Jump to content
Server Move In Progress - Read More ×
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    Lincoln Unveils the 2015 Lincoln Navigator

      The 1998 Lincoln Navigator created the full size luxury SUV segment, but the Navigator has lost the spotlight since then. Lincoln hopes to get it back with the redesigned 2015 Navigator.

    The 1998 Lincoln Navigator created the full size luxury SUV segment, but the Navigator has lost the spotlight since then. Lincoln hopes to get it back with the redesigned 2015 Navigator. Lincoln took the wraps off the next version of the Navigator today.

    One thing the Navigator has never been is subtle and that trait carries over with the 2015 model. Up front is a brash interpretation of Lincoln's split grille design sporting 5 chunky, horizontal bars in each grille portal. The light cluster carry LED accent lighting while the headlights are the more traditional HID type. The power tailgate sports a full width LED tail light design, that some have suggested is reminiscent of the 2014 Dodge Durango, but is actually just the same theme seen on the coming 2015 Lincoln MKC crossover, flipped upside down.

    2015 Lincoln Navigator 031

    Inside, the theme is decidedly more conservative. Sticking with the dual cowl dashboard design of the current generation, the layout of the 2015 Navigator feels at once fresh yet familiar. It comes swathed in hand wrapped leather and natural grain wood trim. Ford's now ubiquitous Sync system features an 8 inch display on the center stack and a 4.2 inch LCD in the instrument cluster. Redundant hardware controls for climate and radio are placed below.

    2015 Lincoln Navigator 020

    As we reported previously, the 2015 Navigator will no longer have a V8 under the hood but will instead be powered by an Ecobost V6. Producing at least 370 horsepower and 430 lb-ft of torque, a 60 horsepower and 65 lb-ft jump over the outgoing 5.4 Liter V8, the 3.5 liter V6 Ecoboost Navigator will lay claim to best in class towing. Power is routed through a 6-speed automatic with rear-wheel and 4-wheel drive configurations available.

    As with the current model, the 2015 Navigator will be offered in both standard length and extended length models.

    The 2015 Lincoln Navigator is a fresh look on a vehicle that has been fading in its segment in spite of arguably being the segment's founder. It faces stiff competition from an all new 2015 Cadillac Escalade, the excellent Mercedes GL-Class, and a soon to be seen Audi Q7. In its favor, 70% of Lincoln Navigator buyers return to buy a new one.

    Do you think this new 2015 Navigator has the direction to take on these market foes? Sound off below.

    Drew Dowdell is Managing Editor of CheersandGears.com and can be reached at [email protected] or on twitter as @cheersngears.

    Source: Lincoln News

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    After reviewing the pictures my initial impression is UNDERWHELMED!

    First off this is NOT a competitor to Cadillac, Mercedes, Audi, BMW in my opinion even though Ford thinks so.

    It is more in line to compete with GMC Yukon Denali, Lexus and Infinity where you see clearly a re-badge of their entry level full size SUV. The clipped on Lincoln nose is not enough to make it stand out from the Ford version. While the nose is new, the back side is dated looking to me. I do not see this as fresh and 21st century. Sad part is that it needs a V8, yes their V6 has more HP / Torque but it is still non competitive with the rest. I am not sold that the V6 engines will hold up in the long haul for these 10,000lb SUV's.

    Interior is a disappointment to me as I see the cheap plastic FORD interior with a few leather and wood pieces put on to say this is luxury but still comes off as a cheap attempt to save as much money while charging people high prices. The dash does not flow for me but looks like a Ford HD truck, Chunky, Blocky and cut up. The interior says ISOLATION from each other. Reminds me of a cubical farm at the office. Does not come across as luxury to relaxe and enjoy as you haul, tow and move people around on road trips.

    This version reminds me of the Old GM where you can clearly tell the Bean Counters dictated what could and could not be done in the auto.

    I have to give this a D for effort that falls way short of bringing out a true luxury competitor.

    post-12-0-90271600-1390508479_thumb.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They still haven't gotten rid of the '97 vintage doors or greenhouse, looks like. Amazing... I like the dash treatment, similar to the current model w/ the two pods. Got the whole '70s Oldsmobile tribute going on w/ the grille, more so than other Lincolns..

    Someone at Lincoln really likes the '71-72 Cutlass grille treatment..

    2117148_1.jpg

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I keep looking for Bravada badges only to feel very disappointed.

    Glad I'm not alone in thinking that the front of this looks like a Chinese tribute to a '70s Oldsmobile.

    You know what else? Those taillights look pretty familiar, too.

    2014-Dodge-Durango.jpg

    Lincoln is officially the worst luxury brand of all time, ever. It's even more amusing that they believe this warmed over 15 year-old turd can compete with and poses any threat to the 2015 Escalade, which is all-new. So what if you've limited the powertrain to a turbocharged V6, Ford Lincoln? I don't think buyers in this segment give one rat's ass about fuel economy.

    It's sad when the 2015 F-150 in top-level trim is more of a luxury vehicle than this. Kill Lincoln, please. They're so far gone they make Acura look relevant. Acura.

    Edited by black-knight
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    An embarrassment to Ford's luxury brand, especially after the stunning, aluminum F-150. From a distance, it is simply a nose job on an old tank. Hopefully, this is not a "mid-cycle refresh", as that would mean another ten years with this Russian limo face.

    Although the more I read about the new Pickup, the more concerns I have about the aluminum aspect.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So let's see. This refresh has swapped out the aweful grill of the last model for one that's less bad but also a half-assed interpretation of the split wing grill design.The tail light shape is more than a little reminiscent of the Durango. The interior gets new electronics, leather stitching for the dash, and Ziricote wood. However, these improvements are at odds with the every man steering wheel plucked from the F-150 (what was wrong with the old tiller?), the cheap black plastic surrounding the Nav and HVAC controls, as well as the hard plastic all over the door panels. That and the dash design itself is a holdover from what Lincoln was using six years ago. The only real highlight is the new powertrain.

    This is a refresh that would have been good 3 years ago, what this needed after seven long years was a full redesign.

    2/10 try again.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    at first I just thought it was OK

    but

    after seeing this video

    I'm more than surprised...ASTONISHED how Beautiful the remade Navigator is!

    Max(imum)Wolff is a GENIUS!!

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So... My problem is this:

    1998 Lincoln Navigator...

    Navigator1.jpg

    2003 Lincoln Navigator...

    Navigator2.jpg

    2007 Lincoln Navigator...

    Navigator3.jpg

    2015 Lincoln Navigator...

    Navigator4.jpg

    Suddenly, you start to realize how lazy of a refresh this is, and how little Lincoln cares.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Even then, it wasn't a complete redesign. It still has the same front doors since its inception in 1998. The bottom half of the rear doors were slightly reshaped, but otherwise are mostly the same as well. It's been written that the roof panel is shared with the original through the last "generation", so I can only assume that remains the same on this slight refresh.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I wouldn't be surprised. Ford is notorious for milking sheet metal stamps for years. Look at the Super Duty.

    Yes...same cab since 99...the Expedition has had the same greenhouse and doors since MY '97..cheap ass bastards.... Ford has a history of this--the F series had two mild facelifts and went from '80-96. The current E-series van dates to '92 with a few nose jobs since then. Of course, GM has done this also--the '73-87 trucks and the vans have had long lifespans..

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That interior is plastastic. So I guess this is why Ford got rid of Mercury...they wanted to bring Lincoln further downmarket.

    Help me here, guys--what does Lincoln compete with? Acura? Lower-end Buick? Help me here...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That interior is plastastic. So I guess this is why Ford got rid of Mercury...they wanted to bring Lincoln further downmarket.

    Help me here, guys--what does Lincoln compete with? Acura? Lower-end Buick? Help me here...

    The Navigator's main competition is the Yukon and Escalade, I suppose. Also the Lexus LX and Infiniti QX..the big truck-based V8 luxo SUVs. I can't imagine anyone cross shopping the Navi w/ European SUVs, though.

    As far as Lincoln sedans and CUVs, they target Acura, Buick, and the appliance end of Lexus (ES/RX), I would say...

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That interior is plastastic. So I guess this is why Ford got rid of Mercury...they wanted to bring Lincoln further downmarket.

    Help me here, guys--what does Lincoln compete with? Acura? Lower-end Buick? Help me here...

    The Navigator's main competition is the Yukon and Escalade, I suppose. Also the Lexus LX and Infiniti QX..the big truck-based V8 luxo SUVs. I can't imagine anyone cross shopping the Navi w/ European SUVs, though.

    As far as Lincoln sedans and CUVs, they target Acura, Buick, and the appliance end of Lexus (ES/RX), I would say...

    So...basically exactly what Mercury was allegedly attempting to target, then, right?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That interior is plastastic. So I guess this is why Ford got rid of Mercury...they wanted to bring Lincoln further downmarket.

    Help me here, guys--what does Lincoln compete with? Acura? Lower-end Buick? Help me here...

    The Navigator's main competition is the Yukon and Escalade, I suppose. Also the Lexus LX and Infiniti QX..the big truck-based V8 luxo SUVs. I can't imagine anyone cross shopping the Navi w/ European SUVs, though.

    As far as Lincoln sedans and CUVs, they target Acura, Buick, and the appliance end of Lexus (ES/RX), I would say...

    So...basically exactly what Mercury was allegedly attempting to target, then, right?

    Well, Mercury was the step-up from Ford and below the then-Luxury brand Lincoln, so... Yes, Lincoln went downmarket.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Lincoln seems to be tied up with a short leash. Every now and then Ford will let little Lincoln stretch its little legs, but is quick to give 'em a swift tug before they explore too much of the world. Sure, you can design your own vehicles to a degree, but we'll do the engineering for you. Here's some FWD platforms to work with... and here's an outdated truck platform, but you're not allowed to change the cab. Better yet, just do the fascias and soft points of the interior. Make it look fresh, no one will notice. Here, since you didn't go potty inside the factory today, you can have the SHO's Ecoboost V6 as a treat. You weren't really going to compete with the Escalade, anyways.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Reminds me of the "new" Tundra which basically got a new grille and fascia, carryover power trains and a revised interior. The difference here is that the Nav's interior is much the same but it's engine changed. If it wasn't for the engine I would have a hard time calling this anything but a model year refresh. And putting only the Ecoboost V6 as the lone engine is crazy. I hope Ford enjoys lots of Warranty repairs for this one.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is what you get when you put in a CEO that is used to creating a new platform every 15-20 years and updates pretty much are Lipstick on a Pig. The Plan industry due to heavy regulations has hardly changed. Ford seems to be using the same CEO attitude of it worked at Boeing, should work at Ford.

    2025 - Finally replace the 1990's platform that is being used. ;)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    One thing I realized today listening to the Autoblog podcast (and went back and re-read the article) is the new Navi is V6 only. Interesting--no more V8s for Lincoln. I guess this is an attempt to lower the CAFE rating.

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There is no "Lincoln CAFE rating". There is a Ford Motor Company CAFE rating of which Lincoln is part of, but those 600 Navigators per month that Lincoln sells really doesn't add much to the overall average.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I don't plan on gardening anytime soon. We need to finish other things before I'd have a permanent spot for a garden, but I would like a small garden in the future. We consume enough various peppers, onions, and zucchinis that I think it would be pretty cool to grow them myself. 
    • If you do tomatoes or any water hungry container veggies, Pittmoss is the GOAT and will save you a ton of headache with watering.
    • Thanks! Yeah, from what I've read it needs a lot of water but also media that drains well so the roots can dry out between waterings. I've now looked into this Pittmoss stuff, and it sounds pretty dang good. I think I'll order some and mix it with planter soil, as well. 
    • All done with the detail inside and out of the SS for the spring/summer season.
    • I had never driven an Infiniti Q50 before, let alone ever really looked at them.  I also didn’t know much about these cars. I was supposed to be assigned a medium sized SUV, but remarked I wanted the luggage area to be hidden.  The rental agent told me they could not guarantee the presence of a retractable cover. (Why would they order a car without one or why would someone take one?  eBay?)  They didn’t have any SUVs anyway, and I got put into an Infiniti Q50.  I checked my phone to verify the cost would be covered by my insurance and the credit card parameters.  It came in at around $43,000.  That’s if new.  That said: “no worries.”  However, this unit would be a much-depreciated 3+ year model with 57,000 miles.  I relaxed.  At any rate, I put less than 500 miles on it over a week.  As one walks up to it, you can tell its heritage … and rather quickly.  You can instantly see similarities to the Nissan Altima in the instrument panel’s main cluster and in the switches much the same way that a CT6 by Cadillac and a Cruze by Chevrolet share dials and such.  However, the assembly and detailing are nicer in the Q50.  It had leather seating, which I don’t care for in a warm weather location, that was comfortably contoured and nicely finished.  The same could be said for the doors and other trim and fittings.  Inside, I liked the way that the dash, center stack, and console flowed together.  The scalloped tops of the dash hearken to those of the very last Impala, which had an attractive dashboard on various levels. The center stack is slightly like that of an Olds Aurora.  These comments go along with the often-cited commentary that this car is traditional and old school in a lot of ways, thus not breaking any new ground. The least favorable aspect of the interior is operating the various touch screen and stalk functions.  Some are redundant and confusing.  However, for one, it is possible to pull up a clock that resembles old school chronometer and have it sitting at the top of the center stack. On the interior's plus side, there are perfectly contoured and angled slots to store water bottles at the base of the front doors.  On the minus side, there is a remote latch release for the trunk, but not one for the fuel cap door.  (The fuel cap door remains closed if the car is locked.) I figured that this Infiniti would have a V6.  It was no ordinary V6, but 3.7 liters worth of V6 with twin turbochargers.  Rarely does one need this much power and, in one week, I got aggressive with the throttle in one merging situation and one passing situation.  It is up to the task and kicks out a little torque steer.  Its hum is a rather muted purr.  As would be expected in what is supposed to be a premium car, the automatic transmission is a geared unit.  It has 7 speeds.  The first 2 shifts can be felt while the remaining shifts are not.  However, if in stop and go traffic, and alternating speed, those early shifts can be a little less smooth as the transmission seems to hunt.  (It could also be how many miles were on the unit.) Why 7 speeds?  How about 6 … or 8?  I’m talking even numbers! With the powertrain comes the requirement for premium fuel.  Also, compared to many full-size Japanese cars working with 4 cylinders and turning in commendable gas mileage, this car with its V6 is a little thirsty. Ride, handling, and noise are related, but different enough.  The ride was supple and controlled, but not much more so than that of an uplevel 4-cylinder sedan.  Handling was better and this Infiniti tracked accurately and nimbly.  Also, the Q50 was fairly hushed, but I might have expected a little more isolation and a higher premium "feel" for the price jump from a Nissan to an Infiniti. Its exterior features that extra chrome and trim to make it uplevel within the Nissan family tree, yet the greenhouse is an almost familiar one.  This car delivered on one greenhouse dimension I’m fussy about - rearward vision from the driver’s vantage point is very good. I don’t know how the order sheet was configured when this car was purchased. There was an indicator for forward alerts, but I never got to experience it in action.  Also, whether on the rearview mirrors or inside of the front pillars, there was nothing to warn of side traffic and there weren’t parking assists that kicked in.  Perhaps they were there, but the car was not put in a situation where they’d engage.  On another rental car of a lower price point, those were always at work and perhaps a little too eager.  I almost prefer the latter. I didn’t read any reviews about this car before beginning the rental or during the rental.  I echo what they have to say.  For its niche, it doesn’t drum up much enthusiasm.  The best point is its more premium handling while the negatives are some difficulties in setting it up when first getting in and its slight thirstiness. If something about this overall package is appealing and a person connects with the Q50, then the consumer will probably go for it.  I don’t know how it will hold up and how much it will cost to service over the long haul.  While there are no Toyota and Nissan dealerships in Beverly Hills, California, as an example, there is a Lexus agency there while the Infiniti dealership seems to have closed.  Infiniti seems to want to ride the same wave that Lexus is riding, though I’d think piggybacking onto Toyota might be a more lauded genealogy. This is very much a personal decision and you’re on your own.  I was going to turn in the Q50 after a day to see if I could get something more familiar to me but decided to keep it.  Exchanging cars is a hassle.  Once past the learning curve and adjustments, it’s fairly easy to live with, but it’s neither a remarkable nor compelling vehicle. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings