LAIAS: 2009 Chevrolet Aveo5 Press Release & Image Gallery
#22
Posted 14 November 2007 - 11:18 PM

Actually Audi did not start it that is how cars were designed for the most part for most of the early 20th century. Now I like it because
it is bold and different with a nice quality interior at a cheap price.
#23
Posted 14 November 2007 - 11:22 PM
noted: the HP is +4 and the torque is -1 ...that's kinda sad, assuming the same peak rpms.
edit- says the engine was fitted with oil squirters... that should've brought the compression up a little.
this is just pre-spec griping.
This post has been edited by loki: 14 November 2007 - 11:26 PM
#24
Posted 14 November 2007 - 11:28 PM
This looks better after seeing the Sequoia.
When is the Gamma Aveo Scheduled for?
#25
Posted 15 November 2007 - 05:51 AM
Although I may be wrong.
They've also built updated versions of Suzuki's old F-series engines (widely built in China as well, including by GM JV partner Wuling Motors), as the S(Suzuki)-Tec II. Daewoo's Family 1 engines are of course the E-Tec II engines (E for Ecotec?), dubbed A-series. Beside the F-series and A-series engines Daewoo uses engines supplied directly by GM Holden (Family II) and GM Powertrain Europe (1.8 L Family 1); and its own engines based on the Suzuki block, dubbed B-series. The original SOHC B10 is pretty much the same as Suzuki's F10C, but the new DOHC B12 (also built by SGMW) is all-new, and will soon be joined by a new DOHC B10. The XK-series straight sixes are also pre-Daewoo, designed when Aston-boss and former Porsche engineer Ulrich Bez was running Daewoo's R&D.
#26
Posted 15 November 2007 - 08:49 AM
With this restyle, the front end has gone to I-will-devour-your-soul-for-the-sake-of-fuel-economy agressiveness. It's gone way over the top on the aggressive side, and is less integrated with the rest of the car than the last nose was.
No sir, I don't like it.
-RBB
#27
Posted 15 November 2007 - 09:29 AM
And why did they get rid of the electric throttle control?
#28
Posted 15 November 2007 - 01:50 PM
#30
Posted 15 November 2007 - 04:23 PM
Come on, Daewoo, you can do better than this. The sedan was a much better effort.
#34
Posted 16 November 2007 - 08:01 AM
Wifey's '00 Alero 2.4 automatic get's 30-32 consistantly.... 29mpg on a bad week.
If that's the case, why do you think the Aveo will be any different? Your wife's Alero can get better than EPA estimates, but the Aveo can't?
#35
Posted 16 November 2007 - 12:09 PM
it is bold and different with a nice quality interior at a cheap price.
And the restyled front end keeps it pertinent to the market. Too bad it is not out now, so I can replaced our toalled Corolla that some dumbsh*t rear ended last week.
#36
Posted 16 November 2007 - 01:08 PM
What I mean is the front doesn't look as chunky. Here's the current one:

Well I guess it is a like or hate it thing... much like the final gen N-Body Skylarks...
This post has been edited by ToniCipriani: 16 November 2007 - 02:37 PM
#40
Posted 18 November 2007 - 06:23 PM

Sign In
Register
Help
Bookmark
Del.icio.us
Digg
Email
Facebook
Google
Mixx
Reddit
StumbleUpon


MultiQuote






