Jump to content
Server Move In Progress - Read More ×
Create New...
  • Blake Noble
    Blake Noble

    Could BMW be Bidding for Saab?

    G. Noble

    Editor/Reporter

    CheersandGears.com

    Tuesday, 21st February, 2011

    No doubt about it, the drama surrounding the bankruptcy of Saab almost seems scripted enough to be fit for daytime television at times. The latest news to come out of Trollhättan is no exception, now that the Swedish automaker is looking for a new suitor.

    According to a recent post on Saabs United, Saab's bankruptcy administrators have 6 to 7 bidders interested in purchasing the company and that each bidder is serious about building new Saabs. Among Saab's new suitors in particular is a European automaker which, according to Saabs United's rather patulous sources, "is German and located in Munich." There is also information that indicates that this particular company has the desire to build Saabs and their own vehicles on shared platforms.

    Interestingly, Saabs United also notes that the company that wins the Saab deal won't be the highest bidder, but the company that has the best plan for getting Saab back in business.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I believe it would be a dream scenario for SAAB if BMW bought them. SAAB could remain FWD and BMW could remain RWD... no exact market overlap.

    That's probably the thinking.

    I wonder how much Jack Link's I'd have to set out to get Herr Sasquatch to drop his two cents into the cup on this one.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I personally see what people are thinking of in tying up wih BMW, but in reality, This is a company that should die and just let the assets go to a company that is already successful and can grow more.

    I really do not see any reason for trying to keep this brand alive. The wasted millions it would take to rebuild their image and build out a new dealership, etc. Rather see BMW put it into their own successful Family of products.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I personally see what people are thinking of in tying up wih BMW, but in reality, This is a company that should die and just let the assets go to a company that is already successful and can grow more.

    I really do not see any reason for trying to keep this brand alive. The wasted millions it would take to rebuild their image and build out a new dealership, etc. Rather see BMW put it into their own successful Family of products.

    BMW has plenty of spare cash and really needs a brand that would allow it to sell more small to medium-sized front-wheel drive cars without diluting the brand image of Mini or BMW and without over-crowding the BMW portfolio. Saab could be that brand at a fire sale price, provided BMW presents a solid buisness plan.

    Medium-sized cars aren't a good fit for Mini and small front-drive cars are a bad fit for BMW. In fact, I don't think BMW is exactly happy about their decision to make the next 1er a front-wheel drive model, only making the choice light of new fuel economy regs.

    Edited by black-knight
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I personally see what people are thinking of in tying up wih BMW, but in reality, This is a company that should die and just let the assets go to a company that is already successful and can grow more.

    I really do not see any reason for trying to keep this brand alive. The wasted millions it would take to rebuild their image and build out a new dealership, etc. Rather see BMW put it into their own successful Family of products.

    BMW has plenty of spare cash and really needs a brand that would allow it to sell more small to medium-sized front-wheel drive cars without diluting the brand image of Mini or BMW and without over-crowding the BMW portfolio. Saab could be that brand at a fire sale price, provided BMW presents a solid buisness plan.

    Medium-sized cars aren't a good fit for Mini and small front-drive cars are a bad fit for BMW. In fact, I don't think BMW is exactly happy about their decision to make the next 1er a front-wheel drive model, only making the choice light of new fuel economy regs.

    I see your point yet, why not pull a Scion then and have BMW badge their FWD auto's on a new name and sell it through the BMW or mini dealership. They could easily have built a show floor within a showfloor for this market. No differance than a GMC/Buick Dealership or Toyota/Scion dealership.

    I do not see enough good karma in SAAB to buy it up even at fire sale prices and try to bring it back. I see it as a black hole, but then I coud be wrong. Would not be the first time.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I personally see what people are thinking of in tying up wih BMW, but in reality, This is a company that should die and just let the assets go to a company that is already successful and can grow more.

    I really do not see any reason for trying to keep this brand alive. The wasted millions it would take to rebuild their image and build out a new dealership, etc. Rather see BMW put it into their own successful Family of products.

    BMW has plenty of spare cash and really needs a brand that would allow it to sell more small to medium-sized front-wheel drive cars without diluting the brand image of Mini or BMW and without over-crowding the BMW portfolio. Saab could be that brand at a fire sale price, provided BMW presents a solid buisness plan.

    Medium-sized cars aren't a good fit for Mini and small front-drive cars are a bad fit for BMW. In fact, I don't think BMW is exactly happy about their decision to make the next 1er a front-wheel drive model, only making the choice light of new fuel economy regs.

    I see your point yet, why not pull a Scion then and have BMW badge their FWD auto's on a new name and sell it through the BMW or mini dealership. They could easily have built a show floor within a showfloor for this market. No differance than a GMC/Buick Dealership or Toyota/Scion dealership.

    I do not see enough good karma in SAAB to buy it up even at fire sale prices and try to bring it back. I see it as a black hole, but then I coud be wrong. Would not be the first time.

    SAAB is an existing brand with existing dealers and existing customer base...probably much cheaper to pick up an existing brand than try and create one from scratch...and SAAB has manufacturing facilities and people w/ experience in midsize FWD models.

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cubical, I see the point in regards to the customer base, manufacturing facilities and peopl with experiance building midsize to small size FWD auto's.

    Yet, will the Unions be willing to give up pay/benefits and scale back the number of employees to make it profitable? Big if here I think.

    Dealers as far as I see on the west coast are all closed and gone. The two that I would drive by in Washington are boarded up, no product to sell, no customers. History, so I do not see any value in the dealer base. I am sure some dealers are still open more as a used car lot, but I again wonder if there is any real value there for BMW to get.

    Like I said I could be wrong here, but I get this gut feeling that this is not a road to success for them.

    Edited by dfelt
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There would be no union....or at least no contract. The buyer would be purchasing SAAB's assets, not the paper company.

    BMW could buy SaaB with the change in their seat cushions.

    Why should they? How does BMW get to do mass market volumes for something like an Accord/Sonata fighter without damaging the main brand?

    Saab can be used to build a credible FWD sedan in both small and medium sizes. Throw in a small and midsize crossover and you have the makings of an actual full line manufacturer.

    Saab wouldn't and couldn't be a luxury brand anymore, however, they could be "premium" along the lines of how VW is generally perceived.

    BMW buying SAAB for that sort of redevelopment is a clear shot across VW AG's rather large bow.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    SAAB is an existing brand with existing dealers and existing customer base...probably much cheaper to pick up an existing brand than try and create one from scratch...and SAAB has manufacturing facilities and people w/ experience in midsize FWD models.

    Are there really many dealers left? I don't see any positive value in the brand name.

    Edited by frogger
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    SAAB is an existing brand with existing dealers and existing customer base...probably much cheaper to pick up an existing brand than try and create one from scratch...and SAAB has manufacturing facilities and people w/ experience in midsize FWD models.

    Are there really many dealers left? I don't see any positive value in the brand name.

    Probably most of the dealers closed by now, but they could be reopened. The brand had it's fans....better than creating a new brand from scratch...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    SAAB is an existing brand with existing dealers and existing customer base...probably much cheaper to pick up an existing brand than try and create one from scratch...and SAAB has manufacturing facilities and people w/ experience in midsize FWD models.

    Are there really many dealers left? I don't see any positive value in the brand name.

    So I called today the only 3 dealers in washington state that still are listed with the SAAB name and they are all dealerships that have Cadillac's and they say they will service SAABs as any place would but the SAAB dealership is dead. So I would have to think that the dealerships across NA is mostly dead at this point.

    In regards to VW being preceived as a Premium car line, I have to disagree. VW is considered a competitor to Chevy. An entery level car line with some Buick Level auto's. I have yet to run into anyone that considers them premium here on the west coast. If they were there would be more dealers than just the couple that are around.

    I see the point being made for a mid level small to Medium FWD auto division with a couple of CUV's so that BMW does not dilute their brand. Assets being what they are, there might be value to be had, but I think it would truly have to be for pennies on the dollar to pick up all the assets and make a go of it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    i've felt for a very long time, like since the 9-3 came out in 04 that Saab should have been positioned up against VW...more acurately between say VW and Acura at the time so that the 9-3 was a Passat competitor. or at least something that a VW shopper could move up to without much more dough.

    For Saab to maybe come back the same way.......

    Saab had so much potential......

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I can't think BMW would be interested in any more than a quarter of the former SAAB dealers. Most of them are sitting in GM Mega Complexes. If the whole idea is to end up building a BMW-SAAB-Mini-Cooper dealer network, BMW isn't going to want to be selling Saabs next to Cadillacs in an old Hummer building.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Saw on the News today that the SAAB dealerships here in washington have officially removed all logo's and in the case of the dealer down in Tacoma, they remodeled it into a new Audi Dealership which now sits between a Cadillac dealership and a Mercedes dealership.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think BMW has enlarged the mini line as far as it can go and still be recognizable as a mini. I have to wonder if sales for the countryman and clubman are less than expected.

    Is Saab a good fit for BMW remains to be seen. But let's look at it from the other side. As one person said already this is the best possible scenario for Saab.

    The other bidders consist of companies in newly developed nations China/India/Turkey that want a way into western markets. Building a brand takes a long time and Saab although slightly tarnished still has good brand recognition. There is some precedent that this combination can work, geely/volvo, proton/lotus, tata/jag/land rover etc..

    Still I believe BMW has the best chance to get Saab up and running in the shortest amount of time. BMW has experience reviving a dead brand like mini. I also agree that they hope to compete with VW in the mid-range mainstream market.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Crash900s, thank's for joining C&G and welcome.

    I think the one thing you didn't mention, but maybe touched on slightly, is that of all the bidders for Saab that are possible, it is unlikely that any of them have the cash that BMW has to complete the transaction and do the job right.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Crash900s, thank's for joining C&G and welcome.

    I think the one thing you didn't mention, but maybe touched on slightly, is that of all the bidders for Saab that are possible, it is unlikely that any of them have the cash that BMW has to complete the transaction and do the job right.

    Both Crash900s comment and yours are the key point to giving SAAB any chance at all. The experiance gained at reviving Mini and the cash is what will allow them to succeed where I see the others only failing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hmmmm.....a Mini/SAAB/BMW/Roller range actually sort of make sense...

    It does and to me personally it would be a match made in Heaven :)

    Edited by ZL-1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think it would be great if BMW snapped up Saab. I'm betting they could turn them around. It's not like Saab has a bad reputation. BMW would get a known brand that still has loyal followers and buyers. With a little patience and a lot of money, I think Saab could be brought back from the dead. GM bought them and let them wither on the vine for a while before making a half assed attempt to give them some new poduct. They never had a chance under GM ownership.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    GM bought them and let them wither on the vine for a while before making a half assed attempt to give them some new poduct. They never had a chance under GM ownership.

    Agreed. GM put way too much on its plate when it bought Saab.

    Edited by black-knight
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    BMW would get a known brand that still has loyal followers and buyers.

    All five of them!!

    On paper this seems like a good idea. In practice, I'm pessimistic it'd work. Unless BMW mandated joint SAAB/BMW or SAAB/Mini dealerships, the Scandanavian brand's limited dealer network would hinder the brand. Going toe-to-toe with the Buick's, VW's and Acura's would be a challenge.

    Mini had immediate brand awareness that BMW could milk from the get-go. SAAB has nowhere near the brand cachet.

    That being said, if they could pull it off, it'd be a really cool revival for a brand that even I believe deserved a lot more love than it got.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    BMW would get a known brand that still has loyal followers and buyers.

    All five of them!!

    On paper this seems like a good idea. In practice, I'm pessimistic it'd work. Unless BMW mandated joint SAAB/BMW or SAAB/Mini dealerships, the Scandanavian brand's limited dealer network would hinder the brand. Going toe-to-toe with the Buick's, VW's and Acura's would be a challenge.

    Mini had immediate brand awareness that BMW could milk from the get-go. SAAB has nowhere near the brand cachet.

    That being said, if they could pull it off, it'd be a really cool revival for a brand that even I believe deserved a lot more love than it got.

    The current Saab network would have no affiliation with the "new Saab" at all. BMW could offer Saab franchises to whomever it chooses from the old network, but would more likely team them up with their existing network.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • I had never driven an Infiniti Q50 before, let alone ever really looked at them.  I also didn’t know much about these cars. I was supposed to be assigned a medium sized SUV, but remarked I wanted the luggage area to be hidden.  The rental agent told me they could not guarantee the presence of a retractable cover. (Why would they order a car without one or why would someone take one?  eBay?)  They didn’t have any SUVs anyway, and I got put into an Infiniti Q50.  I checked my phone to verify the cost would be covered by my insurance and the credit card parameters.  It came in at around $43,000.  That’s if new.  That said: “no worries.”  However, this unit would be a much-depreciated 3+ year model with 57,000 miles.  I relaxed.  At any rate, I put less than 500 miles on it over a week.  As one walks up to it, you can tell its heritage … and rather quickly.  You can instantly see similarities to the Nissan Altima in the instrument panel’s main cluster and in the switches much the same way that a CT6 by Cadillac and a Cruze by Chevrolet share dials and such.  However, the assembly and detailing are nicer in the Q50.  It had leather seating, which I don’t care for in a warm weather location, that was comfortably contoured and nicely finished.  The same could be said for the doors and other trim and fittings.  Inside, I liked the way that the dash, center stack, and console flowed together.  The scalloped tops of the dash hearken to those of the very last Impala, which had an attractive dashboard on various levels. The center stack is slightly like that of an Olds Aurora.  These comments go along with the often-cited commentary that this car is traditional and old school in a lot of ways, thus not breaking any new ground. The least favorable aspect of the interior is operating the various touch screen and stalk functions.  Some are redundant and confusing.  However, for one, it is possible to pull up a clock that resembles old school chronometer and have it sitting at the top of the center stack. On the interior's plus side, there are perfectly contoured and angled slots to store water bottles at the base of the front doors.  On the minus side, there is a remote latch release for the trunk, but not one for the fuel cap door.  (The fuel cap door remains closed if the car is locked.) I figured that this Infiniti would have a V6.  It was no ordinary V6, but 3.7 liters worth of V6 with twin turbochargers.  Rarely does one need this much power and, in one week, I got aggressive with the throttle in one merging situation and one passing situation.  It is up to the task and kicks out a little torque steer.  Its hum is a rather muted purr.  As would be expected in what is supposed to be a premium car, the automatic transmission is a geared unit.  It has 7 speeds.  The first 2 shifts can be felt while the remaining shifts are not.  However, if in stop and go traffic, and alternating speed, those early shifts can be a little less smooth as the transmission seems to hunt.  (It could also be how many miles were on the unit.) Why 7 speeds?  How about 6 … or 8?  I’m talking even numbers! With the powertrain comes the requirement for premium fuel.  Also, compared to many full-size Japanese cars working with 4 cylinders and turning in commendable gas mileage, this car with its V6 is a little thirsty. Ride, handling, and noise are related, but different enough.  The ride was supple and controlled, but not much more so than that of an uplevel 4-cylinder sedan.  Handling was better and this Infiniti tracked accurately and nimbly.  Also, the Q50 was fairly hushed, but I might have expected a little more isolation and a higher premium "feel" for the price jump from a Nissan to an Infiniti. Its exterior features that extra chrome and trim to make it uplevel within the Nissan family tree, yet the greenhouse is an almost familiar one.  This car delivered on one greenhouse dimension I’m fussy about - rearward vision from the driver’s vantage point is very good. I don’t know how the order sheet was configured when this car was purchased. There was an indicator for forward alerts, but I never got to experience it in action.  Also, whether on the rearview mirrors or inside of the front pillars, there was nothing to warn of side traffic and there weren’t parking assists that kicked in.  Perhaps they were there, but the car was not put in a situation where they’d engage.  On another rental car of a lower price point, those were always at work and perhaps a little too eager.  I almost prefer the latter. I didn’t read any reviews about this car before beginning the rental or during the rental.  I echo what they have to say.  For its niche, it doesn’t drum up much enthusiasm.  The best point is its more premium handling while the negatives are some difficulties in setting it up when first getting in and its slight thirstiness. If something about this overall package is appealing and a person connects with the Q50, then the consumer will probably go for it.  I don’t know how it will hold up and how much it will cost to service over the long haul.  While there are no Toyota and Nissan dealerships in Beverly Hills, California, as an example, there is a Lexus agency there while the Infiniti dealership seems to have closed.  Infiniti seems to want to ride the same wave that Lexus is riding, though I’d think piggybacking onto Toyota might be a more lauded genealogy. This is very much a personal decision and you’re on your own.  I was going to turn in the Q50 after a day to see if I could get something more familiar to me but decided to keep it.  Exchanging cars is a hassle.  Once past the learning curve and adjustments, it’s fairly easy to live with, but it’s neither a remarkable nor compelling vehicle. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING
    • The two big things you need to know are How Acidic and how well it drains or not. I took a class last year on how to grow the American Chestnut. American Chestnuts like to be high on hilltops with very well-drained soils. There's a geomapping tool in Pennsylvania that uses known land and altitude data to populate the best places for Chestnut plantings, and my property is one of the best in the county.  What I used was a mix of planter soil and something called Pittmoss, better than Peatmoss. Its manufactured here and is mostly recycled newspaper. It's good for containers because it holds moisture better than peat.  Just put them in some 5-gallon buckets and let them go.  I need to move them around a bit soon. True genetic American Chestnuts are very hard to find. If you find them online, they are most likely crossbred with something else that is blight-resistant. I got my seeds directly from the Pennsylvania Chapter of the American Chestnut Foundation at one of their research centers at Penn State.
    • They look like sticks right now, lol. Their leaves are just starting to come back. But here's what they looked like going in.
    • My wife gets starter trees for landscaping, and we use 5-gallon plant buckets that have the holes already, but you could use a normal 5-gallon bucket and drill some holes and put it in a planter plate to hold water to help with feeding. We always just use miracle grow soil and the trees are doing really well. We have a bunch of Leyland Cypress trees to be planted once I finish the yard retaining wall and new fence.
    • Speaking of growing trees in buckets/pots, did you over-research what type of potting soil/media to use? I think I'm going down a wormhole of too much information and overthinking.  What did you end up using? 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings