Jump to content
Server Move In Progress - Read More ×
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Tesla's Upcoming Model Y To Use Model 3 Platform

      There has been a change of plans for the upcoming Model Y

    Tesla CEO Elon Musk made a surprise announcement earlier this year with the upcoming Model Y crossover using a new platform and not the one used for the Model 3. Musk has changed his tune, however.

    “Upon the council of my executive team . . . who reeled me back from the cliffs of insanity—much appreciated—the Model Y will in fact be using substantial carryover from Model 3 in order to bring it to market faster,” said Musk during the second quarter earnings call yesterday.

    How much faster? Previously, Musk said the Model Y (if that is the final name) could arrive by 2019. But during this call, Musk did not give a date - possibly a wise idea.

    Source: Autoblog, Car and Driver

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    12 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    480,000 reservations for the Model 3 as of August 2, 2017.

    So in this world of yours, sedans are selling better than CUVs? 

     

    Oh and they had 65,000 cancellations. 

    6 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    The crossover would probably have 800k reservations in today's market.

    Exactly my point. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    480,000 reservations for the Model 3 as of August 2, 2017.

    During the earnings call Musk answered the question about reservations and cancellations.

    http://www.thedrive.com/tech/13163/63000-people-have-cancelled-their-tesla-model-3-reservations-so-far

    They had 518,000 reservations at the start of the year and have now had 63,000 cancellations so far leaving them with 455,000 reservations. If this stays steady, then expect another 63,000 cancellations leaving them with 392,000.

    Yes I am sure they might get a few more reservations but now that people see the production auto and see the limited options, I kinda doubt they will get much more and expect them to close out the year under 400K reservations.

    Clearly the difference between 480,000 and 455,000 is a big one. Where did you get this number?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quote

    480,000 reservations for the Model 3 as of August 2, 2017.

    On 8/1/2017 at 1:53 PM, balthazar said:

    I doubt half have been cancelled- I would believe 15% from the initial placement... but now that hard numbers are out there WRT $, I expect it to edge up from that some. I think it's realistic to guess 25%.

    480,000 / 63000 = 13%

    Let's see where it goes from here.

    Edited by balthazar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Probably will be over 500k by Labor Day..

    Doubt it, but maybe, Musk says 1800 people a day are making reservations. that is only 32 days away or 57,600 and if the number is true then you have 455,000 + 57,600 = 512,600 but then minus those cancellations which is 63,000 from Jan 1st to July 31st. So take 63,000 divided by 212 days = 297.169 cancelations per day.

    32 days times 297.169 = 9,509.4339 cancelations.

    512,600 - 9,509 = 503,091 so you may be right, but also I really doubt Musk is getting 1,800 reservations a day. I still expect the reservations to be below 400,000 by the end of the year and only about 20 to 30,000 model 3's actually delivered.

    29 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    480,000 / 63000 = 13%

    Let's see where it goes from here.

    Would it not be 63,000 / 455,000 = 13.8%

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If they even sell 200,000 Model 3's next year that would be more than the 3-series ever sold in a year.  At 350,000 they are at Camry and Accord levels, which are the best selling sedans in the US.  If sedan sales look bad now, wait till next year when the Model 3 takes a huge chunk of them.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    They will not, I repeat, will not sell 200K Model 3s in one year. 

    Agreed, since the Tesla S & X sold 46,000 last year, If they can double that number to 46,000 Tesla S & X and 46,000 Tesla 3 for 2018 they will be doing good I think.

    Since they have clarified that they will be adding a Tesla Y CUV on the Tesla 3 platform, I think they really are pushing just how many auto's they can build.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    If they even sell 200,000 Model 3's next year that would be more than the 3-series ever sold in a year.  At 350,000 they are at Camry and Accord levels, which are the best selling sedans in the US.  If sedan sales look bad now, wait till next year when the Model 3 takes a huge chunk of them.

    Thinking people are going to get tired of waiting...and their money may go to someone else....

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, balthazar said:

    Anyone going to be surprised to see Model Y pre-ordering opened up in short order? Like before the end of 2017?

    Wouldn't surprise me....Next Big Thing for Tesla...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, balthazar said:

    Anyone going to be surprised to see Model Y pre-ordering opened up in short order? Like before the end of 2017?

    Yes, a way to keep money for those fleeing the extra long wait for a Tesla 3 and really wanting a CUV. With all the other OEM's bringing out CUV's over the next 12 months, I think Tesla's cake is going to be eaten!

    9 hours ago, daves87rs said:

    Thinking people are going to get tired of waiting...and their money may go to someone else....

    Exactly, OEM's over the next 12 months will have various new CUV EV's. Tesla missed this boat big time as the Tesla 3 CUV should have been first not the car. Plus other options without long waits will have people going back to their favorite auto dealer.

    19 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Wouldn't surprise me....Next Big Thing for Tesla...

    Only way to keep the cash flow going to prop up the company.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    When are all these electric CUVs arriving?  Audi and Mercedes are targeting 2019, they are 2 years away.   The Buick Bolt is probably a year or two away and if it is the size of a Bolt, will be a lot smaller than a Model Y.  It's not like Lexus has an electric RX for $40k coming in 6 months.  Even if the Model Y is 2019, they aren't really behind the curve and they do already sell an electric SUV.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "No one buys" mercedes plug-ins - Bolt is moving SIX TIMES all MB EVs combined monthly.
    That's likely to continue no matter how Daimler repackages it. Meanwhile MB is just conceding more & more ground to General Motors by refusing to get serious about the segment and fix the uncompetitive models they already have out.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    48 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    "No one buys" mercedes plug-ins - Bolt is moving SIX TIMES all MB EVs combined monthly.
    That's likely to continue no matter how Daimler repackages it. Meanwhile MB is just conceding more & more ground to General Motors by refusing to get serious about the segment and fix the uncompetitive models they already have out.

    Mercedes is making 10 electric vehicles.  I hope the Bolt and its Buick sibling can take on all 10.  Mercedes has also had a battery factory under construction, GM does not have a battery factory like Tesla and Mercedes do.

    I think the electric Mercedes will sell, they don't even advertise any of their plug ins, plus a plug in is not an EV.   The real EVs are coming in 2019 and we'll see what they got.  Which to my original point, who has an electric SUV now besides Tesla and people are critizicng Tesla for lack of electric suvs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Mercedes is making 10 electric vehicles.  I hope the Bolt and its Buick sibling can take on all 10.  Mercedes has also had a battery factory under construction, GM does not have a battery factory like Tesla and Mercedes do.

    I think the electric Mercedes will sell, they don't even advertise any of their plug ins, plus a plug in is not an EV.   The real EVs are coming in 2019 and we'll see what they got.  Which to my original point, who has an electric SUV now besides Tesla and people are critizicng Tesla for lack of electric suvs.

    Just stop. Tesla is just like every other make out there and every other make has prioritized CUVs over sedans because that is what's selling. To pretend otherwise is just an obvious case of bias to suit your argument of the day. 

     

    "Cadillac needs seven CUVs to compete"

     

    "Tesla doesn't need a CUV to compete"

     

    That's how you're coming off right now. 

     

    Finally, no one has an electric SUV including Tesla. They have an electric CUV and so does GM. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    When are all these electric CUVs arriving?  Audi and Mercedes are targeting 2019, they are 2 years away.   The Buick Bolt is probably a year or two away and if it is the size of a Bolt, will be a lot smaller than a Model Y.  It's not like Lexus has an electric RX for $40k coming in 6 months.  Even if the Model Y is 2019, they aren't really behind the curve and they do already sell an electric SUV.

    Latest news that I have read is showing that the german brands and a few asian brands along with Volvo are planning to roll out production version during the 2017-2018 auto shows with production and on sale in late 2018 at 2019 models. Even MB your superior brand has updated their news that their first EV will launch at dealerships in late Q3 or early Q4 of 2018 which means we will see it announced at one of the major shows during the 2017-2018 show time frame.

    End result is that Tesla is going to find it very hard very soon as other auto companies offer EV CUV's that people want and many will pass on waiting years to get a Tesla compared to buying MB, BMW, Audi, Volvo, Jaguar, GM, Ford, etc.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, FAPTurbo said:

    what's gm's electric cuv?

    mustn't be good if no one's heard of it

    The Bolt is a small CUV that is called a hatchback (which all CUVs are). Thanks for playing though. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Mercedes is making 10 electric vehicles.  I hope the Bolt and its Buick sibling can take on all 10. 

    Bolt is ALREADY taking ALL 4 of MB's plug-ins on, right now.

    July '17~
    Bolt : 1,971
    Volt : 1,518
    total ~ 3,833
    ALL 4 MB plug-ins : 344

    So if 4 MB plug-ins average 86 sales each/mnth, 10 would be 860/mnth.

    I hope MB can take on all of the Bolt with their 10 vehicles.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hatchbacks are their own body style classification while CUV's were jacked up hatchbacks that want to look like they can maybe but not really go offroad.

    For example:

     

    Subaru Impreza is a hatchback

    2015-Subaru-Impreza-Hatchback-Sport.jpg


    Subaru UX Crosstrek is a CUV

    2013-Subaru-XV-Crosstrek-Placement-626x3

    Hence why if you look up Chevy Bolt you get this:

     

    Quote

    The Chevrolet Bolt or Chevrolet Bolt EV is a front-engine, five-door all-electric subcompact hatchback marketed by Chevrolet.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, Intrepidation said:

    Hatchbacks are their own body style classification while CUV's were jacked up hatchbacks that want to look like they can maybe but not really go offroad.

    For example:

     

    Subaru Impreza is a hatchback

    2015-Subaru-Impreza-Hatchback-Sport.jpg


    Subaru UX Crosstrek is a CUV

    2013-Subaru-XV-Crosstrek-Placement-626x3

    Hence why if you look up Chevy Bolt you get this:

     

     

    I am speaking tongue in cheek. No need to get literal. Fact is though that all CUVs are just tall hatchbacks in my book. You also missed the initial point when SMK claimed that Tesla has an SUV when they do not. It is a CUV that they try to market as an SUV with the word "crossover" in front of it. Sorry but that's a CUV any way you slice it. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    No doubt Subaru loves having the Crosstek called a 'CUV" but those 2 above are -for all practical purposes- the same physical vehicle.

    Exactly. Much like Tesla calling the X a "crossover SUV", it is just not so clever marketing going on here. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, surreal1272 said:

    The Bolt is a small CUV that is called a hatchback (which all CUVs are). Thanks for playing though. 

    The Bolt is not an SUV or CUV.  Where is the Electric SUV the size of an Equinox or Traverse?  Tesla already has the 3 row SUV.  I don't think doing a sedan instead of an SUV is a bad move, Tesla builds sporty cars and sedan makes sense for their brand.  And the smaller SUV is coming.

    In a way the Model 3 as a sedan makes total sense, most companies are , giving up on sedans because they see easier profit on a truck, but there are still sedan fans as proven by the fact that 450,000 people are in line to get one, which is 450,000 more than any other car on the market has.

    1 hour ago, balthazar said:

    Bolt is ALREADY taking ALL 4 of MB's plug-ins on, right now.

    July '17~
    Bolt : 1,971
    Volt : 1,518
    total ~ 3,833
    ALL 4 MB plug-ins : 344

    So if 4 MB plug-ins average 86 sales each/mnth, 10 would be 860/mnth.

    I hope MB can take on all of the Bolt with their 10 vehicles.

    Plugins are not EVs.  Mercedes is technically going to have a 100% hybrid line up by 2019, so then I guess you can compare their 2 million a year sales to the Bolt.  Which would be just as pointless as comparing Bolt EV sales to plug in s-Class sales.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    The Bolt is not an SUV or CUV.  Where is the Electric SUV the size of an Equinox or Traverse?  Tesla already has the 3 row SUV.  I don't think doing a sedan instead of an SUV is a bad move, Tesla builds sporty cars and sedan makes sense for their brand.  And the smaller SUV is coming.

    In a way the Model 3 as a sedan makes total sense, most companies are , giving up on sedans because they see easier profit on a truck, but there are still sedan fans as proven by the fact that 450,000 people are in line to get one, which is 450,000 more than any other car on the market has.

    Plugins are not EVs.  Mercedes is technically going to have a 100% hybrid line up by 2019, so then I guess you can compare their 2 million a year sales to the Bolt.  Which would be just as pointless as comparing Bolt EV sales to plug in s-Class sales.

    Read my last post before posting again. I specified what I meant by the Bolt being a CUV. 

     

    And again, the X is a crossover which, by the very definition, is a CUV. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    42 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    The Bolt is not an SUV or CUV.  Where is the Electric SUV the size of an Equinox or Traverse?  Tesla already has the 3 row SUV.  I don't think doing a sedan instead of an SUV is a bad move, Tesla builds sporty cars and sedan makes sense for their brand.  And the smaller SUV is coming.

    In a way the Model 3 as a sedan makes total sense, most companies are , giving up on sedans because they see easier profit on a truck, but there are still sedan fans as proven by the fact that 450,000 people are in line to get one, which is 450,000 more than any other car on the market has.

    Plugins are not EVs.  Mercedes is technically going to have a 100% hybrid line up by 2019, so then I guess you can compare their 2 million a year sales to the Bolt.  Which would be just as pointless as comparing Bolt EV sales to plug in s-Class sales.

    You do realize that you are only hurting your argument since right now Benz has only one EV and it is going bye bye due to $h! sales? 

     

    Btw, he included the Volt since it is a plug in. 

     

    As far as your Benz hybrid statement, are you telling us that they will have only hybrids and nothing else (i.e. Gas only models)?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Supposedly M-B is developing an electric CUV (production version of the Concept EQ?) but who knows when it will be out...and Smart is going all-electric for the US market, so that will be a few EV sales.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    All Mercedes gas engines will be paired with a 48 volt mild hybrid system, thus making everything they make by definition a hybrid, but Audi and Volvo are moving toward this too, they are all still burning gas.  

    The Mercedes electric crossover is supposed to go on sale in 2019.

    We know eventually everything will be electric, it is just a matter of how fas the market adapts to it.  If it swings fast to EV, at least Mercedes will be ready.  If it doesn't they'll have the inline 4 and six gas engines still.  They are covered.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I don't plan on gardening anytime soon. We need to finish other things before I'd have a permanent spot for a garden, but I would like a small garden in the future. We consume enough various peppers, onions, and zucchinis that I think it would be pretty cool to grow them myself. 
    • If you do tomatoes or any water hungry container veggies, Pittmoss is the GOAT and will save you a ton of headache with watering.
    • Thanks! Yeah, from what I've read it needs a lot of water but also media that drains well so the roots can dry out between waterings. I've now looked into this Pittmoss stuff, and it sounds pretty dang good. I think I'll order some and mix it with planter soil, as well. 
    • All done with the detail inside and out of the SS for the spring/summer season.
    • I had never driven an Infiniti Q50 before, let alone ever really looked at them.  I also didn’t know much about these cars. I was supposed to be assigned a medium sized SUV, but remarked I wanted the luggage area to be hidden.  The rental agent told me they could not guarantee the presence of a retractable cover. (Why would they order a car without one or why would someone take one?  eBay?)  They didn’t have any SUVs anyway, and I got put into an Infiniti Q50.  I checked my phone to verify the cost would be covered by my insurance and the credit card parameters.  It came in at around $43,000.  That’s if new.  That said: “no worries.”  However, this unit would be a much-depreciated 3+ year model with 57,000 miles.  I relaxed.  At any rate, I put less than 500 miles on it over a week.  As one walks up to it, you can tell its heritage … and rather quickly.  You can instantly see similarities to the Nissan Altima in the instrument panel’s main cluster and in the switches much the same way that a CT6 by Cadillac and a Cruze by Chevrolet share dials and such.  However, the assembly and detailing are nicer in the Q50.  It had leather seating, which I don’t care for in a warm weather location, that was comfortably contoured and nicely finished.  The same could be said for the doors and other trim and fittings.  Inside, I liked the way that the dash, center stack, and console flowed together.  The scalloped tops of the dash hearken to those of the very last Impala, which had an attractive dashboard on various levels. The center stack is slightly like that of an Olds Aurora.  These comments go along with the often-cited commentary that this car is traditional and old school in a lot of ways, thus not breaking any new ground. The least favorable aspect of the interior is operating the various touch screen and stalk functions.  Some are redundant and confusing.  However, for one, it is possible to pull up a clock that resembles old school chronometer and have it sitting at the top of the center stack. On the interior's plus side, there are perfectly contoured and angled slots to store water bottles at the base of the front doors.  On the minus side, there is a remote latch release for the trunk, but not one for the fuel cap door.  (The fuel cap door remains closed if the car is locked.) I figured that this Infiniti would have a V6.  It was no ordinary V6, but 3.7 liters worth of V6 with twin turbochargers.  Rarely does one need this much power and, in one week, I got aggressive with the throttle in one merging situation and one passing situation.  It is up to the task and kicks out a little torque steer.  Its hum is a rather muted purr.  As would be expected in what is supposed to be a premium car, the automatic transmission is a geared unit.  It has 7 speeds.  The first 2 shifts can be felt while the remaining shifts are not.  However, if in stop and go traffic, and alternating speed, those early shifts can be a little less smooth as the transmission seems to hunt.  (It could also be how many miles were on the unit.) Why 7 speeds?  How about 6 … or 8?  I’m talking even numbers! With the powertrain comes the requirement for premium fuel.  Also, compared to many full-size Japanese cars working with 4 cylinders and turning in commendable gas mileage, this car with its V6 is a little thirsty. Ride, handling, and noise are related, but different enough.  The ride was supple and controlled, but not much more so than that of an uplevel 4-cylinder sedan.  Handling was better and this Infiniti tracked accurately and nimbly.  Also, the Q50 was fairly hushed, but I might have expected a little more isolation and a higher premium "feel" for the price jump from a Nissan to an Infiniti. Its exterior features that extra chrome and trim to make it uplevel within the Nissan family tree, yet the greenhouse is an almost familiar one.  This car delivered on one greenhouse dimension I’m fussy about - rearward vision from the driver’s vantage point is very good. I don’t know how the order sheet was configured when this car was purchased. There was an indicator for forward alerts, but I never got to experience it in action.  Also, whether on the rearview mirrors or inside of the front pillars, there was nothing to warn of side traffic and there weren’t parking assists that kicked in.  Perhaps they were there, but the car was not put in a situation where they’d engage.  On another rental car of a lower price point, those were always at work and perhaps a little too eager.  I almost prefer the latter. I didn’t read any reviews about this car before beginning the rental or during the rental.  I echo what they have to say.  For its niche, it doesn’t drum up much enthusiasm.  The best point is its more premium handling while the negatives are some difficulties in setting it up when first getting in and its slight thirstiness. If something about this overall package is appealing and a person connects with the Q50, then the consumer will probably go for it.  I don’t know how it will hold up and how much it will cost to service over the long haul.  While there are no Toyota and Nissan dealerships in Beverly Hills, California, as an example, there is a Lexus agency there while the Infiniti dealership seems to have closed.  Infiniti seems to want to ride the same wave that Lexus is riding, though I’d think piggybacking onto Toyota might be a more lauded genealogy. This is very much a personal decision and you’re on your own.  I was going to turn in the Q50 after a day to see if I could get something more familiar to me but decided to keep it.  Exchanging cars is a hassle.  Once past the learning curve and adjustments, it’s fairly easy to live with, but it’s neither a remarkable nor compelling vehicle. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings