Jump to content
Server Move In Progress - Read More ×
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Spying: Audi Q8 Is Almost Undisguised

      Looks almost like the concept

    It has been almost a year since Audi unveiled the Q8 concept at the Detroit Auto Show. The concept was Audi's take on the SUV-coupe that the BMW X6 kicked off. We've known for some time that Audi was planning to bring the Q8 into production and recently, a spy photographer caught one almost uncovered.

    The production model keeps the coupe-like stance and narrow glass area of the concept. Up front is massive octagonal grille, long and slim headlights, and faux openings in the bumper. The rear hatch is quite rakish and features a unique design for the tailgate. 

    The Q8 is expected to use Audi's MLB platform that underpins the Q7 crossover. We're guessing the base powertrain will be the turbocharged 3.0L V6 offering 354 horsepower and 369 pound-feet of torque. This will be paired with an eight-speed automatic and quattro AWD. Expect a plug-in hybrid and high-performance RS model to follow.

    We won't have to wait too long for the Q8 to be revealed. Reports say the Q8 will go into production sometime later this year, meaning we could see the Q8 debut at Geneva or New York.

    Source: Autoblog, Autocar, Motor Authority

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    38 minutes ago, frogger said:

    I get a bit of a large XT5 profile from the A-pillar back..

    Frogger I did not think about it till I compared side by side and your right very similar profiles for these two CUVs.

    audiq8-undisguised03-kgp-ed-1.jpg

    See the source image

    Thinking on what Frogger has said, I take the Cadillac over the Audi as I like the stronger brick look over the coupe look, but very similar.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, Frisky Dingo said:

    The Audi looks way better than the XT5. Proportions are better, overall design is more cohesive, and less busy.

    Fixed it for you as I assume you meant the XT5.

    I will have to disagree with you. XT5 has the more SUV brick look over the overused Coupe look. Also not sure why as my eyes could be playing tricks on me but I think the XT5 has the longer hood which is a nod to the cadillac of old days with a long front hood.

    Audio looks more like a car that they pumped up on Steroids compared to a more traditional SUV look on the XT5

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    Fixed it for you as I assume you meant the XT5.

    I will have to disagree with you. XT5 has the more SUV brick look over the overused Coupe look. Also not sure why as my eyes could be playing tricks on me but I think the XT5 has the longer hood which is a nod to the cadillac of old days with a long front hood.

    Audio looks more like a car that they pumped up on Steroids compared to a more traditional SUV look on the XT5

     

    I think the Audi looks very un-coupe like compared to other players in this class. It has a quite traditional sport SUV/CUV profile and silhouette. The XT5 looks too cab-forward and FWD-based for my tastes.

    Though I'm not a huge SUV fan, proportions and stance are the 2 biggest things for me, and I think the Q8 has it in spades. Others that are great in this regard are the Macan, Touareg, Grand Cherokee, and Infiniti FX.

    Edited by Frisky Dingo
    • Thanks 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    I would assume since the Q8 is above the Q7 it is larger than the XT5? 

    XT5 comes in at: 189.5 inch length, 112.5 inch wheelbase, 75 inch width.

    Q8 comes in at: 197.64 inch length, 118.11 inch wheelbase, 80.32 inch width.

    Q7 comes in at: 199.6 inch length, 117.9 inch wheelbase, 77.5 inch width.

    So yes, you could say this is the next size up category but almost identical to the Q7 in size. 

    Interesting :scratchchin:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I was wondering how big this thing was, thanks dfelt for posting the size.  What I don't quite get is why it is nearly as big as a Q7 when it is a 2 row vehicle.  But maybe they just want it to feel like a jacked up A8.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    I was wondering how big this thing was, thanks dfelt for posting the size.  What I don't quite get is why it is nearly as big as a Q7 when it is a 2 row vehicle.  But maybe they just want it to feel like a jacked up A8.

    Agree, I am also scratching my head as to why have the Q8 so close in size to the Q7 and only 2 rows at that. :scratchchin:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Agree, I am also scratching my head as to why have the Q8 so close in size to the Q7 and only 2 rows at that. :scratchchin:

    Because the Q7 is 3 row, isn't it?  2 row may be perceived as more premium, since 3 row implies family hauler. 

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Why not just offer 1 vehicle here, with an optional 3rd row?
    Instead of 2 vehicles fractions of an inch apart in dimensions?

    Because that would be too predictable... 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The platforms are 2/10th of an inch different in wheelbase. If VW can't engineer a 3rd row to fit the existing Q7, MAN are they finding new ways to blow money.

    Used to be model lines were separated by 6 inches (which BTW I always found ridiculous)- but here we have the same segment/type vehicle from the same brand with a 2 inch difference and a different name. Yikes.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Q7 is wider, will undoubtedly be more upscale inside, and will most likely offer powertrain options the Q7 doesn't get. There will be plenty of separation between the two. More than are with the X5 vs X6, and GLE vs GLE Coupe.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I couldn't find any information on the Audi USA site or Wikipedia..is the Q7 a 3 row or a 2 row SUV?  

    Edit: found it on the Audi website..Q7 is listed as 7 passenger, so 3 row. 

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    41 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    This is basically the poor man's Bentley Bentayga.

    Same wheelbase, same platform.  Probably a lot of dirty bits in common.  VWAG seems to really get the most out of platforms. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Using a 117.9-in wheelbase platform for one SUV, then also using another 118.1-in wheelbase platform for another SUV shows they have a lot more work to do.

    Why?  They have been using a modular platform for a decade, gone are the days of being tied to one wheelbase when sharing a modern platform. It underpins most Audis and other VW group vehicles 

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Group_MLB_platform

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Look again at the numbers and keep in mind platforms are not made of taffy.  It shares hard points but still has to be fabricated independently.  That costs money; money for 3/16ths of an inch difference. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    24 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Look again at the numbers and keep in mind platforms are not made of taffy.  It shares hard points but still has to be fabricated independently.  That costs money; money for 3/16ths of an inch difference. 

    Lamborghini probably had a specific reason for that extra 3/16th of an inch for the Urus.   Likewise, the Bentyaga and Q7 wheelbases differ by 1/12 of an inch (could be a rounding error by the source, though)

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Bentley Bentayga has a 117.9 inch wheelbase.  That is what this thing is, although the overall length is less than the Bentayga, maybe shorter hood if they have no W12 plans.

    I wonder how they will price the Q8, my guess is above A8, so it better have an A8 level interior or better.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, Frisky Dingo said:

     

    Coming from someone who owned an Escape. :roflmao:

    As ugly as that gen Escape was, it still looks better than any of the "coupe" CUVs. 

    15 hours ago, balthazar said:

    Why not just offer 1 vehicle here, with an optional 3rd row?
    Instead of 2 vehicles fractions of an inch apart in dimensions?

    Yeah even if they completely re-engineered the second row to make it look unique to the two row, premium, thing, it would have to save them a ton of money. 

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Such small differences could be accounted for by adjustable suspension arm mounting brackets, perhaps?  

    That's a good point- suspension geometry certain could explain that small of a variance, yet the platform could still be the same otherwise. It's the only explanation that makes any sense.

    Edited by balthazar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    As ugly as that gen Escape was, it still looks better than any of the "coupe" CUVs. 

    Yeah even if they completely re-engineered the second row to make it look unique to the two row, premium, thing, it would have to save them a ton of money. 

    I don't think the Escape is ugly, but it has a more dramatically sloping rear roofline than this. And it was supposed to be 'conventional'. That was the point I was trying to make.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, Frisky Dingo said:

    I don't think the Escape is ugly, but it has a more dramatically sloping rear roofline than this. And it was supposed to be 'conventional'. That was the point I was trying to make.

    Umm... No... 

    2013 Escape.jpg

    Audi.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am completely underwhelmed, but only because the styling, it feels sooooo old. Only Audi can pull off having their flagship crossover be like a stuffed up Q2 with nicer proportions portions here and there.

    And yeah the XT5 is not pretty either. Ditto for the Escape. The Bentayga can drive off a cliff all I care.

    I'm starting to see a pattern here.....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I don't plan on gardening anytime soon. We need to finish other things before I'd have a permanent spot for a garden, but I would like a small garden in the future. We consume enough various peppers, onions, and zucchinis that I think it would be pretty cool to grow them myself. 
    • If you do tomatoes or any water hungry container veggies, Pittmoss is the GOAT and will save you a ton of headache with watering.
    • Thanks! Yeah, from what I've read it needs a lot of water but also media that drains well so the roots can dry out between waterings. I've now looked into this Pittmoss stuff, and it sounds pretty dang good. I think I'll order some and mix it with planter soil, as well. 
    • All done with the detail inside and out of the SS for the spring/summer season.
    • I had never driven an Infiniti Q50 before, let alone ever really looked at them.  I also didn’t know much about these cars. I was supposed to be assigned a medium sized SUV, but remarked I wanted the luggage area to be hidden.  The rental agent told me they could not guarantee the presence of a retractable cover. (Why would they order a car without one or why would someone take one?  eBay?)  They didn’t have any SUVs anyway, and I got put into an Infiniti Q50.  I checked my phone to verify the cost would be covered by my insurance and the credit card parameters.  It came in at around $43,000.  That’s if new.  That said: “no worries.”  However, this unit would be a much-depreciated 3+ year model with 57,000 miles.  I relaxed.  At any rate, I put less than 500 miles on it over a week.  As one walks up to it, you can tell its heritage … and rather quickly.  You can instantly see similarities to the Nissan Altima in the instrument panel’s main cluster and in the switches much the same way that a CT6 by Cadillac and a Cruze by Chevrolet share dials and such.  However, the assembly and detailing are nicer in the Q50.  It had leather seating, which I don’t care for in a warm weather location, that was comfortably contoured and nicely finished.  The same could be said for the doors and other trim and fittings.  Inside, I liked the way that the dash, center stack, and console flowed together.  The scalloped tops of the dash hearken to those of the very last Impala, which had an attractive dashboard on various levels. The center stack is slightly like that of an Olds Aurora.  These comments go along with the often-cited commentary that this car is traditional and old school in a lot of ways, thus not breaking any new ground. The least favorable aspect of the interior is operating the various touch screen and stalk functions.  Some are redundant and confusing.  However, for one, it is possible to pull up a clock that resembles old school chronometer and have it sitting at the top of the center stack. On the interior's plus side, there are perfectly contoured and angled slots to store water bottles at the base of the front doors.  On the minus side, there is a remote latch release for the trunk, but not one for the fuel cap door.  (The fuel cap door remains closed if the car is locked.) I figured that this Infiniti would have a V6.  It was no ordinary V6, but 3.7 liters worth of V6 with twin turbochargers.  Rarely does one need this much power and, in one week, I got aggressive with the throttle in one merging situation and one passing situation.  It is up to the task and kicks out a little torque steer.  Its hum is a rather muted purr.  As would be expected in what is supposed to be a premium car, the automatic transmission is a geared unit.  It has 7 speeds.  The first 2 shifts can be felt while the remaining shifts are not.  However, if in stop and go traffic, and alternating speed, those early shifts can be a little less smooth as the transmission seems to hunt.  (It could also be how many miles were on the unit.) Why 7 speeds?  How about 6 … or 8?  I’m talking even numbers! With the powertrain comes the requirement for premium fuel.  Also, compared to many full-size Japanese cars working with 4 cylinders and turning in commendable gas mileage, this car with its V6 is a little thirsty. Ride, handling, and noise are related, but different enough.  The ride was supple and controlled, but not much more so than that of an uplevel 4-cylinder sedan.  Handling was better and this Infiniti tracked accurately and nimbly.  Also, the Q50 was fairly hushed, but I might have expected a little more isolation and a higher premium "feel" for the price jump from a Nissan to an Infiniti. Its exterior features that extra chrome and trim to make it uplevel within the Nissan family tree, yet the greenhouse is an almost familiar one.  This car delivered on one greenhouse dimension I’m fussy about - rearward vision from the driver’s vantage point is very good. I don’t know how the order sheet was configured when this car was purchased. There was an indicator for forward alerts, but I never got to experience it in action.  Also, whether on the rearview mirrors or inside of the front pillars, there was nothing to warn of side traffic and there weren’t parking assists that kicked in.  Perhaps they were there, but the car was not put in a situation where they’d engage.  On another rental car of a lower price point, those were always at work and perhaps a little too eager.  I almost prefer the latter. I didn’t read any reviews about this car before beginning the rental or during the rental.  I echo what they have to say.  For its niche, it doesn’t drum up much enthusiasm.  The best point is its more premium handling while the negatives are some difficulties in setting it up when first getting in and its slight thirstiness. If something about this overall package is appealing and a person connects with the Q50, then the consumer will probably go for it.  I don’t know how it will hold up and how much it will cost to service over the long haul.  While there are no Toyota and Nissan dealerships in Beverly Hills, California, as an example, there is a Lexus agency there while the Infiniti dealership seems to have closed.  Infiniti seems to want to ride the same wave that Lexus is riding, though I’d think piggybacking onto Toyota might be a more lauded genealogy. This is very much a personal decision and you’re on your own.  I was going to turn in the Q50 after a day to see if I could get something more familiar to me but decided to keep it.  Exchanging cars is a hassle.  Once past the learning curve and adjustments, it’s fairly easy to live with, but it’s neither a remarkable nor compelling vehicle. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings