn't function as a true commodity* even with taxes, gas is basically a silver dime per gallon. how's that for cheap?

    Yes, I could see that happening...in a fantasy world. Not going to happen in the real world.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes, I could see that happening...in a fantasy world. Not going to happen in the real world.

    yes, subjectively it's not going to happen, but objectively it already has. the law just needs to change to allow currency competition.

    so which is fantasy and which is reality? the law, or the price of gas vs other commodities.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Yeah, it doesn't seem super space efficient.
    • So three major problems with this car, one, terrible Jellybean external shape, not impressed at all with the style. Second is the buttonless dash having everything via a touch screen and rotary knob, terrible safety issue as your eyes will be off the road more than on trying to find the right option in the right menu. Third is the center pack clearly cuts into valuable leg space based on their own picture. This is a hard pass.
    • Great Masculine shape, really digging the style they did here.
    • First seen at the Shanghai Auto Show (see article: Polestar 4 - The New Breed of Electric SUV Coupe), Polestar brought the Polestar 4 to the New York International Auto Show for North Americans to see in person. Polestar calls the Polestar 4 an "electric SUV 4-door coupe". Outside of that marketing speak, the Polestar 4 is a slightly lifted four-door hatchback about 190 inches in length, or roughly 2 inches shorter than a Toyota Camry.  Built without rear glass, the Polestar 4 makes use of a rear camera for visibility astern. Polestar 4 features a plethora of standard content, including 20-inch 5 V-spoke black diamond cut alloy wheels, panoramic glass roof, adaptive cruise control, 360 parking camera with 3D view, energy saving heat pump, front-illuminated Polestar logo, e-latch doors, power-operated tailgate with soft close, Polestar digital key, wireless phone charging, and 8-way electrical driver seat and 6-way electrical passenger seat. The fastest production car the brand has ever developed to date, Polestar 4 can accomplish a 0-60 mph sprint in 3.7 seconds and in top spec can produce 544 horsepower. Long-range single-motor variants have 272 horsepower and a targeted EPA range of over 300 miles. All long range variants have a 102 kWh battery capable of 200 kW charging on a DC Fast Charger and 11 kW on home level-2 charging. Google built-in is ... built in and includes Google Assistant, Google Maps and Google Play. Polestar continues to offer a leading connected in-car experience. As with all other Polestar cars, regular over-the-air updates allow for new features and improvements to be sent remotely to all vehicles. Pricing starts at $54,900, with orders opening in April for deliveries in the latter half of this year.   View full article
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings