Jump to content
Server Move In Progress - Read More ×
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    Tesla Laying Off 7% of Workforce

      Musk says he expects a tiny Q4 profit

    In an email to all employees today, Elon Musk has announced that Tesla plans to layoff 7% of its staff or about 3,150 jobs. In addition to these cuts, Tesla will also retain only the most critical of contractors and temporary workers. Tesla's workforce grew by 30% last year. 

    Musk reported that preliminary financial results for Q4-2018 show a small profit, smaller than the 4% profit reported for Q3-2018. 

    Musk stressed that Telsa must work to get the mid-range Model-3 available in all markets by May in order to target a tiny profit for that quarter. 

    The email was also posted to Tesla's company blog.

    Hat tip to reader @Cmicasa the Great for notifying us of the story. 

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Amazing. Where are the death to Tesla comments? The U.S. Gov't has helped keep Tesla alive for almost its entire 15 year life and now its betraying workers by laying them off in pursuit if survival. Off with their heads. I'm buying a Chevy Bolt

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    Amazing. Where are the death to Tesla comments? The U.S. Gov't has helped keep Tesla alive for almost its entire 15 year life and now its betraying workers by laying them off in pursuit if survival. Off with their heads. I'm buying a Chevy Bolt

    Not sure if you're joking or not.... but they expanded their workforce by 30% and then need to cut it by 7%.  It sounds like they expanded too rapidly to get the Model-3 going.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Drew Dowdell said:

    Not sure if you're joking or not.... but they expanded their workforce by 30% and then need to cut it by 7%.  It sounds like they expanded too rapidly to get the Model-3 going.

    GM has added about 30K new workers since 2010. Then decided that based on sales of vehicles in the car segment being low, they needed to let go of about 1/2 the number of that hire spree, but recall and reassign some of those workers in a more advance field of manufacturing if.. IF.. they trained for the new positions. People SQUAWKED.. threatening to boycott GM. Yes some of those position may go to cheaper labor plants in Mexico,... but a job lost a GM NA is a job lost just like at Tesla. Its literally the same scenario in the end

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    GM has added about 30K new workers since 2010. Then decided that based on sales of vehicles in the car segment being low, they needed to let go of about 1/2 the number of that hire spree, but recall and reassign some of those workers in a more advance field of manufacturing if.. IF.. they trained for the new positions. People SQUAWKED.. threatening to boycott GM. Yes some of those position may go to cheaper labor plants in Mexico,... but a job lost a GM NA is a job lost just like at Tesla. Its literally the same scenario in the end

    substantially different time frames (not that I'm excusing Tesla.... or GM for that matter)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    substantially different time frames (not that I'm excusing Tesla.... or GM for that matter)

    Tesla did the same thing back in June... but then it was 9% of their work force. Not even a "I hate Tesla" whisper was heard. As I said.. GM should either leave the US and fire everyone.. .or change their name to get fair treatment. Hell.. maybe they should merge with Tesla.. just to get some of the superficial love

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    Tesla did the same thing back in June... but then it was 9% of their work force. Not even a "I hate Tesla" whisper was heard. As I said.. GM should either leave the US and fire everyone.. .or change their name to get fair treatment. Hell.. maybe they should merge with Tesla.. just to get some of the superficial love

    Ah okay. I wasn't sure what point you were trying to make.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, balthazar said:

    WHOA WHOA WHOA! Multi-billionaire throwing people out of work struggling to pay of holiday credit card bills! BOYCOTT!

    What if he buys them the finest, most luxurious spread of great American fast food?  That is a good way to solve problems...

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Tesla hasn't been around for generations with manufacturing plants building towns and supporting generations of families. That's why there is uproar when they layoff/fire people. 

    Also, for the record, I'm not taking sides here. I'm just pointing out why there isn't uproar when a small company doesn't get the same flak as a massive one. 

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    Tesla hasn't been around for generations with manufacturing plants building towns and supporting generations of families. That's why there is uproar when they layoff/fire people. 

    Also, for the record, I'm not taking sides here. I'm just pointing out why there isn't uproar when a small company doesn't get the same flak as a massive one. 

    Yet where is the Hate and ROAR in the News about Fords massive layoffs. Seems there has been a bit of unfair attack in the press and from the white house.

    Like you again not taking sides, but pointing out there does seem to be a bit of a lopsided attack on GM versus the others.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I thought you were already boycotting Tesla?

    They have the brass lamp edition with a rumble seat for balthy....

     

    4 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Yet where is the Hate and ROAR in the News about Fords massive layoffs. Seems there has been a bit of unfair attack in the press and from the white house.

    Like you again not taking sides, but pointing out there does seem to be a bit of a lopsided attack on GM versus the others.

    Companies should be free to lay off workers. And no one of any real serious nature takes a single word from the current administration seriously about anything.

    3 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    Tesla hasn't been around for generations with manufacturing plants building towns and supporting generations of families. That's why there is uproar when they layoff/fire people. 

    Also, for the record, I'm not taking sides here. I'm just pointing out why there isn't uproar when a small company doesn't get the same flak as a massive one. 

    Neither should get flak. The job of the media is to report the news....not editorialize and shame people for free choices they make.

    3 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    What if he buys them the finest, most luxurious spread of great American fast food?  That is a good way to solve problems...

    He and nearly every other CEO of any profitable company has more class than that.

    4 hours ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    Tesla did the same thing back in June... but then it was 9% of their work force. Not even a "I hate Tesla" whisper was heard. As I said.. GM should either leave the US and fire everyone.. .or change their name to get fair treatment. Hell.. maybe they should merge with Tesla.. just to get some of the superficial love

    Or ignore the haters. Haters will always hate people who accomplish something.  The guy who has zero motivation to hit the weight room will always be the first to mock a football player or a wrestler.

    4 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    substantially different time frames (not that I'm excusing Tesla.... or GM for that matter)

    I am...companies should be free to react to business cycles.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    Amazing. Where are the death to Tesla comments? The U.S. Gov't has helped keep Tesla alive for almost its entire 15 year life and now its betraying workers by laying them off in pursuit if survival. Off with their heads. I'm buying a Chevy Bolt

    Hell...I would prefer a CTS V while I can still get an ICE car.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Hell...I would prefer a CTS V while I can still get an ICE car.

    CT5 V EV might just be so much faster than the ICE V can ever be if Cadillac executes properly.

    • Agree 2
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, dfelt said:

    CT5 V EV might just be so much faster than the ICE V can ever be if Cadillac executes properly.

    We have a vendor named Vince who has a cT6 and a Black Label Conti. If he can have that....I can have an electric CT5 and a cTS-V.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    51 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Yet where is the Hate and ROAR in the News about Fords massive layoffs. Seems there has been a bit of unfair attack in the press and from the white house.

    Like you again not taking sides, but pointing out there does seem to be a bit of a lopsided attack on GM versus the others.

    I've seen and heard people complain about it just like GM. 

    49 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Neither should get flak. The job of the media is to report the news....not editorialize and shame people for free choices they make.

    I agree. If people want these businesses to not go under and employ NOBODY, then they have to realize they're businesses and they need to make decisions best for the business otherwise nobody has a job. 

    Deal with it, people. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    Tesla hasn't been around for generations with manufacturing plants building towns and supporting generations of families. That's why there is uproar when they layoff/fire people. 

    Also, for the record, I'm not taking sides here. I'm just pointing out why there isn't uproar when a small company doesn't get the same flak as a massive one. 

    ohhhhh!!! So when a company has been around for generations "building towns and supporting generations of families..." the get boycotted. Makes sense. Sorta like me raising my children, providing them with everything they ever ask for, then eventually telling they need to go live on their own because I can't afford to take care of them anymore and they then tell me that they hate me.. vs them meeting a friend a year ago who gave them a piece of chicken and then told them "no more" and the kid just says.. "oh.. OK."

    Got it!

    Edited by Cmicasa the Great
    • Haha 1
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No, it means they have touched that make more people and families that it will naturally upset more people. 

    Just because somebody gets upset and writes on the internet about it in 2019, doesn't mean it has any validity to it. Its 2019. Everybody likes to have hurt feelings and type it out. 

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Not sure if you're joking or not.... but they expanded their workforce by 30% and then need to cut it by 7%.  It sounds like they expanded too rapidly to get the Model-3 going.

    them werkers best durn be joinin the You Yoon. them big corperashuns just want to hyre and fyre at will

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • The two big things you need to know are How Acidic and how well it drains or not. I took a class last year on how to grow the American Chestnut. American Chestnuts like to be high on hilltops with very well-drained soils. There's a geomapping tool in Pennsylvania that uses known land and altitude data to populate the best places for Chestnut plantings, and my property is one of the best in the county.  What I used was a mix of planter soil and something called Pittmoss, better than Peatmoss. Its manufactured here and is mostly recycled newspaper. It's good for containers because it holds moisture better than peat.  Just put them in some 5-gallon buckets and let them go.  I need to move them around a bit soon. True genetic American Chestnuts are very hard to find. If you find them online, they are most likely crossbred with something else that is blight-resistant. I got my seeds directly from the Pennsylvania Chapter of the American Chestnut Foundation at one of their research centers at Penn State.
    • They look like sticks right now, lol. Their leaves are just starting to come back. But here's what they looked like going in.
    • My wife gets starter trees for landscaping, and we use 5-gallon plant buckets that have the holes already, but you could use a normal 5-gallon bucket and drill some holes and put it in a planter plate to hold water to help with feeding. We always just use miracle grow soil and the trees are doing really well. We have a bunch of Leyland Cypress trees to be planted once I finish the yard retaining wall and new fence.
    • Speaking of growing trees in buckets/pots, did you over-research what type of potting soil/media to use? I think I'm going down a wormhole of too much information and overthinking.  What did you end up using? 
    • Interesting. I'm using my work computer so I can't exactly download anything to edit them, but I'll probably just try from my phone next time. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings