Jump to content
Create New...
  • David
    David

    Performance Cars Dead? Not According to Hyundai's N Brand EVs

      Hyundai Motor's N Brand Unveils Two rolling lab concepts, signaling High-Performance Vision for the electrification era.

    Hyundai Motor's is on a fast forward push toward electrification from their luxury division Genesis to the core Hyundai auto's and even their budget brand Kia.  All three brands are pushing hard to be electrified totally by 2030 and with that, the industry overall has gone with consumers taste for SUVs and trucks as more and more auto companies kill off the cars.

    Hyundai brought out their N sub-brand for only a couple performance focused ICE auto's and while outstanding in their selective categories, customers have asked for more including the electrified crowd wanting more performance in their EVs as they start to come out on the global market. Hyundai is showing their commitment to the car side of electrification by showing two functional concepts that demonstrate the company's commitment to the future focused on zero-emissions technologies. RN22e and N Vision 74 are Hyundai's inspirational examples of N's electrification vision. These two "Rolling Lab" concepts demonstrate Hyundai's ambition to not only become a leader in zero-emission autos but performance autos for the future.

     Hyundai's first electric concept is the RN22e which uses their innovative E-GMP platform and is a fully functional racetrack-ready performance sedan and packaged in the IONIQ 6 based streamliner design.

    Hyundai has tested the RN22e to maximize the three pillars that make up the N's performance focus.

    1. Corner Rascal - N developed cornering capability since the brand launch, providing e-LSD, Corner Carving Differential for N models. RN22e corner carving is accomplished by using torque vectoring with AWD. Optimized torque distribution for all different drive modes allows the driver to choose the torque power they want for front and rear wheels.
    2. Track optimized cooling and braking - RN22e provides track-optimized settings, allowing customers to enjoy circuit driving without derating the performance of the EV. Four piston monoblock calipers and a 400-mm hybrid disc system allows the RN22e to withstand the weight of electric system. Hyundai will use the RN22e to study and deliver superior dynamic movement with regen-braking that precisely controls yaw and corner attack.
    3. N Sound+ & N e-shift - Hyundai understands the connection humans have with sound, RN22e provides generated sounds from interior and exterior speakers that enhance the dynamic driving feel. N e-shift integrates vibration and shifting feel with N Sound+ to deliver an emotional driving experience. N Sound+ and N e-shift will allow the driver to select the driving experience they want enhancing the fun of driving their Ioniq EV.

    The RN22e leverage of the IONIQ 6's streamliner design helps to maximize performance with low ground clearance, emphasized shoulders with a distinct wide and sturdy stance. The low bumper design offers a sporty, radiating charm while enhancing cooling and aerodynamics according to the N's design team.

    RN 22e AWD Specifications:

    • Total Max Power - 430 kW or 577 HP
    • Total Max Torque - 740 Nm or 546 lb-ft
    • Battery Capacity - 77.4 kWh multi-charging capable in 400V or 800V
      • Charging time to 80%, less than 18 min.
    • Max Speed - 250 kph or 155 mph plus
    • Length / Width / Height / Wheelbase - 4,915 MM / 2,023 MM / 1,479 mm / 2,950 mm or 194 inches / 80 inches / 58 inches / 117 inches

     

    N Vision 74 is inspired by the Hyundai N 2025 Vision Gran Turismo and the Hyundai Pony Coupe concept from 1974. The N Vision 74 is a high-performance hydrogen fuel cell electrified performance car. Hyundai hired legendary car designer Giorgetto Guigiaro to design the 1974 Pony Coupe Concept which became prototypes for Hyundai's first production sports car. While the car did not see production, the daring attitude was set for the Hyundai corporation in setting the tone for the entire company of products.

    The N Vision 74 was given the pure surface from the 1974 Pony car along with a dynamic profile and unique B pillar and Parametric Pixel lighting to provide a futuristic look.

    N Vision 74 is a driver focused car first and foremost, while no interior pictures have been supplied, Hyundai does say that car has a driver-centric cockpit with a blend of heritage elements and modern design, having a digital cluster and analogue buttons.

    Hyundai's engineers developed this hybrid system of hydrogen / battery electric system that has improved cooling efficiency while using two different power sources depending on the driving conditions as you get torque vectoring from the twin rear motors for precise and responsive cornering and added electrical boost from the Hydrogen generator supplying electrical needs including additional boost, giving you both fun, performance, sporty driving while also allowing for long range and fast refueling times.

    The N Vision 74 RWD Specifications:

    • Total Max Power - 500 kW or 671 HP
    • Total Max Torque - 900 Nm or 664 lb-ft of torque
    • Battery Capacity - 62.4 kWh with 800V fast-charging
    • Hydrogen 
      • Tank capacity - 4.2 kg
      • Fuel Cell stack - Max 95 kW
      • Refueling time - 5 min
    • Max Speed - 250 kph or 155 mph plus
    • Length / Width / Height / Wheelbase - 4,952 MM / 1,995 MM / 1,331 mm / 2,905 mm or 195 inches / 78 inches / 52 inches / 114 inches
    • Driving Range - Over 600 km or Over 373 Miles

    Project RM or what Hyundai calls "Racing Midship" was started in 2012 to embark on developing new technology and innovation which has brought to Hyundai a performance rear-drive, midship powertrain configuration. The fundamental difference of this design provides an ideal balance of handling and agility from a low polar moment of inertia and can be found in the N product line of autos.

    RM series has evolved to the current RM19, this platform facilitates an engineering rolling lab to test high-performance technologies while connecting to the tarmac at all speeds and driving conditions. The RM validating of advanced technologies, increase performance and end up in applications for future N models.

    Two years ago, the RM20e Racing Midship Sports Car was Hyundai's first High-Performance BEV and their first attempt at applying a zero-emissions powertrain to a high-performance car. This technology will now show up as it has been fine tuned in N versions of the IONIQ product line.

    2023 IONIQ 5 N edition will be available for sale on the global market with more details about the IONIQ 5 N edition to be released closer to the on-sale release.

    More details will also be released on an ongoing basis from the N YouTube channel: Hyundai N Worldwide - YouTube

    Hyundai believes auto enthusiast will be excited to know they will have N performance versions of both Cars and SUVs in the future BEV product line.

    IONIQ Articles | Hyundai Worldwide

    Hyundai Motor’s N Brand Unveils Two Rolling Lab Concepts, Signaling High-Performance Vision for Electrification Era

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    3 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    You can mask it, but it’s still there. 

    yes.

    and nobody, me, is not saying otherwise. hence the word choice of masking the heft.

    But weight,

    *sigh*

    for the umpteenth time

    *sigh*

    is but 1 factor regarding handling.

    *sigh*

    The skateboard platform allows for all the heft be BELOW THE AXLES MAKING A VERY VERY LOW CENTER OF GRAVITY FAVOURING HANDLING AND TRACKING. 

    plus

    the weight is so evenly distributed along the length and side of the vehicle all that is left to do is just an easy calibration of the suspension not having to factor for up front engine heft in a front engined car.  even in a rear mid-engine car, the weight is still ABOVE the wheels instead of below.   Traction is compensated by having the electric motors directly engaged to the driving wheels be it 3 or even 4. Software programming even allows for torque vectoring on ALL 4 wheels if all 4 wheels are able to be torquing.....

    Heft is just a factor in a myriad of factors in a tracking formula...

    yes, heft is a detriment to performance. NOBODY is denying that. Its just that a skateboard platform EV isnt really phased by that.

    An ICE track car has many more deficiencies that an EV has as an advantage... 

    yes yes yes

    heft aint onee of them

    But HIGHER center of gravity and heft to where it aint optimal for an engine to be are what favours the EV...

    *phoque me its such a difficult concept to understand???*

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    suspension symmetry or asymmetry, dampening rates, the kind of dampers to begin with, suspension travel. How low the car is to the ground, overall weight, weight distribution, center of gravity, how well the motor or engine transfers the power and torque to the wheels, wheel cambers,  all just some of the factors that are involved in tracking...

    Some of those factors are equal and same solutions to both EVs and ICEs and some of those are advantageous or disadvantageous to each differently and separately but could use any and either factor in that track equation to compensate for the disadvantage. 

    At the end of the day, a Model S Plaid, as a heavy Hellcat Charger do an excellent job at handling street legal speed cornering and do inspire confidence in accident avoidance maneuvers.

    However, they do the job somewhat on a track, but they aint the right tool to conquer the track races as both vehicles were NOT ENGINEERED TO DO ANY TRACK WORK. THEY BOTH LACK THE NEEDED HARDWARE, THE PROPER TRACK SUSPENSIONS...

    And quite frankly, the heft  issue on both the Plaid and Hellcat could be overcome without even eliminating the heft part just by utilizing the necessary hardware. 

    Of course knocking off 500-600 lbs on either would benefit them for plenty of things, not just tracking.  Im not denying that. Its just that heft is NOT the deterrent its spoke of by SMK aka Alex with a skateboard platform EV...

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    You’re comparing cheap sports cars, which do 0-60 in 6 seconds and saying there needs to be a light sporty electric car. 
     

    The ones I mentioned earlier were the original Model 3 when it could be had with a much smaller battery and was supposed to cost at or around 40k. That car doesn’t exist anymore. 
     

    How about cutting 12-16" off the vehicle and make it a two-door sports car? That doesn’t sound unreasonable to think that would cut 3-400lbs. If it were a two-seater, that would certainly get the 400lb out. 

    I guess my point is the cheap sports car segment will die with the EV switch.  I suppose if you shrunk the Model 3 ( which is already smaller than a Mustang) down to Supra size and removed the rear seat then you could shed some weight and get under 3500 lbs.  

    I don’t really care if the affordable sports car segment dies, I’d prefer a sensory deprivation air matic Mercedes over a Mustang or Supra that’s more raw and connected to the road. 

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    I guess my point is the cheap sports car segment will die with the EV switch.  I suppose if you shrunk the Model 3 ( which is already smaller than a Mustang) down to Supra size and removed the rear seat then you could shed some weight and get under 3500 lbs.  

    I don’t really care if the affordable sports car segment dies, I’d prefer a sensory deprivation air matic Mercedes over a Mustang or Supra that’s more raw and connected to the road. 

    You don’t really care yet spent two pages trying to convince everyone here that you, in fact, did. 
     

    mmmkay. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/6/2022 at 6:01 PM, oldshurst442 said:

    NOT ENGINEERED TO DO ANY TRACK WORK. THEY BOTH LACK THE NEEDED HARDWARE, THE PROPER TRACK SUSPENSIONS...

    Maybe the Plaid or Hellcats shouldn't have "Track Modes" if they're supposedly not engineered for track work. 

    We can also just take a look at their respective websites to see if they think they're not built for racetracks... 

    Straight off Dodge's website:

    image.png.9499cce455fb09ecb929e2cc405d9191.png

     

    Straight off Tesla's website:

    This week, Plaid Track Mode is rolling out to Model S Plaid vehicles across North America. With Plaid Track Mode our goals were simple: achieve the quickest lap time for a production electric vehicle at Germany’s Nürburgring, and allow individual adjustability of stability control, handling balance and regenerative braking to give drivers more authority over vehicle control at the racetrack.

    Plaid Track Mode was developed to take full advantage of our tri-motor platform and more than 1,000 horsepower on tap, with features including:

     

    • Optimized Powertrain Cooling
      Track driving generates an enormous amount of heat in the battery, motors, and brakes. Maximum track endurance is achieved by managing this heat to keep these components as cool as possible.

    • When Plaid Track Mode is engaged, we drop the temperature of the battery pack and motors to create a significant amount of chilled thermal mass. Once track driving begins and heat is generated, shared coolant loops between the battery and motors keep the entire system cooler for longer.

    • We also increase regenerative braking power, which has three major benefits: re-capture more energy during deceleration, reduce load on the friction brakes for better thermal management, and give the driver better modulation and controllability with a single pedal.

    • Lateral Torque Vectoring
      Using the same foundation as Model 3 Track Mode, Plaid Track Mode relies heavily on front and rear motors to command rotation: additional torque applied to the rear axle helps turn the nose of the car into a corner; torque applied to the front axle arrests rotation to pull the car straight.

    • Building on this principle, Model S Plaid’s dual rear motors enable full lateral torque vectoring. With Track Mode activated, Plaid automatically adjusts torque split across the rear wheels, independently, which applies a torque bias to rotate the car through turns; this increases turn-in response, improves on-center steering feel, and delivers even greater yaw control throughout a corner.

    • Compared to traditional open- and limited-slip differentials, which must always compete between turn-in response and maximum traction, our electric motors adjust in milliseconds to give the driver both strengths simultaneously, allowing for faster turn-in, increased cornering speeds, and harder acceleration on corner exit.

    • Adjustable Vehicle Dynamics
      During normal road driving, our stability control systems are optimized to limit tire slippage and maximize grip to keep the driver safe.

    • In Plaid Track Mode, stability controls enter a race tuning to give the driver maximum control over the car’s lateral movement. With Plaid Track Mode engaged, Tesla’s Vehicle Dynamics Controller (VDC) evaluates steering angle, accelerator, and brake pedal inputs to determine where the driver wants to place the car and will permit tire slippage and automatically adjust torque split to give the driver even more authority and improved agility during high-speed cornering.

    • For drivers who want additional adjustability over vehicle dynamics, handling balance, stability assist and regenerative braking can be changed independently based on their skill level and preferences.

    • Adaptive Suspension Damping
      When Plaid Track Mode is engaged, adaptive suspension damping is optimized for track handling: reduced pitch during hard braking and fast acceleration, rebalanced damping to improve responsiveness, and faster settling of vehicle disturbances over bumpy segments to increase driver confidence. To facilitate consistent dynamic driving, ride height is set to Low on drive-off, and the suspension will no longer automatically raise to improve comfort.

    • Performance UI
      We have added a track-focused user interface to provide critical performance data, including a vehicle thermals monitor, lap timer, G-meter, dashcam video capture and vehicle telemetry, along with several other customizable options.

    With Plaid Track Mode, we have added a host of new features to make Model S Plaid as quick around a racetrack as it is at the drag strip. Our approach focuses on allowing greater driver control and adjustability while promoting driver confidence, and like most aspects of Tesla vehicles, we’ll continue to improve Plaid Track Mode over time with future over-the-air updates.

    On 8/6/2022 at 7:22 PM, smk4565 said:

    I guess my point is the cheap sports car segment will die with the EV switch.  I suppose if you shrunk the Model 3 ( which is already smaller than a Mustang) down to Supra size and removed the rear seat then you could shed some weight and get under 3500 lbs.  

    I don’t really care if the affordable sports car segment dies, I’d prefer a sensory deprivation air matic Mercedes over a Mustang or Supra that’s more raw and connected to the road. 

    I don't think it will go completely away but I think it'll be awhile before there's a cheap sports car EV. There just isn't a business case for a 30k sports car that's an EV yet. 

    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/8/2022 at 9:55 AM, ccap41 said:

    Maybe the Plaid or Hellcats shouldn't have "Track Modes" if they're supposedly not engineered for track work. 

    We can also just take a look at their respective websites to see if they think they're not built for racetracks... 

    Straight off Dodge's website:

    image.png.9499cce455fb09ecb929e2cc405d9191.png

     

    Straight off Tesla's website:

    This week, Plaid Track Mode is rolling out to Model S Plaid vehicles across North America. With Plaid Track Mode our goals were simple: achieve the quickest lap time for a production electric vehicle at Germany’s Nürburgring, and allow individual adjustability of stability control, handling balance and regenerative braking to give drivers more authority over vehicle control at the racetrack.

    Plaid Track Mode was developed to take full advantage of our tri-motor platform and more than 1,000 horsepower on tap, with features including:

     

    • Optimized Powertrain Cooling
      Track driving generates an enormous amount of heat in the battery, motors, and brakes. Maximum track endurance is achieved by managing this heat to keep these components as cool as possible.

    • When Plaid Track Mode is engaged, we drop the temperature of the battery pack and motors to create a significant amount of chilled thermal mass. Once track driving begins and heat is generated, shared coolant loops between the battery and motors keep the entire system cooler for longer.

    • We also increase regenerative braking power, which has three major benefits: re-capture more energy during deceleration, reduce load on the friction brakes for better thermal management, and give the driver better modulation and controllability with a single pedal.

    • Lateral Torque Vectoring
      Using the same foundation as Model 3 Track Mode, Plaid Track Mode relies heavily on front and rear motors to command rotation: additional torque applied to the rear axle helps turn the nose of the car into a corner; torque applied to the front axle arrests rotation to pull the car straight.

    • Building on this principle, Model S Plaid’s dual rear motors enable full lateral torque vectoring. With Track Mode activated, Plaid automatically adjusts torque split across the rear wheels, independently, which applies a torque bias to rotate the car through turns; this increases turn-in response, improves on-center steering feel, and delivers even greater yaw control throughout a corner.

    • Compared to traditional open- and limited-slip differentials, which must always compete between turn-in response and maximum traction, our electric motors adjust in milliseconds to give the driver both strengths simultaneously, allowing for faster turn-in, increased cornering speeds, and harder acceleration on corner exit.

    • Adjustable Vehicle Dynamics
      During normal road driving, our stability control systems are optimized to limit tire slippage and maximize grip to keep the driver safe.

    • In Plaid Track Mode, stability controls enter a race tuning to give the driver maximum control over the car’s lateral movement. With Plaid Track Mode engaged, Tesla’s Vehicle Dynamics Controller (VDC) evaluates steering angle, accelerator, and brake pedal inputs to determine where the driver wants to place the car and will permit tire slippage and automatically adjust torque split to give the driver even more authority and improved agility during high-speed cornering.

    • For drivers who want additional adjustability over vehicle dynamics, handling balance, stability assist and regenerative braking can be changed independently based on their skill level and preferences.

    • Adaptive Suspension Damping
      When Plaid Track Mode is engaged, adaptive suspension damping is optimized for track handling: reduced pitch during hard braking and fast acceleration, rebalanced damping to improve responsiveness, and faster settling of vehicle disturbances over bumpy segments to increase driver confidence. To facilitate consistent dynamic driving, ride height is set to Low on drive-off, and the suspension will no longer automatically raise to improve comfort.

    • Performance UI
      We have added a track-focused user interface to provide critical performance data, including a vehicle thermals monitor, lap timer, G-meter, dashcam video capture and vehicle telemetry, along with several other customizable options.

    With Plaid Track Mode, we have added a host of new features to make Model S Plaid as quick around a racetrack as it is at the drag strip. Our approach focuses on allowing greater driver control and adjustability while promoting driver confidence, and like most aspects of Tesla vehicles, we’ll continue to improve Plaid Track Mode over time with future over-the-air updates.

    I don't think it will go completely away but I think it'll be awhile before there's a cheap sports car EV. There just isn't a business case for a 30k sports car that's an EV yet. 

     

    Okay Sure GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You see CCAP, you cherry pick my words, but it dont matter....

    Track mode means nothing...

    There was once a rumour that the Challenger would be offered in ACR trim and undergo the same treatment as the Viper ACR.

    But that never really happened now did it?

    Its not as if  the Challenger Demon wasnt the specialized track car...  But for the quarter mile track..

    No stupendous rear wing for downforce, no aerocanards up front, etc.....

    Land vehicle, Vehicle, Car, Sports car, Automotive design, Performance car, Hennessey viper venom 1000 twin turbo, Dodge Viper, Mercedes-benz sls amg, Automotive exterior,

     

    Its not as if the Demon get crazy for it being a track car for the quarter mile

    DODGE CHALLENGER SRT DEMON | 2021 - 21Motoring

     

    as if MOPAR didnt include in the pice tag skinny wheels up front and slicks in the back and delete all the seats except the driver's one and sell the owner the 3 others for a dollar each....

    Meaning, if Dodge really wanted the Challenger to go trackin' they would have made one to replace the Viper ACR.

    But they didnt...DID THEY?

    https://www.musclecarsandtrucks.com/why-the-dodge-challenger-acr-didnt-happen/

    weight is mentioned as why this never happened

    which leads us back to the Model S.....

    The battery weight is below the axles.

    Low center of gravity.

    Now have a great day tomorrow because I aint wasting my precious time with both of you (smk as well) bozos

    My mic drop

    Bozo The Clown GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    You see CCAP, you cherry pick my words, but it dont matter....

    Track mode means nothing...

    There was once a rumour that the Challenger would be offered in ACR trim and undergo the same treatment as the Viper ACR.

    But that never really happened now did it?

    Its not as if  the Challenger Demon wasnt the specialized track car...  But for the quarter mile track..

    No stupendous rear wing for downforce, no aerocanards up front, etc.....

    Land vehicle, Vehicle, Car, Sports car, Automotive design, Performance car, Hennessey viper venom 1000 twin turbo, Dodge Viper, Mercedes-benz sls amg, Automotive exterior,

     

    Its not as if the Demon get crazy for it being a track car for the quarter mile

    DODGE CHALLENGER SRT DEMON | 2021 - 21Motoring

     

    as if MOPAR didnt include in the pice tag skinny wheels up front and slicks in the back and delete all the seats except the driver's one and sell the owner the 3 others for a dollar each....

    Meaning, if Dodge really wanted the Challenger to go trackin' they would have made one to replace the Viper ACR.

    But they didnt...DID THEY?

    https://www.musclecarsandtrucks.com/why-the-dodge-challenger-acr-didnt-happen/

    weight is mentioned as why this never happened

    which leads us back to the Model S.....

    The battery weight is below the axles.

    Low center of gravity.

    Now have a great day tomorrow because I aint wasting my precious time with both of you (smk as well) bozos

    My mic drop

    Bozo The Clown GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY

     

    Maybe your beef is with Dodge then, because they're the one advertising it as a track-ready car. The same can be said with Tesla and the Model S Plaid. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Battle is on for EV Performance as Porsche just reclaimed the EV track record for Nurburg. Beating the Plaid by 2 seconds.

    Porsche Taycan Turbo S Tops Tesla Model S Plaid Nurburgring Record (msn.com)

    Yes as @smk4565 they still do not beat a few exclusive ICE autos, but they are showing that EV will dominate the track and Mercedes, nor BMW or Audi are anywhere to be found in the EV performance world. Hopefully Cadillac will take their EV V series there to show it off like they did with the ICE series.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, David said:

    The Battle is on for EV Performance as Porsche just reclaimed the EV track record for Nurburg. Beating the Plaid by 2 seconds.

    Porsche Taycan Turbo S Tops Tesla Model S Plaid Nurburgring Record (msn.com)

    Yes as @smk4565 they still do not beat a few exclusive ICE autos, but they are showing that EV will dominate the track and Mercedes, nor BMW or Audi are anywhere to be found in the EV performance world. Hopefully Cadillac will take their EV V series there to show it off like they did with the ICE series.

    I saw the Taycan is back on top, still slower than their own Panamera Turbo S though.  Mercedes is coming, I think it is interesting that the AMG EQE here is called an AMG 53 in Europe and that's the 670 hp version.  So I wonder if there is a "63" coming or if they are just waiting til their 2nd gen battery comes in 2025ish because they have a performance EV architecture in the works and their F1 team has been doing work on the battery and motors.  And maybe the the EQE and EQS AMG's are just what they are now, and they'll add a coupe and sedan on the performance car architecture that will basically be the AMG GT 4-door replacement and it would make more sense to make a new sports car rather than try to turn a luxury barge like the EQS into one, even the EQE is as big as a Lucid Air or Taycan.

    Hopefully Cadillac makes an EV that isn't an SUV, outside of the Celestiq.  American car companies outside of Tesla hate sedans.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, surreal1272 said:

    And there are those famous last words whenever they are not, in fact, there already as the "best or nothing".

    They already build the best luxury EV.  The AMG ICE cars (and the plug in hybrids) are better performing around a track than EV's, so maybe they want to hold off on the AMG only EV's until they can get where the gas ones are.  They need a more advanced battery and motor than what's available now, the axial flux motor won't be ready until 2025, likewise with the next-gen battery.

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    They already build the best luxury EV.  The AMG ICE cars (and the plug in hybrids) are better performing around a track than EV's, so maybe they want to hold off on the AMG only EV's until they can get where the gas ones are.  They need a more advanced battery and motor than what's available now, the axial flux motor won't be ready until 2025, likewise with the next-gen battery.

    So, in other words, you're admitting that the Best or Nothing is true, they have NOTHING since they do not have the best.

    Clearly since Tesla and others have better products, your backup is to say that ICE or Hybrid is better than any other EV out there. 

    Seems Mercedes is truly behind since they have nothing to offer the average consumer, just the 1% crowd with that awful EQS styling mess.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, David said:

    So, in other words, you're admitting that the Best or Nothing is true, they have NOTHING since they do not have the best.

    Clearly since Tesla and others have better products, your backup is to say that ICE or Hybrid is better than any other EV out there. 

    Seems Mercedes is truly behind since they have nothing to offer the average consumer, just the 1% crowd with that awful EQS styling mess.

    They have the same lithium ion batteries and radial flux motors that Tesla and everyone uses.  When they get the silicon anode batteries and axial flux motors it is said they will get 20-40% more energy density and power over the current offerings.  

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    They have the same lithium ion batteries and radial flux motors that Tesla and everyone uses.  When they get the silicon anode batteries and axial flux motors it is said they will get 20-40% more energy density and power over the current offerings.  

    They DO NOT have the same batteries and motors that Tesla has. Remember we have posted here the company in the UK, YASA that Mercedes bought to build them electric motors, they are not the same. END OF LINE!

    Plenty of stories about this startup that does not have the history of Tesla power train.

    Acquired by Mercedes-Benz, YASA’s revolutionary electric motor is set for big things | TechCrunch

    Yes, Mercedes is going to build the axial flux motors that Yasa designs, an unproven new tech electric motor.

    Press Release

    20211118_PI_Transformation_Insight_Berlin_en.docx

    This does not put it in the same league or is the same as what Tesla has.

    Ford and GM DO NOT have the same batteries or electric motors as Tesla. They are all building what they think is the best battery packs and motors, but assumptions is all you have in the above statement, total vaporware at this point just like you called Chryslers Airflow Concept EV auto.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    According to Reuters, seems Kia and Hyundai are going to produce EVs in the U.S. so they qualify for the U.S. rebates on auto sales. Read the original story on Reuters, but realized it is a paid for story that if you do not have any free reads left for the month, one could not read it, but insidesevs did a write up on it and the Korean news stories that also say Hyundai is looking to start production of EVs in the U.S. to get access to the rebates and challenge Tesla for the EV sales crown.

    Production is to begin 2024 on all EVs.

    Kia To Build EVs In The US From 2024, Per Reports (insideevs.com)

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • Posts

    • I am not aware of travel cases for internal drives. Usually you have the drive and once you have made sure you own static electricity is discharged on your body, open the computer and unplug the power cable and data cable to the HD. Then you unscrew the screws holding the drive in. Put the drive into an Anti-Static bag and then usually into a box that has foam padding on all sides to protect the drive and then tape it up to close it.  With both drives in their proper storage bags, you can then have both drives in between foam insulation for handling any dropping of the box, etc. Pack them in a box and tape shut, should then easily handle going through your carry on or checked in luggage. To ship a hard drive, you need to: Secure the hard drive in its original packaging or anti-static bag. If you don't have an anti-static bag, place the drive into a zipped freezer bag to prevent any moisture getting into the drive during transit. Sandwich the drive between foam or wrap it in bubble wrap to absorb any minor shocks. Put the hard drive in a padded shipping box. Close and seal the box. Label your package. Amazon.com : hard drive shipping box This is pretty much all you need.
    • Either a co-pilot first time landing or something truly went wrong on the plane.
    • The incoming rectangular lamps on many GM cars in that era made them much more attractive.  They made a big difference. Now, as far the powerplant went, the notion of 500 cubic inches was mindboggling even during the malaise era.  If you want to see someone's jaw drop, tell a European that their engines have 8200 cc or 8.2 liters.  For those who aren't driving the occasional Mustang or Camaro you see, they freak out at anything over 2,500 or 3,000 cc.
    • Thank you for the response. I want to reinstall them into the computers, especially the "newer" one.  The old one has been a real champ.   The reason for not leaving them in the desktop is that the basic tower might have to be transported ... and not by me.  That means it will be out of my possession for a while.  Since the HDs would be traveling with me, they'll have to get scanned through airport security a time or two.  I'm guessing that shouldn't mess with the data.   I've already backed up the C drive on several large 1 TB portable hard drives.  I don't want to touch the basic functions and files on the computers since I don't know how that all works.  I stay away from the drives and files I am not familiar with. I tend to donate other things to charity.   I did give the Regal I once owned to charity.   A good friend told me that, about a month or two later, he saw it being driven around the city by its new owner and we had a good laugh. This is what I want to do.  I'm just trying to figure out if the guy or gal at Office Depot can size a case based on looking up the unit and the HD in it.  Any ideas on that part?  Or should I do that and approximate the size and weight of the part to get the cases?
    • I'm wondering about a lot of things related to this.  I am sure that, sadly, the passengers inside were jolted.  This is way different from a rough landing. Why was it even necessary to do it?  What was going on at the airport property at that time?  How does one even pull this off?  I've seen some vids of where they barely touch and then go off again, but this one looks way more complicated.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings