C&G Spy Shots: Zeta Commodore!
#22
Posted 30 August 2005 - 11:29 PM
ToniCipriani, on Aug 30 2005, 06:54 PM, said:
I'd LOVE to have that exact wheel with the same color on my G6! Silver or white with rims
You could probably get them for your Cavalier, if you changed the bolt pattern. Check TireRack of American Tire.
#24
Posted 30 August 2005 - 11:51 PM
empowah, on Aug 30 2005, 11:29 PM, said:
Nah, don't really feel like doing anything to my car given that it'll be gone next year. It's only a leased car which I won't keep.
Thanks for the idea though!
#25
Posted 31 August 2005 - 12:11 AM
GM have already announced their rear-wheel drive plans in the post of August 15th by Mark Phelan of the Detroit Free Press - "GM plans rear-drive family". Why are we going around and around on decisions which have already been made? They have said there will be at least 7 offerings - Chevrolet Caprice/Impala, Chevrolet Camaro, Chevrolet Monte Carlo, Pontiac Grand Prix/G8, Pontiac GTO, Buick Roadmaster, and Buick Velitte.
The key questions left are:
1. The dates and sequence of the roll-outs (which will probably now require up to 2011 to complete versus 2010 before the Zeta development delay), and
2. How has Lutz managed to overcome the problem he had when he first announced the Zeta delay - namely that the original Zeta designs were not price-, quality-, and performance-competitive with the Chrysler 300/Dodge Charger competition? How does Lutz plan to beat out a Charger SRT-8 with a quarter of 13.2, and a top speed of 173 mph, all at under $ 40 large?
#30
Posted 31 August 2005 - 12:26 PM
Hmmmm... but (as others have mentioned) it does appear smaller than what I thought a Zeta vehicle would be. Will Zeta still be in SWB & LWB versions? Because Torana was suppose to show off the potential of a "Beta" platform...
Why my concern? A Zeta vehicle should not be close enough in size to cause confusion between it and the up-coming (smaller... almost compact) 2008 Cadillac CTS. That just seems to be "Beta" territory.
Maybe a SWB Zeta can be small enough to cover the compact/midsize segment?
#32
Posted 31 August 2005 - 12:53 PM
LosAngeles, on Aug 30 2005, 11:07 PM, said:
I was hoping Epsilon II would be flexible.
No I am not an insider. But Epsilon II will be Ep I based and that means transverse engine mounting which means FWD biased if AWD shows up and there is NO chance that a transverse RWD car will come out of GM.
#35 Guest_Josh_*
Posted 31 August 2005 - 10:41 PM
#37
Posted 02 September 2005 - 11:14 AM
wildcat, on Aug 31 2005, 01:09 PM, said:
Perhaps you're right. I just thought as long as we have to put uip wiht the bastard chiold they might as well offer RWD to the masses.
#38
Posted 08 September 2005 - 09:13 AM
http://www.autoblog....34000947056960/
http://spyphotos.aut...34000293056962/
This post has been edited by douglask: 08 September 2005 - 09:15 AM
#39
Posted 10 October 2005 - 01:58 AM
I can't wait to get this into our showroom next September / October, and I am just drooling over the thought of the HSV modified versions shortly thereafter.
#40
Posted 10 October 2005 - 04:44 AM
FunkyPig, on Aug 30 2005, 10:37 PM, said:
Wishfull thinking by power-mad Australian journalists. The base V8 engine will not go from a 328 hp LS1 to a 400 hp LS2, especially when the top V6 has only 255 hp. There are other options. The 3.6 L V6 is also available in a unique 235 hp base variant with intake VVT like the turbocharged 2.8, instead of the LY7s dual-VVT.

Sign In
Register
Help
Bookmark
Del.icio.us
Digg
Email
Facebook
Google
Mixx
Reddit
StumbleUpon
MultiQuote

