Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Genesis G70 is Korea's 3-Series Challenger

      Another entrant in the compact luxury sedan fight


    Genesis' first all-new vehicle has arrived. Today at Genesis’ design center in Namyang, Korea, the G70 sedan was introduced. This model has a tough task ahead of it as the model will enter one of the highly competitive market segments, the compact luxury sedan. On paper, the G70 has a recipe that looks unbeatable.

    There is a fair amount of the New York Concept in the G70's design, which is a good thing. The front is reminiscent of the G80 and G90, but there is a little bit of aggression in the bumper and hood. The side profile is very similar to the current BMW 3-Series, right down to the fender vents. Around back is where we run into some trouble. We like the short rear deck, but someone pointed out that the G70's rear looks almost the same as the recently departed Chrysler 200 - an image we cannot get out of heads.

    Inside, Genesis went with a minimalist approach with little brightwork and no wood trim - similar to what you see in the Jaguar XE. Quilted leather upholstery is available. An eight-inch infotainment system with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto integration is standard, and 15-speaker Lexicon surround-sound system is optional.

    The G70 will offer three engines at launch,

    • 2.0L Turbo-Four: 254 Horsepower, 256 Pound-Feet of Torque
    • 2.2L Turbodiesel-Four: 201 Horsepower, 324 Pound-Feet of Torque (Europe Only)
    • 3.3L Turbo V6: 365 Horsepower, 376 Pound-Feet of Torque

    An eight-speed automatic will be standard on all engines, while a manual transmission with limited-slip differential will be on the options list. There will be the choice of rear-wheel or all-wheel drive.

    We'll learn more details about the G70 for North America early next year, possibly including price.

    Source: Genesis
    Press Release is on Page 2


    GENESIS G70 RESETS EXPECTATIONS OF CUSTOMER-FOCUSED PERFORMANCE AND LUXURY

    September 14, 2017 – A new era dawned today as Genesis officially presented the highly anticipated G70 luxury performance sedan at the Hyundai·Genesis Design Center in Namyang. 

    Dr. Woong-Chul Yang, Vice Chairman of the Hyundai Motor Group’s R&D Division, key Genesis brand officials, and approximately 300 international automotive journalists participated in the activities. The G70 goes on sale in Korea on September 20th, with timing for its rollout in other markets to be announced soon.

     “The Genesis G70 is the latest demonstration of our dedication to delivering innovative, customer-oriented vehicles,” said Vice Chairman Yang. “We will continue to focus our R&D efforts on the development and expansion of the Genesis brand. It is a great point of pride to have Genesis showcase what a true luxury brand of Korean origin can present to our discerning customers.”

    The Genesis G70 is an athletic sedan characterized by its graceful and dynamic exterior styling; elegant and intuitively designed interior; choice of three different powertrains. Customers will be able to select between a turbocharged 3.3-liter gasoline V6, a 2.0-liter turbocharged gasoline I4, and a 2.2-liter I4 diesel models.

    The G70 also incorporates numerous advanced driver assist systems such as Highway Driving Assist (HDA), best-in-class safety with nine standard airbags and active hood function, and a high level of connectivity with server-based voice recognition technology, using Kakao Corp’s artificial intelligence platform.

    Hot stamping methods and extended use of structural adhesives have been employed to enhance torsional rigidity and improve overall body stiffness.

    “G70 Seoul 2017”

    To commemorate this important moment, 15,000 people will celebrate the official unveiling of the G70 at “G70·Seoul 2017,” a global launch festival held on September 15th in Seoul’s Olympic Park.

    “The launch of the Genesis G70 is an important milestone for our brand,” said Manfred Fitzgerald, Head of Genesis Division. “We deliberately chose Seoul, as this is our place of origin. This is where we are coming together with our customers and friends in the music industry to celebrate as a people’s festival.”

    “G70 Seoul 2017” is a brand celebration of Genesis and the new G70, featuring global music superstars Gwen Stefani, Andra Day and CL. While attendance is capped at 15,000, more than 80,000 people expressed interest in being part of the festivities.

    Completing the Genesis sedan lineup

    The G70 completes the Genesis brand’s sedan lineup, along with the G90 flagship and mid-luxury G80. The arrival of G70 further strengthens the Genesis brand’s presence in the global luxury market.

    In November 2015, Genesis launched and set out to compete with the world’s top luxury automakers as a Korean brand. To differentiate itself in the luxury segment, Genesis strives to make a positive impact in the lifestyles of its discerning customers through a progressive and innovative approach to performance and design excellence.

    Genesis launched the flagship G90 sedan in December 2015, followed by the G80 sedan in July 2016 in Korea. Since the brand’s inception, Genesis has sold more than 150,000 units, with strong performances in both Korea and the U.S.

    Genesis has also received many accolades, most recently, ranking highest among premium automakers in the J.D. Power 2017 U.S. Initial Quality Study (IQS), topping all 13 brands in the premium segment.

    The G70 marks the completion of Genesis sedan line-up and the brand will now start strengthening its lineup with SUVs and alternative powertrains. Genesis plans to roll out new products to expand its presence and coverage across the global market and six models are expected in its product portfolio by 2021.

    An Exterior with Genesis’ Unique Design Identity

    The all-new G70 showcases the future direction of the Genesis brand’s design identity.

    Athletic elegance is represented in the exterior styling, as the car captures both beauty and tension, like an athlete poised to perform.

    Luc Donckerwolke, Head of Genesis Design, said, “At Genesis, we shape fascination and desire with the passion, dedication and talent from our designers. We modulated all parameters from the Genesis DNA to tailor a sports sedan. This challenge required the highest skills and know-how. The G70 is designed to captivate all senses with its sensuous and tensioned muscular volumes.”

    The long hood and short front overhang, elegant roofline and assertive multi-spoke alloy wheels combine to form a sleek, dynamic profile, subtly highlighted by dark chrome aero trim.

    The hockey stick daylight opening and parabolic sidelines further express the unique design signatures of Genesis, displaying fast and dramatic energy with voluptuous forms and smooth surfaces.

    From the front and side, the G70’s prominent crest-type grille, character lines extending from the hood emblem, and pronounced air intakes communicate the muscular performance that the car is capable of.

    Two distinctive linear LED DRLs on each side of the large crest grille foreshadow the future Genesis signature quad lamps.

    In the rear, the LED rear combination lamps continue the quad lamp theme, while the raised trunk lid and compact bumper designs give the G70 a poised character. The rear lamps, evolved from the G80, have been stretched to the end of the rear to convey a wide and dynamic stance.

    A Sophisticated, Driver-Focused Interior

    G70’s interior is configured to prioritize an excellent user experience, with superb fit and finish throughout. The interior packaging reflects the thoughtfulness that drives the Genesis brand, with a priority on simplicity and an emphasis on genuine functionality instead of gimmickry.

    A horizontal layout brings a sense of stability and the driver-focused packaging provides a comfortable driving environment, with intuitively laid out switchgear and a comfortable, assertive sport steering wheel.

    Genesis designers employed premium materials throughout, including aluminum door handles, quilted leather door panels, metal speaker grills and high-quality soft touch surfaces. Nappa leather seats further add to the dynamic yet elegant interior.

    The G70 offers a wide range of unique and sophisticated color options that properly reflect global trends to meet client demand.

    Ten exterior colors are available: Platinum Silver, Carbon Metal, Marble White, Titanium Black, Racing Gray, Graceful Gray, Lapis Blue, Royal Blue, Blazing Red and Umber Brown.

    A new paint-finishing method separates small, evenly distributed aluminum particles and high luminosity colors, maximizing the brilliance of the exterior colors.

    The passenger cabin is available in five different colors: Obsidian Black, Sandstorm Gray, Velvet Burgundy, Tobacco Brown and Vanilla Beige. Two additional interior colors, which are Sports Gray and Sports Red will be dedicated to the G70 Sport and the high-end trim level for the 2.0T.

    Driving Character -- Agile Yet Safe, Dynamic Yet Quiet

    The G70 offers three powertrains – a 3.3-liter V6 gasoline turbo, 2.0-liter I4 gasoline turbo and a 2.2-liter I4 diesel. The 3.3-liter V6 turbo is the backbone of the enthusiast-focused “G70 Sport.”

    The G70 Sport is equipped with the Lambda II 3.3-liter V6 turbo GDI engine, with 370 PS and maximum torque of 52.0kgf·m.

    G70 Sport is a dynamic and powerful performer with 0 to 100 kph (62.5 mph) acceleration in 4.7 seconds and a top speed of 270 kph (167/168 mph). Variable-ratio steering and electronically controlled suspension are standard to provide agile steering response and an optimal ride-and-handling experience.

    The G70 2.0 turbo gasoline model is equipped with the Theta-II 2.0-liter turbo GDI engine, with 252 PS and maximum torque of 36.0kgf·m. (Sports package: 255 PS)

    The G70 2.2 diesel model is equipped with the R 2.2 VGT engine with 202 PS horsepower and maximum torque of 45.0kgf·m.

    Dynamic performance features include:

    1. Launch Control - Maximizes power control in acceleration mode
    2. Rack-mounted, motor-driven power steering (R-MDPS) and multi-link rear suspension - Provides precise handling and comfortable ride
    3. Dynamic torque vectoring system - Improves vehicle cornering control
    4. Mechanical limited slip differential (M-LSD) - Allows safe driving capabilities in low friction road conditions such as rain, snow and ice 

    The seat positions have been adjusted to lower the center of gravity of the car to maximize performance. To augment the driving experience, the Active Sound Design (ASD) system creates an aural character that reflects the engine load and driving mode settings.

    Noise, vibration and harshness have been minimized in the G70 through enhancements in multiple areas including vehicle body structure; exhaust system; sound absorption and isolation; suspension and body frame connection; and the design of the side mirrors and door sealing systems.

    The performance-focused sedan has been tested under the most challenging environments and surfaces in the world, including Death Valley (U.S.), northern Sweden, the Nürburgring (Germany) and the Alps (Austria) for driving stability, handling, durability and power delivery.

    Best-in-Class Safety

    Following the trend of the G90 and G80, the G70 offers the most comprehensive levels of safety in its class. Overall body stiffness and rigidity have been dramatically strengthened.

    The G70 has also been designed to help protect pedestrians – when imminent impact with a pedestrian is detected, its active hood function operates by lifting the hood to absorb shock and minimize the risk of injury.

    An unparalleled suite of advanced driver assist systems such as Forward Collision-Avoidance Assist (FCA), Highway Driving Assist (HDA), Blind spot Collision Warning (BCW) and Driver Awareness Warning (DAW) have been added as part of the ‘Genesis Active Safety Control’ to offer the highest level of safety and convenience in its class.

    The FCA system provides added safety with newly developed technology designed not only to protect vehicles and pedestrians, but also cyclists on the road. It automatically activates emergency braking through integrated radar-camera sensors when detecting bicycles.

    ‘Genesis Active Safety Control’ is the brand’s newly labeled advanced driver assist system package previously known as ‘Genesis Smart Sense.’

    Genesis aims to receive the highest ratings from both international and domestic organizations including the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and Korea New Car Assessment Program (KNCAP).

    Exceptional Comfort and Convenience

    The G70 incorporates a diverse range of advanced technologies that deliver ultimate convenience and connectivity.

    An example includes the smart posture control system, initially introduced in the G90. When the driver’s body information is input, the system automatically adjusts the seat, steering wheel, outside mirror and heads-up display to the optimal position, ensuring minimal stress even on long journeys.

    The G70 provides a diverse range of advanced convenience and connectivity, including an 8-inch touch screen display supporting MirrorLink, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

    The G70 will also be the first vehicle in Korea to feature server-based voice recognition technology, using Kakao’s artificial intelligence platform ‘Kakao I.’

    For the best audio performance, a 15-speaker Lexicon surround-sound system is available to provide an audiophile-level acoustic experience.

    Overseas product specifications in markets including North America, Russia and the Middle East are planned to be announced in early 2018.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    7 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    GM has two luxury brands in China... GM still outsells Mercedes there. 

    I'm talking about the economies of scale of the 3.6 V6, CUE (most of the underlying programming is identical to Mylink and IntelliLink), transmissions and stuff.  That GM 8-speed and 9-speed are going into everything. A lot of the innards that drivers never see are shared with 3 other crossovers with more to come. 

    Oh right, I forgot that Buick is a luxury brand even though the $16,700 Excelle and $20,600 Verano where 547,000 of Buicks 1.2 million Chinese market sales came from. By that measure, the VW Jetta is a luxury car too.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    First bar move (all of this is paraphrased btw)  

    "Mercedes outsells Cadillac in China"

     

    responded with

    "Buick outsells them both by light years"

     

    Second bar move

    "Well FWD CUVs will phase out and Benz will rule all" and "Buick is not luxury" (even though their cars get compared and cross shopped with MBs FWD offerings)  

     

    Just kick the damn bar over already and be done with it. 

    Edited by surreal1272
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Envision is a bit cheaper than a GLC or Cadillac.  But I brought it up because of economies of scale.  Mercedes has plenty of economies of scale.

    Once upon a time the Deville outsold the E-class and C-class combined in the USA, and in time the front drive luxury sedans have basically died off.  One day these front drive luxury crossovers will fall too, except maybe for the sub $45k market, they'll hold on, but in the end the rear drive always wins in luxury.

    Speaking of economies of scale, if Cadillacs crossovers are all front wheel drive, where do they get economies of scale on rear drive cars?  The Camaro is a shrinking market, this 3-series segment has a dozen entries in it, and the mid-size luxury sedan segment is shrinking.

    ATS and CTS are on the same platform.  Transmissions, engines, shared up and down the line...  you can get the same powertrain ATS, CTS, CT6.  The transmission is the 8L45 which is a light duty version of the 8L90 which is used in all of the 1500 series trucks, and Canyonado , plus the ATS-V and CTS-V.  The 2.0T is used in lots of stuff, so is the 3.6.  The only engines that haven't been borrowed from Cadillac yet are the 3.0T and 3.6T. 

    The AWD system in the XT5 is the same twin-clutch system in the Lacrosse and Acadia All-Terrain, it's made by a third party, and also used in the Focus RS plus a few other brands, no worries about economies of scale there. 

    Your prediction that FWD based crossovers will die off is wrong. Mercedes, BMW, and Infiniti just added to the count. 

    5 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Oh right, I forgot that Buick is a luxury brand even though the $16,700 Excelle and $20,600 Verano where 547,000 of Buicks 1.2 million Chinese market sales came from. By that measure, the VW Jetta is a luxury car too.

    As @surreal1272 warned you, be careful where you move those goalposts to. Mercedes builds vinyl laden taxis and for years built silly little things like the A-Class and B-Class. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, surreal1272 said:

    A bit cheaper and outsells the others by mere light years. Yeah, completely comparable. 

     

    And I don't care about "once upon a time". 

     

    And big words on FWD vehicles when Benz is increasing their FWD sedan stable. 

    So front wheel drive is bad for sedans, but good for crossovers?  You seem to hate on Mercedes front drive entry level car, but defend Cadillac's move to use it in mid-size crossover.

    Personally I wouldn't even consider a front drive car, but I won't consider buying a CLA/GLA either.  The market in the $30-40k space doesn't care though as most buyers don't notice the difference.   

    Chevy makes the Spark and Sonic, does that somehow hurt the Corvette and make it crap because the Sonic is a 138 hp front driver?  Mercedes makes like 20 models with a 500+ hp V8/V12 if they make 2 with a 208 hp fwd 4-cyldinder I don't think it a big deal.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    First bar move (all of this is paraphrased btw)  

    "Mercedes outsells Cadillac in China"

     

    responded with

    "Buick outsells them both by light years"

     

    Second bar move

    "Well FWD CUVs will phase out and Benz will rule all" and "Buick is not luxury" (even though their cars get compared and cross shopped with MBs FWD offerings)  

     

    Just kick the damn bar over already and be done with it. 

    VW outsells Buick in China, so what?  Buick doesn't sell their cars at Mercedes price point in China, or here.  No bar has been moved.  I made a Cadillac vs Lexus vs Mercedes comparison.  If Buick was a luxury brand, GM wouldn't need Cadillac, but Cadillac is still here, because they need a luxury brand.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    So front wheel drive is bad for sedans, but good for crossovers?  You seem to hate on Mercedes front drive entry level car, but defend Cadillac's move to use it in mid-size crossover.

    Personally I wouldn't even consider a front drive car, but I won't consider buying a CLA/GLA either.  The market in the $30-40k space doesn't care though as most buyers don't notice the difference.   

    Chevy makes the Spark and Sonic, does that somehow hurt the Corvette and make it crap because the Sonic is a 138 hp front driver?  Mercedes makes like 20 models with a 500+ hp V8/V12 if they make 2 with a 208 hp fwd 4-cyldinder I don't think it a big deal.  

    Actually you will not see me defending that once. I am pointing out sales and how you keep moving the bar to suit your argument. Big difference there because I have been very clear about my disdain for CUVs on this site. 

     

    Btw, that very same argument can be applied to you in reverse. 

     

    And in yet another bar move, you attempt to compare mainstream brand Chevy to luxury maker Mercedes. I have no words for the pure grade A bull$h! fallacy of that "argument". 

    Edited by surreal1272
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    ATS and CTS are on the same platform.  Transmissions, engines, shared up and down the line...  you can get the same powertrain ATS, CTS, CT6.  The transmission is the 8L45 which is a light duty version of the 8L90 which is used in all of the 1500 series trucks, and Canyonado , plus the ATS-V and CTS-V.  The 2.0T is used in lots of stuff, so is the 3.6.  The only engines that haven't been borrowed from Cadillac yet are the 3.0T and 3.6T. 

    The AWD system in the XT5 is the same twin-clutch system in the Lacrosse and Acadia All-Terrain, it's made by a third party, and also used in the Focus RS plus a few other brands, no worries about economies of scale there. 

    Your prediction that FWD based crossovers will die off is wrong. Mercedes, BMW, and Infiniti just added to the count. 

    As @surreal1272 warned you, be careful where you move those goalposts to. Mercedes builds vinyl laden taxis and for years built silly little things like the A-Class and B-Class. 

    No doubt GM has massive economies of scale on front drive.  On rear drive they have Camaro/ATS/CTS on one chassis and CT6 on another.  That isn't a lot of volume on those platforms.  Sure they can share the transmission with the pickups, but the 3.6 is outclassed by Cadillac's competition so that leaves them with turbo V6s that get criticized in a lot of reviews and no V8, because there is no volume to justify a Cadillac only V8, let alone a V12 or hybrid drivetrain.  

    Mercedes might build B-class taxis but they build $150k sports cars and S-class sedans and $240k V12 G-wagens.  They have the top end, Buick and even Cadillac don't have that high end. Although I would love to see Cadillac make a $150,000 car, at this point I don't even care if it is coupe, sedan, or SUV, just do something.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    44 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    No doubt GM has massive economies of scale on front drive.  On rear drive they have Camaro/ATS/CTS on one chassis and CT6 on another.  That isn't a lot of volume on those platforms.

    How many platforms are in the German lineups? Is the 3/4 Series on one? C Class on one? Or do those share platforms with the 5/6 and E Class? I honestly don't know. 

    How many of those V12's have ever been sold? I doubt they are selling THAT many S65's and G65's. It's just an old engine now. That was probably the only way they could justify making it. Make sure they use it for 10 years. 

    Edited by ccap41
    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    39 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    How many platforms are in the German lineups? Is the 3/4 Series on one? C Class on one? Or do those share platforms with the 5/6 and E Class? I honestly don't know. 

    How many of those V12's have ever been sold? I doubt they are selling THAT many S65's and G65's. It's just an old engine now. That was probably the only way they could justify making it. Make sure they use it for 10 years. 

    I don't know how many BMW has, but the 7-seires platform is shared with Rolls, and a cut down version is used for the 5-series.  Plus their inline 4 and inline six share a ton of parts.

    Mercedes has the MFA platform for A-class/B-class, which is also shared with Renault and the Infiniti QX-whatever the small one is.  The MRA platform is under the C-class, GLC, E-class and S-class, the GLE/GLS are on another platform, G-wagen on a platform, SL, SLC and AMG GT are each on their own platform, but SLC is dying and SL and GT I think are merging to one platform in the next gen.  They also are switching to inline six because it will share 70% of the parts with the inline 4.  The Mercedes V12 is about a $60,000 option over an AMG V8 car, I would say the profit margin is sick on those.

    I think every VW, Audi, and Bentley share one platform.  Well maybe not, but the VW Atlas full size SUV is built on a Golf platform.  And that is true, I am not making that up.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Pick a goal post and stick with it. You're all over the map SMK! We get it, you think that no matter what GM does, Mercedes does it better, and you'll make up every excuse or strawman argument in the book when you're shown to be wrong.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    He won't.. he will continually move the post in either direction so long as it accommodates Benz or the Germans. GM, a downsized company.. leaner than ever.. managed too pull in $12Billion last year still with lawsuits from ignition over its head. For '17 they are at about $4 Billion (for Q1 and 2) down slightly because of the Opel sale, still a strong possibility to pull off $8-9Bil for the year

    GM have been historically about their truck sales more than anything else.. RWD TRUCK sales in the U.S. alone accounted for about 1.3 Million sales last year. IMO, car RWD sales are a luxury that GM affords.. but the economies of scale are carried forward generation after generation. That being.. these platforms are not costing them the billions upon billions that everyone whats to throw on them. Alpha and Omega are similar in many regards to the each other with the exception of certain weight saving techs that came about after alpha was already on the market.. bet good money that Alpha2 is going to be basically a scaled down version of Omega. I have also been told several times by GM insiders that technically a great deal of Alpha was really SIGMA.. as Sigma was a revised version of ZETA.. (or was it vice-versa?) 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Pick a goal post and stick with it. You're all over the map SMK! We get it, you think that no matter what GM does, Mercedes does it better, and you'll make up every excuse or strawman argument in the book when you're shown to be wrong.

    The bar moving is simply baffling nad unprecedented and that is saying something given the history of rabid fanboys I have seen over the years. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Mercedes might build E-class taxis but they build $150k sports cars and S-class sedans and $240k V12 G-wagens.  They have the top end, Buick and even Cadillac don't have that high end. 

    Correct your Error AGAIN on the Taxis, E-CLASS,

    Plus as has been proven with Pictures by Drew, The Crappy G-Wagon is built with mismatched screws, poor fit n finish and is not as amazing and godly as you proclaim.

    Your being blind to the truth that MB is just another Mass market maker now and no longer a luxury brand only. Moving the goalposts to fit your warped vision.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @smk4565

    Will help you out with the Truth as this was first published in 2014 when MB stated they were moving to 4 platforms by 2017.

    https://www.autoevolution.com/news/mercedes-benz-will-switch-to-just-four-car-platforms-78508.html

    To Quote:

    In a bid to reduce both the costs and the speed of development for new models, the three-pointed star car maker is hard at work in developing four different modular passenger car platforms which will cover their entire ever-expanding lineup. 

    The MFA (Modular Front Architecture) platform currently consists of the A-Class, B-Class, CLA-Class and the recently-unveiled GLA-Class, with an upcoming CLA Shooting Brake to complement the rest of the models later this year. A not-yet-confirmed SLA Roadster might be part of the second generation of the MFA platform, which is set to arrive in 2017.

    The MRA (Modular Rear Architecture) platform debuted with the all-new Mercedes-Benz C-Class W205, featuring an extensive use of aluminium and a dramatic decrease in weight. It is presumably a lot more flexible than the fixed-wheelbase MFA, with Daimler's Thomas Weber being quoted as saying that over ten different vehicles could be manufactured on the MRA platform, as it allows engineers to differentiate them with different wheelbases and even body width. 

    The MHA (Modular High Architecture) platform will be used on future large crossovers and SUVs from Mercedes-Benz, including the upcoming MLC crossover, which should be unveiled in 2015 and built alongside the ML, GL and C-Class W205 in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. The next generations of the ML and GL will also be manufactured on the MHA platform, with smaller crossover/SUVs to be built either on the MRA (upcoming GLK X205 and a GLC competitor for the BMW X4) or the MFA (the GLA X156) platforms. 

    The MSA (Modular Sports Architecture) platform will also use a hefty amount of aluminium but also carbon fiber reinforced plastic to decrease weight even more. The future generation of the SLK might switch from using a modified C-Class platform to the MSA, along with the Mercedes-Benz SL Roadster R232, but nothing is confirmed as of yet.

    Interesting is that motorauthority interviewed MB CEO and this is what he stated as an update:

     

    In future, Mercedes will only use two platforms, explained Bernhard. These will be the new Front Wheel Architecture (MFA), used for small cars and featured already in the third-generation A Class and B Class models, as well as a flexible Mercedes Rear Wheel Architecture (MRA) that will cover the rest of Mercedes’ lineup and will debut later this year in the next-generation S Class.

    Finally, Bernhard said that more production will take place outside of Europe. Currently, 90 percent of Mercedes’ lineup is built in Europe and almost of all its engines are. By 2020, only 50 percent of its lineup will be built in Europe and around 60 percent of its engines. Key areas for increased production will be the NAFTA region and China. On top of this, there will also be greater co-operation with partners such as Renault-Nissan.

    http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1074706_mercedes-to-halve-its-number-of-platforms-by-2015

    Yet this story came out before the one above so even MB is not really sure what they are doing.

    Euro Auto news states this which seems to be most current.:

    http://europe.autonews.com/article/20140910/ANE/140919998/mercedes-reorganizes-manufacturing-operations-to-reduce-costs

    Mercedes' platforms
    1. MRA (rear-wheel-drive architecture)
    2. MFA (front-wheel-drive architecture)
    3. MHA (SUVs)
    4. MSA (sports cars)
    5. MPA (powertrains)

    So End Result is MB is using 4 platforms for their auto's and 1 Powertrain line across all of them so from the cheapest Toyota, Chevy Ford competition of an A - Class to the top of the line S-Class they all have the same engine in one way or another sharing parts and doing the same thing as everyone else.

    Looks like VW with their singular Modular platform to be used on all VW, Audi and Porsche will beat MB in Efficiency for Germany and Europe.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    46 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    The Crappy G-Wagon is built with mismatched screws, poor fit n finish and is not as amazing and godly as you proclaim.

    The gf's isn't fit with mismatches screws or poor fit and finish. Things fit as they should and with 180k miles on it there still aren't squeaks or rattles. Plus, its a vehicle you could fit in. The roof is like a mile high. 

    If you ask me, 4 platforms across their entire brand is pretty impressive. They have so many vehicles there isn't a single hole in their lineup from the cheap CLA to the bonkers Maybach AMG. It's safe to assume that the G is the only one on its own platform along with the AMG GT but with the G being 800 years old I'd say its safe to assume that's been paid for long ago. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    Correct your Error AGAIN on the Taxis, E-CLASS,

    Plus as has been proven with Pictures by Drew, The Crappy G-Wagon is built with mismatched screws, poor fit n finish and is not as amazing and godly as you proclaim.

    Your being blind to the truth that MB is just another Mass market maker now and no longer a luxury brand only. Moving the goalposts to fit your warped vision.

    Said it a thousand times.. only in the U.S. is Mercedes considered a Luxo-Only maker. They are essentially Chevy/GMC/Cadillac/Buick.. just on a smaller scale

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    Correct your Error AGAIN on the Taxis, E-CLASS,

    Plus as has been proven with Pictures by Drew, The Crappy G-Wagon is built with mismatched screws, poor fit n finish and is not as amazing and godly as you proclaim.

    Your being blind to the truth that MB is just another Mass market maker now and no longer a luxury brand only. Moving the goalposts to fit your warped vision.

    While talking about the the high end that Cadillac doesn't have, he will completely sidestep the low end that Cadillac also doesn't have (Looking at you FWD CLA, A Class, and Metris).

     

    "Look ma! There's a bar over there! Can I just kick it for the hell of it?"

    Edited by surreal1272
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    The gf's isn't fit with mismatches screws or poor fit and finish. Things fit as they should and with 180k miles on it there still aren't squeaks or rattles. Plus, its a vehicle you could fit in. The roof is like a mile high. 

    If you ask me, 4 platforms across their entire brand is pretty impressive. They have so many vehicles there isn't a single hole in their lineup from the cheap CLA to the bonkers Maybach AMG. It's safe to assume that the G is the only one on its own platform along with the AMG GT but with the G being 800 years old I'd say its safe to assume that's been paid for long ago. 

    U are quickly becoming an apologetic sap for these German brands when evidence constantly proves U wrong. I guess U are trying to be a devil's advocate.. but...The first pic is the one that had me laughing the hardest.. fuck using it as a cup holder.. cut the bottom out and let's play Hoops using balled up receipts i70mfl.jpg&key=4d853abb8ce436bc98d5e70f3 Pathetic people ever make a negative statement about an GMT800 Tahoe again, let alone an Escalade or Denali.. or a 900 or K2xx

    G Class-2.jpg

    G Class-5.jpg

    G Class-9.jpg

    G Class-11.jpgG Class-8.jpg

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    39 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    The gf's isn't fit with mismatches screws or poor fit and finish. Things fit as they should and with 180k miles on it there still aren't squeaks or rattles. Plus, its a vehicle you could fit in. The roof is like a mile high. 

    If you ask me, 4 platforms across their entire brand is pretty impressive. They have so many vehicles there isn't a single hole in their lineup from the cheap CLA to the bonkers Maybach AMG. It's safe to assume that the G is the only one on its own platform along with the AMG GT but with the G being 800 years old I'd say its safe to assume that's been paid for long ago. 

     

    There aren't squeaks and rattles because you can tighten everything up with a penknife every time you stop for gas. :P

     

    G Class-1.jpg

    G Class-8.jpg

    G Class-2.jpg

     

    I don't blame MB for selling these.... if they can get suckers to buy them for $110k+, more power to them.  But don't let's hold the G-Wagon up as some marvel of engineering. John Deeres run forever also. 

     

    Hahah! We posted the same pics at the same time.

    Here's the whole thread for those who are interested. Mercedes G-Class quality

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

     

    There aren't squeaks and rattles because you can tighten everything up with a penknife every time you stop for gas. :P

     

    G Class-1.jpg

    G Class-8.jpg

    G Class-2.jpg

     

    I don't blame MB for selling these.... if they can get suckers to buy them for $110k+, more power to them.  But don't let's hold the G-Wagon up as some marvel of engineering. John Deere's run forever also. 

     

    SUCKERS is the key word. Its for the suburbanite who has to tackle the sand dunes at the local Costco, Dunkin, or higher end Crate and Barrel :huh:

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    34 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    The gf's isn't fit with mismatches screws or poor fit and finish. Things fit as they should and with 180k miles on it there still aren't squeaks or rattles. Plus, its a vehicle you could fit in. The roof is like a mile high. 

    If you ask me, 4 platforms across their entire brand is pretty impressive. They have so many vehicles there isn't a single hole in their lineup from the cheap CLA to the bonkers Maybach AMG. It's safe to assume that the G is the only one on its own platform along with the AMG GT but with the G being 800 years old I'd say its safe to assume that's been paid for long ago. 

    Glad your girlfriend has a solid 180K miles G-Wagon and that fit n finish is up to your standard.

    Drew had posted the last time SMK bragged about how great the G-Wagon was over everything else and moving his goal posts pictures from the actual auto show floor that showed mismatched screws and poor fit n finish.

    MB is no different than GM or FORD, they make some great auto's and they also totally flub up and build crap. They are also again no different than Toyota, GM, Ford or VW in that they build from entry level auto's to top end and not everything is the best of the best of the best.

    Crap happens!

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Dude every time Smk says something about Benz fit and finish... I think I will reference how this 244vcsz.jpg... 

    cupholder.jpg

    SMDH

    wasn't even a step up from this from the 1970s-80s

    9ede4bbb31cc8a64a77050c3ede18bef--mug-hof27br8.jpgf27br8.jpgf27br8.jpgf27br8.jpgf27br8.jpg

    GWagon.. the Official vehicle of the... ABA.. no not the BAR ASSOCIATION.. the outdated and defunct 

    spalding_aba_game_-6872.jpg

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    41 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    The gf's isn't fit with mismatches screws or poor fit and finish. Things fit as they should and with 180k miles on it there still aren't squeaks or rattles. Plus, its a vehicle you could fit in. The roof is like a mile high. 

    If you ask me, 4 platforms across their entire brand is pretty impressive. They have so many vehicles there isn't a single hole in their lineup from the cheap CLA to the bonkers Maybach AMG. It's safe to assume that the G is the only one on its own platform along with the AMG GT but with the G being 800 years old I'd say its safe to assume that's been paid for long ago. 

    Right and the G-wagon is going to the MHA platform I think, it is getting a new chassis for the first time in 40 years with the 2019 model.

    There is a 5th platform for electric cars that will carry 10 models on it. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Right and the G-wagon is going to the MHA platform I think, it is getting a new chassis for the first time in 40 years with the 2019 model.

    There is a 5th platform for electric cars that will carry 10 models on it. 

    So instantly U forgive them for selling people shit... for minimum the last 20 years. And that's me giving them the benefit of the doubt that a platform that was engineered during the Carter Admin was good up to the Bush I admin

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

     

    There aren't squeaks and rattles because you can tighten everything up with a penknife every time you stop for gas. :P

     

    G Class-1.jpg

    G Class-8.jpg

    G Class-2.jpg

     

    I don't blame MB for selling these.... if they can get suckers to buy them for $110k+, more power to them.  But don't let's hold the G-Wagon up as some marvel of engineering. John Deere's run forever also. 

     

    Exactly and over half of G-wagons sold are AMG so that is a $140k starting price before options.  On a vehicle that has been paid off long ago.  This is the easiest money in the whole auto industry.  And this because Mercedes is a desirable brand and the G is a highly desirable product. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Exactly and over half of G-wagons sold are AMG so that is a $140k starting price before options.  On a vehicle that has been paid off long ago.  This is the easiest money in the whole auto industry.  And this because Mercedes is a desirable brand and the G is a highly desirable product. 

    In his defense I think the SUCKER he was talking about was U... I kno for a FACT.. that I certainly was. But then again.. make no mistake.. I'd certainly take this:

    1200px-Mercedes-Benz_W463_G_350_BlueTEC_

      over this...:

    2017-cadillac-escalade-02-1024x682.jpg

    if the Benz was free.. simply to find a SUCKER like U and sell it to so I could, buy the 'Slade...  pocket the $45K difference to get a sweet new:

    maxresdefault.jpg  

    to use as DD 

    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    U are quickly becoming an apologetic sap for these German brands when evidence constantly proves U wrong. I guess U are trying to be a devil's advocate.. but...The first pic is the one that had me laughing the hardest.. f@#k using it as a cup holder.. cut the bottom out and let's play Hoops using balled up receipts i70mfl.jpg&key=4d853abb8ce436bc98d5e70f3 Pathetic people ever make a negative statement about an GMT800 Tahoe again, let alone an Escalade or Denali.. or a 900 or K2xx

    G Class-2.jpg

    G Class-5.jpg

    G Class-9.jpg

    G Class-11.jpgG Class-8.jpg

    Like you say every single time with your personal Cadillac experience, get out and drive one and be in one regularly and them come talk to me. ;)  Anybody can find bad pictures on the internet about almost any vehicle. Shall we find quality control issues on Cadillacs? 

    That cup holder is a fckn joke though. I literally laugh about it because it's such a joke. It holds...almost nothing..

    36 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    There aren't squeaks and rattles because you can tighten everything up with a penknife every time you stop for gas. :P

    Hell yeah you can! 

    Everybody here complains about how overly complex vehicles and their systems get and how technology is ruining the driver's car and when there's one vehicle which keeps it old school(and the Wrangler!) people get on it for that too. There's just no winning with people. 

    35 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Drew had posted the last time SMK bragged about how great the G-Wagon was over everything else and moving his goal posts pictures from the actual auto show floor that showed mismatched screws and poor fit n finish.

    Drew has also mentioned that it isn't an uncommon occurrence to see things like this on auto show floors as most aren't finished vehicles/concepts/prototypes/vehicles that will never be for sale. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    27 minutes ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    So instantly U forgive them for selling people $h!... for minimum the last 20 years. And that's me giving them the benefit of the doubt that a platform that was engineered during the Carter Admin was good up to the Bush I admin

    At least MB knows how to convince people to buy $h!. Cadillac should take note. 

    15 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The Escalade would be my DD, but I get your point.

    No, I don't care that the G-Wagon can go pining for the fjords.... The amount of off-roading I do even my CR-V can handle. 

    So never buy to consider anything cool because you don't do it often? That's the least enthusiast-like thing you've ever said. If we all did that we would all be in Camrys and Fusions(and Casa can get a Malibu, because Chevy). 

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Hell yeah you can! 

    Everybody here complains about how overly complex vehicles and their systems get and how technology is ruining the driver's car and when there's one vehicle which keeps it old school(and the Wrangler!) people get on it for that too. There's just no winning with people. 

    No, I don't mind old school vehicles at all. I often prefer to drive my '81 over either of my newer cars.  I *love* old cars.

    If the G-Wagon was priced like a Wrangler, even only double the Wrangler, you wouldn't hear a peep of complaint out of me..... but $140k?  That's 3.5 very nicely equipped wranglers.   You could literally buy one of each model Trailhawk that Jeep sells (there are 4) plus a Wrangler unlimited and still pay less money than a single G-Wagon. 

     

    7 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    At least MB knows how to convince people to buy $h!. Cadillac should take note. 

    So never buy to consider anything cool because you don't do it often? That's the least enthusiast-like thing you've ever said. If we all did that we would all be in Camrys and Fusions(and Casa can get a Malibu, because Chevy). 

    You misunderstand me.  My objection to the G-Wagon is only to the price of the thing compared to the way it is built.... especially since the tooling was paid off before you were born.  I like the Wrangler for a weekend of fun, but I'd never own one as a DD.  Just because I don't want one as a daily driver doesn't mean I can't appreciate it for other things. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    That cup holder is a fckn joke though. I literally laugh about it because it's such a joke. It holds...almost nothing..

    Drew has also mentioned that it isn't an uncommon occurrence to see things like this on auto show floors as most aren't finished vehicles/concepts/prototypes/vehicles that will never be for sale. 

    Yet these pictures are not just from a search of the Internet, these are pictures taken by Drew at the auto show of a production G-Wagon available for sale.

    Your Right MB built a joke of a cup holder, plenty of the G-Wagon is great, but plenty is also a Joke and just pathetic.

    Your right about old school as I do love the Wrangler and older SUV's that are much more simpler before the Gov's became Nanny device crazy trying to protect you at ever turn, every foot forward or back. 

    Auto Craziness with the nanny devices.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    If the G-Wagon was priced like a Wrangler, even only double the Wrangler, you wouldn't hear a peep of complaint out of me..... but $140k?  That's 3.5 very nicely equipped wranglers.   You could literally buy one of each model Trailhawk that Jeep sells (there are 4) plus a Wrangler unlimited and still pay less money than a single G-Wagon. 

    There's no reason to sell it that cheap though... Between a leather lined interior, electronic locking front and rear and/or together along with a standard v8 and solid axles front and rear there's no reason to because it sells. Plus, they probably couldn't keep up with demand as they're still hand assembled. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    38 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Drew has also mentioned that it isn't an uncommon occurrence to see things like this on auto show floors as most aren't finished vehicles/concepts/prototypes/vehicles that will never be for sale. 

    These are pictures I took of a production vehicle. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, ykX said:

    So pretty much every thread comes to MB vs Caddy right now ...

    Yup, seems so lately, but then Fall is about to begin so it could change to everything is about NFL or Hockey. :P 

    In regards to Genesis, it will be interesting to watch if they try to mimic the whole BMW product line or just go with a single 3 series competitor and focus on the SUV/CUV run.

    SUV/CUV is what I would be focused on with Hybrid/EV options in those that beat the Germans.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, dfelt said:

    Yup, seems so lately, but then Fall is about to begin so it could change to everything is about NFL or Hockey. :P 

    In regards to Genesis, it will be interesting to watch if they try to mimic the whole BMW product line or just go with a single 3 series competitor and focus on the SUV/CUV run.

    SUV/CUV is what I would be focused on with Hybrid/EV options in those that beat the Germans.

    Well they'll have the G70, 80, and 90. I'm not sure where those all line up but I thought the 90 was more 5 Series size..? Or is it big like the 7/S Class? 

    Just now, dfelt said:

    Yes we keep telling you that, Taken at an Auto Show of a Production built G-Wagon available for sale! :)

    ohhhhh well somebody is gettin' ripped off. Also, those are some of the most beaten on vehicles one could buy. Who'd want to buy a vehicle that hundreds of people have sat in and fiddled with things? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    There's no reason to sell it that cheap though... Between a leather lined interior, electronic locking front and rear and/or together along with a standard v8 and solid axles front and rear there's no reason to because it sells. Plus, they probably couldn't keep up with demand as they're still hand assembled. 

    Right, they're selling it for that much because they can, I don't blame Mercedes for it one bit.  I can still think they are a terrible deal, no?  The reason the G-Wagon keeps coming up is because @smk4565 likes to tout it as "the best" simply because it costs so much.   It is not a luxury vehicle in the same vein as the GLS or Escalade or Range Rover though... it is a luxury vehicle simply because it is a luxury to own such an expensive toy that has few redeeming qualities for everyday use. 

     

    And of course they are hand built.... you could assemble one with a power drill bought at harbor freight. 

    6 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Well they'll have the G70, 80, and 90. I'm not sure where those all line up but I thought the 90 was more 5 Series size..? Or is it big like the 7/S Class? 

    ohhhhh well somebody is gettin' ripped off. Also, those are some of the most beaten on vehicles one could buy. Who'd want to buy a vehicle that hundreds of people have sat in and fiddled with things? 

     

    70 - 3-series sized,

    80 - CT6 sized (larger than 5-series, smaller than 7 Long wheel base)

    90 - 7-series LWB sized. 

    The one on the auto show floor wouldn't be any different mechanically than one at the dealership though... it's not like some visitor snuck in and changed out the screws in the door.   Besides, I go on press days before you riff-raff are allowed in.  :P  (That's obviously a joke, because as @William Maley can tell you, auto journalists can be some of the most obnoxious people you ever meet)

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So now that Genesis has their car lineup, Wonder how fast they will turn out a full SUV/CUV lineup and I wonder how soon before the first updates. 

    It will be interesting to see how Genesis, AKA Hyundai will do in the Luxury race and how the public will take to it?

    Will it become like Lexus with a loyal following but just another low tier luxury line or will they truly raise to the competition and become one of the top 3 luxury auto lines?

    :scratchchin:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Right, they're selling it for that much because they can, I don't blame Mercedes for it one bit.  I can still think they are a terrible deal, no?  The reason the G-Wagon keeps coming up is because @smk4565 likes to tout it as "the best" simply because it costs so much.   It is not a luxury vehicle in the same vein as the GLS or Escalade or Range Rover though... it is a luxury vehicle simply because it is a luxury to own such an expensive toy that has few redeeming qualities for everyday use. 

     

    And of course they are hand built.... you could assemble one with a power drill bought at harbor freight. 

     

    70 - 3-series sized,

    80 - CT6 sized (larger than 5-series, smaller than 7 Long wheel base)

    90 - 7-series LWB sized. 

    It is also an outdated $h! of a deal (and proving there are suckers everywhere) when you can pick up a two year G for about half the price of a new one. Barnum was truly right.

     

    IMG_0639.PNG

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The one on the auto show floor wouldn't be any different mechanically than one at the dealership though... it's not like some visitor snuck in and changed out the screws in the door.   Besides, I go on press days before you riff-raff are allowed in.  :P  (That's obviously a joke, because as @William Maley can tell you, auto journalists can be some of the most obnoxious people you ever meet)

    :roflmao: Us Riff-Raff love what you do, makes us look good when we are not the ones breaking, scratching and overall messing things up. :P 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, dfelt said:

    So now that Genesis has their car lineup, Wonder how fast they will turn out a full SUV/CUV lineup and I wonder how soon before the first updates. 

    It will be interesting to see how Genesis, AKA Hyundai will do in the Luxury race and how the public will take to it?

    Will it become like Lexus with a loyal following but just another low tier luxury line or will they truly raise to the competition and become one of the top 3 luxury auto lines?

    :scratchchin:

    I believe they are going to lead off with an XT5 sized crossover first. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    It is also an outdated $h! of a deal (and proving there are suckers everywhere) when you can pick up a two year G for about half the price of a new one. Barnum was truly right.

     

    IMG_0639.PNG

    So true that a sucker is born every day.

    For that coin, I would still take a brand new Escalade over this!

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, ccap41 said:

    Insert any fun car ever here. 

    No, not really.  Plenty of people use Mustangs, Camaros, Wranglers, and even F-150 Raptors as daily drivers.    The G-wagon is a ginormous gas hog, rides poorly, and built the same way they built cars in 1975.  The main redeeming quality is you can buy most replacement parts off the HELP! rack at Walmart. 

    • Haha 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

     

     

    16 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The one on the auto show floor wouldn't be any different mechanically than one at the dealership though... it's not like some visitor snuck in and changed out the screws in the door.

    That's not what you or anybody else is complaining about though. The mechanical bits of the G are it's highest selling points(even though none of the buyers will use those for what they're designed for). But being on a floor where hundres of people will fiddle with and fondle if some jabroni cracks something and the only thing on hand is a different screw to hold on the other reflector(because ANOTHER jabroni dropped and lost the first one) you're going to use a different screw because it means absolutely nothing. 

    10 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    when you can pick up a two year G for about half the price of a new one

    That's the only way to buy any luxury car, if you ask me. It was literally what the gf's parents did. I think theirs was 4-5 years old and paid 50k or 55k. 

    Edited by ccap41
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, ccap41 said:

     

    That's not what you or anybody else is complaining about though. The mechanical bits of the G are it's highest selling points(even though none of the buyers will use those for what they're designed for). But being on a floor where hundres of people will fiddle with and fondle if some jabroni cracks something and the only thing on hand is a different screw to hold on the other reflector(because ANOTHER jabroni dropped and lost the first one) you're going to use a different screw because it means absolutely nothing. 

    Give me a little credit here.  This wasn't my first time at the rodeo.  LA Auto Show is in a few months. If you really want, I'll take more pics for you. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    No, not really.  Plenty of people use Mustangs, Camaros, Wranglers, and even F-150 Raptors as daily drivers.    The G-wagon is a ginormous gas hog, rides poorly, and built the same way they built cars in 1975.  The main redeeming quality is you can buy most replacement parts off the HELP! rack at Walmart. 

    Uhhh yeah... what redeeming qualities does a Camaro or Wrangler offer a daily driver over any sedan or CUV? They ride like $h! and have little to no storage in comparison. 

    1 minute ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Give me a little credit here.  This wasn't my first time at the rodeo.  LA Auto Show is in a few months. If you really want, I'll take more pics for you. 

    I'm not discrediting YOU at all, at least I'm not trying to. I'm just saying why there's a possibility that a reflector may have two different screws because it was an auto show car, not at a dealership. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, ccap41 said:

    Uhhh yeah... what redeeming qualities does a Camaro or Wrangler offer a daily driver over any sedan or CUV? They ride like $h! and have little to no storage in comparison. 

    Camaro and Mustang actually ride really nice. I like either of them for a long distance drive.  Wrangler takes its top off, which I'm told can be fun.  The Raptor has at least the abilities that any other truck offers. In any case, for G-Wagon money, I can buy a Camaro, Mustang, Wrangler, and Raptor and still have money left over to fuel all of them for a few years

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I am not aware of travel cases for internal drives. Usually you have the drive and once you have made sure you own static electricity is discharged on your body, open the computer and unplug the power cable and data cable to the HD. Then you unscrew the screws holding the drive in. Put the drive into an Anti-Static bag and then usually into a box that has foam padding on all sides to protect the drive and then tape it up to close it.  With both drives in their proper storage bags, you can then have both drives in between foam insulation for handling any dropping of the box, etc. Pack them in a box and tape shut, should then easily handle going through your carry on or checked in luggage. To ship a hard drive, you need to: Secure the hard drive in its original packaging or anti-static bag. If you don't have an anti-static bag, place the drive into a zipped freezer bag to prevent any moisture getting into the drive during transit. Sandwich the drive between foam or wrap it in bubble wrap to absorb any minor shocks. Put the hard drive in a padded shipping box. Close and seal the box. Label your package. Amazon.com : hard drive shipping box This is pretty much all you need.
    • Either a co-pilot first time landing or something truly went wrong on the plane.
    • The incoming rectangular lamps on many GM cars in that era made them much more attractive.  They made a big difference. Now, as far the powerplant went, the notion of 500 cubic inches was mindboggling even during the malaise era.  If you want to see someone's jaw drop, tell a European that their engines have 8200 cc or 8.2 liters.  For those who aren't driving the occasional Mustang or Camaro you see, they freak out at anything over 2,500 or 3,000 cc.
    • Thank you for the response. I want to reinstall them into the computers, especially the "newer" one.  The old one has been a real champ.   The reason for not leaving them in the desktop is that the basic tower might have to be transported ... and not by me.  That means it will be out of my possession for a while.  Since the HDs would be traveling with me, they'll have to get scanned through airport security a time or two.  I'm guessing that shouldn't mess with the data.   I've already backed up the C drive on several large 1 TB portable hard drives.  I don't want to touch the basic functions and files on the computers since I don't know how that all works.  I stay away from the drives and files I am not familiar with. I tend to donate other things to charity.   I did give the Regal I once owned to charity.   A good friend told me that, about a month or two later, he saw it being driven around the city by its new owner and we had a good laugh. This is what I want to do.  I'm just trying to figure out if the guy or gal at Office Depot can size a case based on looking up the unit and the HD in it.  Any ideas on that part?  Or should I do that and approximate the size and weight of the part to get the cases?
    • I'm wondering about a lot of things related to this.  I am sure that, sadly, the passengers inside were jolted.  This is way different from a rough landing. Why was it even necessary to do it?  What was going on at the airport property at that time?  How does one even pull this off?  I've seen some vids of where they barely touch and then go off again, but this one looks way more complicated.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings