Jump to content
Create New...

Cars of the '70s, Decade of Disaster or Delight?


axlon

Recommended Posts

I'm surprised I wrote that Cort and overlooked my love of GM's '73-'79 truck line. Chevy or GMC, I love them both (still would get the GMC though). I know this is about cars but GM's '70s trucks are probably loved just a tad more than their '70s cars I think ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL!  Ya know, I _almost_ pointed that out, but thought better of it since the topic is titled "Cars" ... thought maybe you hadn't mentioned them on purpose, Roger..... ;)

 

 

Cort :) www.oldcarsstronghearts.com

1979 & 1989 Caprice Classics | pigValve, paceMaker, cowValve
"The curves around midnight aren't easy to see" __ Rosanne Cash __ 'Runaway Train'
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ I have a number of first gen Toro references in my library, but back in the day many mags used 'stopping rate' numbers rather than feet, so I have no distance.

 

'66 tested by R&T recorded 20 ft/sec2, and control was marginal. Rear brake lock-up was an issue here. Overall rating was 'fair'.

Toro gained optional discs for '68, there the braking rates improved to 29 ft/sec2, with no fade.

Tires were a HUGE component in braking back then. A good radial will improve everything vintage today, across the board.

 

Interesting to note : when Buick gained optional discs, they performed worse WRT fade than the drums they were slated to replace. 

'68 Rivie with discs: # of stops from 80 (@ 60-sec intervals) before 20% loss in deceleration rate: 2. Rate was 23 ft/sec2.

'67 Wildcat with drums: # of stops from 80 (@ 60-sec intervals) before 20% loss in deceleration rate: 6 tho rate was a tiny bit worse @ 22.

Buick had the best brake engineers @ GM in the '50s/60s.

 

If you read a lot of vintage road tests you find braking performance is all over the charts. I have 1 test that's still a high water mark; 91' 60-0, '68 Olds 442, IIRC.

Must've been a lot of production variances....

 

It's interesting because from all my Toronado talk in other places, the original drums in '66 were scary bad with fading and just overall insufficient for the size of the car.  Many '66 owners seem to retrofit (futurefit?) their '66 with later model disks that swap over exactly. 

 

On my car, the issue is the opposite.  The rear drums are fine, the rear disks are fine, but the rear calipers tend to leak and fail easily.. and sometimes people will swap them from disk to drum... (the rare oddballs like me who likes the '79 - '85 model)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My dad bought himself a 1970 Pontiac GTO

In Lemans Blue...I think the paint colour was called.

Fathers%20day%20gto%20pics%20001.jpg

 Kinda like this one.

 Then he bought a 1974 2 door Impala. Dark red with a white vinyl top.

14566265.1974.Chevrolet.Impala.2-Door.Sp

 

It kinda looked like that car above.

but their was no 3/4 window at the back...like this one.

FL0113-148177_2.jpg

 

Then we bought a 2 door coupe 1979 Impala...same dark red as the 1974 Impala.

1979_chevrolet_impala-pic-50987.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Say what you will about '70's cars, I would take just about any one of them over almost any car from the 80's.  On design alone they stand head and shoulders above their next generation of descendants.  It seems like for an entire decade, maybe more, car companies forgot about making interesting and attractive cars and just put some ugly square boxes on wheels and called it a day.  There's a beautiful '79 Corvette Stingray on the lot here that gives me goosebumps to look at though, it could maybe use some mechanic work at the moment, but the looks....  About the only '80's cars I could say that about would be maybe a Lambo, because what kid in the '80's didn't lust after a Lambo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings