Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    GM Recalls 1.4 Million Older Vehicles To Fix Fire Issue For the Fourth Time

      For the fourth time, GM is calling back older vehicles with the 3.8L V6 for fires


    General Motors has ordered a recall on 1.4 million older vehicles equipped with the 3.8L V6 for a fire risk again. The affected vehicles include,

    • 1997 - 2004 Buick Regal
    • 2000 - 2004 Chevrolet Impala
    • 1998 - 1999 Chevrolet Lumina
    • 1998 - 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
    • 1998 - 1999 Oldsmobile Intrigue
    • 1997 - 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix


    The problem deals with valve covers that degrade and can leak oil. The leaking oil can fall onto the exhaust manifold under hard braking and catch fire. Now the Detroit News reports this is the fourth time that GM recalled vehicles with this problem since 2008. GM says the previous recalls haven't worked because of the "aging and wear to the valve cover and valve cover gasket".

     

    Now the bad news is that GM hasn't figured out a fix for this problem. But in the meantime, they are contacting owners about this problem.

     

    Source: The Detroit News, General Motors

     

    Press Release is on Page 2


     

    General Motors is recalling 1,283,340 older sedans and coupes in the U.S. from the 1997 to 2004 model years because drops of oil may be deposited on the hot exhaust manifold through hard braking, which can cause engine compartment fires. GM is working on a remedy. The company is aware of post-repair fires in some vehicles but no crashes or fatalities. There have been 19 reported minor injuries over the last six years. These vehicles with 3.8-liter V6 3800 engines are affected: 1997-2004 Pontiac Grand Prix, 2000-2004 Chevrolet Impala, 1998-1999 Chevrolet Lumina and 1998-2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, 1998-1999 Oldsmobile Intrigue and 1997-2004 Buick Regal. Including Canada, Mexico and exports, the total population is 1,411,332.General Motors is recalling 1,283,340 older sedans and coupes in the U.S. from the 1997 to 2004 model years because drops of oil may be deposited on the hot exhaust manifold through hard braking, which can cause engine compartment fires. GM is working on a remedy. The company is aware of post-repair fires in some vehicles but no crashes or fatalities. There have been 19 reported minor injuries over the last six years. These vehicles with 3.8-liter V6 3800 engines are affected: 1997-2004 Pontiac Grand Prix, 2000-2004 Chevrolet Impala, 1998-1999 Chevrolet Lumina and 1998-2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, 1998-1999 Oldsmobile Intrigue and 1997-2004 Buick Regal. Including Canada, Mexico and exports, the total population is 1,411,332.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Why are they being so proactive on this?  Could it be that so many of these good old GM cars are still in daily use, especially out of the rust belt region of the country?

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Why are they being so proactive on this?  Could it be that so many of these good old GM cars are still in daily use, especially out of the rust belt region of the country?

    Since there's been over 1300 fires since last recall, one can say GM is not being proactive at all.

    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Why are they being so proactive on this?  Could it be that so many of these good old GM cars are still in daily use, especially out of the rust belt region of the country?

    Since there's been over 1300 fires since last recall, one can say GM is not being proactive at all.

     

    It's not different than the almost twenty years of Ford cruise control issues, some issued more than four times for certain models. GM is going beyond the need considering a big chunk of these models are almost 20 years old. 

     

    http://www.lieffcabraser.com/Personal-Injury/Car-Accidents/Ford-Cruise-Control-Switch-Fires.shtml

     

    http://www.autosafety.org/ford-cruise-control-deactivation-switch-recalls-and-history

     

    Point being "pro-active" is a relative term in this case.

    Edited by surreal1272
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    Why are they being so proactive on this?  Could it be that so many of these good old GM cars are still in daily use, especially out of the rust belt region of the country?

    Since there's been over 1300 fires since last recall, one can say GM is not being proactive at all.

     

    It's not different than the almost twenty years of Ford cruise control issues, some issued more than four times for certain models. GM is going beyond the need considering a big chunk of these models are almost 20 years old. 

     

    http://www.lieffcabraser.com/Personal-Injury/Car-Accidents/Ford-Cruise-Control-Switch-Fires.shtml

     

    http://www.autosafety.org/ford-cruise-control-deactivation-switch-recalls-and-history

     

     

     

    Wrong thread. This has NOTHING to do with Ford. 

    • Disagree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Why are they being so proactive on this? Could it be that so many of these good old GM cars are still in daily use, especially out of the rust belt region of the country?

    Since there's been over 1300 fires since last recall, one can say GM is not being proactive at all.

    It's not different than the almost twenty years of Ford cruise control issues, some issued more than four times for certain models. GM is going beyond the need considering a big chunk of these models are almost 20 years old.

    http://www.lieffcabraser.com/Personal-Injury/Car-Accidents/Ford-Cruise-Control-Switch-Fires.shtml

    http://www.autosafety.org/ford-cruise-control-deactivation-switch-recalls-and-history

    Wrong thread. This has NOTHING to do with Ford.

    Correct thread because it was made to illustrate the relative nature of the term "pro active" and how competing companies handle repeat issues. Edited by surreal1272
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Why are they being so proactive on this? Could it be that so many of these good old GM cars are still in daily use, especially out of the rust belt region of the country?

    Since there's been over 1300 fires since last recall, one can say GM is not being proactive at all.
    It's not different than the almost twenty years of Ford cruise control issues, some issued more than four times for certain models. GM is going beyond the need considering a big chunk of these models are almost 20 years old. http://www.lieffcabraser.com/Personal-Injury/Car-Accidents/Ford-Cruise-Control-Switch-Fires.shtmlhttp://www.autosafety.org/ford-cruise-control-deactivation-switch-recalls-and-history

    Wrong thread. This has NOTHING to do with Ford.

    Correct thread because it was made to illustrate the relative nature of the term "pro active" and how competing companies handle repeat issues.

    Wrong thread. This is a GM Recall. Nothing to do with Ford.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What bothers me is that the prior fixes didn't work... so I want to know what will be different this time.

    Yeah it's a mess that seems to be due to some old school incompetence on the part of some long gone idiots. Hopefully a true fix will happen this time.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Though I have no information to back this up, my suspicion is that they just did a gasket job with the same part numbers and called it a day.

    Probably. GM has made some of the worst gaskets over the years. My wife's old 3.4L Grand Am had gasket issues.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    More than half these cars are in the junkyard already....not going to be much of a recall....

     

    When a recall occurs, it will be associated with the vehicle identification numbers (VINs) of all affected registered vehicles.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    More than half these cars are in the junkyard already....not going to be much of a recall....

     

    When a recall occurs, it will be associated with the vehicle identification numbers (VINs) of all affected registered vehicles.

     

    True.....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest Wings4Life(BANNED)

    Posted (edited)

    Meanwhile, the aftermarket community had already been able to address ANY issue with the 3.8L V6 Series II engine;

    http://www.wbodystore.com/gaskets-hardware.html

    I just hope that there are no attempts by plaintiff lawyers to try and file any class-action lawsuits over 

     

     

    I had several GM products with the infamous 3.8L valve cover leak.  GM made them out of composite for years and many millions made, knowing from day one that they leaked due to warping.  The problem was clearly the material.   Did GM ever bother to switch the material / design?  Heck no.  To this day customers still have to deal with it, because so many are still in customers driveways.  I have two myself, both leaking on my driveway.

    Edited by Wings4Life
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    IBB

    Actually that's KBB. And they show Market Share from Oct 2014 to Oct 2015

    Ford + .6%

    GM - .3%

    FCA +/- .0%

    And to think just the other day here I was reading someone crowing about GM's Market Share increase. Yet the truth of the matter is they've lost MS.

    Edited by Burnt Valve LS7
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yeah, they are just going the Ford route and focusing more on profits.

    http://www.autonews.com/article/20151012/OEM/310129962/gm-claims-victory-even-as-its-market-share-slips

     

    "GM's share of more-profitable retail sales this year has grown faster than for any of the other six largest automakers, figures from the Automotive News Data Center show. GM has dialed way back on sales to rental-car operators, long its favorite sales-goosing trick. Transaction prices are up, while incentive spending has remained below that of key competitors."

     

    in addition,

    "But this year's downtick is largely explained by a 50,000-unit reduction in the number of vehicles headed to rental lots, a 14 percent drop. GM's 7.2 percent retail sales growth topped all major automakers, including Toyota (up 2.9 percent) and Ford (up 5.1 percent)."

     

     

    It helps when you tell the whole tale.

    Edited by surreal1272
    • Agree 3
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^

    Also good to know.

    I am considering leasing again real soon, and a higher residual always helps reduce the monthly.

    All I'll say is I found that while cruising another enthusiast site. Someone there posted an article about Oct 2015 up 12% for the industry vs 2014.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yeah, they are just going the Ford route and focusing more on profits.

    http://www.autonews.com/article/20151012/OEM/310129962/gm-claims-victory-even-as-its-market-share-slips

     

    "GM's share of more-profitable retail sales this year has grown faster than for any of the other six largest automakers, figures from the Automotive News Data Center show. GM has dialed way back on sales to rental-car operators, long its favorite sales-goosing trick. Transaction prices are up, while incentive spending has remained below that of key competitors."[/size]

     

    in addition,[/size]

    "[/size]But this year's downtick is largely explained by a 50,000-unit reduction in the number of vehicles headed to rental lots, a 14 percent drop. GM's 7.2 percent retail sales growth topped all major automakers, including Toyota (up 2.9 percent) and Ford (up 5.1 percent)."[/size]

     

     

    It helps when you tell the whole tale.[/size]

    Indeed. GM's products have shown their superiority as of late. No doubt their marketing team is looking to maximize on that superiority.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yeah, they are just going the Ford route and focusing more on profits.

    http://www.autonews.com/article/20151012/OEM/310129962/gm-claims-victory-even-as-its-market-share-slips

     

    "GM's share of more-profitable retail sales this year has grown faster than for any of the other six largest automakers, figures from the Automotive News Data Center show. GM has dialed way back on sales to rental-car operators, long its favorite sales-goosing trick. Transaction prices are up, while incentive spending has remained below that of key competitors."[/size]

     

    in addition,[/size]

    "[/size]But this year's downtick is largely explained by a 50,000-unit reduction in the number of vehicles headed to rental lots, a 14 percent drop. GM's 7.2 percent retail sales growth topped all major automakers, including Toyota (up 2.9 percent) and Ford (up 5.1 percent)."[/size]

     

     

    It helps when you tell the whole tale.[/size]

    And that tale told here about GM Market Share increase was a what then?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest Wings4Life(BANNED)

    Posted

     

    Yeah, they are just going the Ford route and focusing more on profits.

    http://www.autonews.com/article/20151012/OEM/310129962/gm-claims-victory-even-as-its-market-share-slips

     

    "GM's share of more-profitable retail sales this year has grown faster than for any of the other six largest automakers, figures from the Automotive News Data Center show. GM has dialed way back on sales to rental-car operators, long its favorite sales-goosing trick. Transaction prices are up, while incentive spending has remained below that of key competitors."[/size]

     

    in addition,[/size]

    "[/size]But this year's downtick is largely explained by a 50,000-unit reduction in the number of vehicles headed to rental lots, a 14 percent drop. GM's 7.2 percent retail sales growth topped all major automakers, including Toyota (up 2.9 percent) and Ford (up 5.1 percent)."[/size]

     

     

    It helps when you tell the whole tale.[/size]

    And that tale told here about GM Market Share increase was a what then?

     

     

    Amazing then that with all that market share gain and sales of high profit segments, they lag so far behind in profit.

     

    And that really is the whole picture, not just sales.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    But GM's profits are better than Ford's.

    Maybe in Bizarro World...

    $1.4b ( GM ) vs $1.9b ( Ford ).

    Funny you should put it that way, because I was using the same thought process that wings used here:

    http://www.cheersandgears.com/topic/85823-47-grand-0-60-in-46-mt-tests-mustang-gt-pp/page-6

    ...post #103, to be precise. Now THAT'S a logical thought process, eh :P

    But good on you for mocking thought processes like that. I'm sure your buddy would agree. :D :D :D

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    But GM's profits are better than Ford's.

    Maybe in Bizarro World...

    $1.4b ( GM ) vs $1.9b ( Ford ).

    Funny you should put it that way, because I was using the same thought process that wings used here:http://www.cheersandgears.com/topic/85823-47-grand-0-60-in-46-mt-tests-mustang-gt-pp/page-6

    ...post #103, to be precise. Now THAT'S a logical thought process, eh :P

    But good on you for mocking thought processes like that. I'm sure your buddy would agree. :D :D :D

    Very constructive dragging a locked thread here.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Now, let's drag this sucker back on topic.

    Issuing recalls for 18 year-old cars is probably a bit of an overreaction. But hey, erring on the side of caution is a good flavour of the month to be sampling. Hopefully they add it to the main menu.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yeah, they are just going the Ford route and focusing more on profits.http://www.autonews.com/article/20151012/OEM/310129962/gm-claims-victory-even-as-its-market-share-slips

    "GM's share of more-profitable retail sales this year has grown faster than for any of the other six largest automakers, figures from the Automotive News Data Center show. GM has dialed way back on sales to rental-car operators, long its favorite sales-goosing trick. Transaction prices are up, while incentive spending has remained below that of key competitors."[/size]

    in addition,[/size]"[/size]But this year's downtick is largely explained by a 50,000-unit reduction in the number of vehicles headed to rental lots, a 14 percent drop. GM's 7.2 percent retail sales growth topped all major automakers, including Toyota (up 2.9 percent) and Ford (up 5.1 percent)."[/size]

    It helps when you tell the whole tale.[/size]

    And that tale told here about GM Market Share increase was a what then?
    Maybe you missed the above part where GMs retail sales growth far exceeded Fords and as a result their profits have increased as well, hence me saying that they are going the Ford route. You should be taking that as a compliment but of course it appears that went right over your head. Edited by surreal1272
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's a bit of a backhanded compliment, blu... but compared to some of the thought processes I've read in here lately it's Einstein-level stuff :D

    Edited by El Kabong
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It really wasn't though. Ford has played it smart with managing their production and inventories, as well as reducing their dependence on rental sales. GM is following suit and that is a good thing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yeah, they are just going the Ford route and focusing more on profits.http://www.autonews.com/article/20151012/OEM/310129962/gm-claims-victory-even-as-its-market-share-slips

    "GM's share of more-profitable retail sales this year has grown faster than for any of the other six largest automakers, figures from the Automotive News Data Center show. GM has dialed way back on sales to rental-car operators, long its favorite sales-goosing trick. Transaction prices are up, while incentive spending has remained below that of key competitors."[/size]in addition,[/size]"[/size]But this year's downtick is largely explained by a 50,000-unit reduction in the number of vehicles headed to rental lots, a 14 percent drop. GM's 7.2 percent retail sales growth topped all major automakers, including Toyota (up 2.9 percent) and Ford (up 5.1 percent)."[/size]It helps when you tell the whole tale.[/size]

    And that tale told here about GM Market Share increase was a what then?
    Maybe you missed the above part where GMs retail sales growth far exceeded Fords and as a result their profits have increased as well, hence me saying that they are going the Ford route. You should be taking that as a compliment but of course it appears that went right over your head.

    Maybe you missed the part where ' the tale told here about GM's Market Share increase was what then?'

    It appears that went right over your head.

    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

    Yeah, they are just going the Ford route and focusing more on profits.http://www.autonews.com/article/20151012/OEM/310129962/gm-claims-victory-even-as-its-market-share-slips

    "GM's share of more-profitable retail sales this year has grown faster than for any of the other six largest automakers, figures from the Automotive News Data Center show. GM has dialed way back on sales to rental-car operators, long its favorite sales-goosing trick. Transaction prices are up, while incentive spending has remained below that of key competitors."[/size]in addition,[/size]"[/size]But this year's downtick is largely explained by a 50,000-unit reduction in the number of vehicles headed to rental lots, a 14 percent drop. GM's 7.2 percent retail sales growth topped all major automakers, including Toyota (up 2.9 percent) and Ford (up 5.1 percent)."[/size]It helps when you tell the whole tale.[/size]

    And that tale told here about GM Market Share increase was a what then?
    Maybe you missed the above part where GMs retail sales growth far exceeded Fords and as a result their profits have increased as well, hence me saying that they are going the Ford route. You should be taking that as a compliment but of course it appears that went right over your head.

    Maybe you missed the part where ' the tale told here about GM's Market Share increase was what then?'

    It appears that went right over your head.

     

    So you did not read the article at all. Thanks for confirming that because I never said one thing about market share prior. That's you trying to put words in my mouth. Now head on back over to the 2017 GT500 thread so that you and your buddy can keep each other company and work on those up votes. Oh, that's right. You ran outa votes for the day. Oh well. :thumbsup:

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • So three major problems with this car, one, terrible Jellybean external shape, not impressed at all with the style. Second is the buttonless dash having everything via a touch screen and rotary knob, terrible safety issue as your eyes will be off the road more than on trying to find the right option in the right menu. Third is the center pack clearly cuts into valuable leg space based on their own picture. This is a hard pass.
    • Great Masculine shape, really digging the style they did here.
    • First seen at the Shanghai Auto Show (see article: Polestar 4 - The New Breed of Electric SUV Coupe), Polestar brought the Polestar 4 to the New York International Auto Show for North Americans to see in person. Polestar calls the Polestar 4 an "electric SUV 4-door coupe". Outside of that marketing speak, the Polestar 4 is a slightly lifted four-door hatchback about 190 inches in length, or roughly 2 inches shorter than a Toyota Camry.  Built without rear glass, the Polestar 4 makes use of a rear camera for visibility astern. Polestar 4 features a plethora of standard content, including 20-inch 5 V-spoke black diamond cut alloy wheels, panoramic glass roof, adaptive cruise control, 360 parking camera with 3D view, energy saving heat pump, front-illuminated Polestar logo, e-latch doors, power-operated tailgate with soft close, Polestar digital key, wireless phone charging, and 8-way electrical driver seat and 6-way electrical passenger seat. The fastest production car the brand has ever developed to date, Polestar 4 can accomplish a 0-60 mph sprint in 3.7 seconds and in top spec can produce 544 horsepower. Long-range single-motor variants have 272 horsepower and a targeted EPA range of over 300 miles. All long range variants have a 102 kWh battery capable of 200 kW charging on a DC Fast Charger and 11 kW on home level-2 charging. Google built-in is ... built in and includes Google Assistant, Google Maps and Google Play. Polestar continues to offer a leading connected in-car experience. As with all other Polestar cars, regular over-the-air updates allow for new features and improvements to be sent remotely to all vehicles. Pricing starts at $54,900, with orders opening in April for deliveries in the latter half of this year.   View full article
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings