Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    2020 Cadillac CT4-V and CT5-V Aren't As Powerful As Their Predecessors

      ...More Potent Versions Could Be In the Pipeline...


    At an event tonight in Detroit, Cadillac delivered a one-two punch for those craving for a bit of performance with the introduction of the 2020 CT4-V and CT5-V. On paper, the two models aren't what we were expecting. Instead of the firebreathing monsters that were the ATS-V and CTS-V, the CT4 and CT5-V are more in line with middle children of German automakers - Audi S4, BMW M340i, and Mercedes-AMG C43 and E43.

    CT4-V

    To say we're a bit surprised that Cadillac is showing off the performance variant of their upcoming entry-level sedan would be an understatement - the reveal of the standard CT4 is expected to happen in a few weeks. Aimed at the likes of the Audi S3 and Mercedes-AMG A45, the CT4-V uses a 2.7L turbo-four from the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra. It makes 320 horsepower and 369 pound-feet of torque. Power flows through a 10-speed automatic to either rear or all four wheels. No manual is available. Other mechanical bits to be aware of are four-piston brake calipers at all corners, and Magnetic Ride Control being standard on RWD models - AWD sticks with conventional shocks.

    Design-wise, the CT4-V looks like it could be mid-cycle facelift for the ATS with a similar profile. The front end mimics the larger CT5 with a wide grille and unique headlight shape. Around back, there is a boat tail effect for the trunk lid with a small lip spoiler and quad tailpipes.

    CT5-V

    Cadillac appears to be playing it quiet with the CT5-V's design. The only bits that set it apart from the standard model are the dark trim, quad-tailpipes, rear diffuser, and new wheels. Under the hood is a twin-turbo 3.0L V6 making 355 horsepower and 400 pound-feet of torque. For those keeping score, that's 20 more horsepower than the CT5 with this same engine, while torque is unchanged. Like the CT4-V, the CT5 routes power through a 10-speed automatic and either rear- or all-wheel drive. An electronically controlled limited-slip differential, Magnetic Ride Control, Performance Traction Management system, and four-piston brakes finish off the changes.

    The CT4-V and CT5-V are expected to go on sale early next year.

    Our Big Concern

    We find ourselves wondering what is Cadillac thinking? On paper, these models make more sense as V-Sport models considering what's being presented. Badging them as V dilutes hardcore image that the past few models have brought forth. Why is Cadillac doing this? Autoblog may have an answer. According to a Cadillac representative, the brand is wanting to bring in a broader set of buyers to showrooms, hence they are making them less hardcore. This will allow them to bring V versions of other models like their crossovers. But there are hardcore versions coming in the pipeline according to the rep.

    Still, we can't help but wonder if GM has done their classic move of shooting themselves in the foot.

    Source: Cadillac


    Cadillac Reveals First-Ever CT4-V and CT5-V

    • Expanded lineup adds more choices for spirited performance. Highlights include available Super Cruise, AWD, Magnetic Ride Control 4.0, eLSD and new V-Mode

    Driven by Cadillac’s latest turbocharging technology and building on more than 15 years of performance credentials, the first-ever 2020 CT4-V and CT5-V were unveiled today, expanding choices for the brand’s V-Series performance sub-brand.

    Following the 2019 CT6-V, they grow the V-Series family with even more levels of performance, while preserving the lineage established by the original V-Series lineup introduced in 2004.   

    “The new V-Series sedan lineup defines modern sophistication by combining luxury appointments with thoughtful technology and athletic refinement for the discerning enthusiast,” said Brandon Vivian, Cadillac executive chief engineer. “We are inviting even more customers into the V-Series family by adding a new level of elevated performance between our Sport models and the ultimate, high-performance track capability that the V-Series has grown to represent.”

    The first-ever CT4 and recently introduced CT5 represent Cadillac’s realigned sedan portfolio, characterized by new proportions, innovative technologies and more appearance and performance choices. Each is built on Cadillac’s award-winning rear-wheel-drive Alpha architecture, with the V-Series models developed to deliver the ultimate blend of performance, presence and road-going refinement.

    Both share the latest standard V-Series performance technologies, including Magnetic Ride Control 4.0, which is tuned specifically for V models to enhance comfort without sacrificing performance-oriented responsiveness, and drive modes that include new V-Mode personalization. Each model is available in RWD or AWD and features a 10-speed automatic transmission, Brembo front brakes with eBoost electronic assist and a limited-slip rear differential on CT4-V and electronic limited-slip differential on CT5-V.

    Cadillac’s exclusive Super Cruise1, the first true hands-free driver assistance feature for the freeway, is available on more than 130,000 miles of limited-access freeways in the U.S. and Canada. It will be available on both new V-Series models.  

    “The new lineup expands the V-Series ethos, drawing more customers into the Cadillac Performance family, and the newest Vs are focused on elevated athleticism and luxurious refinement for customers wanting a dynamic daily drive,” said Mark Reuss, GM president. “And this is only the beginning of the V family. Cadillac’s passion for performance shines on a racetrack. Stay tuned.”

    Vehicle highlights

    CT5-V — The first-ever CT5-V builds on the precision-focused details of the all-new luxury sedan introduced earlier this year to offer elevated road performance and an engaging driving experience.  

    • Powered by Cadillac’s high-output 3.0L Twin Turbo V-6 engine, which uses low-inertia turbochargers to enhance power production across the rpm band. It is rated at a Cadillac-estimated 355 horsepower (265 kW), pending SAE certification.
    • 10-speed automatic transmission.
    • Electronic limited-slip rear differential.
    • Standard RWD and available AWD.
    • V-Series performance chassis with Magnetic Ride Control 4.0.
    • Performance Traction Management.
    • Vehicle Control Mode with customizable V-Mode.
    • Brembo front braking system.
    • 19-inch wheels and summer-only performance tires2 (all-season tires available with AWD).
    • Dark exterior accents and V-Series mesh grilles; unique rear diffuser and quad exhaust tips.
    • Super Cruise1 available.
    • Unique performance persona instrument cluster and V-Mode steering wheel control.

    CT4-V — Developed for a new generation of sedan customers, the first-ever CT4 blends nimble handling and Cadillac’s signature technology. The CT4-V takes these traits further, infusing the brand’s racing DNA for a dynamic, responsive and exhilarating driving experience.   

    • Powered by Cadillac’s high-output 2.7L Turbo engine featuring a unique three-step sliding camshaft that helps optimize performance at all speeds. It is rated at a Cadillac-estimated 320 horsepower (239 kW), pending SAE certification.
    • 10-speed automatic.
    • Limited-slip rear differential.
    • V-Series performance chassis with Magnetic Ride Control 4.0 (on RWD) or ZF MVS passive dampers (on AWD).
    • Vehicle Control Mode with customizable V-Mode.
    • Brembo front braking system.
    • 18-inch wheels and summer-only performance tires2 (all-season tires available with AWD).
    • Near-perfect 50/50 weight distribution for an exceptional feeling of balance and control.
    • Dark exterior accents and V-Series mesh grilles; quad exhaust tips, unique rear spoiler design that helps reduce rear lift while increasing grip for the rear tires.
    • Super Cruise1 available.
    • Unique performance persona instrument cluster and V-Mode steering wheel control.

    MORE TO COME
    The CT4-V and CT5-V go on sale early in the 2020 calendar year, with production at GM’s Lansing Grand River facility in Michigan. Additional product information, as well as details on additional V-Series variants and CT4 Luxury, Premium Luxury and Sport models, will be announced at a later date.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    On 5/31/2019 at 6:20 PM, smk4565 said:

    Who knows if there will be a more powerful version than these.  GM can say that now, doesn't mean they will build them.  If these cars don't sell they may not bother to put a bigger engine in.  

    This CT4 seems to be a refreshed ATS, I would like to see the actual dimensions and weight of it.  I am also curious on the price, and how Cadillac came up with this strategy and direction for these 2 cars.

    https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a27692341/cadillac-ct5-v-ct4-v-track-confirmed/

     

    CT4-V.jpg

    CT5-V.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

     

    Yeah, I saw that after I posted this. I opened C&G and was still in that last thread so as I was reading through that I posted the comment. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here's the summary:-

    (1) The WEAK SAUCE CT4-V and the CT5-V are disgraces to and a total squandering of the Cadillac V brand. At the minimum, they should have kept the VSport's "V/" badging even if Cadillac is dropping the VSport name.

    (2) The CT4-V's 320hp 2.7T I4 is no more than an ECU retune of the Silverado Pickup Truck's 2.7T four banger engine making a "whopping" extra 10 hp. The CT5-V's 355hp 3.0T V6 is no more than an ECU retune of the 335hp 3.0T V6 in the "regular" CT5. Both of which make significantly less power than the existing 404hp 3.0T (LGW) engine in the CT6 Premium and Platinum cars, the 420hp 3.6T V6 in the CTS VSport or the 464hp 3.6T V6 in the ATS-V. This is before we even get to the fact that engines with tiny turbos which peak early and starts running out of breathe at 4,000 rpm (which are exactly what the these new Caddy power plants are designed to do) are decidedly uninteresting to drive -- its akin to the Peterblit driving experience!

    (3) The one engine GM could easily have built is a 420 hp rendition of the 2.7T I4. Based on the compressor and turbine maps simply going to a larger turbo like the Honeywell G25-550 will yield ~420hp @ 5,300 rpm / 420 lb-ft @ 2,200~5,200 rpm. This is without actually dropping compression ratio or increasing the 6,100 rpm rev limit. Going to 9.0:1 compression and a slightly larger turbo like the G25-660 will yield about 500 hp @ 5,800 rpm / 460 lb-ft @ 2,600~5,600 rpm. The former would have been a perfect fit for the CT4-V whereas the latter will work well in the CT5-V, 4 cylinders not withstanding. Such engines will also give GM the bragging rights to the "most powerful" production four cylinder engines in the world, snubbing the likes of the 375hp Mercedes-AMG M133 2.0T -- perhaps not in specific output, but certainly in performance and livability.

    (4) As it stands today, the CT5 is a total disappointment. Stylistically, the Mazda front end and the Honda Accord C-pillar does wonders to move Cadillac DOWN MARKET and nothing else. The new Vs do not even hold a candle to the outgoing VSports. As an owner of a 2014 CTS Vsport, I will not even consider the CT5. It may become necessary for me to cause additional US Trade deficits and fork over tariffs to buy German, or more likely seek out a used CTS-V.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    @dwightlooi but what if they come up with the goods and use the blackwing as is rumored to be the case?

    As I said, AS IT STANDS TODAY, the CT5 is a total disappointment. Besides, it'll be hilarious to watch them spin whatever they try to call it. What will it be? CT5-NOT-FAKE-V?

    It could have been very subtle, very logical and very easy to understand. Just use give them the CT5-V/ badge; the same "V/" badge the Vsport uses. Basically, while there is no longer a VSport moniker and all performance models are called CT5-V. The V/ badging denote the WEAK SAUCE cars from the real V# cars with the checkered flag badge.

    What I suspect is that GM marketing and the Cadillac BU knows that they do not and will not have a real V# for another year and whats to leverage what they got for immediate revenue production. They slap on the V badge hoping that it'll get them a few additional sales which they may not otherwise get.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    BTW, the "Blackwing" 4.2T is another WEAK SAUCE engine. I say that empirically because 119~131 bhp/liter is... meh... and really not worth the complexity, mass and cost of turbocharging. Look at it this way. The 500 hp and 550 hp BW is basically a 238 hp 2.0T or 260 hp 2.0T engine in terms of specific output. Not very impressive. The BW is NOT a tri-power engine; it doesn;t have the 3-stage cam switching valvetrain making it a little out of step with the GM's latest high feature Inline fours. Again, not very impressive. It does not share the turbos, pistons, valves and other internals with the other GM products, reducing economies of scale and increasing costs. Again, not very impressive. Finally, like the new 2.0T and 3.0T engines it spends everywhere on the tachnometer above 4,000 rpm running out of breathe which means it is not very enticing when pushed. The more spirited version engine makes 627 lb-ft but "only 550 hp @ 5700. What that means is that torque has fallen to 507 lb-ft by 5,700 rpm -- 120 lb-ft off its peak of 627 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm. An engine that pulls weaker and weaker as the revs build is not very entertaining. Again, not very impressive.

    I would have based the Blackwing on two 2.7T Inline 4s siamesed at the crank at 90 degrees to create a 5.5L V8 (the 2.7T is actually 2.727cc). The engine shares the Tripower valvetrain, pistons, rods, valves and turbos with the 2.7T. The engine will make 620 hp @ 5,000 rpm and 700 lb-ft @ 1,500 rpm in the luxury cruiser applications. The "V" engine upgrades to two G25-660 turbos, big air-to-water ICs, forged internals and officially makes an "ambiguous" ENOUGH horsepower for the AWD CT6-V, XT7-V and whatever the Escalar V ends up being called.

    Unofficial tests will reveal that the engine makes about 1000 hp @ 5,800 rpm with 920 lb-ft @ 2,600~5,600 rpm. For all the insane output, the engine has cylinder deactivation, start/stop and 2-stage valve lift control. Just to add to the pun, the drive mode knob should have three positions GREEN, PLUSH and HASTE.

    GREEN: Operates permanently in 4-cylinder mode delivering 310 or 500 hp, with start-stop active and disconnects the front wheels.

    PLUSH: Operates with a boost limiter for 500 or 700 hp, with 4-cylinder mode automatically engaged in cruise, with start-stop and AWD active.

    HASTE: Unlocks full boost for 620 or 1000 hp with cylinder deactivation and start-stop disabled.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    And seriously? 1000HP is what you need? 

     

    To each there own but that makes zero sense in this country unless you own a race track with two mile straightaways. 

    Edited by Drew Dowdell
    Politics
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, dwightlooi said:

    ...

     

     

     

    ....

    As far as CT5-V goes, what if it is $49,950 including destination with a $2500 cash back or 0% for 60 months finance deal on the hood?  I could see the CT4-V for $39k, if they price these low enough they could get some sales volume.   Although if they can't sell at that price point they might as well give up on sedans.

    Edited by Drew Dowdell
    politics
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    ...

    As far as CT5-V goes, what if it is $49,950 including destination with a $2500 cash back or 0% for 60 months finance deal on the hood?  I could see the CT4-V for $39k, if they price these low enough they could get some sales volume.   Although if they can't sell at that price point they might as well give up on sedans.

    1

    ....

    As far as the CT5-V and CT4-V is concerned, the point isn't whether. a $49K CT5 with 355 hp or a $39K CT4 with 320hp is a selleable product. The point is that they should not be called a CT5-V# and CT4-V# which destroys the hard won Cadillac-V brand for no good reason. As I suggested, if GM wants to ditch the clumsy VSport moniker the weak sauce sport models should carry a V/ badge while the proper performance models can carry a V# badge.

    Edited by Drew Dowdell
    Politics
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, dwightlooi said:

    As far as the CT5-V and CT4-V is concerned, the point isn't whether. a $49K CT5 with 355 hp or a $39K CT4 with 320hp is a selleable product. The point is that they should not be called a CT5-V# and CT4-V# which destroys the hard won Cadillac-V brand for no good reason. As I suggested, if GM wants to ditch the clumsy VSport moniker the weak sauce sport models should carry a V/ badge while the proper performance models can carry a V# badge.

    GM cares about salable product.  They could always have Cadillac Blackwing series that is above V-series and slap V-badges on 50% of the product they sell.  Name equity means nothing at Cadillac, they dumped Eldorado Deville and Seville for  STS, CTS, SRX, and dumped those for CT4, CT5, XT5.  They don't care about name brand being built up.  They might be thinking V is desirable, so if they have $40k V cars they will get sales volume.  

    I am surprised all SUVs aren't called Escalade Sport, Escalade Imaj, Escalade Evoq, etc

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    GM cares about salable product.  They could always have Cadillac Blackwing series that is above V-series and slap V-badges on 50% of the product they sell.  Name equity means nothing at Cadillac, they dumped Eldorado Deville and Seville for  STS, CTS, SRX, and dumped those for CT4, CT5, XT5.  They don't care about name brand being built up.  They might be thinking V is desirable, so if they have $40k V cars they will get sales volume.  

    I am surprised all SUVs aren't called Escalade Sport, Escalade Imaj, Escalade Evoq, etc

    Then they are a bunch of fools! Brand equity is EVERYTHING. Without brand equity BMW is just another unreliable german car and Lexus is just a Toyota with nicer leather.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    GM cares about salable product.  They could always have Cadillac Blackwing series that is above V-series and slap V-badges on 50% of the product they sell.  Name equity means nothing at Cadillac, they dumped Eldorado Deville and Seville for  STS, CTS, SRX, and dumped those for CT4, CT5, XT5.  They don't care about name brand being built up.  They might be thinking V is desirable, so if they have $40k V cars they will get sales volume.  

    I am surprised all SUVs aren't called Escalade Sport, Escalade Imaj, Escalade Evoq, etc

    Big talk about naming schemes when your favorite brand has used a hodgepodge of different lettering schemes for decades now. 

     

    Not disagreeing about Cadillac dumping names for letters but let’s keep things in perspective here. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    35 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    Big talk about naming schemes when your favorite brand has used a hodgepodge of different lettering schemes for decades now. 

     

    Not disagreeing about Cadillac dumping names for letters but let’s keep things in perspective here. 

    SL for 65  years

    S-class 47 years

    G-wagen for 40 years

    E-class 26 years

    Pretty consistent there, the suv names are new but the suv craze is new.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    SL for 65  years

    S-class 47 years

    G-wagen for 40 years

    E-class 26 years

    Pretty consistent there, the suv names are new but the suv craze is new.

    Nice cherry picking there. Want to try that with their CUVs now? Actually, I’ll take care of it. Here’s the explanation straight from Mercedes themselves. 

    https://www.mbhuntington.com/mercedes-benz-model-names-explained/

     

    just sayin’, glass houses man. Glass houses. 

    Edited by surreal1272
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    SL for 65  years

    S-class 47 years

    G-wagen for 40 years

    E-class 26 years

    Pretty consistent there, the suv names are new but the suv craze is new.

    Try again, S-Class has only been since 1993.    Yes, they had cars in those segments prior to those years, but they were not Sxxx until that point. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, surreal1272 said:

    What do you mean? Cadillac and the lack of names or Mercedes never having names?

    SMK keeping things in perspective 

    Edited by balthazar
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Try again, S-Class has only been since 1993.    Yes, they had cars in those segments prior to those years, but they were not Sxxx until that point. 

    While we're setting the record straight, the xxxS / Sxxx wasn't in the luxury segment until the 1990s; it was just a run-of-the-mill family sedan prior to. Like a Plymouth.

    EDIT :: I take it back- you could get better in a Plymouth (1965 here). Whew- look at those MB door panels! ~ 

    Screen Shot 2019-06-07 at 12.20.03 AM.png

    Edited by balthazar
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, balthazar said:

    While we're setting the record straight, the xxxS / Sxxx wasn't in the luxury segment until the 1990s; it was just a run-of-the-mill family sedan prior to. Like a Plymouth.

    EDIT :: I take it back- you could get better in a Plymouth (1965 here). Whew- look at those MB door panels! ~ 

    Screen Shot 2019-06-07 at 12.20.03 AM.png

    I'll tell you this...

    The USA is a high cost country. You cannot design, engineer and make cars in a high cost ####ry while trying to be a value leader in the automotive industry. You can bean count all you want; you'll still lose the affordable end of the market to cheap imports and your bean counted products still won't sell as luxury exports. That was GM and the other US manufacturer's folly in the 80s and 90s.

    USA manufacturers, operating in a high cost country, can be a Porsche, a BMW, a Mercedes, a Rolls-Royce or a Ferrari, but they cannot be a Hyundai or a Geely. This necessarily means that they MUST shed marketshare and focus on the premium end of the industry. It's very simple logic, but one which nobody seems to understand for decades.

    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The only work-around there is if your higher end lines subsidize your lower end models… but from a business case scenario it makes no sense. Why do all the investment/work with no ROI? Yeah; there a couple of reasons, such as filling production capacity, but its still just 'busy work'.

    Edited by balthazar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, balthazar said:

    The only work-around there is if your higher end lines subsidize your lower end models… but from a business case scenario it makes no sense. Why do all the investment/work with no ROI? Yeah; there a couple of reasons, such as filling production capacity, but its still just 'busy work'.

    Why would you want that? Just reduce capacity, sell less and make more money! The point of any business is to make money. It is not to make a lot of things. Profitability is king. Profitability was why Porsche ALMOST got rich enough to take over Volkswagen. In the end they over stretched and got reverse swallowed, but the fact that a 250,000 car manufacturer was even in a position to buy a 10,000,000 car conglomerate 40x its size serves well to illustrate the point.

    As far as economies of scale, once you get to a certain volume, there is practically no difference in your unit costs. GM sells about 3,000,000 cars whereas Mazda sells about 300,000 cars. But, the amount of money each manufacturer will have to pay for an alternator, a spark plug or an upholstered seat is for all intents and purposes about the same.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Try again, S-Class has only been since 1993.    Yes, they had cars in those segments prior to those years, but they were not Sxxx until that point. 

    They had a 1972 450SEL, they called S-class.  Doesn’t matter if the S was a true end or the front.  The 300SL is still and SL.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, dwightlooi said:

    I'll tell you this...

    The USA is a high cost country. You cannot design, engineer and make cars in a high cost ####ry while trying to be a value leader in the automotive industry. You can bean count all you want; you'll still lose the affordable end of the market to cheap imports and your bean counted products still won't sell as luxury exports. That was GM and the other US manufacturer's folly in the 80s and 90s.

    USA manufacturers, operating in a high cost country, can be a Porsche, a BMW, a Mercedes, a Rolls-Royce or a Ferrari, but they cannot be a Hyundai or a Geely. This necessarily means that they MUST shed marketshare and focus on the premium end of the industry. It's very simple logic, but one which nobody seems to understand for decades.

    Toyota builds most of their cars in the USA, and the others in Japan with even higher costs.  They seem to have figured it out.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, dwightlooi said:

    Why would you want that? Just reduce capacity, sell less and make more money! The point of any business is to make money. It is not to make a lot of things. Profitability is king.

    I agree, but in a manufacturing industry there are a myriad of conditions that have some degree of bottom line/cost. Union contracts and plant costs, raw material contracts which MAY make balance sheet sense to go ahead and put into production than stockpile/ get NO revenue from.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    I agree, but in a manufacturing industry there are a myriad of conditions that have some degree of bottom line/cost. Union contracts and plant costs, raw material contracts which MAY make balance sheet sense to go ahead and put into production than stockpile/ get NO revenue from.

    There are two alternatives...

    (1) You eliminate all wage floors, taxes, regulations, social safety nets and everything else and have absolute capitalism and zero immigration control. In that case, US workers will be able to match 50 cents an hour wages if they have to and if demand and supply allows it. Absolute and comparative advantages that you learned in economics 101 applies again because labor efficiency is measured in man-hours not dollars.

    (2) You tariff the hell out of imports to eliminate any price advantage they enjoy from being in a lower cost country. But, we have done the opposite because our leaders have NEVER represented the interest of the country, just the interest of their Globalist corporate donors.

    Let me give you an example. The EU is a net exporter of cars, the USA is a net importer of cars. Why? Is it because they make better cars or their workers do a better job? Or is it, at least in part, because EU tariffs US car exports to the EU at 10%, whereas the US tariffs EU cars only at 2.5%?

    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wasn’t talking about production WRT immigration, merely within the OEMs POV. 

    But agree with you in principle, i don’t understand advocating against instilling the same policies other trade partners do against you. Pretty sure that makes me an ‘anti-redistributionist’.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Gotta love “I love choice as long as you choose us” mantra of some folks.

     

    Its like it’s your choice to go or not to go to church so long as choose going to church. 

     

    And I swore we were done with this idiotic tariff discussion yesterday. Guess some folks just can’t let go of things. Must be a pitiful life. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Back to the topic... my opinion is VERY SIMPLE:-

    • 320hp CT4-V and 355hp CT5-V should where the V/ previously used on the VSport models.
    • The high performance CT4-V and CT5-V can wear the V# used on the current CTS-V and ATS-V cars.
    • Cadillac can call both V/ and V# cars CTS-V models
    • This will not hurt the CTS-V brand, it'll be subtle yet very easy to differential by anyone who cares.

    I also believe that a 420 hp version of the 2.7T four banger is the one engine GM really stands to benefit from across the greatest number of models, and that it is EASILY attainable.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    38 minutes ago, dwightlooi said:

    Back to the topic... my opinion is VERY SIMPLE:-

    • 320hp CT4-V and 355hp CT5-V should where the V/ previously used on the VSport models.
    • The high performance CT4-V and CT5-V can wear the V# used on the current CTS-V and ATS-V cars.
    • Cadillac can call both V/ and V# cars CTS-V models
    • This will not hurt the CTS-V brand, it'll be subtle yet very easy to differential by anyone who cares.

    I also believe that a 420 hp version of the 2.7T four banger is the one engine GM really stands to benefit from across the greatest number of models, and that it is EASILY attainable.

    So which vehicle would you put that 2.7T 4cyl in, other than the CT4 and CT5?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 6/1/2019 at 6:49 PM, NINETY EIGHT REGENCY said:

    I have looked at the video and studied these two cars. These are my thoughts only...

    GM clearly has not fixed Cadillac. There is a huge problem. I thought about the changes in the lineup.  All they did was drop XTS and replace it with XT6 crossover because this is what sells. XT6 just like XTS appeals to the same segment of buyers. 

    They replaced CTS and ATS. They said that was not happening. They did. They go by different names( CT4 and CT5). They have three sedans instead of four.  XTS was too close to CT6 and put the squeeze on CTS. At least XTS had a bigger trunk unlike the small trunk on CT6.  They still have not fixed the fundamental problems of the CTS and ATS. I checked out the dimensions on the CT4. It is as big as a downsized 1986 Buick Riviera.  They at least got the c pillar right on CT4.

    They still clearly have not let this Euro aspiration thing go.  They need to stop being ashamed who they they are,  and use the heritage and history to rebuild Cadillac.  GM has the strong heritage and does not use it to rebuild the entire company.

    It is like John Mc Elroy from Autoline said:  GM is shrinking its foot print globally for the next down turn. They want to act like a smaller company, but they do not realize they are still a large company.  They are smaller globally:  No presence in Europe, and have left countries they were not selling. That is a good move, but you have got to invest in your brands. GM is scared to take chances and it shows. They cannot depend on China. They need a: Ed Welburn, a Harley Earl, or a Bill Mitchell, a Wayne Cherry, or Chuck Jordan to lead design.

    Looking Back on GM’s Six Past Design Chiefs

    https://www.automobilemag.com/news/looking-back-gms-six-design-chiefs/

    The Cadillac crest needs revision. I at first thought with the guy that was working for Cadillac whose first name starts with a U who left recently was changing it, that maybe it was a good idea. I do not think so now. It does not say luxury or stand out any longer. It is no different than a Chevrolet emblem.  You could put Chevrolet emblems on these two cars and they could pass for Chevrolets. That Cadillac emblem/ crest is missing something.  Even the one from the 1950's said "luxury" 

    They need to bring the wreath back or the V or make them emblem more detailed.  Right now it does not say luxury. It says "cheap or mass market"

    It is sad when a company favors Chevrolet for everything and it shows. Too many brands have suffered because of Chevrolet. People thought oh, kill brands and it will solve the problem. It has not and GM still is doing the same thing and making the same mistakes. This is getting old. They did not give Oldsmobile this much time to turn around. That was unfair. 

    GM should engineer top down and not bottom up. What is good enough for Chevrolet is not good enough for the rest of GM. They should invest and change how they think. 

    The people who post here know what Cadillac is. GM does not know.  Cadillac is majestic. It is stately. It is luxury. It stands apart. It has features you should not find on Chevrolet. It has styling to stay you have arrived. 

    CT6 is a good start, but it is not complete. That c pillar on that car does not say Cadillac. It says Toyota, Audi or other six window design c- pillar cars.  You look at CT5, you do not immediately think Cadillac. You think Saturn or Chevrolet. It should not be that way. Cadillac needs to lay off all that black trim. Again.. it says cheap.  

    They have taken the Escala concept styling and put it on the  CT4( small) the CT5( medium) and the CT6( large).  That philosophy does not work. That is what BMW does. BMW is in trouble right now too. 

    If Pontiac was here and they said these two cars were Pontiac, no one would have an issue because that is what they would expect from Pontiac.  If they said they were Holden, no one would have an issue. 

    When you look at Cadillac, you should want to own it or drive it.  It should be nice to look at. The only vehicle that has stayed true to Cadillac's mission is Escalade. They need to look at that vehicle and build on that. They need to learn who they are again.

    They need to start using real names. The letter and number thing is not working.  Just stop. 

    I am just expressing how I feel. I do not work at GM, but it is clear to the outside what needs to happen to fix Cadillac. 

    I want GM and Cadillac to be great again. What will it take?  What must happen? 

     

     

     

     

     

    Can anybody tell me the difference between today's Cadillac from all other luxury makes?  As in a unique selling point.  SuperCruise is great but Cadillac needs a clear identity that a ten-year-old would recognize.  Escalade truly fills the bill, while the XT CUVs do fall short.  The sedans do need to stop trying to be German.  Neither Lexus nor Acura made that infuriating error.  Luxury car buyers are not going to ditch the Germans or Lexus if Cadillac is not true to itself.  Ideally, Cadillac would have its OWN design studio AND its own factory so that GM can make Cadillac vehicles, not share facilities with the others.  Cadillac needs its own leadership who understands what Cadillac is and proceed accordingly.  Sometimes that means telling the CEO NO to stupid bean counting moves that hurt the vehicle more than its helps the bottom line.  In fact, Cadillac should return to names so that it can be a true All-American luxury make (the alphanumeric designations belong to Germany ---- send those back).  At a time when a lot of people are pushing for a clear identity, why can't GM in general (and Cadillac in particular) push for an all-American identity that can bring pride to its owners, not just mere badge snobbery?

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree with Riviera that Cadillac needs identity.  But Cadillac right now reminds me more of Chevy.  The design language inside and out screams Chevy, all their SUVs are based on Chevys as well.  I can’t remember a time that Cadillac design seems so close to Chevy since maybe the dark days of the mid 80s.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It is NOT that Cadillac doesn't have an identity. It is that its identity keeps changing!

    Through the 90s, Cadillacs were comfort barges just like every other American luxury marque.

    Then Cadillacs were the High Value Luxury with stupid cars like the BTS followed by the CTS

    Then Cadillacs were the Performance Luxury with the ATS and 3rd Gen CTS

    Now, Cadillacs are the balanced luxury -- a mixture of above average performance with above average comfort for above average value.

    It should have been very simple for GM -- Buick is Comfort Luxury to take on Lexus and serve Chinese likings, Caddy is Performance Luxury to beat BMW. But GM's wavering has complicated their own game.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, riviera74 said:

    So which vehicle would you put that 2.7T 4cyl in, other than the CT4 and CT5?

    420 hp @ 5,300 rpm, 420 lb-ft @ 2,200~5,200 rpm goes a long way and is really a sweet spot for performance vehicles particularly so when its from a four banger.

    • XT4-V# *
    • XT5-V/ *
    • XT6-V/ *
    • CT6-V/ *
    • Escalade (as the base engine)
    • Camaro RS
    • Buick Regal GNX *
    • Silverado Z71
    • GMC Terrain Denali R *
    • GMC Acadia Denali R *

    * AWD w/ Ford 8F57 8-speed Automatic transmission

    Edited by dwightlooi
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @riviera74, @NINETY EIGHT REGENCY, @smk4565, @dwightlooi ~ ALL the above premises are erroneous.

    >>"Can anybody tell me the difference between today's Cadillac from all other luxury makes?"<<
    If you can answer how Audi/BMW/mercedes/lexus are different than all other luxury makes, you can answer the same for Cadillac.
    >>"The sedans do need to stop trying to be German."<<
    They're not; it was the Germans who became distinctly American, then eclipsed Cadillac in many instances. This was a clear targeting/copying, and they did a good job by the '90s, but prior to they weren't even on the same field.
    >>"
    Not everyone agrees the V-series is what Cadillac needs, though. Cadillac super cars “answer a question the world wasn't asking,”"<<
    Wow, an issue "not everyone" agrees on? We're still on Earth, correct? "Not everyone" agrees with anything you care to mention, especially within the automotive industry.
    >>"I agree with Riviera that Cadillac needs identity."<<
    It has as much as any other luxury brand, with a richer heritage.
    >>"It is NOT that Cadillac doesn't have an identity. It is that its identity keeps changing!"<<
    It really hasn't in the 2000s. Prior to that, it was a near non-stop bemoaning of how out of step Cadillac was in the luxury field. They adjusted their course heading and now people want them to go back. 

    Where people fall into their own wormhole is their erroneous idea that Cadillac MUST be a singular, black & white, hard-line "definition"; a one-mission brand. I struggle to think of a multi-model mainstream brand that does this. I guess one might say ferrari or Lamborghini, tho ferrari's low point in the '80s is hard to 
    remedy with their before & after.

    Is Cadillac where I personally would advocate they be? Not exactly, but my perspective is highly unique. But it's from the vantage point that I can see the Overall Picture that people have cried out for 'Cadillac to go back to being Cadillac' with no Earthly idea how to define that or what that means.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    @riviera74, @NINETY EIGHT REGENCY, @smk4565, @dwightlooi ~ ALL the above premises are erroneous.
    Is Cadillac where I personally would advocate they be? Not exactly, but my perspective is highly unique. But it's from the vantage point that I can see the Overall Picture that people have cried out for 'Cadillac to go back to being Cadillac' with no Earthly idea how to define that or what that means. 

    "Highly unique" while being "average in many areas and outstanding in none" is an oxymoron.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, dwightlooi said:

     

    It should have been very simple for GM -- Buick is Comfort Luxury to take on Lexus and serve Chinese likings, Caddy is Performance Luxury to beat BMW. But GM's wavering has complicated their own game.

    But Chevrolet is the performance division of GM as proven by the fact that the Camaro and Corvette have better performance than any Cadillac.

    The gen 1 CTS was a good looking car, it stood out, looked nothing like any other GM product.  The XT6 looks like it was designed by the same person that designed the Blazer as do a lot of other Cadillacs.  

    Yes the identity keeps changing that is a big problem, the other problem is product as displayed by CT4 and CT5, and the 3rd problem is marketing.  They have 3 main issues and I don’t know if they can get 1 right let alone all 3.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I was at first against the reduction in power of the CT4/5-V.

    The German brands have expanded their M models and AMGs to no detriment to their high power options. I don’t think this has be different for Cadillac either.

    I like the CT4 quite a bit too.

    I think Cadillac in terms of non-crossovers really only lags in glitzy looking infotainment systems and model choice like coupes, or ultra luxury level cars above the CT6.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, Suaviloquent said:

    I was at first against the reduction in power of the CT4/5-V.

    The German brands have expanded their M models and AMGs to no detriment to their high power options. I don’t think this has be different for Cadillac either.

    I like the CT4 quite a bit too.

    I think Cadillac in terms of non-crossovers really only lags in glitzy looking infotainment systems and model choice like coupes, or ultra luxury level cars above the CT6.

    There is nothing wrong with a 355hp CT5 or a 320 hp CT4. But why give them the full CT5-V and CT4-V badging? As I said they could have used the old V/ badge from the VSport without calling them VSports.

    VSport.jpg

    Edited by dwightlooi
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Good grief. I’m a bit mystified by the lettering change but I’m not going to harp on it for three pages until more details come out regarding other trim options. Who knows? There might actually be a semi good reason for it. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, dwightlooi said:

    "Highly unique" while being "average in many areas and outstanding in none" is an oxymoron.

    I didn't say Cadillac was highly unique. Then again, none of the other luxury players are either. 

    Or were you saying I was 'average in many/outstanding in none'? 

    Edited by balthazar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    But Chevrolet is the performance division of GM as proven by...

    It matters not at all that Cadillac & Chevrolet are both under General Motors. This is where you continually trip yourself up. 'General Motors' is a far secondary to Cadillac and Chevrolet. Just like when Buick & Olds & Chevy & Pontiac all had mid-6 liter V8 muscle cars selling near 100K per year ('66 GTO) and pulling down a 54% market share, there is literally no reason 2 (or 3 or 4) brands cannot have performance cars. None. VW has Lambo, bugatti & porsche under the same corporate letterhead- where's the outcry there? Don't all 3 have some excellent performance cars; which is the "performance division" of VW?? Full-fledged & blatant hypocrisy.

    It's exactly like saying only one division should have CUVs, and you've actually said the complete opposite there.

    Edited by balthazar
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Or were you saying I was 'average in many/outstanding in none'? 

    That...that right there...would be me.

    Got you beat by a mile! 

    @smk4565

    I wanted to respond to that Chevy is GM's performance rant of yours...but I got bored writing it all up...I guess @balthazar took care of it anyway...and I wrote it EXACTLY how he put it...  Its awesome!!!  And Im impressed with myself...you know....the whole Im average in many/outstanding in none thing...

    But since he did not mention the one thing that I wanted to...Ill do it now.  All of a sudden, I got some excitement again in me.

    OK...

    Chevrolet has no high performance SEDANS anymore...and that is worldwide too.  Chevrolet has got ONLY 2 two door coupe sports cars...1 that seats 4...more or less, and the other that only seats 2.  

    Cadillac...yeah...Cadillac...I did say Cadillac, right? So as we dont confuse Chevrolet with Cadillac and sedans with coupes.

    Cadillac....has got 3 high performance SEDANS and NO high performance coupes for sale. 

    So...although, like I wanted to say, but Balthy said it anyway...there is NO reason why even BUICK cannot sell high performance stuff under the GM umbrella...but as it stands NOW...Chevrolet and Cadillac dont even sell the same high performance shyte...

    And while the way the market has shifted lately, I dont think Chevy is hurting without the SS 4 door, and I dont think Cadillac is going to hurt without having a 2 seat sports car in their line-up.   

    Cadillac is hurting not having a PERSONAL COUPE and CONVERTIBLE though.  And the PERSONAL COUPE thing need NOT be a car. It could also be a 4 door fastback CUV  type thingy... an IMPOSING... "get the phoque outta my way I have arrived" type personal CUV thing. One that even outdoes the Escalade in the "get the phoque outta my way I have arrived" category. 

    It could be as big as the Escalade or it could be as big as the XT6...but it needs one.

    And to answer Balthy's respoonse above about how one perceives what Cadillac lacks.

    Ive been whining about Cadillac longer than all of of you...

    But there is always ONE thing that I always say...

    And yes...its to go back to what they are known for. 

    And that is ARROGANT, IMPOSING, IN YOUR FACE LUXURY the ONLY way Cadillac and AMERICA knows how...

    Lincoln is kinda doing it...but the Continental was a bust, because it truly was NOT an imposing, in your face American luxury car....

    But Cadillac could CERTAINLY do high performance. SHYTE...they've been doing it BETTER than the Germans...And I wouldnt worry too much about these new V cars...there is more to come...

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    It matters not at all that Cadillac & Chevrolet are both under General Motors. This is where you continually trip yourself up. 'General Motors' is a far secondary to Cadillac and Chevrolet. Just like when Buick & Olds & Chevy & Pontiac all had mid-6 liter V8 muscle cars selling near 100K per year ('66 GTO) and pulling down a 54% market share, there is literally no reason 2 (or 3 or 4) brands cannot have performance cars. None. VW has Lambo, bugatti & porsche under the same corporate letterhead- where's the outcry there? Don't all 3 have some excellent performance cars; which is the "performance division" of VW?? Full-fledged & blatant hypocrisy.

    It's exactly like saying only one division should have CUVs, and you've actually said the complete opposite there.

    2 brand can have performance cars, but Cadillac should have the best performance cars at GM, then work your way down to the others.  

    To use the VW example, Bugatti is $1 million plus, Lamborghini is $250k-$500k or whatever they cost, Porsche is $50k-$250k (baring a one off Carrera GT or 918 Hybrid).   Throw in Audi if you want but the R8 is not as fast as a Huracan and their SUVs or A8 aren't as fast as a Cayenne or Panamera.  They keep things in levels, it makes sense what they do.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Plastic cladding = off road.  Instead of killing the Sonata, they should just put plastic body cladding down the side and raise the price by $10k and call it the Sonata HD Overlander X.  Instant hit.
    • Considering a planet with 8 Billion and he sold almost 2 million cars, then he is covering .025% of the population compared to other auto companies. I think 2024 going into 2025 we will see other auto companies top Tesla. You and I are two peas in a pod as I also was up on a hill watching the implosion and thinking what a waste as it was a great building. I love the Kingdome and hate the new stadium.  Agree it was surreal to see the ship hit the support pillar and the whole building just collapse. Be interesting to see what replaces it as today bridges built like that are not allowed due to the exact nature of how it collapsed.  Yes, Tesla is a love or hate and the minimalist approach is not for everyone. I honestly have to agree with the comment @smk4565 I believe made that the touch screen only will be the future of cheap autos and switches and buttons will be the higher end autos. Interesting times we live in for sure.
    • Decent upgrade to the aging 2024 model. Nice to see they are reducing costs of the curved screen in the EVs by pushing it out across the Hyundai Family and into Kia. The one thing I do not like is all the Chrome. 🤢 🤮
    • Today at the New York International Auto Show, Hyundai unveiled an update to its little truck, the Hyundai Santa Cruz. The refresh to the exterior is relatively mild, though it features a more menacing grille with bolder verticle lines.  Updated running lights and new wheel designs add to the fresher look. Inside, there is a new steering wheel, infotainment system, and instrument panel. on upper trims, an optional panoramic curved display houses dual 12.3-inch displays for driver and entertainment. The plenty-capable powertrains carry over with either a 191-horsepower direct injected 2.5-liter 4-cylinder or a turbo-charged version of of the same engine with 281 horsepower.  The transmission for the entry-level engine is a traditional 8-speed automatic, while the turbo-charged model gets an 8-speed dual-clutch transmission. Santa Cruzes with the turbo engine gain a new tow mode for enhanced towing control.  Both powertrains are towing capable with a 3,500 lb rating for the entry engine and a stout 5,000 lb rating for the turbo models when equipped with all-wheel drive. New for 2025 is an XRT trim geared even more towards outdoor adventure. It features a trim-specific front fascia and grille, special 18-inch wheels with all-terrain tires, an increased approach angle, front tow hooks, and surround-view monitoring.    The 2025 Hyundai Santa Cruz goes on sale this summer. View full article
    • Regarding Tesla - it's either love or hate with these vehicles.  A college friend I'll be seeing when in SoCal next month has 2 of them, and I'll probably be riding in both of them - one is his sleeker S model and I forgot which the other one (that his wife drives) is.  In certain places, people have a lot of disposable income and having a Tesla goes with the landscape. Minimalist(ic) isn't necessarily bad.  We all remember the adage "less is more."  I'll vouch that the workmanship of the interior is good and I can also vouch that the overall look (including the centered everything on one display) is ugly.  I will say that EV motors are supposed to last a long time but the battery replacement is very expensive and the range is currently not that optimal. I did not like the model Y I had for less than 1 day.  Also, its exterior is mostly ugly.  That's my opinion. This isn't a discussion I want to get into.  I would much prefer a more user-friendly EV ... and not just yet. - - - - - What I was randomly going to say: I'm not sure whether I'm in shock or still feeling surreal as to what happened in Baltimore.  At first, I thought a ship just hit something on a bridge.  Then I saw the footage and that's the surreal part ... the domino-like collapse of the entire structure and the size of the ship.  I remember having to figure out the forces of either tension or compression on each member of a truss-like structure when I was in school.   A group of us sat there for about 3 or 4 hours one night - with some Mountain Dew - to work that out. I don't believe I've been on that bridge since it's on the outer beltway, but it's numbered as part of the U.S. interstate system.  From looking at the map, it is the major bridge on the entrance to/exit from Baltimore Harbor.  I hope they find the 6 individuals who were working on it fixing potholes in the middle of the night who fell down with the bridge.  The ship giving a mayday is what allowed them to shut down both approaches to the bridge just in time.   The weird thing is that it happened on March 26.  IIRC, the deliberate (domino-like) implosion of the reinforced concrete Kingdome in Seattle happened on March 26, 2000 (no rain that day) and people were sitting on slopes overlooking downtown to see that happen.  But that's how it is with planned implosions.  I went there that morning and have photos of the Kingdome's last day somewhere. https://www.seahawks.com/video/kingdome-implosion-hd It was indeed March 26, 2000.  I was one of the few who liked the Kingdome.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings