Jump to content
Create New...
  • Blake Noble
    Blake Noble

    Nissan Reviving Datsun Brand for 2014

    G. Noble

    Editor/Reporter

    CheersandGears.com

    March 2, 2012

    According to Nikkei, one of Japan’s leading news sources, Nissan could be setting the stage for a revival of the Datsun brand in 2014. The Datsun brand has been in mothballs for about 26 years (since 1986) when Nissan phased the name out in the American market in favor of its own. However, that doesn’t mean you should expect to see Datsun badges on the next Z car, or any other future Nissan for that matter. Nikkei’s report claims that the revived Datsun brand would dirty its hands by building and selling inexpensive cars in emerging markets for Nissan such as India and Indonesia, which probably means you won’t be able to buy one in North America.

    A target price for a brand-new 2014 Datsun is said to be about 500,000 yen ($6,200 dollars) and sales are projected to be about 300,000 cars per year. It all sounds fairly ambitious, but when you consider Nissan’s French benefactor Renault builds and sells the Dacia Logan — which costs about the same and sells about 500,000 cars annually — it suddenly seems pretty realistic.

    A rumored revival of the Datsun nameplate has been around for quite a few years. It wasn’t until CEO Carlos Ghosn recently began pressing Nissan to establish themselves in emerging markets like India, Indonesia, and Brazil those rumors started to make sense. With Datsun a part of the picture, the Nissan brand doesn’t run the risk of associating itself with very cheap entry-level cars like Datsun would build.

    When Nikkei asked for comment, Nissan declined to speak. And while this two-tier strategy isn’t anything new, the revival of the Datsun brand should prove to be interesting.

    Source: Nikkei, The Detroit Bureau

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I do find this interesting as we already seem to have far to many brands in the world market with some companies struggling to remain profitable.

    This does not mean that they could not become profitable with a select focused market segment for bare essential cars. Yet how will they hold up against other more established players who are in the market?

    Interesting move for Nissan, will be watching this one for sure.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the Versa is a complete pile then how come it outsells every other subcompact car out there?

    http://www.subcompactculture.com/2012/03/february-2012-subcompact-sales.html

    I rented a 2009 Versa a few months ago. My wife hated it. I liked it and thought it had potential, but with automatic I would not want it as a daily driver. It's too spartan, and needs a manual transmisson to keep me interested. On the same page I rented a 2007 Toyota Corolla a few years ago and again I would have to have a standard transmission to actually own one. But on the other hand, the 2007 Chevy Cobalt I rented the same year (and kept for about 2 months as it was a very awesome little car) would be fine with automatic.

    I would love to see plain basic transportation in the US courtesy of Datsun. Feel free to bring back the rear-drive 210, the front-drive 310, the rear-drive midsize 510, and the 200SX coupe and hatchback. Datsun in 1979-1982 was doing it right. Then they swapped out the 210 for the Sentra, the 310 for the Pulsar and promptly dropped the hatchbacks (stupid stupid) and the 510 gave way to the Stanza. Remember those? Neither do most people. The 510 had character. The Stanza had...um...I forget.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the Versa is a complete pile then how come it outsells every other subcompact car out there?

    The Versa is shunned here because you can hear the engine while its running, it doesn't have SatNav and electric bun warmers standard and because the dashboard isn't so soft you can use it for a pillow.

    I like basic transportation, and have only 1 gripe with my GF's Corolla... its too small. I'd love a V8 Caprice with no options beyond a radio, AC and power windows/locks for dirt cheap.

    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Versa is shunned here because you can hear the engine while its running, it doesn't have SatNav and electric bun warmers standard and because the dashboard isn't so soft you can use it for a pillow.

    That's not the case.

    The Versa is reviled for many reasons. For starters, the engine is fairly crude and not terribly efficient. In fact, it's so awful it probably runs on pure vulgarity instead of gasoline. The interior build quality is fitting of something from a Vietnamese sweatshop and the styling is so outright insulting there should mobs banning together to burn them en masse. Most lawn tractors can out handle it and entire species can evolve in the time it takes to get it up to freeway speed. It's totally disposable and its ultimate fate with a scrapyard crusher is honestly a fate too kind.

    The Versa had some potential, though, that Nissan sadly pissed away. Hop on Google Images and look up the concept car that preceeded it.

    I like the idea of a basic car, don't get me wrong. But just because you build a basic car doesn't mean you have to skimp on fairly essiential things like build quality, styling, and acceptable driving performance. We've seen automakers run with the idea of basic transportation before and the results spoke volumes, so I see little excuse for botching it up in the fashion Nissan has with the Versa.

    Edited by black-knight
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like the idea of a basic car, don't get me wrong. But just because you build a basic car doesn't mean you have to skimp on fairly essiential things like build quality, styling, and acceptable driving performance. We've seen automakers run with the idea of basic transportation before and the results spoke volumes, so I see little excuse for botching it up in the fashion Nissan has with the Versa.

    Its the cheapest car sold in the US. For that, you don't get quality, styling or performance... you simply get "new".

    Its a step up from 1986... when $3995 got you a Yugo.

    The Versa's styling looks just as brain damaged as every other Renault-influenced Nissan, such as the Juke or the Moron-o, and it is within 10% of the rest of the hit-with-ugly-bat entry-level craps. Same goes for performance... its within 10% of the competition. As for quality, it seems to have enough quality to avoid being unfavorably compared with the Yugo after 8 years on the market.

    In the end, you aren't walking and you have $2000 in your pocket to easy your pain over its shortcomings.

    Now, I'm not saying the smart money is on the Versa... smart money is on buying a used car. But there are plenty of people who value new over everything else.

    Sure Nissan botched it up. That why its being sold as the cheapest car in the US.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Its the cheapest car sold in the US. For that, you don't get quality, styling or performance... you simply get "new".

    That's the standard reponse when someone criticizes something dreadful and cheap like the Versa. Let's dig into this a little bit further then.

    The Versa is the cheapest car in the US by the way of a huge, nicely constructed lie. It only earns that title because Nissan advertises the $10,998 MSRP of the sedan without including destination fees, which when included brings the sticker price up to $11,770. Of course, that price doesn't include tax, title, license, and those stupid dealer documentation fees, which if you buy one in the state I live in jacks the price up by an estimated extra grand. So, that means the cheapest car in America — which is so spartan, it makes solitary confinement look like a stay at the Hilton — actually costs in the ballpark of $12,770 big ones on the road. Uh, yuck.

    It gets worse when you option a base Versa with just an automatic transmission because, let's face, almost no one wants the manual. The Versa's auto-tragic tranny is a $2,130 dollar option. So that jacks the Versa's sticker price up to about $13,900 with destination. Factor in the TTL and doc fees I mentioned earlier as an example and America's so-called "cheapest car ever" will run you $15,000.

    The base Ford Fiesta, which is a much better car, will cost you about $15,000 as a sedan with an automatic transmission. Factor in those TTL and doc fees I had as an example and you're only looking at a difference of $1,200 bucks, which amounts to about a $20 dollar difference on a monthly payment (figured up with a 72 month term at 4 percent interest with nothing down and no trade-in). For only $20 dollars more, why wouldn't someone buy the Fiesta?

    The whole story only gets worse if you want the hatchback. A base Nissan Versa 5-door with nothing on it or in it aside from an automatic gearbox costs a massive $16,460 with destination costs and without TTL and doc fees. Know which car is much cheaper than that with an automatic? Yep, the Ford Fiesta hatchback, which rings up at $15,990. It's also very much worth mentioning the Honda Fit is only $16,745 with the desired slushbox, which is a difference of just $285 dollars. Both the Fiesta and Fit hatches look much better than the Versa hatch, drive much nicer, have better standard levels of equipment, and far better build quality. Remind me why someone would buy the Versa again?

    Its a step up from 1986... when $3995 got you a Yugo.

    That's like saying to someone to be thankful they caught lice instead of crabs.

    The Versa's styling looks just as brain damaged as every other Renault-influenced Nissan, such as the Juke or the Moron-o, and it is within 10% of the rest of the hit-with-ugly-bat entry-level craps. Same goes for performance... its within 10% of the competition. As for quality, it seems to have enough quality to avoid being unfavorably compared with the Yugo after 8 years on the market.

    See above. Also, what doesn't have more quality than a Yugo these days? By modern quality-to-money standards, the Versa is the Yugo for the early 21st century. It really is that bottom rung.

    In the end, you aren't walking and you have $2000 in your pocket to easy your pain over its shortcomings.

    An extra $2,000? How? Where? Why? And by "why" I mean, "Why didn't someone spend that extra $2,000 on the better Fiesta or Fit?"

    I guess if you made the mistake of buying a Versa and had an extra $2,000 grand left over, that would be enough money for you to buy the best assault rifle money could buy so that you could shoot yourself for buying the worst car in America.

    Now, I'm not saying the smart money is on the Versa... smart money is on buying a used car. But there are plenty of people who value new over everything else.

    Sure Nissan botched it up. That why its being sold as the cheapest car in the US.

    See above. If someone wants cheap and new, they should do some research and forget the Versa. The Versa is only the cheapest car on our shores by the way of false advertising.

    I agree, though, that a smart buyer will and should consider a low-mileage, late-model used car.

    Edited by black-knight
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It gets worse when you option a base Versa with just an automatic transmission because, let's face, almost no one wants the manual. The Versa's auto-tragic tranny is a $2,130 dollar option. So that jacks the Versa's sticker price up to about $13,900 with destination. Factor in the TTL and doc fees I mentioned earlier as an example and America's so-called "cheapest car ever" will run you $15,000.

    This is a falsehood. I know plenty of people who are fine driving a stick, or prefer it... even in econoboxes. AC and CD stereo are standard... and the automatic, according my my source is $1770... granted, pricy.

    And working out the difference to $20 monthy is also bogus... because $20 a month still adds up when you are broke... you just went through that with your car situation, and should understand that problem the most. I don't consider the Fiesta to be particularly attractive... and its a moot point if you don't have that $20.

    Why stop at $20? For $80 more a month, you can get into a completely diferent class of car.

    If Nissan is truly hiding costs in the TTL, dest and doc fees, it sounds like you have your next expose article... but $11.7K has been what I was hearing for the cost of the 2012, not $10,998. Either number is the cheapest car in the US.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is a falsehood. I know plenty of people who are fine driving a stick, or prefer it... even in econoboxes.

    A falsehood? How? Facts are facts and almost no one ("no one" meaning 5 percent of buyers) buys a brand-new car with a manual transmission these days if they have the option of an automatic.

    I know a few folks who are fine driving a stick, sure. For example, both of my parents are more than okay with it, but they've consistently bought cars equipped with automatic gearboxes since, well, forever. The two notiable exceptions are my dad's old S10 (which became my first car) which he bought over a decade ago, and a Nissan Pulsar my mom bought all the way back in the '80s. That's only two cars out of ... let's see ... carry the two ... uh, well, a lot.

    AC and CD stereo are standard... and the automatic, according my my source is $1770... granted, pricy.

    Air-conditioning and a CD player are standard, yes. But the basic Versa sedan gives you those two things by cutting corners elsewhere. For example, the CD player is only hooked up to two speakers that sound like they came out of an old K-mart boombox and the rear brakes are a set of drums that have been pulled from am old farm tractor. The rear seat doesn't fold down in the Versa unless you feel like buying one in top-line trim and Nissan has completely deleted any sort of rear seat ventilation for passengers there when you have to keep the back windows closed. You also don't get coat hooks or rear seat lighting, so forget about easily changing into a suit late at night in the back seat on your multiple-hour drive to your grandma's funeral.

    Now that I'm done ranting about that, I should mention I grabbed the price of the Versa's CVT option pretty much from Nissan's own site. In fact, that's where all of the MSRPs and prices I posted about the Versa came from.

    And working out the difference to $20 monthy is also bogus... because $20 a month still adds up when you are broke... you just went through that with your car situation, and should understand that problem the most. I don't consider the Fiesta to be particularly attractive... and its a moot point if you don't have that $20.

    This counterpoint is bogus, no offense. If someone can't afford about $254 a month for the Fiesta on the terms I mentioned, then they probably can't even afford the $234 for the CVT-equipped Versa sedan either. In fact, I can't think of anything that I've bought or could buy where some twenty dollar difference absolutely broke or could break things off. If a matter of $20 bucks — which won't buy most four member families a nice dinner at a sit-down restaurant any more — is preventing someone from buying a car, they should probably be looking at buying a burro instead.

    The situation I had over my car payments wasn't over a matter of just $20 a month. If it were, I would've had little to worry about. In the end, it was over a figure of about $150 per month. Big, big difference there.

    Why stop at $20? For $80 more a month, you can get into a completely diferent class of car.

    Sure you can, but see above.

    If Nissan is truly hiding costs in the TTL, dest and doc fees, it sounds like you have your next expose article... but $11.7K has been what I was hearing for the cost of the 2012, not $10,998. Either number is the cheapest car in the US.

    Nissan advertises the base Versa 1.6 S at $10,998 on their own website. Besides, becoming fixated on that number completely misses the point.

    Edited by black-knight
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Plastic cladding = off road.  Instead of killing the Sonata, they should just put plastic body cladding down the side and raise the price by $10k and call it the Sonata HD Overlander X.  Instant hit.
    • Considering a planet with 8 Billion and he sold almost 2 million cars, then he is covering .025% of the population compared to other auto companies. I think 2024 going into 2025 we will see other auto companies top Tesla. You and I are two peas in a pod as I also was up on a hill watching the implosion and thinking what a waste as it was a great building. I love the Kingdome and hate the new stadium.  Agree it was surreal to see the ship hit the support pillar and the whole building just collapse. Be interesting to see what replaces it as today bridges built like that are not allowed due to the exact nature of how it collapsed.  Yes, Tesla is a love or hate and the minimalist approach is not for everyone. I honestly have to agree with the comment @smk4565 I believe made that the touch screen only will be the future of cheap autos and switches and buttons will be the higher end autos. Interesting times we live in for sure.
    • Decent upgrade to the aging 2024 model. Nice to see they are reducing costs of the curved screen in the EVs by pushing it out across the Hyundai Family and into Kia. The one thing I do not like is all the Chrome. 🤢 🤮
    • Today at the New York International Auto Show, Hyundai unveiled an update to its little truck, the Hyundai Santa Cruz. The refresh to the exterior is relatively mild, though it features a more menacing grille with bolder verticle lines.  Updated running lights and new wheel designs add to the fresher look. Inside, there is a new steering wheel, infotainment system, and instrument panel. on upper trims, an optional panoramic curved display houses dual 12.3-inch displays for driver and entertainment. The plenty-capable powertrains carry over with either a 191-horsepower direct injected 2.5-liter 4-cylinder or a turbo-charged version of of the same engine with 281 horsepower.  The transmission for the entry-level engine is a traditional 8-speed automatic, while the turbo-charged model gets an 8-speed dual-clutch transmission. Santa Cruzes with the turbo engine gain a new tow mode for enhanced towing control.  Both powertrains are towing capable with a 3,500 lb rating for the entry engine and a stout 5,000 lb rating for the turbo models when equipped with all-wheel drive. New for 2025 is an XRT trim geared even more towards outdoor adventure. It features a trim-specific front fascia and grille, special 18-inch wheels with all-terrain tires, an increased approach angle, front tow hooks, and surround-view monitoring.    The 2025 Hyundai Santa Cruz goes on sale this summer. View full article
    • Regarding Tesla - it's either love or hate with these vehicles.  A college friend I'll be seeing when in SoCal next month has 2 of them, and I'll probably be riding in both of them - one is his sleeker S model and I forgot which the other one (that his wife drives) is.  In certain places, people have a lot of disposable income and having a Tesla goes with the landscape. Minimalist(ic) isn't necessarily bad.  We all remember the adage "less is more."  I'll vouch that the workmanship of the interior is good and I can also vouch that the overall look (including the centered everything on one display) is ugly.  I will say that EV motors are supposed to last a long time but the battery replacement is very expensive and the range is currently not that optimal. I did not like the model Y I had for less than 1 day.  Also, its exterior is mostly ugly.  That's my opinion. This isn't a discussion I want to get into.  I would much prefer a more user-friendly EV ... and not just yet. - - - - - What I was randomly going to say: I'm not sure whether I'm in shock or still feeling surreal as to what happened in Baltimore.  At first, I thought a ship just hit something on a bridge.  Then I saw the footage and that's the surreal part ... the domino-like collapse of the entire structure and the size of the ship.  I remember having to figure out the forces of either tension or compression on each member of a truss-like structure when I was in school.   A group of us sat there for about 3 or 4 hours one night - with some Mountain Dew - to work that out. I don't believe I've been on that bridge since it's on the outer beltway, but it's numbered as part of the U.S. interstate system.  From looking at the map, it is the major bridge on the entrance to/exit from Baltimore Harbor.  I hope they find the 6 individuals who were working on it fixing potholes in the middle of the night who fell down with the bridge.  The ship giving a mayday is what allowed them to shut down both approaches to the bridge just in time.   The weird thing is that it happened on March 26.  IIRC, the deliberate (domino-like) implosion of the reinforced concrete Kingdome in Seattle happened on March 26, 2000 (no rain that day) and people were sitting on slopes overlooking downtown to see that happen.  But that's how it is with planned implosions.  I went there that morning and have photos of the Kingdome's last day somewhere. https://www.seahawks.com/video/kingdome-implosion-hd It was indeed March 26, 2000.  I was one of the few who liked the Kingdome.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings