Jump to content
Create New...

LeftLane News: Cadillac DT7 Flagship Sedan To Be Based On FWD Platform.


cire

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 198
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

At least it would be step up from the DTS--maybe even have a 6 speed automatic instead of the ancient 4 speed? But what name--DT7 is lame.

But, a large FWD/AWD Cadillac could be competitive with Lincoln, since the MKS is FWD/AWD.

Edited by moltar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a Saab.

Honestly, why the hell go through all the trouble of building the brand back up, just to flush it back down the toilet? I mean, teh CTS has highhandedly brought the brand respectability, and the right to be called The Standard of the World. Imagine what a 2nd car equally good would do? BUt no....GM is f@#king retarded, and thinks that FWD is what luxury buyers want. Ask Acura how RL sales have been doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think they are assuming a couple things.

1) any lux car must be sold AWD going forward and so why bother with anything RWD bias if more of their cars are to be FWD to start with

2) they feel regulations going forward on emissions and mpg can only be met with lighter duty platforms

3) they feel they can get adequate performance for the customer with suspension and steering tuning to manage the engine placement and weight distribution

to me this means not a lot of the DT7 will be FWD if they want to be taken seriously.

For me, I can never afford this car anyways. But honestly, why can GM sustain one rear bias platform?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is true (the article attributes the info to the mysterious "sources within the automaker"), then I wonder if the next gen CTS line will end up on Eps II also (as well as what was supposed to be a RWD Alpha based compact Cadillac series). I can't see GM continuing to support and develop Sigma if it is going to end up carrying one product line only (mainly CTS). With the corporation's precarious financial difficulties, they may stretch Epsilon to cover as many products as possible in the future in an effort to reduce costs. Instead of Cadillac challenging Mercedes and BMW with RWD based products, maybe GM will have to refocus the division's sights on Audi instead. Losing Saab would allow GM to position Cadillac as more of an AWD luxury brand instead of a true MB/BMW competitor. My only hope now is that the resulting DT7 will not end up as a direct replacement for the geriatric DTS. Even if the car ends up on a FWD platform, it still doesn't have to be a senior-mobile. At the very least, the car should come standard with AWD and a turbocharged DI V6 engine. If the gosh darn thing can't be RWD (which I agree would be preferable), at least engineer/style/equip it to be something other than the recommended ride for AARP.

Edited by cire
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is true (the article attributes the info to the mysterious "sources within the automaker"), then I wonder if the next gen CTS line will end up on Eps II also (as well as what was supposed to be a RWD Alpha based compact Cadillac series). I can't see GM continuing to support and develop Sigma if it is going to end up carrying one product line only (mainly CTS). With the corporation's precarious financial difficulties, they may stretch Epsilon to cover as many products as possible in the future in an effort to reduce costs. Instead of Cadillac challenging Mercedes and BMW with RWD based products, maybe GM will have to refocus the division's sights on Audi instead. Losing Saab would allow GM to position Cadillac as more of an AWD luxury brand instead of a true MB/BMW competitor. My only hope now is that the resulting DT7 will not end up as a direct replacement for the geriatric DTS. Even if the car ends up on a FWD platform, it still doesn't have to be a senior-mobile. At the very least, the car should come standard with AWD and a turbocharged DI V6 engine. If the gosh darn thing can't be RWD (which I agree would be preferable), at least equip it to be something other than the recommended ride for AARP.

you could have read my mind with that entire post.

here is where they are going

mercedes / bmw > cadillac > acura > vw

although it troubles me a bit since audis new platforms are no longer heavy front bias. although i think audi is trying too hard to go up market too.

perhaps the world ahead will be all new. maybe rwd platforms will come close to extinction before our eyes in the next decade.

rest assured too, cadillac is trying for volume here. people, this economic crash means people won't be spending as much on luxury cars anytime soon. the luxury segment may drop down in transaction price and perhaps cadillac is only viable competing in a higher volume / lower price segment now.

so why would we need buick then? Just asking. I still wonder why Pontiac has to go.

Edited by regfootball
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a Saab.

Honestly, why the hell go through all the trouble of building the brand back up, just to flush it back down the toilet? I mean, teh CTS has highhandedly brought the brand respectability, and the right to be called The Standard of the World. Imagine what a 2nd car equally good would do? BUt no....GM is f@#king retarded, and thinks that FWD is what luxury buyers want. Ask Acura how RL sales have been doing.

Unfortunately, GM is broke, bankrupt, on life support, etc. For them to truly make Cadillac a big league competitor on par with BMW and M-B beyond 1 model would require a tremendous investment. For now, it's all about survival, and that means FWD generics, which GM knows very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

truth is i would drive this if it were priced same as saab and available here. i like the 9-3 although a little extra leg room would be nice.

Give me some of what you're smoking, reg. For around the same price as the BTS, if it were sold in the States, you could get a CTS, which does have "a little extra leg room" versus the Saaballac Bull$h!. It's actually the reason why they didn't sell this particular Cadillac in America, the price overlap didn't justify its existence.

There's a reason why GME has only sold all of 4 of these in Europe: it's a turd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

YellowJacket is making me :rotflmao:

So...

All this talk of GM doing this as a cost cutting move, yet Zeta is done and redy to rock and roll with minimal to no more investment required...

Hmmm... Typical GM. Flushing money down the toilet like it's nothing. Let's spend 100 billion dollars to develop a new AUTOMATICALLY subpar model and throw all that engineering we did 3 years ago down the drain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

perhaps the world ahead will be all new. maybe rwd platforms will come close to extinction before our eyes in the next decade.

I truly hope the disappearance of RWD isn't an industry wide phenomenon, but it definitely is the trend as far as GM and Ford are concerned. Maybe everyone is being a little bit pessimistic here; if VW can establish Audi as a proper luxury brand with FWD based AWD sedans, then why can't GM do it with Cadillac? It will involve GM doing more to differentiate the division than they have ever done in the past (unless they want to end up losing it too); mainly vision, focus, and commitment (unfortunately, GM seems to have been lacking these three qualities for the last 30-40 years). For the sake of the corporation, I hope they can make it work. I would still prefer for Cadillac products (at least the sedans, coupes, and wagons) to be RWD, but I'm not going to doom them to failure just because the products happen to be FWD based instead. Again, I just hope GM uses some engineering and design expertise to properly differentiate Cadillac's products from the offerings of GM's other divisions (especially Buick). Cadillac certainly won't be on par with the luxury segment big dogs (mainly BMW and Mercedes) with a FWD based lineup, but it can still attempt to be more competitive within the segment than it has been in the past.

Edited by cire
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, GM is broke, bankrupt, on life support, etc. For them to truly make Cadillac a big league competitor on par with BMW and M-B beyond 1 model would require a tremendous investment. For now, it's all about survival, and that means FWD generics, which GM knows very well.

They have a large, RWD platform that is world class and ready to go. But some retarded dumbasses high up in GM have made it their personal mission to kill the best platform besides Sigma GM has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have a large, RWD platform that is world class and ready to go. But some retarded dumbasses high up in GM have made it their personal mission to kill the best platform besides Sigma GM has.

True. GM does seem to have a talent for wasting development dollars on what ends up being disposable assets (although it is due to the corporation's lack of focus and commitment more than the quality of the assets). Zeta and Kappa are 2 obvious examples of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True. GM does seem to have a talent for wasting development dollars on what ends up being disposable assets (although it is due to the corporation's lack of focus and commitment more than the quality of the assets). Zeta and Kappa are 2 obvious examples of this.

Well Kappa's problem was in it's design and limitations. Zeta didn't have that problem, it was just scraped because some jackass with a rod up butt decided he hated Holden and RWD, and he was in a high enough position with enough power to make his stupid plans work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Kappa's problem was in it's design and limitations. Zeta didn't have that problem, it was just scraped because some jackass with a rod up butt decided he hated Holden and RWD, and he was in a high enough position with enough power to make his stupid plans work.

Also true.

Which I guess begs the question: What moron would spend precious development dollars to create a limited platform (Kappa) for products that produce little volume and no profits for the corporation (especially when most of the corporation's essential products were below par)? I guess Kappa wouldn't really fall into the severely underutilized platform category given its severe limitations (although it definitely could be classified as a typical GM bonehead move).

Zeta, on the other hand...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, GM is broke, bankrupt, on life support, etc. For them to truly make Cadillac a big league competitor on par with BMW and M-B beyond 1 model would require a tremendous investment. For now, it's all about survival, and that means FWD generics, which GM knows very well.

Since that's the case, just leave the DTS on the G-body and update the power train. No, it's not a 7 series, but at least it's not a Towncar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the death of Zeta, we kind of knew the STS/DTS replacement wouldn't end up rear drive. Quite sad.

There are only two reasons I'm considering an STS over a DTS and one of those is because it's not rear drive. I have no need for AWD, just reduces gas mileage from my perspective. Though I understand there are those who desire (and to a lesser degree need) the AWD capabilities. Guess I need to get my order in before they kill off the STS.

If Caddy goes FWD/AWD at least I'll have a reason to look at Lincoln again.... sigh....

Edited by DBeaSSt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have a large, RWD platform that is world class and ready to go. But some retarded dumbasses high up in GM have made it their personal mission to kill the best platform besides Sigma GM has.

I got your DT7 right here. Anyone wanna throw some Art & Science on this?

buick_park_ave.jpg

Carscoop_Buick_ParkAvenue_a4.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Cadillac should be front wheel drive, any credibility built with the CTS and original SRX is going to be flushed down the drain by the front drive SRX, dated DTS and the DT7. The DT7 will just be like what the Lincoln MKS is now, but it is 3 years away still. Cadillac is going to be no better than Lincoln or Acura. If Cadillac is going to use Chevy front drive platforms for cars, then Buick isn't needed, and GM should just go to 2 brands. Chevy for mainstream, Cadillac for $30-55,000.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DT7 IMO should NOT be FWD or RWD, but only AWD. That is a luxury level a car like that should have. End of story. Hopefully this is all rumor and they are not going to flush the last 3 years of engineering work down the drain do to some Morons Political schedule and personal ambition at the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get why they don't at the very least, stretch the Sigma platform (to be larger than the STS) and use that.

Yes, that seems the most rational approach. The biggest problem I've seen with the STS is it's way too close to the CTS in size. Use the existing platforms, they aren't ancient.

GM has two excellent, modern RWD platforms in Sigma and Zeta...and they are way under-utilized. Alas, the market wants bland FWDers, which has been GM's focus for the last 25+ years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get why they don't at the very least, stretch the Sigma platform (to be larger than the STS) and use that.

You would think that modified versions of Sigma would be the logical choice for the DT7 as well as the Escalade replacement. Go figure?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally HOPE that the Escalade does NOT go UniBody, otherwise my current one will probably be the last one I buy as I preferre the Body on Frame design of full size SUV's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DT7 IMO should NOT be FWD or RWD, but only AWD. That is a luxury level a car like that should have. End of story. Hopefully this is all rumor and they are not going to flush the last 3 years of engineering work down the drain do to some Morons Political schedule and personal ambition at the top.

AWD adds weight and doesn't necessarily help performance. Jaguars are rear drive, the 7-series was always rear drive only (awd will be offered) Lexus LS460 is rear wheel, Genesis is rear wheel, S-class is has optional awd. Rear wheel will always be the superior drivetrain, that is why the Corvette isn't front wheel or all wheel drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AWD should be an option but has no need to be standard. Most AWD systems add weight, and there are many who prefer RWD only VS AWD.

Yes, I prefer RWD only in a car. Living in AZ, I don't need AWD. I have a 4WD SUV for when I spend winters in Colorado...if were to relocate full time to someplace w/ more severe winters, then I might want an AWD car, but the 4WD SUV w/ RWD cars approach has worked for me for the last 15 years...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AWD adds weight and doesn't necessarily help performance. Jaguars are rear drive, the 7-series was always rear drive only (awd will be offered) Lexus LS460 is rear wheel, Genesis is rear wheel, S-class is has optional awd. Rear wheel will always be the superior drivetrain, that is why the Corvette isn't front wheel or all wheel drive.

Agreed. But the braintrust at GM is likely considering a midengine FWD C7 just to piss us off.

When did GM change their slogan to "Standard of Excellent Spite".

The best part about having a big BOF RWD car is helping tow AWD idiots out of snowbanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give me some of what you're smoking, reg. For around the same price as the BTS, if it were sold in the States, you could get a CTS, which does have "a little extra leg room" versus the Saaballac Bull$h!. It's actually the reason why they didn't sell this particular Cadillac in America, the price overlap didn't justify its existence.

There's a reason why GME has only sold all of 4 of these in Europe: it's a turd.

considering only a few months ago i could get a 9-3 with stick and a couple options for a hair over 20g, i would buy that. i don't have the extra 10-12k for a CTS, even though obviously it would be a better car. the CTS in real money in real shopping is more spendy than the 9-3. that was where my statement comes from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AWD adds weight and doesn't necessarily help performance. Jaguars are rear drive, the 7-series was always rear drive only (awd will be offered) Lexus LS460 is rear wheel, Genesis is rear wheel, S-class is has optional awd. Rear wheel will always be the superior drivetrain, that is why the Corvette isn't front wheel or all wheel drive.

you forgot to list the RWD A8 that you were telling us about a month ago.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DT7 IMO should NOT be FWD or RWD, but only AWD. That is a luxury level a car like that should have. End of story. Hopefully this is all rumor and they are not going to flush the last 3 years of engineering work down the drain do to some Morons Political schedule and personal ambition at the top.

this might be where they go with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AWD adds weight and doesn't necessarily help performance. Jaguars are rear drive, the 7-series was always rear drive only (awd will be offered) Lexus LS460 is rear wheel, Genesis is rear wheel, S-class is has optional awd. Rear wheel will always be the superior drivetrain, that is why the Corvette isn't front wheel or all wheel drive.

AWD is needed to make the car market viable in snowy climes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings