Jump to content
Server Move In Progress - Read More ×
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Marchionne Still Dreams of A FCA-GM Merger

      Marchionne, No means no.

    You have to admire Fiat Chrysler Automobiles' CEO Sergio Marchionne for still hanging onto the dream of FCA and General Motors merging, despite being told repeatedly that isn't going to happen. At the Geneva Motor Show this week, Marchionne put out there that he is still interested in getting together with GM.

    "I never close any doors. I may shamelessly try and knock again ... on the GM door or any door if I thought it was a good thing for the business. Absolutely, without even blinking. The desirability of GM as a potential merger candidate remains untouched," said Marchionne.

    Unsurprisingly, GM shot down Marchionne's dreams.

    "We weren't interested before and we're even less interested now," said GM President Dan Ammann.

    Marchionne isn't one to give up however, he has a plan B: Volkswagen. As he told Bloomberg, with PSA Group becoming the second largest automaker in Europe with the acquisition of Opel/Vauxhall, this could put Volkswagen in a vulnerable position. He sees the company possibly looking for a partner.

    “I have no doubt that at the relevant time VW may show up and have a chat” about a merger, said Marchionne.

    Volkswagen CEO Matthias Müller slapped down that idea when asked.

    “We are not ready for talks about anything. I haven’t seen Marchionne for months,” said Müller.

    “We have other problems.” 

    Source: Bloomberg , Reuters, (2)

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    12 minutes ago, Stew said:

    It is completely comparable because The Sting Ray was a brand new car on a brand new platform, which a brand new powertrain.  Like the Alfa it is also not a high production car.  looking at modern times, it is COMPLETELY comparable.  And FYI:  heat soak issues ere with the Z06.  The engine failures were regular LT1 powered Sting Rays.  Of course last i checked, the Corvette isn't exactly known for being highly reliable.  Cheaply built, with economy car interiors SURE, but that at least changed with the C7, though cost cutting is still noticeable........ 

    Keep trying to compare that until the cows come home but the problem with Fiat and Alfa is not just their powertrains and platforms (old or new) but their manufacturing and assembly in general and this is well known to anyone with a computer. They have had problems and Europe for decades and they are bringing those problems over here. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    Keep trying to compare that until the cows come home but the problem with Fiat and Alfa is not just their powertrains and platforms (old or new) but their manufacturing and assembly in general and this is well known to anyone with a computer. They have had problems and Europe for decades and they are bringing those problems over here. 

    I can't remember but the Alfa plant is either all new or completely redone and revamped for these new cars, so again, using the past is really pointless.

     

    The fact is you have no idea what it's reliability will be, neither do I or anyone else PERIOD.  That is the only point I am trying to make.  Continuing to quote the past is kind of like mental masturbation trying to get off your point through fake screams and manic groaning. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Stew said:

    I can't remember but the Alfa plant is either all new or completely redone and revamped for these new cars, so again, using the past is really pointless.

     

    The fact is you have no idea what it's reliability will be, neither do I or anyone else PERIOD.  That is the only point I am trying to make.  Continuing to quote the past is kind of like mental masturbation trying to get off your point through fake screams and manic groaning. 

    Except it's not. They are using the same assembly and manufacturing they have used for years, which has always been the core problem with their quality or lack thereof. Sorry but history absolutely comes into play here and Fiat and Alfa have to prove that their history of junk is just that, history. Until then, they are junk.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, Stew said:

    C&D had 2.  The one they had for best driver's car also blew up and GM admitted a production issue. 

    Do you have a link to the second one? Their long-termer is the only engine I can find that went "BOOM".

     

    13 minutes ago, Stew said:

    Shoot yourself in the foot.  There are no official recalls on the Giullia yet either.......   Yet, you assume problems?

    You're right. But they've always been unreliable why give me 5 reasons why anybody with a right mind would consider them to be reliable and give them a shot this time? It isn't like Alfas and Fiats have just had small blips of unreliability. They've been unreliable for the past 50 years and the current crop of FCA vehicles shows no sign of changing that.

    We'll use the current then. FCA's locked down the bottom 4 spots and something like 5 of the last 7 spots on CR's. Are they(CR) perfect? Hell no. But they have some weight in what they say.

    So again, what about that is making the consumer believe something else from them will be more reliable(when they've had a track record for themselves of being terribly unreliable)?

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    Except it's not. They are using the same assembly and manufacturing they have used for years, which has always been the core problem with their quality or lack thereof. Sorry but history absolutely comes into play here and Fiat and Alfa have to prove that their history of junk is just that, history. Until then, they are junk.

    This a totally different product than anything they have done before.  The platform, engine, manufacturing, etc have to be ready for higher volume models. 

    The Cassino plant has identified with the Alfa Romeo brand since 2015. Modernisation works were started and completed in time for the first introduction phase of the Giulia in 2016.

    Quote

     

     

    23 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Do you have a link to the second one? Their long-termer is the only engine I can find that went "BOOM".

     

    You're right. But they've always been unreliable why give me 5 reasons why anybody with a right mind would consider them to be reliable and give them a shot this time? It isn't like Alfas and Fiats have just had small blips of unreliability. They've been unreliable for the past 50 years and the current crop of FCA vehicles shows no sign of changing that.

    We'll use the current then. FCA's locked down the bottom 4 spots and something like 5 of the last 7 spots on CR's. Are they(CR) perfect? Hell no. But they have some weight in what they say.

    So again, what about that is making the consumer believe something else from them will be more reliable(when they've had a track record for themselves of being terribly unreliable)?

    Quote


     

     

    Power is always available, and the car’s tall gearing is suited to VIR. The entertainment level was reaching tsunami height just when the Corvette suddenly died coming onto the front straight. Chevy suspects contaminated oil caused the engine failure that killed the car; it was no more, expired, a 0-hp Corvette. We were content with our lap time, but if Chevy wants to bring back a live one for another go, we wouldn’t say no.

    http://www.caranddriver.com/features/chevrolet-corvette-stingray-at-lightning-lap-2014-feature

    Edited by Stew
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Stew said:

    This a totally different product than anything they have done before.  The platform, engine, manufacturing, etc have to be ready for higher volume models. 

     

     

     

     

     

    Using the same people, same corporate structure, and same assembly and manufacturing they have used on every car. It Giulia will not be unique to this. That is my point. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    Using the same people, same corporate structure, and same assembly and manufacturing they have used on every car. It Giulia will not be unique to this. That is my point. 

    Um no, the plant is updat3ed to modern standards and equipment and this will be the first new Alfa to come out of this plant........

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Stew said:

    Um no, the plant is updat3ed to modern standards and equipment and this will be the first new Alfa to come out of this plant........

    Sorry but I'm still not convinced. They have updated plants for years prior to this and still have the same unreliable cars coming out of there. Sorry but again, the burden of proof that they won't be the same piles they have always been is on them. When that car has been out a year or two with no major issues, then we can talk. Until then, I stand by my view of them. 

    Edited by surreal1272
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, surreal1272 said:

    Sorry but I'm still not convinced. They have updated plants for years prior to this and still have the same unreliable cars coming out of there. Sorry but again, the burden of proof that they won't be the same piles they have always been is on them. When that car has been out a year or two with no major issues, then we can talk. Until the , I stand by my view of them. 

    You do that and we will see what happens. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Looking at the high volume current gen Gulietta, it seems pretty decent in the build quality and reliability stuff (looked at a number of sites and reviews).  biggest issue is a start/stop system that doesn't work if the battery charge is too low. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Stew said:

    I can't remember but the Alfa plant is either all new or completely redone and revamped for these new cars, so again, using the past is really pointless.

     

    The fact is you have no idea what it's reliability will be, neither do I or anyone else PERIOD.  That is the only point I am trying to make.  Continuing to quote the past is kind of like mental masturbation trying to get off your point through fake screams and manic groaning. 

    History is how you view all companies and all companies have had dark episodes in their history. For Fiat / Alfa, they have always been dark on reliability no matter the process in their plants, or the technology they try to use. The bigger issue is their unionized work force and the lack of desire to build quality products and put in an honest hard days work.

    The US auto Unions were getting just as bad till bankruptcy hit and it forced them to change which the Union members did by kicking out the old way of thinking leadership and make many other changes including taking actual ownership  in GM as one example and they had to bring in better educated people to manage the money and lead the union and one of the changes was to work with GM rather than against it.

    In Italy, the Unions are known to fight the companies and the history points to the bad attitude of the workers towards Fiat and Alfa. They demand jobs, benefits and plenty of time off and yet do not change even on new models to put in an honest days work with a focus on quality. 

    The reviews of the Guiliana have already proven to be very buggy auto's and at this time the history leads one to expect this new product line to not be any better than other existing products.

    Sadly there is nothing one can do to change history, you can only change the way you do the job and build up a reputation for quality over Time, something the American auto companies for the most part are doing versus Fiat / Alfa that has not done that.

    Business as usual is what will lead to the Death of Fiat / Alfa in a global market. Yes they will sell to the uninformed, but to those that know their history, they will be shunned. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    46 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    And until then... Watch Alfa sales blow the roof off their competition... *cough cough*

    Hardly.  Giullia is going to be a much harder sell than the Stelvio. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I don't plan on gardening anytime soon. We need to finish other things before I'd have a permanent spot for a garden, but I would like a small garden in the future. We consume enough various peppers, onions, and zucchinis that I think it would be pretty cool to grow them myself. 
    • If you do tomatoes or any water hungry container veggies, Pittmoss is the GOAT and will save you a ton of headache with watering.
    • Thanks! Yeah, from what I've read it needs a lot of water but also media that drains well so the roots can dry out between waterings. I've now looked into this Pittmoss stuff, and it sounds pretty dang good. I think I'll order some and mix it with planter soil, as well. 
    • All done with the detail inside and out of the SS for the spring/summer season.
    • I had never driven an Infiniti Q50 before, let alone ever really looked at them.  I also didn’t know much about these cars. I was supposed to be assigned a medium sized SUV, but remarked I wanted the luggage area to be hidden.  The rental agent told me they could not guarantee the presence of a retractable cover. (Why would they order a car without one or why would someone take one?  eBay?)  They didn’t have any SUVs anyway, and I got put into an Infiniti Q50.  I checked my phone to verify the cost would be covered by my insurance and the credit card parameters.  It came in at around $43,000.  That’s if new.  That said: “no worries.”  However, this unit would be a much-depreciated 3+ year model with 57,000 miles.  I relaxed.  At any rate, I put less than 500 miles on it over a week.  As one walks up to it, you can tell its heritage … and rather quickly.  You can instantly see similarities to the Nissan Altima in the instrument panel’s main cluster and in the switches much the same way that a CT6 by Cadillac and a Cruze by Chevrolet share dials and such.  However, the assembly and detailing are nicer in the Q50.  It had leather seating, which I don’t care for in a warm weather location, that was comfortably contoured and nicely finished.  The same could be said for the doors and other trim and fittings.  Inside, I liked the way that the dash, center stack, and console flowed together.  The scalloped tops of the dash hearken to those of the very last Impala, which had an attractive dashboard on various levels. The center stack is slightly like that of an Olds Aurora.  These comments go along with the often-cited commentary that this car is traditional and old school in a lot of ways, thus not breaking any new ground. The least favorable aspect of the interior is operating the various touch screen and stalk functions.  Some are redundant and confusing.  However, for one, it is possible to pull up a clock that resembles old school chronometer and have it sitting at the top of the center stack. On the interior's plus side, there are perfectly contoured and angled slots to store water bottles at the base of the front doors.  On the minus side, there is a remote latch release for the trunk, but not one for the fuel cap door.  (The fuel cap door remains closed if the car is locked.) I figured that this Infiniti would have a V6.  It was no ordinary V6, but 3.7 liters worth of V6 with twin turbochargers.  Rarely does one need this much power and, in one week, I got aggressive with the throttle in one merging situation and one passing situation.  It is up to the task and kicks out a little torque steer.  Its hum is a rather muted purr.  As would be expected in what is supposed to be a premium car, the automatic transmission is a geared unit.  It has 7 speeds.  The first 2 shifts can be felt while the remaining shifts are not.  However, if in stop and go traffic, and alternating speed, those early shifts can be a little less smooth as the transmission seems to hunt.  (It could also be how many miles were on the unit.) Why 7 speeds?  How about 6 … or 8?  I’m talking even numbers! With the powertrain comes the requirement for premium fuel.  Also, compared to many full-size Japanese cars working with 4 cylinders and turning in commendable gas mileage, this car with its V6 is a little thirsty. Ride, handling, and noise are related, but different enough.  The ride was supple and controlled, but not much more so than that of an uplevel 4-cylinder sedan.  Handling was better and this Infiniti tracked accurately and nimbly.  Also, the Q50 was fairly hushed, but I might have expected a little more isolation and a higher premium "feel" for the price jump from a Nissan to an Infiniti. Its exterior features that extra chrome and trim to make it uplevel within the Nissan family tree, yet the greenhouse is an almost familiar one.  This car delivered on one greenhouse dimension I’m fussy about - rearward vision from the driver’s vantage point is very good. I don’t know how the order sheet was configured when this car was purchased. There was an indicator for forward alerts, but I never got to experience it in action.  Also, whether on the rearview mirrors or inside of the front pillars, there was nothing to warn of side traffic and there weren’t parking assists that kicked in.  Perhaps they were there, but the car was not put in a situation where they’d engage.  On another rental car of a lower price point, those were always at work and perhaps a little too eager.  I almost prefer the latter. I didn’t read any reviews about this car before beginning the rental or during the rental.  I echo what they have to say.  For its niche, it doesn’t drum up much enthusiasm.  The best point is its more premium handling while the negatives are some difficulties in setting it up when first getting in and its slight thirstiness. If something about this overall package is appealing and a person connects with the Q50, then the consumer will probably go for it.  I don’t know how it will hold up and how much it will cost to service over the long haul.  While there are no Toyota and Nissan dealerships in Beverly Hills, California, as an example, there is a Lexus agency there while the Infiniti dealership seems to have closed.  Infiniti seems to want to ride the same wave that Lexus is riding, though I’d think piggybacking onto Toyota might be a more lauded genealogy. This is very much a personal decision and you’re on your own.  I was going to turn in the Q50 after a day to see if I could get something more familiar to me but decided to keep it.  Exchanging cars is a hassle.  Once past the learning curve and adjustments, it’s fairly easy to live with, but it’s neither a remarkable nor compelling vehicle. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings