[NOS2006]

Oh shit. Round two.

[mute]

guys, noone but you cares if he names it that way its not thrilling to me he called it a pontiac, but its his name he can do as he pleases, the name may not need any more in your opinion, but maybe he felt like it ok deal

and dont tell me any bullshit about it being about principles and such
i dont care about your principles

This post has been edited by mute: 26 August 2005 - 12:48 AM

[Sixty8panther]

Hey MUTE: don;t skimp on the meds buddy! ;)

[blackviper8891]

Sixty8, Okay... I know it was never a stand alone model... It was itself a trim, but that's not my point and has nothing to do with this discussion. We're talking about the name itself. Not its history.

You say Trans Am GT was too much, but still not GA and GP. What you say about them already having it... doesn't make any sense. The Grand Prix never had GXP... So, it shouldn't get it? Under your logic, it wouldn't. Still, its not different for those three to each have GT. Same length.

But what really confuses me right now... Is how we ended up argueing about something so stupid...?

This post has been edited by blackviper8891: 26 August 2005 - 12:51 AM

[Enzora]

Sixty8panther, on Aug 24 2005, 11:45 PM, said:

Well first off mid engined Poncho: either call it a Fiero or a Banchee...

No "hell no that ain't a Fiero!" reply? BV must be slipping a little.

And I've always thought the Me-412 was too busy to begin with.

This post has been edited by Enzora: 26 August 2005 - 12:49 AM

[mute]

meh, i tried, but no, bicker like children i dont care i just wont reply to this topic anymore

[NOS2006]

Us regulars are able to do that on a mature level with each other. You're bickering, dude. Chill a bit, please.