• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    What if? - The Cord 810


    Drew Dowdell
    • What if Gordon Buehrig didn't work for Cord?

    For the 1936 model year, Cord unveiled its bombshell beauty 810 sedan to great fanfare. Designer Gordon Buehrig conceived of the design from scratch, meaning he didn't have to use any off the shelf parts from elsewhere in the Cord/Auburn/Duesenburg organization. By being allowed such freedom in his design, the result was a car that has frequently been voted one of the most beautiful American cars ever built.

    But what if Gordon Buehrig didn't work for Cord? What if instead he was a designer at one of the other American car companies producing vehicles in 1936? Well Frank Peiler over at The Daily Drive blog on Consumer Guide - Automotive wondered just that. Only, Frank took that wonder and put it on paper.

    Frank produced a series of drawing depicting what might have happened if Mr. Buehrig had been employed by Walter P. Chrysler or Harley Earl.. and a few others, four other to be exact.

    Below is what Frank imagines the Cord 810 would have looked like had it passed through the design house at General Motors headed by Harley Earl in 1935.

    gallery_51_134_13491.jpg

    What do you think? Dive in to the article to see what the Cord 810 might have looked like had it been built at Chrysler, Hudson, Studebaker, Ford, or Nash. Which one is your favorite?

    What if GM, Hudson, Chrysler, and Others Had Designed the Cord 810?

    0


      Report Article
    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback


    Always an interesting part of an issue of Collectible Automobile.

    A couple of things bother me, though, about the drawrings: the GM one has its nose offcenter, his perspective is skewed wrong, the driver's side of the coffin nose is farther from the fender peak than the passenger side. If the perspective were natural, it would appear opposite. And the Studebaker's headlights? the passenger side is clearly too far back in the sketch.

    I am not trying to be a sketch nazi, just saying, it throws me off an otherwise enjoyable conjecture. I do like the GM one the best, however.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^ I see what you're seeing Bill, but I don't think it's necc. off. I know you'v seen this era cars in person; the distances between forms, such as the bumper to the sheet metal, is often much greater than one would expect. I'm not saying the drawing is spot on; it isn't, but off so much as to effect the viewing? These are tough to illustrate convincingly because they are so many unjoined shapes.

    I'm looking at the fog lamps- where are they in relation to the bumper guards, exactly?

    I like the Ford, then the Nash versions, but my main question is; why are they all so much taller in the body than the factory Cord??

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like the Ford, then the Nash versions, but my main question is; why are they all so much taller in the body than the factory Cord??

    Because they are all built on frames and bodies that had to accommodate a drive shaft to the back.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Perhaps this is a question best left unanswered.

    Seems to me that we should be glad that the Cord happened just the way it did.

    The '48 Tucker is my absolute favorite vehicle, and the '36 Cord 810 follows.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    GM Nash and then Hudson are my top three picks in that order of what I like in addition to the original beauty.

    snapback.pngCamino LS6, on 25 October 2012 - 06:14 AM, said:

    Perhaps this is a question best left unanswered. Seems to me that we should be glad that the Cord happened just the way it did.

    The '48 Tucker is my absolute favorite vehicle, and the '36 Cord 810 follows.

    I agree with you, Tucker first then the Cord. :)

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like the Ford, then the Nash versions, but my main question is; why are they all so much taller in the body than the factory Cord??

    Because they are all built on frames and bodies that had to accommodate a drive shaft to the back.

    Yes but no. Even the driveshaft out of my DuraMax wouldn't necessitate raising the Cord body shell that high.

    I know- they're only drawings. :D

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like the Ford, then the Nash versions, but my main question is; why are they all so much taller in the body than the factory Cord??

    Because they are all built on frames and bodies that had to accommodate a drive shaft to the back.

    Yes but no. Even the driveshaft out of my DuraMax wouldn't necessitate raising the Cord body shell that high.

    I know- they're only drawings. :D

    If money was no object and I had unlimited time, would it not be fun to take a donor frame/engine and then build some of these?

    You could truly have some special cars then.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Oh absolutely yes to the concept. I would love to design my own vision of a fat-fendered circa '40 machine.

    I've thrown this one up before (the bottom one next to the locomotive), because it's got the presence & proportions right, and the fighter plane cockpit kicks ass. I'd change up the front end some, but this beats down everything in the above piece IMO :

    spy_ph1.gif

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Perhaps this is a question best left unanswered.

    Seems to me that we should be glad that the Cord happened just the way it did.

    The '48 Tucker is my absolute favorite vehicle, and the '36 Cord 810 follows.

    they are both fantastic vehicles!

    Oh absolutely yes to the concept. I would love to design my own vision of a fat-fendered circa '40 machine.

    I've thrown this one up before (the bottom one next to the locomotive), because it's got the presence & proportions right, and the fighter plane cockpit kicks ass. I'd change up the front end some, but this beats down everything in the above piece IMO :

    spy_ph1.gif

    That is a sweet design, and it even has a lot of the same proportional stuf I like about a lot of more modern sports cars.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^ beyond long hood/short deck, I'm not seeing it.

    IU like it when the cockpit of the car doesn't overwhelm the body....which is what I liked about the original Mustang fastback. Too many cars are dominated by the greenhouse, the car you posted is just the opposite....

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So they've crossed the sweltering, parched desert and what appears before them? That's no Mitsubishi Mirage... it's real, and it's spectacular!

    2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Oh absolutely yes to the concept. I would love to design my own vision of a fat-fendered circa '40 machine.

    I've thrown this one up before (the bottom one next to the locomotive), because it's got the presence & proportions right, and the fighter plane cockpit kicks ass. I'd change up the front end some, but this beats down everything in the above piece IMO :

    spy_ph1.gif

    Was that an Olds?

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    Loading...