Jump to content

  •  

Photo

C&G Exclusive - 2008 Enclave Spy Shots!


93 replies to this topic

#1

Flybrian

    Aurora Oldsmoborealis

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,050 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 03:33 PM

Cheers and Gears Exclusive
2008 Buick Enclave (GMT-967)

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Cheers and Gears has paid for the rights to use these photos. Please link to the URL OF THIS TOPIC AND NOT HOTLINK OR REHOST THE IMAGES if you wish to share! Thank you!

The above are some of the best photos of the production Enclave we've seen so far and we're happy to report that its not that exciting. Why? Because it looks quite identical to the stunning concept vehicle first shown seven months ago at Detroit. The instrument panel consists of a five-pack of round gauges like the concept along with the cabin-wide swath of wood trim nestled atop metallic accent of equal length. Chrome bezeling encircles the round outer air vents and console cupholders and its clear by the abundance of the chrome and wood that this is a more luxurious vehicle.

Outside, this Enclave rides signature Buick multispoke alloy wheels with telltale center caps removed. High-intensity discharge xenon headlamps in carefully jeweled housings grace the rounded front fascia. Our sources indicated this Buick will feature the adaptive headlamp technology now on several Cadillac models. Though you can't see the rear, we can tell you it retains the jeweled taillamps of the concept as well as their shape. One noticable difference with the Enclave is the window pillar on the rear side glass.

Underneath, Enclave will ride on MacPherson struts up front and a multi-link setup in the rear. As with its sister Lambdas, it will feature GM's High Feature 3.6l V6 engines at rollout with a UV8 option in a likely 'Reserve' or 'Super' trim for MY2009. Also like the Outlook and Acadia, it will feature GM's 6-speed automatic transmission in all trims and have available AWD. Production starts in March or April of 2007 for a 2008 model year introduction.

Cheers and Gears strives to bring you the latest spyshots and information while remaining member-supported with no annoying advertising. Like what you see? Consider donating to help C&G continue to give you the latest exclusive GM info on the 'net! Click below to contribute securely!
Posted Image
  • 0

#2

regfootball

    Firing on all sixteen cylinders

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,113 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 03:59 PM

a little chunkier than the show car? interior looks like cheap plastic even tho design is nice
  • 0

#3

Croc

    Ultra Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,557 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 03:59 PM

loves it
  • 0

#4

Drew Dowdell

    Unimatrix 01

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 30,546 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 04:03 PM

a little chunkier than the show car?  interior looks like cheap plastic even tho design is nice

View Post


well it took all of 25 minutes for the bashing to start.....
  • 0

#5

wildcat

    OSV Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,379 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 04:07 PM

Buick "signature" wheels? Aren't those the wheels shown on the production Saturn Aura and elsewhere?

CD/BP: Thank you for capturing these.

And thanks to C&G for sharing them :CG_all:
  • 0

#6

regfootball

    Firing on all sixteen cylinders

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,113 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 04:11 PM

Haha, might I suggest a trip to the eye doctor. While in person, it does look like the material isnt quite of the quality of the concept car (which is to be expected) it looked really good.

View Post


I'll go with your take, in this case. :P

was the plastic at least better than the Lucerne?
  • 0

#7

Paolino

    Ultra Member

  • Editor/Reporter
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,111 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 04:14 PM

Well, I'm happy--it appears to be staying close to the concept. I'll be happier when I can see some high-res shots. I'm hoping the dash is leather-wrapped as promised... it appears to be if you look closely.
  • 0

#8

AAS

    Camaro Member #1

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,954 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 04:18 PM

Looks great! I love these Lambdas! What's that strip of "things" below the right-most gauge? Gear-shift indicator?
  • 0

#9

Paolino

    Ultra Member

  • Editor/Reporter
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,111 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 04:21 PM

Looks great!  I love these Lambdas!

What's that strip of "things" below the right-most gauge?  Gear-shift indicator?

View Post

I doubt that... probably just trip computer buttons.
  • 0

#10

MrRogers

    Stock Member

  • Members
  • 20 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 04:25 PM

Just stunning. Absolutely stunning. I am so glad that it stayed true to the concept. I especially like those adaptive xenon headlights!
  • 0

#11

wildcat

    OSV Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,379 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 04:29 PM

So perhaps anyone who feels the production interior is less than the concept should wait 'til the '09 "Reserve" or "Super" trim?

Not to go off topic, but I think C&G should make people register. All the "visitors" viewing this C&G exclusive should at least have to register.
  • 0

#12

Northstar

    Be afraid of Jake. Very, very afaid.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,304 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 04:49 PM

Can anyone tell if the leather is still around the center stack and on the dash? I don't see any stiching if it is. The rest looks almost exactly the same.
  • 0

#13

Cubical-aka-Moltar

    American Cubicle Dweller

  • Premium Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,559 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 05:00 PM

a little chunkier than the show car?  interior looks like cheap plastic even tho design is nice

View Post



I can't really judge the quality of interior plastics considering it's a photo taken through a closed window of a prototype...wait until you see it in person and can see and feel the trim..
  • 0

#14

pow

    Ultra Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,376 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 05:01 PM

I'm sure the Enclave will be a great truck, but it will also be the eighth or ninth 7-8 passenger, 5000-6000 lb GM SUV released this year. With gas prices rising (I paid $3.79/gal for premium yesterday), it seems like such poor product planning. GM has proven that they can execute competent products; now they need to make wiser business decisions. A lighter, cheaper Epsilon-based (Malibu on stilts?) crossover or stretched Theta would probably serve the same purpose as the Lambdas, if not attract even more buyers (those conscious about fuel prices) without cannabilizing GMT900 sales. I've always been baffled by the sales of Lexus's $45,000 RX, when considering its cheap, Camry underpinnings.
  • 0

#15

pow

    Ultra Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,376 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 05:05 PM

Posted Image

Pacifica, Part II
  • 0

#16

Northstar

    Be afraid of Jake. Very, very afaid.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,304 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 05:08 PM

I'm sure the Enclave will be a great truck, but it will also be the eighth or ninth 7-8 passenger, 5000-6000 lb GM SUV released this year. With gas prices rising (I paid $3.79/gal for premium yesterday), it seems like such poor product planning. GM has proven that they can execute competent products; now they need to make wiser business decisions.

A lighter, cheaper Epsilon-based (Malibu on stilts?) crossover or stretched Theta would probably serve the same purpose as the Lambdas, if not attract even more buyers (those conscious about fuel prices) without cannabilizing GMT900 sales. I've always been baffled by the sales of Lexus's $45,000 RX, when considering its cheap, Camry underpinnings.

View Post


Agreed about needing more small crossovers, but you can't fault GM for being unlucky. Gas was fine and SUV and crossover sales were booming when these products were being developed. If GM knew that gas was going to be so much, I doubt they would have planned as many and planned some smaller X-overs.

However, there still is a market for vehicles that can seat 7-8 passengers, and I have no problem with GM dominating it :AH-HA_wink:
  • 0

#17

Paolino

    Ultra Member

  • Editor/Reporter
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,111 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 05:22 PM

Posted Image

Pacifica, Part II

View Post

I'm sure it'll look tremendously different after the camo is removed. I wouldn't call the concept a Pacifica.
  • 0

#18

pow

    Ultra Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,376 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 05:26 PM

Agreed about needing more small crossovers, but you can't fault GM for being unlucky. Gas was fine and SUV and crossover sales were booming when these products were being developed. If GM knew that gas was going to be so much, I doubt they would have planned as many and planned some smaller X-overs.

However, there still is a market for vehicles that can seat 7-8 passengers, and I have no problem with GM dominating it  :AH-HA_wink:

View Post


But you can fault GM for releasing two similar SUVs consecutively. Why go through all the trouble of developing a new platform only to divert attention from their existing 7-8 passenger SUV? Even if you ignore gas prices, it doesn't make much sense.

And besides, even if the Lambdas were a bit smaller, what's taking them so long? GM seems awfully slow in reacting to product trends. They let midsize crossovers, minivans, and hybrids completely slip by.
  • 0

#19

Flybrian

    Aurora Oldsmoborealis

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,050 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 05:28 PM

And besides, even if the Lambdas were a bit smaller, what's taking them so long? GM seems awfully slow in reacting to product trends. They let midsize crossovers, minivans, and hybrids completely slip by.

View Post


Disagree. Saturn VUE and Buick Rendezvous were both out pretty early and were among the first mainstream CUVs that weren't too small (RAV4) or too expensive (M-Class).
  • 0

#20

Drew Dowdell

    Unimatrix 01

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 30,546 posts

Posted 18 July 2006 - 05:30 PM

well they haven't exactly been rolling in cash for the past few years.....
  • 0



Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users