Jump to content


Advertisment
Photo

Interactive Review: 2011 Cadillac SRX Turbo Premium

- - - - -

#41

Posted 05 January 2011 - 09:38 AM

ZL-1

    Ultra Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,794 posts

Oldsmoboi, the trick to making a 3.0L SRX fun and drivable is to leave it in the "Sport" setting all the time.
In drive it feels very sluggish especially pulling away from a stop sign slowly.

Which means that the problem is not the engine itself but most likely the transmission's software calibration...
  • 0


Advertisment

#42
pow

Posted 05 January 2011 - 12:30 PM

pow

    Ultra Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,376 posts
Edmunds recently track tested the Q5 with the new 2.0T and eight-speed automatic: 0-60 in 6.8 seconds, quicker than SRX Turbo, and 20/27 MPG compared to 15/22 for the Caddy.
  • 0

#43

Posted 05 January 2011 - 01:02 PM

CSpec

    Ultra Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,660 posts

Edmunds recently track tested the Q5 with the new 2.0T and eight-speed automatic: 0-60 in 6.8 seconds, quicker than SRX Turbo, and 20/27 MPG compared to 15/22 for the Caddy.

Sheesh. I suspect Cadillac is working on replacing the 2.8t with something else.
  • 0

#44

Posted 05 January 2011 - 01:48 PM

Drew Dowdell

    Unimatrix 01

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 31,097 posts
Garage View Garage
I've received the same "suggestion" about what engine is going into the SRX from two completely separate sources now.
  • 0



Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Advertisment