Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    FCA To Cut Prices of Fiat Vehicles In U.S.

      To reverse a sales slide, Fiat decides it is time to cut prices

    Sales of Fiat vehicles in the U.S. have been tanking and FCA is making a drastic change to try and reverse this. Automotive News got their hands on documents revealing a new pricing structure that will see Fiat cut the prices on some of their models.

    The base 500 will see a price cut of $2,000 ($14,995 from $16,995). The price doesn't include a $995 destination charge. The big price cuts will come to the 500C lineup as there will now be a $1,495 difference between the cabrio and regular hardtop. A key example is the 500C Abarth which sees its price drop from $26,695 to $21,490 for 2017. Prices for the 124 Spider and 500X remain unchanged.

    A Fiat spokesman declined to comment.

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
    Pic Credit: William Maley for Cheers and Gears

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Yawn, Nothing special here, just a Fire Sale to clear out GARBAGE Auto's.

    Fiat, you want to sell cars in America? 

    First start with making reliable cars.

    Second start with making auto's that actually fit Americans.

    Third, try to actually have a diverse portfolio rather than coping Mini with the same half baked garbage.

    Fourth, drop the used car sales approach and listen to the customer.

    I could go on and on but I think you get the point, FCA, you listening?

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Yawn, Nothing special here, just a Fire Sale to clear out GARBAGE Auto's.

    Fiat, you want to sell cars in America? 

    First start with making reliable cars.

    Second start with making auto's that actually fit Americans.

    Third, try to actually have a diverse portfolio rather than coping Mini with the same half baked garbage.

    Fourth, drop the used car sales approach and listen to the customer.

    I could go on and on but I think you get the point, FCA, you listening?

    They have other issues.....their heart is not in passenger car production. they need to GTFO of making anything other than the Challenger, Charger and 300...and drop them like a hot potato when they no longer are cash cows like they are now.

    Bring in Alfa SUV's as boutique vehicles, and vehicles like the Alfa 4C and the Alfa sedan...this will bring them attention in car magazines and on the road.

    Dump every dime into Jeep and RAM, and get your best and brightest engineers into a skunk works doing electrics and hybrids.

    The new Pacifica Hybrid is actually supposed to be pretty good, so build on that technology.

    They need to differentiate the different jeep models more clearly from each other and continue to just market the living dog piss out of Jeep...

    Continue to build Jeep in foreign markets, where it has always done fairly well.

    Fix the administrative mess that FCA corporate is.  Hire someone somewhat unpleasant that will take charge and make heads roll.

    Find creative sponsorship opportunities for RAM, be they bull riding, Rodeo, Bass fishing, whatever.  Traditional advertising does not do jack squat, send the Ram advertising people over to talk to the Jeep advertising people.  Stop spending money on traditional advertising almost entirely.

    Copy the DNA of what MINI was as a fun unique brand when it first came over in 2002, 2003, and not the mess it is now.

    Dump the entire Fiat line other than the 500X and 500 Abarth, and switch the plant in Mexico building these to building Jeeps.  Sell the 500X and 500 Abarth as limited production boutique vehicles here in the US. Keep the ATP High. Under this scope of sales, you will only sell 5000 to 10,000 Abarths Max in the US, so you could import them from Italy.

    Do not bring out a Fiat crossover other than the 500X, as it will cannibalize Jeep sales.

    Dodge and Chrysler need to go the way of Plymouth, Mercury, all good flesh, and the Dodo bird. Pacifica and Durango could become RAM products, drop the horrible dated unreliable Journey and burn its legacy with flames.

    Continue to build on the success of the U-connect infotainment and put some of your best people in charge of technology because that is what will sell vehicles for you in the future. Especially people dropping coin for a 50K Grand Cherokee.

    Edited by A Horse With No Name
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I love what you stated, 

    I would say dump Chrysler and move the Pacifica into Dodge. FCA, should dump all of Fiat other than the two you mention. Keep Fiat and Alfa as the Boutique sales. Focus on Dodge, Ram & Jeep. That is what I think would drive sales, but get new products ASAP into these companies.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    I love what you stated, 

    I would say dump Chrysler and move the Pacifica into Dodge. FCA, should dump all of Fiat other than the two you mention. Keep Fiat and Alfa as the Boutique sales. Focus on Dodge, Ram & Jeep. That is what I think would drive sales, but get new products ASAP into these companies.

    Or actually renew the current lineups with continuous improvements. Do not do what GM did with the Monte Carlo, Cutlass, Regal, et al and milk the name for all that it is worth with lackluster product.

    If GM had handled these product lines properly, Oldsmobile would still be in driveways all over suburban Midwestern neighborhoods....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Or actually renew the current lineups with continuous improvements. Do not do what GM did with the Monte Carlo, Cutlass, Regal, et al and milk the name for all that it is worth with lackluster product.

    If GM had handled these product lines properly, Oldsmobile would still be in driveways all over suburban Midwestern neighborhoods....

    I see the point your making, but even in the 80's as a college kid, I questioned the need for so many name plates.

    I honestly think the world wide auto industry still has way too many and with all the various Chinese name plates wanting to spread across the globe. I think we will see another consolidation and shutdown as not everyone will win.

    I Personally can see Chrysler going to the History books. Alfa should have been left there and Fiat could end up there too. Alfa/Fiat as a boutique is fine, move chrysler products into Dodge and focus as you have mentioned on the product lines world wide.

    I wonder about some of the name plates in Europe too. Just like Japan, I think eventually we will see certain brands become subbrands under bigger companies. Japan brands I can see going this way would be Mazda, Mitsubishi, Suzuki. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, dfelt said:

    I see the point your making, but even in the 80's as a college kid, I questioned the need for so many name plates.

    I honestly think the world wide auto industry still has way too many and with all the various Chinese name plates wanting to spread across the globe. I think we will see another consolidation and shutdown as not everyone will win.

    I Personally can see Chrysler going to the History books. Alfa should have been left there and Fiat could end up there too. Alfa/Fiat as a boutique is fine, move chrysler products into Dodge and focus as you have mentioned on the product lines world wide.

    I wonder about some of the name plates in Europe too. Just like Japan, I think eventually we will see certain brands become subbrands under bigger companies. Japan brands I can see going this way would be Mazda, Mitsubishi, Suzuki. 

    I think we will see a major reshuffling when we go to electric cars. Give the current auto market until 2030, 2035 at the latest.  China and Germany will lead, and at some point electric will hit critical mass in the USA.

    At that point, all bets are off.

    We are whistling by the graveside of everyone from Buick to Mazda IMHO.  Because I think that electric will be a slate wiper in terms of how cars are perceived, purchased, driven, et al.

    Consider also that the world keeps changing to being more and more urban.  At some point, inter city rail will be a big thing, even in the United states...and the United states will fight that like crazy for the next 50 years...people will no longer drive 450 miles to get somewhere.  Or at least not in the quantity they do now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, bigpoolog said:

    the big story is that the abarth 500 is 5 g's cheaper and that makes it the pocket rocket bargain of the century

    For the first couple months before it dies. ;)

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    52 minutes ago, bigpoolog said:

    the big story is that the abarth 500 is 5 g's cheaper and that makes it the pocket rocket bargain of the century

    Sadly it is such a depreciation magnet that it will loose its arse financially after you buy it...limiting production and selling it as a boutique vehicle could keep it profitable.

    Instead, Chrysler's philosophy seems to be we loose money on every passenger car we sell but make up for it in volume.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Those price cuts aren't even enough to make any difference.  Dodge and Chrysler are in the same situation, these are all bad cars, and there is too much information now online where people can do their own research.  It isn't like the 80s or 90s when the sales people at the dealership could persuade a buyer because all their was was car magazines doing reviews, which usually were of sports cars anyway.

    Dodge has 20% off MSRP right now and their sales are still in the tank.  Fiat could have 50% off and the Corolla would still outsell their whole line.  I would bet money that they could sell the Charger for $14,995 and the Camry would outsell it 3 to 1.  No one wants these cars regardless of how they discount them.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    34 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Those price cuts aren't even enough to make any difference.  Dodge and Chrysler are in the same situation, these are all bad cars, and there is too much information now online where people can do their own research.  It isn't like the 80s or 90s when the sales people at the dealership could persuade a buyer because all their was was car magazines doing reviews, which usually were of sports cars anyway.

    Dodge has 20% off MSRP right now and their sales are still in the tank.  Fiat could have 50% off and the Corolla would still outsell their whole line.  I would bet money that they could sell the Charger for $14,995 and the Camry would outsell it 3 to 1.  No one wants these cars regardless of how they discount them.

    Dodge Charger also has one of the highest rated of depreciation of any North American passenger car.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Actually there's a better pocket rocket, and it's from Ford, the Fiesta ST.

     

    It handles better, has a nicer interior (though devoid of charm) and has more space. And even if it costs more, probably has better resale and reliability by a fair margin. Please do edumicate me on the last two, if I'm totally wrong.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As it pertains to the price cuts, why are they in this market, trying to establish themselves, when their sales are tanking?

    And their price points are being eroded because they have huge problems with the brand. Whole sorts of issues.

    The same Chrysler 200 and Dodge Dart that doesn't sell probably blow the sales of Fiat out of the water. 

     

    Such a mismanagement of brands. Like as if Ameri and Cans are willing to accept cars designed for Europe only. No, we buy small crossovers because they fit a certain image profile at a low price point.

    But goddamn it, we all really do want to drive are F150 Plats, Escalades, Mercedes GLS, you know, the big boys.

    This reminds me in many ways of when Target came to Canada. They basically closed shop here after 1 year, realizing what a challenging retail environment (especially in the department store class like Wal Mart, Sears, Crappy Tire) Canada really is.

     

    Why are we here? Does anyone working at FCA US LLC, the person who is head of Fiat brand in North America, ask that question?

    Like what role can Fiat play? Mini is becoming very large now, but their sales are lower too, because again, niche brand, shoddy reliability, and poor resale. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, daves87rs said:

    Not going to make a difference anyways...expecting a chinese company to pick up Jeep for a song, junk the rest and just use the tech that they have picked up...

    We will see what will happen. i am not ready to throw the towel in yet, but in terms of passenger cars the fat lady is warming up and getting ready to sing...loudly...

    7 hours ago, Suaviloquent said:

    Like what role can Fiat play? Mini is becoming very large now, but their sales are lower too, because again, niche brand, shoddy reliability, and poor resale. 

     

    Mini has no existential awareness of who they are and what their brand stands for. Even people I know who sell MINI products or work for BMW Finance admit this.

    Ironically, Tesla may be the only car company in the world that knows exactly who they are and why they exist...Ford in my mind would come in a reasonable second...

    7 hours ago, Suaviloquent said:

     

    The same Chrysler 200 and Dodge Dart that doesn't sell probably blow the sales of Fiat out of the water. 

     

    At this point they are just trying to recover the fixed costs of keeping the plants running IMHO. Trying to tread water until they figure out how to dig themselves out of...or deeper into...the hole they have made for themselves.

    7 hours ago, Suaviloquent said:

    Such a mismanagement of brands. Like as if Ameri and Cans are willing to accept cars designed for Europe only. No, we buy small crossovers because they fit a certain image profile at a low price point.

     

    We are willing to accept them in low numbers as niche vehicles, where they already have products designed and selling in Europe they can sell here with minimal investment. But they are stoned silly if they think these models will ever get mainstream acceptance.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, Suaviloquent said:

    Hmmm, but you actually get a car with the Fiesta. With the Fiat 500 you get a 2 seater pod with 2 padded handbag perches. 

     

     

    As much as I would cross the Pacific in a leaky row boat before I woudl say nice things about any car maker...Ford gets it about 85 percent right with the Fiesta. I have no rational basis  In reality for saying this but my gut tells me that Ford has something really kind of special in store when they refresh the Fiesta and Focus.

    8 hours ago, bigpoolog said:

    fisting is fun but the abarth has hooligan panache coming out the ying-yang

    It is wildly under rated as a sporty car. Were my wife not threatening to cut me off if I buy a Fiat product, one might be in my driveway. The only blue I want to see in an automotive transaction is World Rally blue on a WRX....I do not wish for my own testicles to become the same shade of blue.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, Suaviloquent said:

    Why are we here? Does anyone working at FCA US LLC, the person who is head of Fiat brand in North America, ask that question?

    I kind of doubt FCA corporate culture allows much introspection or creative dialogue.  They seem like a very top down "we have always done it this way" kind of organization.

    Ford and GM seem much more adaptable....but VW in my mind does the same thing in terms of allowing negative group think and a disconnect with reality ruin what could be a fine brand.

    Again, this is why I said I try to look at things from an overall corporate culture point of view in the Ford Moving Away From One Ford Platform thread. Alan Mulally was not allowed to kill Lincoln for a reason in terms of Fords corporate culture, and fords corporate culture was open to the counter intuitive move of putting money into Lincoln which has gained then quite a few conquest sales....Lincoln is up for the year, and the Conti continues to conquest.

    I am saying FCA and VW are incapable of rational self examination, and the resulting change...and that is why they are in the shape they are in.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, bigpoolog said:

    fisting is fun but the abarth has hooligan panache coming out the ying-yang

    Is that what you call a Fisting Boat Anchor, Ying-Yang? I always thought it was a worthless Gochu! ;) Not sure what the word is, look up in Korean language. :P

    The Socialist culture of Italy is their doom. Italy has many fine things but also builds a ton of crap products. Way too many lazy people building crappy products.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, Suaviloquent said:

    Hmmm, but you actually get a car with the Fiesta. With the Fiat 500 you get a 2 seater pod with 2 padded handbag perches.

    fair, and with the fiesta you can have a baby seat in the back to coddle your freshly neutered testicles. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, bigpoolog said:

    fair, and with the fiesta you can have a baby seat in the back to coddle your freshly neutered testicles. 

    Damn, I was wondering where both of them had gone. That explains the noise in the background I heard for the first few years.

    Thanks, that explains allot. :P

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Dodge Charger also has one of the highest rated of depreciation of any North American passenger car.

    Charger V6, particularly the SEs.  The V8s seem to hold value pretty well, especially those with an SRT badge. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree Chrysler needs to go, but Dodge sales aren't bad at all for what they have save the Dart.  Mine out a compact and midsize for Dodge, bring over the Pacifica, Give Dodge a version of the Cherokee with a sporty design and a Challenger style interior and give it turbo 4 power and concentrate on handling.   Give the LX cars one final refresh to tide them over until the new replacements arrive in 2021.  They still need a more car/cuv oriented brand that isn't as specialized as Jeep with off-road or utility with Ram.  Fiat needs phased out, or keep the 500X, 124, and the Abarth 500, maybe as order only from the Dodge dealership.  If he do Alfa right they could very well have a niche hit on their hands.  Just some thoughts.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hey it's not that hard a squeeze into the back of the Fiesta.

    I've sat in one. Once. Okay, alright the backseat is also garbage, but it's half as garbage as the 500.

    Twice as less of a waste! 

    There is an inherent advantage when you tote other people around, they'll never ask for a ride again, given the damage dealt is permanent. With 500, you never get the chance to torture someone in the back. Let us all hear the wails of REPENT!

    While the extra space just entices you to spend just that much more at Costco or any club warehouse deal, or IKEA.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 11/23/2016 at 2:38 PM, Suaviloquent said:

    Hey it's not that hard a squeeze into the back of the Fiesta.

    I've sat in one. Once. Okay, alright the backseat is also garbage, but it's half as garbage as the 500.

    Twice as less of a waste! 

    There is an inherent advantage when you tote other people around, they'll never ask for a ride again, given the damage dealt is permanent. With 500, you never get the chance to torture someone in the back. Let us all hear the wails of REPENT!

    While the extra space just entices you to spend just that much more at Costco or any club warehouse deal, or IKEA.

    The Fiesta is really, really abetter car in ST guise than the Fiat 500 Abarth....

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I will lake a Beetle, even a 1.8T over either or a Golf 1.8T.  Yes they are bigger, but price would be similar.  You get all the driving pleasure without the claustrophobia. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    ..or the performance..

    Given that the 1.8T uses a timing chain, and VW can't get timing chains right to save their ass...the real performance one would need would be from the Ford F350 Tow truck hauling it in for warranty work....

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Fiat has under performed since they came out. Now that they have been out the few people they did attract have either bought one or moved on. 

    Fiat brought us a crappy modern take of a crappy old car. There was no real love or romance of this car. Fiat left here in shame with buckets of rust and broken timing belts behind. The new technology may have made them more reliable than they were but no where as good as other options. 

    The problem with FCA products outside of Jeep and Ram is they are generally received as being better than they were but not better than others in their class. This is no way to change hearts and minds.  The fact is the lack of money is showing and what money they are making is being wasted at Alfa when it should have gone into the volume brand Chrysler. 

    A class leading quality Chrysler line of products could have funded all their adventures in Europe but now they go down by the bow as they expect Alfa to take on BMW and the like. Sotty that is not going to happen. They just don't have the time or money to compete. 

    GM is making money with Cadillac and they will hold volume with the coming Crossovers. The rest of GM is proving profitable so GM has time to work on Cadillac and grow them to where they need to be. FCA time is running out and if they do not partner up soon they will be broken up and sold off. Well the parts anyone would want would be sold off. 

    Toyota is out, VW is off the table with low funds so this leave few real takers that could financially help outside someone in China. 

    You know when they start talking the already delayed RWD cars now back to 2021 things are grim. 

    Fiat is not loved like Mini and suffered the same stigma that they have to carry on the same look to retain the retro feel. It wears thing when you are loved as well. 

    Edited by hyperv6
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Given that the 1.8T uses a timing chain, and VW can't get timing chains right to save their ass...the real performance one would need would be from the Ford F350 Tow truck hauling it in for warranty work....

    LOL Yeah they aren't known to be the most reliable vehicles on the road...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 minutes ago, hyperv6 said:

    Fiat has under performed since they came out. Now that they have been out the few people they did attract have either bought one or moved on. 

    Fiat brought us a crappy modern take of a crappy old car. There was no real love or romance of this car. Fiat left here in shame with buckets of rust and broken timing belts behind. The new technology may have made them more reliable than they were but no where as good as other options. 

    ....
     

    You know when they start talking the already delayed RWD cars now back to 2021 things are grim. 

    Fiat is not loved like Mini and suffered the same stigma that they have to carry on the same look to retain the retro feel. It wears thing when you are loved as well. 

    It really is the beginning of the end for them....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Plastic cladding = off road.  Instead of killing the Sonata, they should just put plastic body cladding down the side and raise the price by $10k and call it the Sonata HD Overlander X.  Instant hit.
    • Considering a planet with 8 Billion and he sold almost 2 million cars, then he is covering .025% of the population compared to other auto companies. I think 2024 going into 2025 we will see other auto companies top Tesla. You and I are two peas in a pod as I also was up on a hill watching the implosion and thinking what a waste as it was a great building. I love the Kingdome and hate the new stadium.  Agree it was surreal to see the ship hit the support pillar and the whole building just collapse. Be interesting to see what replaces it as today bridges built like that are not allowed due to the exact nature of how it collapsed.  Yes, Tesla is a love or hate and the minimalist approach is not for everyone. I honestly have to agree with the comment @smk4565 I believe made that the touch screen only will be the future of cheap autos and switches and buttons will be the higher end autos. Interesting times we live in for sure.
    • Decent upgrade to the aging 2024 model. Nice to see they are reducing costs of the curved screen in the EVs by pushing it out across the Hyundai Family and into Kia. The one thing I do not like is all the Chrome. 🤢 🤮
    • Today at the New York International Auto Show, Hyundai unveiled an update to its little truck, the Hyundai Santa Cruz. The refresh to the exterior is relatively mild, though it features a more menacing grille with bolder verticle lines.  Updated running lights and new wheel designs add to the fresher look. Inside, there is a new steering wheel, infotainment system, and instrument panel. on upper trims, an optional panoramic curved display houses dual 12.3-inch displays for driver and entertainment. The plenty-capable powertrains carry over with either a 191-horsepower direct injected 2.5-liter 4-cylinder or a turbo-charged version of of the same engine with 281 horsepower.  The transmission for the entry-level engine is a traditional 8-speed automatic, while the turbo-charged model gets an 8-speed dual-clutch transmission. Santa Cruzes with the turbo engine gain a new tow mode for enhanced towing control.  Both powertrains are towing capable with a 3,500 lb rating for the entry engine and a stout 5,000 lb rating for the turbo models when equipped with all-wheel drive. New for 2025 is an XRT trim geared even more towards outdoor adventure. It features a trim-specific front fascia and grille, special 18-inch wheels with all-terrain tires, an increased approach angle, front tow hooks, and surround-view monitoring.    The 2025 Hyundai Santa Cruz goes on sale this summer. View full article
    • Regarding Tesla - it's either love or hate with these vehicles.  A college friend I'll be seeing when in SoCal next month has 2 of them, and I'll probably be riding in both of them - one is his sleeker S model and I forgot which the other one (that his wife drives) is.  In certain places, people have a lot of disposable income and having a Tesla goes with the landscape. Minimalist(ic) isn't necessarily bad.  We all remember the adage "less is more."  I'll vouch that the workmanship of the interior is good and I can also vouch that the overall look (including the centered everything on one display) is ugly.  I will say that EV motors are supposed to last a long time but the battery replacement is very expensive and the range is currently not that optimal. I did not like the model Y I had for less than 1 day.  Also, its exterior is mostly ugly.  That's my opinion. This isn't a discussion I want to get into.  I would much prefer a more user-friendly EV ... and not just yet. - - - - - What I was randomly going to say: I'm not sure whether I'm in shock or still feeling surreal as to what happened in Baltimore.  At first, I thought a ship just hit something on a bridge.  Then I saw the footage and that's the surreal part ... the domino-like collapse of the entire structure and the size of the ship.  I remember having to figure out the forces of either tension or compression on each member of a truss-like structure when I was in school.   A group of us sat there for about 3 or 4 hours one night - with some Mountain Dew - to work that out. I don't believe I've been on that bridge since it's on the outer beltway, but it's numbered as part of the U.S. interstate system.  From looking at the map, it is the major bridge on the entrance to/exit from Baltimore Harbor.  I hope they find the 6 individuals who were working on it fixing potholes in the middle of the night who fell down with the bridge.  The ship giving a mayday is what allowed them to shut down both approaches to the bridge just in time.   The weird thing is that it happened on March 26.  IIRC, the deliberate (domino-like) implosion of the reinforced concrete Kingdome in Seattle happened on March 26, 2000 (no rain that day) and people were sitting on slopes overlooking downtown to see that happen.  But that's how it is with planned implosions.  I went there that morning and have photos of the Kingdome's last day somewhere. https://www.seahawks.com/video/kingdome-implosion-hd It was indeed March 26, 2000.  I was one of the few who liked the Kingdome.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings