Jump to content
Server Move In Progress - Read More ×
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: Chrysler's Future Lineup Is 'Under Re-evaluation'

      Changes Could Be Affoot for Chrysler's Future Lineup

    FCA's second five-year plan had some interesting products for Chrysler, including a new compact called the 100 due in 2016. But there could be some changes in store for Chrysler's lineup due to current situation in the market.

     

    Allpar reports that investor presentation mentioned that Chrysler's future lineup was “under re-evaluation”. Causes for the re-evaluation include fuel prices going down and are predicted to stay there for the next few years, the increasing popularity of crossovers, and the decline in small car sales.

     

    The original plan for Chrysler in the second five-year plan included,

    • Compact 100 sedan to be launched in 2016
    • Next-generation minivan to be launched in 2016, with a PHEV to follow a year later
    • New full-size crossover to be launched, with a PHEV in 2017
    • 200 sedan is refreshed in 2017
    • Midsize crossover is launched in 2018
    • Next-generation 300 is launched in 2018


    Allpar believes that the 100 might morph into a crossover, complementing the Fiat 500X and Jeep Renegade. But there could be the possibility of 100 being sold elsewhere in the world and not the U.S. and Canada. The midsize crossover is speculated to be the replacement for the Dodge Journey and is expected in the near future.

     

    Source: Allpar


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Yes. And this is how technology evolves.

     

    When hybrids and electric cars (or any alternative fuel/powered vehicle) become superior, they'll have faced waves after waves of competing cars that run on gas alone. And it seems like even with over a century of updates, there's more to come.

     

    The economy has come back, certainly not all the way, but inextricably gas has become cheaper when it doesn't make any sense. (Well it does if you do all your homework, but hey school's just started I can schmooze my way back. Got triple A. AAA. ye!!!!)

     

    I did a course this past term - it was about Science and technology.

     

    I loved the article about use-based histories of technology, not innovation based histotries. That at times reserve technologies fight back for relevance because (very quietly as well) they offer reliability or ease of use and ubiquitous understanding. Or how mechanisms of control on the previous technologies are sometimes transplanted onto the new ones or to achieve a similar result.

     

    For example - there's a very current debate to start taxing electric vehicles for the miles driven because they do not contribute to the fuel tax. It sets the story pretty clear - it seems like there will be no free lunch for any driver.

     

    What does this mean for Chrysler? 

     

    Well, aside from the looming CAFE updates, their biding of time with excellent transmissions and some forways with diesel is coming to an end, fast.

     

    This is a time where automakers have to respond quickly to disruptions in the marketplace, and they can come from anywhere. Pushing product back, if there aren't any modifications will lead to products quickly becoming obsolete. And fixing a product near the delivery date is extremely expensive.

     

    I hope, for the love of god that Marchionne uses the Ferrari money for things that will plant the seeds for a lot of future product for the money-making brands in the portfolio. Spending money to fix an uncompetitive Fiat at the expense of letting FCA US LLC brands slide would be very stupid.

     

    He'd be compared to Piech for empire-building if the plan doesn't work. On his side though are gifts from automotive heaven - cheap gas in the near term and the rest of the industry picking up the gasoline slack to produce even more hurdles for alternative vehicles.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Washington State and Oregon State both have a new tax plan. You can switch from paying your tabs and gas tax to a miles tax and have your car inspected once a year and they record the miles driven and you pay your tax then. 

     

    The benefit about Miles Tax over gas tax is that for those that use mass transit, hardly drive or have no car to drive you do not pay the tax or a very little tax and those that enjoy driving and drive lots pay for the wear n tear they put on the roads.

     

    This is from 2013 when the talk went on and the programs had not started yet but a good overview.

    http://www.opb.org/news/article/n3-washington-oregon-consider-mileage-based-road-tax/

     

    Here is an update on the program with specific figures on cost.

    http://www.krem.com/story/news/local/northwest/2014/12/10/cost-of-washingtons-pay-by-mile-program/20190527/

     

    Next step is for Insurance to charge by the mile driven. That is now available here in Washington.

    http://q13fox.com/2013/11/19/new-pay-per-mile-car-insurance-arrives-in-washington/

     

    Here is the coverage about the Oregon pay per mile program.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/07/03/oregon-launches-program-to-tax-drivers-by-mile.html

    http://gas2.org/2015/03/13/oregon-testing-orego-pay-per-mile-program/

     

    The actual Oregon Pay as you go web site for specific info on their pay per mile program.

    http://www.myorego.org/

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    First, Thanks both you and dfelt!

     

    Second, a sub 4000lb suv of that size even in "just" FWD form is fantastic! My Escape, I believe, tips the scales just a tad over 3800 with AWD and the damn panorama sunroof. So for something to grow in size that much and gain less than 200lbs is a job very well done, yet again, my the Mazda crew.  I like everything Mazda has done in the past 3ish years. They're the "drivers cars" of the common folk and put up fantastic economy numbers while doing so. Oh, and they are all the best looking in their respective classes, IMO. I don't know about the interior comparisons as I haven't been in one, let alone all of the competition for a comparison.

     

    The very latest generation of Mazdas have fantastic FANTASTIC interiors.  The CX-3 far far exceeds it's class and would put an Audi Q3 to shame.  Easily best in class.

     

    I sat in the new CX-9 in LA and it is every bit as good as these press photos suggest.

     

     

     

    Drew, is that nav screen move up and down into the dash? Looks like it could.

     

     

    Reply back from Mazda - The NAV screen does not retract into the dash.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Yup, yup, yup.

     

    It is about as difficult, if not more than trying to build a diesel engine without exhaust after-treatment to comply with U.S. emissions regulations.

     

    But it's the key to unlocking an new wave of efficiency for gas engines.

     

    It might permanently make diesels irrelevant for passenger vehicles. 

     

     

    Indeed.... the key is that an HCCI engine cannot run in that mode all the time.  It only runs in HCCI mode under light loads... put too much fuel/air mixture into the cylinder and then things don't work right. The big issue GM was having when it was working on it back in the Saturn days was the transition from HCCI to normal spark ignition.  The engine worked fine in either mode, but it was the switching of modes that was less than graceful.   Even then, I think that Aura would only run in HCCI at stead speed from 35 - 55 mph, but don't quote me on that.

     

     

    Latest computer technology I believe will change the switch over problem. Just like the days of the V8-6-4 engine which was a disaster, it was before it's time of having the electronics, computer smarts to make it work best.

     

    Today, I would not be surprised if a V8-6-4 engine would work very well and smooth. Sadly emissions is a viable issue that needs to be addressed and I think HCCI engines with alternative fuels will be a stepping stone much like CNG towards the eventual day of pure EV auto's.

     

    I can see a day when a standardized electric cell will work on any auto and you just stop as an EV station and swap cells and continue on your way.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    Yup, yup, yup.

     

    It is about as difficult, if not more than trying to build a diesel engine without exhaust after-treatment to comply with U.S. emissions regulations.

     

    But it's the key to unlocking an new wave of efficiency for gas engines.

     

    It might permanently make diesels irrelevant for passenger vehicles. 

    I think Hyundai has been working on this for a few years at this point. No clue where/how the progress is at this point though. I just remember reading something on it quite awhile ago and I thought the idea was awesome. 

     

    Definitely make diesels irrelevant in passenger vehicles. I don't know what kind of energy difference there is between a given amount of diesel vs gasoline but if you can get diesel efficiency with gasoline prices, we're talking monster jump in the industry. 

     

     

    Well, it's not not going to go into HD trucks, it doesn't have the torque.  Overall, the power characteristics of the engine don't change, because anything above light throttle and it switches back to being a conventional engine.   The only advantage is in fuel savings during light load times.... You'd get fantastic highway fuel economy, but city would be the same as any other conventional gasoline engine of the same size and features since that's when you're into the throttle most often. 

     

     

    Wonder how this engine might work in a Hybrid style of auto for long distant road trips. Have electric for city driving and an HCCI engine for road trips and recharging of the battery pack.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

    First, Thanks both you and dfelt!

     

    Second, a sub 4000lb suv of that size even in "just" FWD form is fantastic! My Escape, I believe, tips the scales just a tad over 3800 with AWD and the damn panorama sunroof. So for something to grow in size that much and gain less than 200lbs is a job very well done, yet again, my the Mazda crew.  I like everything Mazda has done in the past 3ish years. They're the "drivers cars" of the common folk and put up fantastic economy numbers while doing so. Oh, and they are all the best looking in their respective classes, IMO. I don't know about the interior comparisons as I haven't been in one, let alone all of the competition for a comparison.

     

    The very latest generation of Mazdas have fantastic FANTASTIC interiors.  The CX-3 far far exceeds it's class and would put an Audi Q3 to shame.  Easily best in class.

     

    I sat in the new CX-9 in LA and it is every bit as good as these press photos suggest.

     

     

     

    Drew, is that nav screen move up and down into the dash? Looks like it could.

     

     

    Reply back from Mazda - The NAV screen does not retract into the dash.

     

     

    Bummer that would give it a very clean look when the end user did not want the nav / screen use.

     

    Much appreciated on getting an answer. Thanks Drew. :D

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    Yup, yup, yup.

     

    It is about as difficult, if not more than trying to build a diesel engine without exhaust after-treatment to comply with U.S. emissions regulations.

     

    But it's the key to unlocking an new wave of efficiency for gas engines.

     

    It might permanently make diesels irrelevant for passenger vehicles. 

     

     

    Indeed.... the key is that an HCCI engine cannot run in that mode all the time.  It only runs in HCCI mode under light loads... put too much fuel/air mixture into the cylinder and then things don't work right. The big issue GM was having when it was working on it back in the Saturn days was the transition from HCCI to normal spark ignition.  The engine worked fine in either mode, but it was the switching of modes that was less than graceful.   Even then, I think that Aura would only run in HCCI at stead speed from 35 - 55 mph, but don't quote me on that.

     

     

    Latest computer technology I believe will change the switch over problem. Just like the days of the V8-6-4 engine which was a disaster, it was before it's time of having the electronics, computer smarts to make it work best.

     

    Today, I would not be surprised if a V8-6-4 engine would work very well and smooth. Sadly emissions is a viable issue that needs to be addressed and I think HCCI engines with alternative fuels will be a stepping stone much like CNG towards the eventual day of pure EV auto's.

     

    I can see a day when a standardized electric cell will work on any auto and you just stop as an EV station and swap cells and continue on your way.

     

     

    GM and Chrysler and Mercedes have been running 8-6-4 V8s since 2004..... they just skip the 6 part because there is very little benefit for a large jump in complexity.  Also, in 6 mode, a V8 isn't very well balanced, so they feel harsh. It is with this technology that GM is able to build a 6.3 V8 that equals the fuel economy of Ford's 3.5 Ecoboost.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks Drew for the reminder, I had forgotten that many have done the V8 to V4 increasing fuel economy.

     

    The next step for GM is called Skip-Fire.  The V8 will be able to run on as few as two cylinders. The computer decides instantaneously if the next cylinder needs to fire or not depending on power and smoothness needs. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

     

    I sat in the new CX-9 in LA and it is every bit as good as these press photos suggest.

     

     

     

    Drew, is that nav screen move up and down into the dash? Looks like it could.

     

     

    Reply back from Mazda - The NAV screen does not retract into the dash.

     

     

    Bummer that would give is a very clean look when the end user did not want the nav / screen use.

     

    Much appreciated on getting an answer. Thanks Drew. :D

     

    I assume it would always be in use, though, with the radio on. It would look very clean down but realistically, I don't see a time when it would be down other than when you turn the car off and it would just be adding weight and complexity to have it move up and down. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The new Pacifica made a fantastic showing at Detroit and confirmation the GC Trackhawk is coming with  the full 707 HP backed with AWD and a actory quoted 0-60 of 3.5 (their estimates are usually a bit slower than the actual numbers too!).  I see a lot more coming!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I don't plan on gardening anytime soon. We need to finish other things before I'd have a permanent spot for a garden, but I would like a small garden in the future. We consume enough various peppers, onions, and zucchinis that I think it would be pretty cool to grow them myself. 
    • If you do tomatoes or any water hungry container veggies, Pittmoss is the GOAT and will save you a ton of headache with watering.
    • Thanks! Yeah, from what I've read it needs a lot of water but also media that drains well so the roots can dry out between waterings. I've now looked into this Pittmoss stuff, and it sounds pretty dang good. I think I'll order some and mix it with planter soil, as well. 
    • All done with the detail inside and out of the SS for the spring/summer season.
    • I had never driven an Infiniti Q50 before, let alone ever really looked at them.  I also didn’t know much about these cars. I was supposed to be assigned a medium sized SUV, but remarked I wanted the luggage area to be hidden.  The rental agent told me they could not guarantee the presence of a retractable cover. (Why would they order a car without one or why would someone take one?  eBay?)  They didn’t have any SUVs anyway, and I got put into an Infiniti Q50.  I checked my phone to verify the cost would be covered by my insurance and the credit card parameters.  It came in at around $43,000.  That’s if new.  That said: “no worries.”  However, this unit would be a much-depreciated 3+ year model with 57,000 miles.  I relaxed.  At any rate, I put less than 500 miles on it over a week.  As one walks up to it, you can tell its heritage … and rather quickly.  You can instantly see similarities to the Nissan Altima in the instrument panel’s main cluster and in the switches much the same way that a CT6 by Cadillac and a Cruze by Chevrolet share dials and such.  However, the assembly and detailing are nicer in the Q50.  It had leather seating, which I don’t care for in a warm weather location, that was comfortably contoured and nicely finished.  The same could be said for the doors and other trim and fittings.  Inside, I liked the way that the dash, center stack, and console flowed together.  The scalloped tops of the dash hearken to those of the very last Impala, which had an attractive dashboard on various levels. The center stack is slightly like that of an Olds Aurora.  These comments go along with the often-cited commentary that this car is traditional and old school in a lot of ways, thus not breaking any new ground. The least favorable aspect of the interior is operating the various touch screen and stalk functions.  Some are redundant and confusing.  However, for one, it is possible to pull up a clock that resembles old school chronometer and have it sitting at the top of the center stack. On the interior's plus side, there are perfectly contoured and angled slots to store water bottles at the base of the front doors.  On the minus side, there is a remote latch release for the trunk, but not one for the fuel cap door.  (The fuel cap door remains closed if the car is locked.) I figured that this Infiniti would have a V6.  It was no ordinary V6, but 3.7 liters worth of V6 with twin turbochargers.  Rarely does one need this much power and, in one week, I got aggressive with the throttle in one merging situation and one passing situation.  It is up to the task and kicks out a little torque steer.  Its hum is a rather muted purr.  As would be expected in what is supposed to be a premium car, the automatic transmission is a geared unit.  It has 7 speeds.  The first 2 shifts can be felt while the remaining shifts are not.  However, if in stop and go traffic, and alternating speed, those early shifts can be a little less smooth as the transmission seems to hunt.  (It could also be how many miles were on the unit.) Why 7 speeds?  How about 6 … or 8?  I’m talking even numbers! With the powertrain comes the requirement for premium fuel.  Also, compared to many full-size Japanese cars working with 4 cylinders and turning in commendable gas mileage, this car with its V6 is a little thirsty. Ride, handling, and noise are related, but different enough.  The ride was supple and controlled, but not much more so than that of an uplevel 4-cylinder sedan.  Handling was better and this Infiniti tracked accurately and nimbly.  Also, the Q50 was fairly hushed, but I might have expected a little more isolation and a higher premium "feel" for the price jump from a Nissan to an Infiniti. Its exterior features that extra chrome and trim to make it uplevel within the Nissan family tree, yet the greenhouse is an almost familiar one.  This car delivered on one greenhouse dimension I’m fussy about - rearward vision from the driver’s vantage point is very good. I don’t know how the order sheet was configured when this car was purchased. There was an indicator for forward alerts, but I never got to experience it in action.  Also, whether on the rearview mirrors or inside of the front pillars, there was nothing to warn of side traffic and there weren’t parking assists that kicked in.  Perhaps they were there, but the car was not put in a situation where they’d engage.  On another rental car of a lower price point, those were always at work and perhaps a little too eager.  I almost prefer the latter. I didn’t read any reviews about this car before beginning the rental or during the rental.  I echo what they have to say.  For its niche, it doesn’t drum up much enthusiasm.  The best point is its more premium handling while the negatives are some difficulties in setting it up when first getting in and its slight thirstiness. If something about this overall package is appealing and a person connects with the Q50, then the consumer will probably go for it.  I don’t know how it will hold up and how much it will cost to service over the long haul.  While there are no Toyota and Nissan dealerships in Beverly Hills, California, as an example, there is a Lexus agency there while the Infiniti dealership seems to have closed.  Infiniti seems to want to ride the same wave that Lexus is riding, though I’d think piggybacking onto Toyota might be a more lauded genealogy. This is very much a personal decision and you’re on your own.  I was going to turn in the Q50 after a day to see if I could get something more familiar to me but decided to keep it.  Exchanging cars is a hassle.  Once past the learning curve and adjustments, it’s fairly easy to live with, but it’s neither a remarkable nor compelling vehicle. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings