Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    Chrysler Voyager To Replace Dodge Grand Caravan

      ...End of the line for the famous Grand Caravan...

    The Dodge Caravan is one of the vehicles that helped saved Chrysler Corporation in the 1980s. Introduced in November 1983, the Caravan, along with the Plymouth Voyager, was based on the K-Car platform championed by Lee Iaccoca.  Chrysler recently re-introduced the Voyager under the Chrysler brand as the low cost entry into the minivan market. The Voyager is a low cost version of the Chrysler Pacifica Minivan that was introduced in 2016.  Dodge continued production of the Grand Caravan as the low-cost model while the Pacifica aims for higher end customers.

    CH020_001VRlcahk651174a2cjo8he31honqk.jpgThe Voyager, starting at $26,958, will come in three trims, L, LX, and LXi, the last one reserved for fleet buyers. Chrysler has previously taken this two-prong approach of Voyager being the value option and Town & Country being the premium offering during the 2001 - 2007 time frame. Voyager production begins in August 2019 at Chrysler's Windsor Ontario plant and will run alongside the Grand Caravan for now.

    If you're looking for a Grand Caravan, you have some time left.  The Grand Caravan is scheduled to go out of production in May 2020. 


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    So, if I’m reading this right, the Voyager will be the same body style as the Pacifica? 

     

    Why doesn’t FCA just come out and say “We really don’t give two farts about Dodge and it’s survival”?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    So, if I’m reading this right, the Voyager will be the same body style as the Pacifica? 

     

    Why doesn’t FCA just come out and say “We really don’t give two farts about Dodge and it’s survival”?

    The picture of the blue minivan in the article is the Voyager. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The picture of the blue minivan in the article is the Voyager. 

    That’s what I thought. I get the Chrysler strategy behind this but abandoning the Caravan seems like a harbinger of things to come for Dodge. Absolutely no new product in the pipeline outside of just talk from FCA. That’s damn near criminal. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I really have to wonder if if Kia will keep making the Sedona based on the sales figures of less than 20k a year in the US, especially now that they have what appears to be a very popular three row CUV.

     

     

     

     

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    45 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    That’s what I thought. I get the Chrysler strategy behind this but abandoning the Caravan seems like a harbinger of things to come for Dodge. Absolutely no new product in the pipeline outside of just talk from FCA. That’s damn near criminal. 

    Wouldn’t surprise me if the next gen Durango becomes a Chrysler Aspen.  I have no idea what they are doing but to make the Caravan until May 2020 when production of this generation started in 2007 is pretty nuts.

    I don’t get why you creat a new model to advertise when it is the same as the Pacifica for $4k less.  

    What Chrysler should have done is decontented the Pacifica and stripped it down and then charged $20k more for it like Porsche does.   A 2 seat Pacifica Superlegerra with no carpeting or stereo would be money.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sometimes I feel that Fiat knows less about American market product than Daimler did. Daimler at least flooded the product pipeline and was very forward looking with crossovers and new concepts - maybe they were a little too early. Daimler's problem was that they thought American product ought to be done as cheaply as possible - damn styling and interior quality. Fiat on the other hand will put a lot of capital in just a few products - but their brand strategy is very confusing and diluted. In either scenario, I'm not sure the guys at Auburn Hills ever have much say. 93-99 was really the golden era and will never return.

    • Sad 2
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Wouldn’t surprise me if the next gen Durango becomes a Chrysler Aspen.  I have no idea what they are doing but to make the Caravan until May 2020 when production of this generation started in 2007 is pretty nuts.

    I don’t get why you creat a new model to advertise when it is the same as the Pacifica for $4k less.  

    What Chrysler should have done is decontented the Pacifica and stripped it down and then charged $20k more for it like Porsche does.   A 2 seat Pacifica Superlegerra with no carpeting or stereo would be money.

    The Chrysler Voyager should be $10K less to start, not $4K.  The 2-seat Pacifica Superlegerra is SO NOT CHRYSLER.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The next generation Durango is going to be a Jeep Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer.

    True, and the 300 is supposed to die so Chrysler will be a brand with 2 minivans?  And no other product?   Doesn’t seem like a good business model.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    True, and the 300 is supposed to die so Chrysler will be a brand with 2 minivans?  And no other product?   Doesn’t seem like a good business model.

    Since Ram and Jeep are so strong, they can support two small brands (if they jettison the walking dead Italian brands). 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The solution to saving Chrysler is clear to anyone who isn't actually at Chrysler. 

    Take the Pacifica platform and build premuim crossovers out of it. 

    Build a premium crossover out of the Cherokee.

     

    Notice I didn't say full luxury, but at least take on Buick and some of Lincoln (though I think Lincoln is moving up fast in the world)

    • Agree 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The solution to saving Chrysler is clear to anyone who isn't actually at Chrysler. 

    Take the Pacifica platform and build premuim crossovers out of it. 

    Build a premium crossover out of the Cherokee.

     

    Notice I didn't say full luxury, but at least take on Buick and some of Lincoln (though I think Lincoln is moving up fast in the world)

    All true.  Too bad GM will not do the right thing and make Cadillac take on RR/Bentley while Buick takes on MB/BMW/Audi/Lexus.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The solution to saving Chrysler is clear to anyone who isn't actually at Chrysler. 

    Take the Pacifica platform and build premuim crossovers out of it. 

    Build a premium crossover out of the Cherokee.

     

    Notice I didn't say full luxury, but at least take on Buick and some of Lincoln (though I think Lincoln is moving up fast in the world)

    Couldn’t they use the Georgio platform for crossovers?  

    I don’t think it is as simple as give Chrysler crossovers however.  Most of Jeep’s and Alfa’s crossovers are down this year, the market is shrinking and everyone else has 6-7 crossovers per brand.  

    I don’t think a Pacifica based crossover would make any dent in the market, although it would be a better idea than trying to sell the Voyager and current Journey and 300.

    1 hour ago, riviera74 said:

    All true.  Too bad GM will not do the right thing and make Cadillac take on RR/Bentley while Buick takes on MB/BMW/Audi/Lexus.

    Cadillac can’t even take on Mercedes/Lexus, how is Buick supposed to?   

    Buick will probably become an SUV only brand in the USA, leaving Cadillac as the only sedan options above the Malibu at GM when the Impala dies.  The CT4 will probably start at $30k so you don’t really need a Buick sedan unless it is so cheap to  rebadge a Malibu into a Lacrosse then why not.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    Couldn’t they use the Georgio platform for crossovers?  

    I don’t think it is as simple as give Chrysler crossovers however.  Most of Jeep’s and Alfa’s crossovers are down this year, the market is shrinking and everyone else has 6-7 crossovers per brand.  

    I don’t think a Pacifica based crossover would make any dent in the market, although it would be a better idea than trying to sell the Voyager and current Journey and 300.

    Big, people mover, crossovers are in right now and FCA only has one, the Durango.  A Pacifica based one would compete with the upper end Pilots, Traverse High Country, and Buick Enclave.  Probably the Palisade and Telluride as well. It would bring in $$$$

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Big, people mover, crossovers are in right now and FCA only has one, the Durango.  A Pacifica based one would compete with the upper end Pilots, Traverse High Country, and Buick Enclave.  Probably the Palisade and Telluride as well. It would bring in $$$$

    Daimler tried that with the original Pacifica that was a 6 seat crossover (sort of crossover) and the full size Aspen.  And both got killed off after 1 generation.  

    The problem is I don’t think many people want a Chrysler SUV when they can buy a more reliable Honda or Toyota product or buy a Hyundai/Kia with a better warranty, or a rwd based Explorer or the other 10 SUVs in that segment.  Chrysler does nothing well to steal buyers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/24/2019 at 11:38 AM, Drew Dowdell said:

    The picture of the blue minivan in the article is the Voyager. 

    ............................ isn't that a Pacifica?  With the Chrysler logo/wings on it?!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/24/2019 at 5:52 PM, Robert Hall said:

    If the Dodge brand is still around in 5 years, it will just be the Charger and Challenger I suspect. 

    Riding on the same LX platform.... 😉 

    Not that it is a bad thing though......

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    37 minutes ago, Paolino said:

    ............................ isn't that a Pacifica?  With the Chrysler logo/wings on it?!

    Voyager is just the lowest trim of a Pacifica. They use the same body.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Voyager is just the lowest trim of a Pacifica. They use the same body.

    Kinda wish it was different  somehow....

    My guess is that it is keeping those shifts running with something they can lease special.....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, daves87rs said:

    Kinda wish it was different  somehow....

    My guess is that it is keeping those shifts running with something they can lease special.....

    The Pacifica had those trims before.  They're just separating the lower end trims from the Pacifica.  They are dropping the base price by about $2,000, so I'm sure some content is coming out of it. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    It'll still be there. 

    Be cool if they do a Hybrid Sport as well as their current normal one. Have two different programmings so you can choose spirited driving or ultimate efficiency.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/26/2019 at 9:01 AM, Drew Dowdell said:

    The Pacifica had those trims before.  They're just separating the lower end trims from the Pacifica.  They are dropping the base price by about $2,000, so I'm sure some content is coming out of it. 

    One big thing I noticed was no stow and go. Bench seat could be okay, if it comes out easy.....

    Think it would be cool if they did something slight different with the voyager, like maybe giving it a sporty “expresso: package.....

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I am not aware of travel cases for internal drives. Usually you have the drive and once you have made sure you own static electricity is discharged on your body, open the computer and unplug the power cable and data cable to the HD. Then you unscrew the screws holding the drive in. Put the drive into an Anti-Static bag and then usually into a box that has foam padding on all sides to protect the drive and then tape it up to close it.  With both drives in their proper storage bags, you can then have both drives in between foam insulation for handling any dropping of the box, etc. Pack them in a box and tape shut, should then easily handle going through your carry on or checked in luggage. To ship a hard drive, you need to: Secure the hard drive in its original packaging or anti-static bag. If you don't have an anti-static bag, place the drive into a zipped freezer bag to prevent any moisture getting into the drive during transit. Sandwich the drive between foam or wrap it in bubble wrap to absorb any minor shocks. Put the hard drive in a padded shipping box. Close and seal the box. Label your package. Amazon.com : hard drive shipping box This is pretty much all you need.
    • Either a co-pilot first time landing or something truly went wrong on the plane.
    • The incoming rectangular lamps on many GM cars in that era made them much more attractive.  They made a big difference. Now, as far the powerplant went, the notion of 500 cubic inches was mindboggling even during the malaise era.  If you want to see someone's jaw drop, tell a European that their engines have 8200 cc or 8.2 liters.  For those who aren't driving the occasional Mustang or Camaro you see, they freak out at anything over 2,500 or 3,000 cc.
    • Thank you for the response. I want to reinstall them into the computers, especially the "newer" one.  The old one has been a real champ.   The reason for not leaving them in the desktop is that the basic tower might have to be transported ... and not by me.  That means it will be out of my possession for a while.  Since the HDs would be traveling with me, they'll have to get scanned through airport security a time or two.  I'm guessing that shouldn't mess with the data.   I've already backed up the C drive on several large 1 TB portable hard drives.  I don't want to touch the basic functions and files on the computers since I don't know how that all works.  I stay away from the drives and files I am not familiar with. I tend to donate other things to charity.   I did give the Regal I once owned to charity.   A good friend told me that, about a month or two later, he saw it being driven around the city by its new owner and we had a good laugh. This is what I want to do.  I'm just trying to figure out if the guy or gal at Office Depot can size a case based on looking up the unit and the HD in it.  Any ideas on that part?  Or should I do that and approximate the size and weight of the part to get the cases?
    • I'm wondering about a lot of things related to this.  I am sure that, sadly, the passengers inside were jolted.  This is way different from a rough landing. Why was it even necessary to do it?  What was going on at the airport property at that time?  How does one even pull this off?  I've seen some vids of where they barely touch and then go off again, but this one looks way more complicated.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings