Jump to content
Server Move In Progress - Read More ×
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Detroit Preview: Volkswagen Continues to Tease the 2019 Jetta

      Wow, the next Jetta gets some style!

    Volkswagen has dropped some new sketches of the upcoming 2019 Jetta that will debut next month at the Detroit Auto Show.

    Compared to the current model, the redesigned Jetta looks to be more upscale. The front end comes with a hexagonal grille shape, sculpted hood, and angled headlights. Along the side is a pronounced character line and lowered roofline. The back comes with an integrated spoiler for the trunk and a dual exhaust system with chrome accents - likely on higher trims. Inside, the Jetta looks to be somewhat luxurious with an improved design for the dash, optional digital instrument cluster, and a large infotainment screen that is angled to the driver.

    Power will come from a turbocharged 1.4L four-cylinder producing 150 horsepower - the same engine found in the current Jetta. Transmission choices include a six-speed manual or an eight-speed automatic.

    Source: Volkswagen

     

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Nice looking coupe design sedan. I wonder how much this will hurt existing sales since multiple outlets say this is a more luxurious version compared to the existing Jetta. :scratchchin:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I really don't believe this interior... I bet it will be cheaped out on materials.

     

    Funny you mention this as I reading through Autoblog's drive of the Jetta prototype.

    Quote

    The door cards had an insert that looked like patterned aluminum, and it nicely set off the angular inset for the door handle. The door pulls, however, were hard, nasty plastic, and while other parts of the door card were soft-touch plastics they didn't look like it. The bottom line is that the interior is much more like the new Atlas than the outgoing Jetta, in both good and bad ways. 

     

    https://www.autoblog.com/2017/12/11/2019-volkswagen-jetta-prototype-first-drive-review/

    • Like 1
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The white car in the picture looks large, the Jetta should be a small car, not a mid-size car.  I am surprised it doesn't look more like a 4-door coupe, since car companies think that is what people want.  So while people flee sedans like crazy for a more practical, more cargo room SUV, the car companies think the way to make a sedan more desirable is to cut the roof line so there is less space and it is less practical.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    The white car in the picture looks large, the Jetta should be a small car, not a mid-size car.  I am surprised it doesn't look more like a 4-door coupe, since car companies think that is what people want.  So while people flee sedans like crazy for a more practical, more cargo room SUV, the car companies think the way to make a sedan more desirable is to cut the roof line so there is less space and it is less practical.  

    VW may be trying to sell on size. There is a big gap between Jetta and Passat thought now. Moving Jetta up and something else to slot below it could make sense.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    VW may be trying to sell on size. There is a big gap between Jetta and Passat thought now. Moving Jetta up and something else to slot below it could make sense.

    Jetta and Passat have 8 inches in length separating them, 183.3 and 191.9.  There is a larger size gap between Civic and Accord, Cruze and Malibu, and Focus and Fusion.  

    And no brand is looking to add more sedans, Chevy and Ford are trying to have less cars.  

    Edited by smk4565
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    And we all know that exterior length is the only measure of a car.

    94.6 cubic feet interior passenger volume in a Cruze, 94.1 cubic feet in a Jetta.   The Jetta has the largest trunk out of the Cruze, Focus, Civic and Corolla.  The Jetta only gives up .3 cubic feet to the Malibu's trunk.  The Jetta doesn't need to be any bigger.  It is right there with every other small car.  And there is for sure no reason to make a Passat bigger or to put a model i the large sedan graveyard.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    94.6 cubic feet interior passenger volume in a Cruze, 94.1 cubic feet in a Jetta.   The Jetta has the largest trunk out of the Cruze, Focus, Civic and Corolla.  The Jetta only gives up .3 cubic feet to the Malibu's trunk.  The Jetta doesn't need to be any bigger.  It is right there with every other small car.  And there is for sure no reason to make a Passat bigger or to put a model i the large sedan graveyard.  

    No point in making the Passat larger; the Arteon will occupy the spot the CC formerly held.   I guess since the car market in the US is shrinking they probably don't need something like the Polo or Up! here below the Jetta. 

    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm not saying make the Passat bigger. It is already one of the roomiest feeling midsize sedans on the market. In spite of the numbers, it feels cavernous inside compared to Accord, Camry, and Malibu. It feels on par with Avalon and Impala.

    So, that said, I can see VW moving the Jetta up to Malibu/Camry size and leaving the Golf where it's at. 

    That would give VW a small, medium, large car lineup with the Arteon being the specialty car.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On exterior dimensions the Passat is smaller than the Malibu, Fusion or Accord.  There is no reason to make it Impala size so sales tank.  The Impala, Avalon and Taurus won’t even be in production in 10 years.

    VW should build 10 crossovers before they consider another sedan. 

    Edited by smk4565
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You really have reading comprehension issues. The Passat feels substantially larger inside than any of the other midsize do. I did not suggest that VW increase it's exterior dimensions.  Just that it feels bigger and roomier than Accord or Malibu.

    Those larger sedans aren't tanking based on size, they are tanking based on cost. An Avalon is $30+k base, people start looking at Crossovers for less than that.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^agreed about the Passat.  Had a rental earlier this year for 3 weeks..I've had most of the late model mid size sedans as rentals over the last 3 years.  The Passat has the best outward visibility of the ones I've driven, big trunk, definitely *feels* bigger inside than the Fusion, new and previous Malibu, previous Camry, Altima and Sonata.    Drives quite nicely also.  Not as flashy as the competition, but solid and comfortable. 

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Thanks 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    38 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    ^agreed about the Passat.  Had a rental earlier this year for 3 weeks..I've had most of the late model mid size sedans as rentals.  The Passat has the best outward visibility of the ones I've driven, big trunk, definitely *feels* bigger inside than the Fusion, new and previous Malibu, previous Camry, Altima and Sonata.  

    Thank you. This is what I'm saying. Regardless of what the numbers say, the Passat feels as big or bigger than the Avalon.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    VW did a brilliant job making the Passat feel spacious.  It is much better than some other cars in its competitive set, which feel like Hitler's bunker, with intrusive consoles, high beltlines and tiny windows.  It gives one a feeling of being able to garage 4 entire C-class Mercedes inside it with no touching.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Passat dwarfs most other midsizers in the interior space department. It makes some- Fusion, 6, 200- feel like they are in a smaller segment even though they aren't. The Jetta is really much the same. There's no reason for either car to get any bigger.

     

    VW's focus with this car should have been on improving fit/finish and refinement levels to that of the Golf. Reverting back to a torsion beam rear on this car is embarrassing. Shame on you, VW.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I think the vast majority of Jetta buyers don't care about the torsion beam, and for those who do, there is the GLI.

    I don't think the vast majority of buyers care about ABS or electric power steering, but ya know......

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Frisky Dingo said:

    I don't think the vast majority of buyers care about ABS or electric power steering, but ya know......

    ABS is a safety thing and more safety is more gooder....

    Electric power steering, I don't think they could even articulate why/how it is different from "normal".

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've never been a big fan of VW styling but I have to say that I actually like the look of this.  It does look huge for a Jetta, though.  On first glance I thought it was a new Passat.  The exterior is still conservative but is stylish and a bit upscale looking.  The instrument panel again is typically German conservative but again does at least have a touch of style to it.  It looks nice.  The door panels on the other hand look plain and a bit cheap.  It's almost like they are missing something.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I don't plan on gardening anytime soon. We need to finish other things before I'd have a permanent spot for a garden, but I would like a small garden in the future. We consume enough various peppers, onions, and zucchinis that I think it would be pretty cool to grow them myself. 
    • If you do tomatoes or any water hungry container veggies, Pittmoss is the GOAT and will save you a ton of headache with watering.
    • Thanks! Yeah, from what I've read it needs a lot of water but also media that drains well so the roots can dry out between waterings. I've now looked into this Pittmoss stuff, and it sounds pretty dang good. I think I'll order some and mix it with planter soil, as well. 
    • All done with the detail inside and out of the SS for the spring/summer season.
    • I had never driven an Infiniti Q50 before, let alone ever really looked at them.  I also didn’t know much about these cars. I was supposed to be assigned a medium sized SUV, but remarked I wanted the luggage area to be hidden.  The rental agent told me they could not guarantee the presence of a retractable cover. (Why would they order a car without one or why would someone take one?  eBay?)  They didn’t have any SUVs anyway, and I got put into an Infiniti Q50.  I checked my phone to verify the cost would be covered by my insurance and the credit card parameters.  It came in at around $43,000.  That’s if new.  That said: “no worries.”  However, this unit would be a much-depreciated 3+ year model with 57,000 miles.  I relaxed.  At any rate, I put less than 500 miles on it over a week.  As one walks up to it, you can tell its heritage … and rather quickly.  You can instantly see similarities to the Nissan Altima in the instrument panel’s main cluster and in the switches much the same way that a CT6 by Cadillac and a Cruze by Chevrolet share dials and such.  However, the assembly and detailing are nicer in the Q50.  It had leather seating, which I don’t care for in a warm weather location, that was comfortably contoured and nicely finished.  The same could be said for the doors and other trim and fittings.  Inside, I liked the way that the dash, center stack, and console flowed together.  The scalloped tops of the dash hearken to those of the very last Impala, which had an attractive dashboard on various levels. The center stack is slightly like that of an Olds Aurora.  These comments go along with the often-cited commentary that this car is traditional and old school in a lot of ways, thus not breaking any new ground. The least favorable aspect of the interior is operating the various touch screen and stalk functions.  Some are redundant and confusing.  However, for one, it is possible to pull up a clock that resembles old school chronometer and have it sitting at the top of the center stack. On the interior's plus side, there are perfectly contoured and angled slots to store water bottles at the base of the front doors.  On the minus side, there is a remote latch release for the trunk, but not one for the fuel cap door.  (The fuel cap door remains closed if the car is locked.) I figured that this Infiniti would have a V6.  It was no ordinary V6, but 3.7 liters worth of V6 with twin turbochargers.  Rarely does one need this much power and, in one week, I got aggressive with the throttle in one merging situation and one passing situation.  It is up to the task and kicks out a little torque steer.  Its hum is a rather muted purr.  As would be expected in what is supposed to be a premium car, the automatic transmission is a geared unit.  It has 7 speeds.  The first 2 shifts can be felt while the remaining shifts are not.  However, if in stop and go traffic, and alternating speed, those early shifts can be a little less smooth as the transmission seems to hunt.  (It could also be how many miles were on the unit.) Why 7 speeds?  How about 6 … or 8?  I’m talking even numbers! With the powertrain comes the requirement for premium fuel.  Also, compared to many full-size Japanese cars working with 4 cylinders and turning in commendable gas mileage, this car with its V6 is a little thirsty. Ride, handling, and noise are related, but different enough.  The ride was supple and controlled, but not much more so than that of an uplevel 4-cylinder sedan.  Handling was better and this Infiniti tracked accurately and nimbly.  Also, the Q50 was fairly hushed, but I might have expected a little more isolation and a higher premium "feel" for the price jump from a Nissan to an Infiniti. Its exterior features that extra chrome and trim to make it uplevel within the Nissan family tree, yet the greenhouse is an almost familiar one.  This car delivered on one greenhouse dimension I’m fussy about - rearward vision from the driver’s vantage point is very good. I don’t know how the order sheet was configured when this car was purchased. There was an indicator for forward alerts, but I never got to experience it in action.  Also, whether on the rearview mirrors or inside of the front pillars, there was nothing to warn of side traffic and there weren’t parking assists that kicked in.  Perhaps they were there, but the car was not put in a situation where they’d engage.  On another rental car of a lower price point, those were always at work and perhaps a little too eager.  I almost prefer the latter. I didn’t read any reviews about this car before beginning the rental or during the rental.  I echo what they have to say.  For its niche, it doesn’t drum up much enthusiasm.  The best point is its more premium handling while the negatives are some difficulties in setting it up when first getting in and its slight thirstiness. If something about this overall package is appealing and a person connects with the Q50, then the consumer will probably go for it.  I don’t know how it will hold up and how much it will cost to service over the long haul.  While there are no Toyota and Nissan dealerships in Beverly Hills, California, as an example, there is a Lexus agency there while the Infiniti dealership seems to have closed.  Infiniti seems to want to ride the same wave that Lexus is riding, though I’d think piggybacking onto Toyota might be a more lauded genealogy. This is very much a personal decision and you’re on your own.  I was going to turn in the Q50 after a day to see if I could get something more familiar to me but decided to keep it.  Exchanging cars is a hassle.  Once past the learning curve and adjustments, it’s fairly easy to live with, but it’s neither a remarkable nor compelling vehicle. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings