Jump to content
Create New...

Industry News: California and Automakers Try To Figure Out A Way To Meet ZEV Rules


Recommended Posts

California is one of most stringent states when it comes emissions in vehicles. Case in point is a law that says an estimated 15 percent of vehicles sold in the state must be a zero emission vehicle (ZEV). But this law has created a rift between regulators and automakers. Regulators want automakers to build ZEVs, but automakers worry that if customers aren't willing to buy them, they'll need to offer big incentives.

Four automakers - Ford, General Motors, Honda, and Toyota have issued a complaint to the California Air Resources Board (CARB) asking them to rewrite the formula to allow more credit for plug-in hybrid models. They argue these models address range anxiety with EVs at the moment and are more likely to be accepted by buyers.

The four introduced a new formula based on electric vehicle miles traveled, or e-miles. This would allow the formula to be much fairer as it would rely on real-world performance, not underlying technology.

During the hearing, a member of CARB liked the idea of e-miles.

"I'm willing to make a bet with you. If we provided a more flexible approach, we are likely to get far more e-miles in 2030 than we would with pure EVs. I really don't believe by 2030 we're going to be able to get a really large market penetration with pure EVs," said Dan Sperling, a CARB member and director of the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California-Davis

However, CARB chairman Mary Nichols disagreed with Sperling, stating that if California was to reach its goal of cutting carbon emissions 80 percent from 1990 levels by 2050, the fleet would have to be fully electric. But even Nichols admits that figuring out the best way is tough.

"I don't know where you would find a better example anywhere in the world of a public deliberating body struggling with a really big issue," said Nichols.

Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)


View full article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

California is going to have to wake up to the reality that they cannot force electric auto's to work for the bulk of the population and that e miles from Hybrids like the VOLT is the best process for now as the alternative fuel system figures out what is best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miss Nichols, you can make the vehicle all electric but then you shift the carbon emissions elsewhere.  That is what your stupid statement does not say.

 

Of course, making vehicles all plug in means you can move the power plants and their pollution to outside of California.  You can say you cleaned up the emissions, and then piss all over (fine, tax, denigrate) the state where the electric plant is that is putting out all the electricity for the plug in cars.

 

Perfect strategy so you can keep motoring around as much as you want and blame the side effects on others.

 

I think from a convenience factor, many car buyers will want an electric vehicle someday.  But only if you can recharge it in 3 minutes like filling your gas tank, and be able to do that at every city block.  And, have comparable range, say 300 miles.

 

In the meantime, we'll need a gas engine included, ala volt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings