Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Review: 2017 Cadillac CT6 Platinum 3.0TT

      A Cinderella story for Cadillac's flagship sedan

    There has been a common theme for most of the Cadillac vehicles I have reviewed over the past few years. They are always so close to being up there with the best, but there is one thing or trait that knocks them down. Such examples include interior appointments that don’t match up with the price being asked, confusing infotainment systems, and engines that don’t quite match up with the image being portrayed. This was floating around in the back of my head when a 2017 Cadillac CT6 Platinum rolled up onto my driveway. This is an important model for Cadillac as it is taking on the likes of the BMW 7-Series and Mercedes-Benz S-Class. The little things can make or break a sedan in the class.

    Seeing the Cadillac CT6 for the first time at Detroit Auto Show a few years ago, I wasn’t too impressed. The toned-down Art & Science design made me feel that the CT6 blended in with other luxury sedans. But after spending a bit of time with this CT6, I grew to like the design. Yes, the design language has lost some edge found on other Cadillacs, but there is still some sharpness with hard angles and bold lines. The Platinum adds some touches that really bring out the CT6’s shape. A chrome grille helps give the model a more imposing front end and a set of optional 20-inch wheels finished in ‘Midnight Silver’ do an excellent job of filling in the wheel wells. 

    If there has been a consistent weak point to Cadillac’s recent models, it has to be interior. On first glance, it seems they have it nailed down with a modern design and quality materials. But when you sit inside and begin to take a closer look, that illusion begins to go away. A fair amount of the materials used doesn't quite match up the luxury aura being presented such as the sheet piano black trim used for touch-sensitive controls on a number of Cadillac models. But the brand is improving as we noted in our XT5 review, and the CT6 is much the same. There is a noticeable step-up in terms of materials such as fine leather, carbon fiber accents, and wood trim. This comes wrapped in a handsomely-designed dashboard. There are some areas Cadillac still needs to do some work on such as the plasticity controls for the climate control system. 

    The front seats are a treat to sit in thanks to the right amount of cushioning and support. The Platinum trim gets 20-way power seats for both the driver and passenger to help dial in the right position. Those sitting in the back will be pleased to find generous head and legroom. As added bonus, you can order heated and ventilated seats, power adjustments, and a rear entertainment system to make the back more luxurious. The only downside to sitting in the back is that the CT6 isn’t long enough to take full advantage of the power adjustments. I felt somewhat cramped when I had the back seat fully reclined and my legs touching the back of the front seat. A few more inches in the wheelbase would fix this issue.

    Cadillac’s CUE system has undergone some changes for the CT6. Most of the touch-sensitive buttons have either been dropped or replaced with actual, physical buttons. Being able to press a button or flick a switch to change a setting is a welcome change and less frustrating than the touch-sensitive controls. It would have been nice if Cadillac swapped the touch-sensitive volume strip for an actual knob, but at least you can adjust it via the steering wheel controls. Cadillac also added a touchpad controller (think Lexus’ Remote Touch system) for CUE. It is a nice idea on paper, but the execution shows Cadillac needs to do a bit more work. The touchpad is hypersensitive and tends to overshoot from where you want the cursor. You’re better off using the touchscreen. As for CUE itself, the system comes with a faster processor, some tweaks to the interface, and Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility. These changes make CUE less frustrating to use on a daily basis.

    There are three engines on offer for the CT6. The base is a turbocharged 2.0L four-cylinder, followed by a 3.6L V6. Our Platinum tester featured the big dog; a twin-turbo 3.0L V6 offering 404 horsepower and 400 pound-feet of torque (@ 2,500 - 5,100 rpm)  Power goes to all four wheels via an eight-speed automatic. Performance for the twin-turbo six may not have same exuberance as V8s found in competitors, but it isn’t a slouch. This engine rockets the CT6 at a surprising rate of speed. Those who have timed the vehicle say it will hit 60 mph in around five seconds and we would believe it. Torque is abundant throughout rev range, meaning you should have no issue trying to merge on the freeway or make a pass. The eight-speed automatic has the right characteristics you want in a flagship sedan, smooth and unobtrusive shifts.

    EPA fuel economy figures for the CT6 3.0TT stand at 18 City/26 Highway/21 Combined. Our average for the week landed around 22 mpg in mostly city driving.

    Describing a sedan that measures 204 inches in overall length as ‘agile’ seems very disingenuous. But the CT6 is that. Drive it around a turn and the CT6 feels like a smaller sedan with nimble manners and well-controlled body motions. Some credit has to go Active Chassis package that comes standard on the Platinum and comes with the excellent Magnetic Ride Control system and rear-wheel steering. 

    But most buyers who tend to buy a sedan of this caliber don’t really care about handling. Ride quality is king here and that’s where the CT6 begins to falter. When equipped with the Magnetic Ride Control system, the ride is just a touch too firm. You will feel more bumps in this than some of the CT6’s competition. It would be nice if Cadillac could offer an air suspension for those who want comfort. On the upside, road and wind noise are kept to near silent levels.

    It seems somewhat surprising to call the CT6 Platinum a great value, but it actually is. The Platinum 3.0TT begins at $87,495 and our test car with a few options (20-inch wheels, white paint, and spoiler) comes in at $91,580. Considering you have to spend a fair amount more on competitors to match the level of equipment on offer, the CT6 Platinum is quite the steal.

    Most of Cadillac’s vehicles have fallen into the cliche of ‘being so close, yet so far’ due to some odd or boneheaded decision. But the CT6 is the first Cadillac that has avoided this. It feels like Cadillac is starting to feel comfortable in this new identity that it has been putting out there since the mid-2000s, a legitimate competitor to the Germans. The CT6 stands out for a number of reasons; excellent driving dynamics, impressive interior, punchy V6, and being quite the value. There are some niggling issues such as a firm ride and questionable materials, but these can and should be addressed down the road. Whether the CT6 can draw people away from the usual suspects remains to be seen. 

    If Cadillac can take what they have learned from the CT6 and implement them into future models, then we can say something that hasn’t been used in a long time, ‘Standard of the World’.

    Disclaimer: Cadillac Provided the CT6, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas

    Year: 2017
    Make: Cadillac
    Model: CT6
    Trim: Platinum
    Engine: Twin-Turbo 3.0L DI DOHC with VVT V6
    Driveline: Eight-Speed Automatic, All-Wheel Drive
    Horsepower @ RPM: 404 @ 5,700
    Torque @ RPM: 400 @ 2,500 - 5,100
    Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 18/26/21
    Curb Weight: 4,085 lbs
    Location of Manufacture: Detroit, MI
    Base Price: $87,495
    As Tested Price: $91,580 (Includes $995.00 Destination Charge)

    Options:
    20" Midnight Silver Wheels - $2,095.00
    Crystal White Tricoat - $500.00
    Spoiler Kit - $495.00

    Edited by William Maley


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    3 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Yeah, I could see a 3.0TT in place of the 3.6 in most cases.  I'd leave the 3.6NA in place for the XT5 as a base engine and the 3.0TT as a buy up engine. Make the 3.0TT the XTS's base engine with a buy up to the 3.6TT.  The 3.0TT would be detuned in both of these cases when it made the transition to transverse layout.  Buick could then have the 3.0TT as a buy up engine in the Lacrosse with the 3.6 as base. 

    OK.. Agreed except the XT5 3.6L. I truly believe the better torque in the 2.0L.. with a lil more HP would be a better fit.. and then the 3.0TT upgrade. GM really needs to utilize the 3.0TT and 3.6TT more. As it stands.. they are wasting them. I also stand by my belief that the next ATS-V(CT3) should have an optional LT V8 even if its similar HP as the LF4.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    OK.. Agreed except the XT5 3.6L. I truly believe the better torque in the 2.0L.. with a lil more HP would be a better fit.. and then the 3.0TT upgrade. GM really needs to utilize the 3.0TT and 3.6TT more. As it stands.. they are wasting them. I also stand by my belief that the next ATS-V(CT3) should have an optional LT V8 even if its similar HP as the LF4.

    You've gotta keep in mind the economies of scale.  If they do a hi-po transverse 2.0T, they need to find other places to use it.  If they do it in the XT5, then they've gotta put it in the Regal, Malibu, etc. 

    Unless you're talking the normal 2.0T that they already build..... then I'd have to disagree.  I don't have high hopes for it in the Traverse.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Yes, the CLA is the cheapening of Benz.    Benz really needs to have a lower brand to work with... or maybe even expand SMART to include normal vehicles. 

    Cheap and less refined than any Cruze  I think. Seriously.. which would U choose.. this

    17380d1428326631-thoughts-2015-base-17-w

    or This sexy thing

    Cruze_Hatchback_2.jpg&key=e6fa2742ca84f1

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Yes... the handling was well regarded and on par with the Germans (because it was German).  The 3.0 was indeed weak, but DOHC humpers like @smk4565 had to have DOHC.  The main reason the 3800 wasn't used was that there was no 3800 production in Europe and these were built in Germany for US consumption. Before we ever got the Catera, Opel made a crazy for 1991 horsepower levels 372 HP / 411 lb-ft of torque 3.6 liter V6 Omega tuned by Lotus. 

    I can see why it is a cult car across the pond!

    36 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    @Cmicasa the Great +1 I totally agree with you on the Chevy over the Benze!

    Make that a plus 2, I agree also!

    The CLA looks like a cold war era eastern European product next to that Cruze hatch!

    59 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Yes, the CLA is the cheapening of Benz.    Benz really needs to have a lower brand to work with... or maybe even expand SMART to include normal vehicles. 

    Given the cost of Smart car repalcemnt parts and the dismal reliability of Smart cars, no....just sadly no....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    About that Catera...

    The Middle East got even BETTER versions of this car!

    Image result for holden commodore ss v6

    The Lumina SS

    These had the Corvette's venerable 5.7 liter V8 under the hood in SS form! I don't know if it was the LT1 or the LS1, but yeah...V8!

    Maybe Cadillac should have gone the V8 direction in North America too with the Catera.

    Anybody read Arabic?  Anyway...there are numbers in the article down at the link that makes sense to my English eyes! Maybe they make sense to your English eyes too...just click on the link!

    http://www.motiontrends.com/2001/m10/features/holden/holden.shtml

     

     

    About the CLA not doing any damage to M-B's image...

    All in due time.

    When M-B OVER saturates the market full of CLA's and closer to mainstream C Class and E Class cars in North America along with the GLA and other MAINSTREAM offerings that play the pretend luxury card...you will see that damage...not now...in 5-10 years from now. And they will hurt as much as Cadillac is hurting now...

    Image result for mercedes c320 coupe

     

    They walked away from this mess ONLY because dumb Americans  were  blinded by the love they have for German cars and the HATRED they have for American cars...but as Cadillac and Chevrolet offer BETTER cars for each and every price point Mercedes Benz offers...that hurt will come awfully soon! 

    You see, American cars are getting better and better perceived by Americans themselves...

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Well yes... but those were larger versions of the car. 

    I did not know that.

    I thought that the Omega, Catera, Commodore and the Middle Eastern Caprice and Lumina were all the same car. I mean...all the same wheel bases and such.

    Internet...well, I did not have access to it then as I do know...

    Nice to know.

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    RE: the CLA- I'm actually surprised it's DOWN 43% on the year.
    If you're going to make an obvious money grab off of your own image, at least get the car right!!
    Kind of still shocked they went FWD on it; it's the same length as the ATS but it has NINE inches LESS legroom!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, oldshurst442 said:

     

    You see, American cars are getting better and better perceived by Americans themselves...

     

     

    Funny, all but two of my neighbors that were never going to buy a domestic when I moved in to my house 15 years ago are now driving domestic cars.

    1 hour ago, balthazar said:

    RE: the CLA- I'm actually surprised it's DOWN 43% on the year.
    If you're going to make an obvious money grab off of your own image, at least get the car right!!
    Kind of still shocked they went FWD on it; it's the same length as the ATS but it has NINE inches LESS legroom!

    It is a shockingly dismal car....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Yes, the CLA is the cheapening of Benz.    Benz really needs to have a lower brand to work with... or maybe even expand SMART to include normal vehicles. 

    Pretty much every luxury brand starts in the low $30s, the difference is most max out at $100k or less, while Mercedes can still go over $200k.  The CLA is a relatively low volume Mercedes also, I don't think it is hurting them.  C-class sales are up since the CLA went on sale. 

    2 hours ago, balthazar said:

    RE: the CLA- I'm actually surprised it's DOWN 43% on the year.
    If you're going to make an obvious money grab off of your own image, at least get the car right!!
    Kind of still shocked they went FWD on it; it's the same length as the ATS but it has NINE inches LESS legroom!

    Yet it sill outsells the ATS.  Because no one wants a Cadillac.  Because Cadillac has no image.  Because Cadillac doesn't have a flagship, super car, hyper car, convertible, GT car, or anything cool to lift the brand image, other than the Escalade, but those that think the Escalade is cool probably aren't shopping for small sedans.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    OK.. Agreed except the XT5 3.6L. I truly believe the better torque in the 2.0L.. with a lil more HP would be a better fit.. and then the 3.0TT upgrade. GM really needs to utilize the 3.0TT and 3.6TT more. As it stands.. they are wasting them. I also stand by my belief that the next ATS-V(CT3) should have an optional LT V8 even if its similar HP as the LF4.

    Agreed and I agree on your earlier post about Cadillac using all turbos, except I would go turbo on the V-series also.  CTS-V is the only supercharger they have, they could make a twin turbo V8 for that, twin turbo V6 and V8 for Escalade and get the whole line turbocharged.  And to take it a step further, start to put in eAssist or a 48 volt battery system, to make all Cadillacs a mild hybrid around 2020.  

    If they took a 2.0T and added on a 25 hp electric motor, then you are nearing 300 hp and lb-ft with it all working together, that is going to be a much better drive than the 3.6 and probably 15% better gas mileage.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    You've gotta keep in mind the economies of scale.  If they do a hi-po transverse 2.0T, they need to find other places to use it.  If they do it in the XT5, then they've gotta put it in the Regal, Malibu, etc. 

    Unless you're talking the normal 2.0T that they already build..... then I'd have to disagree.  I don't have high hopes for it in the Traverse.

    They already make a 2.0T front drive, they could put that in a top end Malibu/Terrain/Equinox, an Impala, LaCrosse, in whatever crossover slots between Equinox and Traverse, can put it in Traverse.  I think for things like Acadia, Enclave, Cadillacs, you want maybe a 2.5 liter turbo 4, or a 2.0T hybrid of some sort, you need a little extra performance and refinement for the added price over a Chevy.

    The quicker GM gets out of the 3.6 V6 the better.   Because the future is electrifying and engine downsizing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

     

    About the CLA not doing any damage to M-B's image...

    All in due time.

    When M-B OVER saturates the market full of CLA's and closer to mainstream C Class and E Class cars in North America along with the GLA and other MAINSTREAM offerings that play the pretend luxury card...you will see that damage...not now...in 5-10 years from now. And they will hurt as much as Cadillac is hurting now...

    Image result for mercedes c320 coupe

     

    They walked away from this mess ONLY because dumb Americans  were  blinded by the love they have for German cars and the HATRED they have for American cars...but as Cadillac and Chevrolet offer BETTER cars for each and every price point Mercedes Benz offers...that hurt will come awfully soon! 

    You see, American cars are getting better and better perceived by Americans themselves...

     

     

    How are they going to over saturate the market when the CLA most months sells less than the S-class?   The GLA is their worst selling crossover.  C, E and GLE are the volume leaders of Mercedes, and those 3 lines are rock solid in their segments, and the S-class is like 40% market share in it's segment.  G-wagen is up this year, hyper car on the way.  The top end is strong as ever.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    Even if U have a GLA competitor.. it doesn't have to be as cheap looking.. as BITCH ASS looking as a the GLA. Seriously mo.. I see the GLA and I started feeling like a need to go hold a teddy bear. Its a bitch car.. and I mean like "frumpy wearing tennis shoes with a flowered dress bitch car."

    That being said.. I could see U chiming in and saying U just bought one for yourself   i70mfl.jpg

    GLA looks not tall enough to be a crossover.  It looks like it got stepped on and squashed.  I will never buy a crossover for one, and two, I only want rear drive or AWD with a rear bias out of a longitudinal mount engine. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    About that Catera...

    The Middle East got even BETTER versions of this car!

    Image result for holden commodore ss v6

    The Lumina SS

    These had the Corvette's venerable 5.7 liter V8 under the hood in SS form! I don't know if it was the LT1 or the LS1, but yeah...V8!

    Maybe Cadillac should have gone the V8 direction in North America too with the Catera.

    Anybody read Arabic?  Anyway...there are numbers in the article down at the link that makes sense to my English eyes! Maybe they make sense to your English eyes too...just click on the link!

    http://www.motiontrends.com/2001/m10/features/holden/holden.shtml

    That's the Holden Commodore! It was also sold in coupe form called the Monaro, which was sold in the US as the Pontiac GTO. It had an LS1 until 2005 when they dropped the 6.0L LS2 under the hood.

    Subsequent generations of the Commodore were sold stateside as well–I think you know where I'm going with this–as the Pontiac G8 and finally the Chevy SS!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    50 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    They already make a 2.0T front drive, they could put that in a top end Malibu/Terrain/Equinox, an Impala, LaCrosse, in whatever crossover slots between Equinox and Traverse, can put it in Traverse.  I think for things like Acadia, Enclave, Cadillacs, you want maybe a 2.5 liter turbo 4, or a 2.0T hybrid of some sort, you need a little extra performance and refinement for the added price over a Chevy.

    The quicker GM gets out of the 3.6 V6 the better.   Because the future is electrifying and engine downsizing.

    I was referring to a high octane, high performance variant. It would have to be power train certified which costs a lot of money. There would need to be some economy of scale to do that.

    34 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    GLA looks not tall enough to be a crossover.  It looks like it got stepped on and squashed.  I will never buy a crossover for one, and two, I only want rear drive or AWD with a rear bias out of a longitudinal mount engine. 

    The mount of the engine has nothing to do with bias in an AWD system. Haldex has been able to send 90% of the power to the rear wheels for more than 10 years. Most modern AWD systems with even a whiff of a sports badge (Chrysler 200s, Focus RS, Regal GS) can do over 60%. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    25 minutes ago, cp-the-nerd said:

    That's the Holden Commodore! It was also sold in coupe form called the Monaro, which was sold in the US as the Pontiac GTO. It had an LS1 until 2005 when they dropped the 6.0L LS2 under the hood.

    Subsequent generations of the Commodore were sold stateside as well–I think you know where I'm going with this–as the Pontiac G8 and finally the Chevy SS!

     

    Yeah. I wished we got the GTO up here in Canada. Id probably would have bought one instead of the 2005 Impala SS I traded my 1999 Olds Alero for.

    All this discussion and Im getting all kinds of memories flooding in from this time period.

    I got married on the 7th of June 2003. Yup...just a couple of days left for our 14th Wedding Anniversary.

     

    Plus...this concept just entered my brain. What happened to this? It never materialized?

    I just remember it had a decent horsepower rating that had me excited at the time, but the 300 HP STS was still the one I wanted!

    Cadillac-Catera-HEADLIGHT-KIT-2.jpg?1424

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I was referring to a high octane, high performance variant. It would have to be power train certified which costs a lot of money. There would need to be some economy of scale to do that.

    The mount of the engine has nothing to do with bias in an AWD system. Haldex has been able to send 90% of the power to the rear wheels for more than 10 years. Most modern AWD systems with even a whiff of a sports badge (Chrysler 200s, Focus RS, Regal GS) can do over 60%. 

    Yes, but you don't get 50/50 weight balance with a fwd based car.  I'm sure a GLA/CLA can throw toque at the rear wheels too, but it isn't going to drive like an E-class.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    How are they going to over saturate the market when the CLA most months sells less than the S-class?   The GLA is their worst selling crossover.  C, E and GLE are the volume leaders of Mercedes, and those 3 lines are rock solid in their segments, and the S-class is like 40% market share in it's segment.  G-wagen is up this year, hyper car on the way.  The top end is strong as ever

    Im beating a dead horse if I answer this one.

    But Ill just show you pics instead.

    d24e4f89a714e934171e2d25679ea62f.jpg

     

    fc74813c96cf3aeefea1c210589c64f8.jpg

    Buy-a-Mercedes-and-you-will-be-driving-t

     

    All Mercedes cars that have engraved into our psyche that Mercedes Benz cars are simply engineered like no other! And Heads of State ride in them because simply the best they are!

     

    You think that in the years 2000-2017, NOT PRE-WAR Europe, but at a time when Mercedes Benz should be at the top of the world catering to the stupendously rich, not the for the masses, should be offering these?

    Rolls Royce...there was a time when Mercedes Benz was ON EQUAL footing with the likes of that 500K and 770K of Adolf Hitler....

    p90261371highresrolls-royce-sweptail.jpg

    p90261369highresrolls-royce-sweptail.jpg

     

    You are the ONLY one that thinks that M-B is that high on the lux scale..

    They could be....but not if they continue selling Cimarrons to the masses!

    Sorry SMK....there are some things we agree on with Cadillac on why they fail often and there are things that we agree on why  Mercedes Benz succeeds....

    But Im baffled as to why you think selling literally shoddy CLAs and B Classes to the masses IN NORTH AMERICA is a good viable strategy where North Americans were actually sheltered from seeing Mercedes-Benz be a  mainstream automaker in Europe!

    This MAINSTREAM insanity in North America to gain volume is gonna hurt  M-B's image in the long run.

    Its OK of you dont wanna see it...but THAT is 1 reason on how  Cadillac screwed the pooch. A Cadillac for all approach did not work out so well for Cadillac.

    Hell, that strategy is starting to hurt BMW as of now....

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The CLA isn't shoddy, it has a very proven and durable 2.0T and 7-speed transmission, and they still have build quality. They just don't have everything wrapped in leather or with a Bang and Olufsun stereo.  The Sprinter has a spartan interior, but it has build quality that will let it last 300,000+ miles also.

    The sweep tail Rolls-Royce is awesome, it is the sort of thing that Cadillac could try to get into, building super luxury sedans.  Mercedes can go against the Bentley Continental and Flying Spur with the Maybach S600 and the S65.  They can match up with anything Porsche has, and they are about to go above the LaFerrari with Project One, so I do think Mercedes is capable of going against anyone at the high end.

    This is the game changer, no one will come close.

    mercedes-amg-project-one-side-view-homep

    Edited by smk4565
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Why do we keep talking about every car on the planet other than the Cadillac in the OP?  I see a link to a 67 Grand Prix and discussion of exotic Rolls Royce and articles linked in Arabic.

    This is not a zero sum game.

    Both Mercedes Benz and Cadillac can succeed or fail.

    Edited by A Horse With No Name
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Funny, all but two of my neighbors that were never going to buy a domestic when I moved in to my house 15 years ago are now driving domestic cars.

    No doubt... my Lexus loving neighbor broke down last week.. literally in their '08 ES350. Saturday night I look outside and see them pull up in a brand new GMC Acadia.They have been asking me about my Yukon for a while.. and I thought they might go for the big Acadia.. nope. The NEW NEW Acadia is in their driveway

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, smk4565 said:

      The Sprinter has a spartan interior, but it has build quality that will let it last 300,000+ miles also.

    This I call BULLSHIT on as my brother In-law bought a diesel new for his appliance repair business and less then 100K miles the interior is broken to hell, the diesel engine has had to have major repairs by the Benze dealership and finally at 97K miles the Transmission has gone out. Yet his Ford and GM full size vans all have 2-300K miles and except for basic repairs for brakes, tires and a few other little things, neither the engines or transmissions have failed on him.

    O'h last thing is the mounts of the rear dif to the cab for a 1 ton dually broke also and had to be replaced. I see more and more Ford, GM and RAM vans out in service than Sprinters and I see plenty on the used lot.

    Sprinters are garbage and if they do last 300K miles not kilometers in Europe, then they are getting a better built van than the garbage they are here.

    Every service person I have talked to that has had Sprinters hates them and thinks they are garbage. Definitely NOT WORLD CLASS BUILT!

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    First off, a 2008 Lexus could not break down, that is a Camry engine, so it can go 500,000 without an oil change or any service of any kind, they are that good.

    Seriously though, I think people are more willing to buy an American SUV than an American sedan.  Not sure why people give one a stigma and not the other.  I bet the Lexus driving neighbors wouldn't consider a LaCrosse or a CTS, partly because they would think a Lexus sedan is more reliable, yet they will buy an Acadia.  

    This is a challenge Cadillac has to overcome to get sedan buyers back.   And the fact that a lot of people continued to buy American SUVs long after they swore off sedans for the CamCords even going back to the 90s, is all the more reason Cadillac needs more crossovers.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, dfelt said:

    This I call BULLSHIT on as my brother In-law bought a diesel new for his appliance repair business and less then 100K miles the interior is broken to hell, the diesel engine has had to have major repairs by the Benze dealership and finally at 97K miles the Transmission has gone out. Yet his Ford and GM full size vans all have 2-300K miles and except for basic repairs for brakes, tires and a few other little things, neither the engines or transmissions have failed on him.

    O'h last thing is the mounts of the rear dif to the cab for a 1 ton dually broke also and had to be replaced. I see more and more Ford, GM and RAM vans out in service than Sprinters and I see plenty on the used lot.

    Sprinters are garbage and if they do last 300K miles not kilometers in Europe, then they are getting a better built van than the garbage they are here.

    Every service person I have talked to that has had Sprinters hates them and thinks they are garbage. Definitely NOT WORLD CLASS BUILT!

    having worked in the trades for years I can second this so strongly.  Look at a large construction site...why do you see a bunch of twenty year old Ford and GM products but the only Sprinter is six months old?

    6 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    First off, a 2008 Lexus could not break down, that is a Camry engine, so it can go 500,000 without an oil change or any service of any kind, they are that good.

    Seriously though, I think people are more willing to buy an American SUV than an American sedan.  Not sure why people give one a stigma and not the other.  I bet the Lexus driving neighbors wouldn't consider a LaCrosse or a CTS, partly because they would think a Lexus sedan is more reliable, yet they will buy an Acadia.  

    This is a challenge Cadillac has to overcome to get sedan buyers back.   And the fact that a lot of people continued to buy American SUVs long after they swore off sedans for the CamCords even going back to the 90s, is all the more reason Cadillac needs more crossovers.  

    You are clinically insane if you think a 2008 Lexus will go a half million miles without an oil change.  I have friends that run Repair business with a foreign car specialty.  Lexus is not bullet proof.  They are multiple orders of magnitude better than the Mercedes Benz though.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    First off, a 2008 Lexus could not break down, that is a Camry engine, so it can go 500,000 without an oil change or any service of any kind, they are that good.

    Seriously though, I think people are more willing to buy an American SUV than an American sedan.  Not sure why people give one a stigma and not the other.  I bet the Lexus driving neighbors wouldn't consider a LaCrosse or a CTS, partly because they would think a Lexus sedan is more reliable, yet they will buy an Acadia.  

    This is a challenge Cadillac has to overcome to get sedan buyers back.   And the fact that a lot of people continued to buy American SUVs long after they swore off sedans for the CamCords even going back to the 90s, is all the more reason Cadillac needs more crossovers.  

    Taking any opportunity to call U out and insult U even tho I read your whole post and realize that U were joking about the Camry engine.. U are a FUCKIN Retard.. I owned a Camry back in the day and that son of a bitch, later a part of a massive recall for engine sludge, is part of the reason why I came back to American cars and have never looked back. The engine locked at 11K

    No.. Altho he and his wife bought the Acadia.. a brand new untried redo.. his wife has several time asked me if she could take my Impala (and even my V..:lol: which she'd have to do some serious stuff to do.. she's pushing 50 but still looks good) for a test.. each time coming back from the grocery store, me frantically awaiting.. with a smile on her face. Every time commenting on how much smoother, more refined, obviously more spacious, and better looking my CHEVY is than her luxury Toyota ES350. They needed an SUV. They kept the Camr... I mean ES350 because the trade in value was not what they wanted. The repair for its issues will probably run about $2900 as the head gasket need replacement as per their dealer, and another $1300 for new tires. The car does have 106K on the odo

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    Taking any opportunity to call U out and insult U even tho I read your whole post and realize that U were joking about the Camry engine.. U are a FUCKIN Retard.. I owned a Camry back in the day and that son of a bitch, later a part of a massive recall for engine sludge, is part of the reason why I came back to American cars and have never looked back. The engine locked at 11K

    No.. Altho he and his wife bought the Acadia.. a brand new untried redo.. his wife has several time asked me if she could take my Impala (and even my V..:lol: which she'd have to do some serious stuff to do.. she's pushing 50 but still looks good) for a test.. each time coming back from the grocery store, me frantically awaiting.. with a smile on her face. Every time commenting on how much smoother, more refined, obviously more spacious, and better looking my CHEVY is than her luxury Toyota ES350. They needed an SUV. They kept the Camr... I mean ES350 because the trade in value was not what they wanted. The repair for its issues will probably run about $2900 as the head gasket need replacement as per their dealer, and another $1300 for new tires. The car does have 106K on the odo

    Irony of Ironies, my sons friend Paul has a 2008 ES 350 that blew both head gaskets.  He bought it dirt cheap when the previous owner did not want tor repair it.

    At least a sexually indecent act could get your neighbor into a Cadillac...there are no sexual acts on the planet that could tempt me to spend my own money on a late model Benz.

    They built some cool stuff in the 60's and 70's though.

    11 minutes ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    Taking any opportunity to call U out and insult U even tho I read your whole post and realize that U were joking about the Camry engine.. U are a FUCKIN Retard..

    His strategy of lecturing us and making up data, and wild claims about Cadillac, seems rather less than rational at winning us over to German automobiles.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hypothetically speaking ~ wondering if last month's Cadillac model sales numbers will influence Cadillac to veer off any pursuit of vehicles smaller than the ATS and return to larger cars.

    Yeah; not expecting such, but here's to hoping; modern "full size" vehicles are severely misnomered.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I wouldn't mind owning a recent Benz as long as someone else is picking up the repair bills.

    There are a lot of other cars I would prefer though.

    30 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Hypothetically speaking ~ wondering if last month's Cadillac model sales numbers will influence Cadillac to veer off any pursuit of vehicles smaller than the ATS and return to larger cars.

    Yeah; not expecting such, but here's to hoping; modern "full size" vehicles are severely misnomered.

    One can hope.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Seriously though, I think people are more willing to buy an American SUV than an American sedan.  Not sure why people give one a stigma and not the other.  I bet the Lexus driving neighbors wouldn't consider a LaCrosse or a CTS, partly because they would think a Lexus sedan is more reliable, yet they will buy an Acadia.  

     

     

    Edited by A Horse With No Name
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    having worked in the trades for years I can second this so strongly.  Look at a large construction site...why do you see a bunch of twenty year old Ford and GM products but the only Sprinter is six months old?

    You are clinically insane if you think a 2008 Lexus will go a half million miles without an oil change.  I have friends that run Repair business with a foreign car specialty.  Lexus is not bullet proof.  They are multiple orders of magnitude better than the Mercedes Benz though.

    It is a joke.  If you listen to any Toyota owner they think their car will never break and the Prius gets 150 mpg.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On a side here is the Acadia.. and here is what I'm currently driving after taking my V in for an Oil Change, tire balance.. and a recall for a fuse box sticker being incorrect... a new XT5 AWD. Thing has some giddy-up if U step.. seems loaded up pretty nice, with pano-sunroof. Still not a fan of Stop-Start... this is cool cause U can disable

     

     

    20170606_075816.jpg

    20170606_114615.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    50 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    If you listen to any Toyota owner they think their car will never break and the Prius gets 150 mpg.

    I'm going to go out on a limb here and surmise you have no IDEA how shatteringly ironic your statement is.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, balthazar said:

    I'm going to go out on a limb here and surmise you have no IDEA how shatteringly ironic your statement is.

    Once again, I would upvote this by a hundred if I could...

    10 minutes ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    On a side here is the Acadia.. and here is what I'm currently driving after taking my V in for an Oil Change, tire balance.. and a recall for a fuse box sticker being incorrect... a new XT5 AWD. Thing has some giddy-up if U step.. seems loaded up pretty nice, with pano-sunroof. Still not a fan of Stop-Start... this is cool cause U can disable

     

     

    20170606_075816.jpg

    20170606_114615.jpg

    See if you had just bought a Lexus you could go another 475,000 miles before you needed an oil change...!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    55 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Once again, I would upvote this by a hundred if I could...

    See if you had just bought a Lexus you could go another 475,000 miles before you needed an oil change...!

    Some how some people think anything german or asian can out last and out run an American product. Crazy but true.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    38 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Some how some people think anything german or asian can out last and out run an American product. Crazy but true.

    Its wild because the majority of the cars I see on the road over 20 years old are American. It might be a bad thing cause perception wise some of them looked rugged... even though they are all running. Saw a what had to be a 95 Buick Lesabre the other day..  The front bumper was held on by duct tape:mellow:... And Lord knows I see old Cavaliers and S10 Blazers on the regular 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    Its wild because the majority of the cars I see on the road over 20 years old are American. It might be a bad thing cause perception wise some of them looked rugged... even though they are all running. Saw a what had to be a 95 Buick Lesabre the other day..  The front bumper was held on by duct tape:mellow:... And Lord knows I see old Cavaliers and S10 Blazers on the regular 

    In the rolling Junk yards of Ohio highways 80's and 90's American Iron is not uncommon...

     

     

    Obviously this 247 Mile per hour Mustang proves how bad domestic cars really are....maybe he should be Fond of Honda?

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    Its wild because the majority of the cars I see on the road over 20 years old are American. It might be a bad thing cause perception wise some of them looked rugged... even though they are all running. Saw a what had to be a 95 Buick Lesabre the other day..  The front bumper was held on by duct tape:mellow:... And Lord knows I see old Cavaliers and S10 Blazers on the regular 

    Here is the statistics for the longest lasting cars currently on the road, it seems majority trucks are American but cars are Japanese:

    https://blog.iseecars.com/longest-lasting-cars-over-200000-miles

    Trucks/SUVs:

    1 Ford Expedition 5.7%
    2 Toyota Sequoia 5.6%
    3 Chevrolet Suburban 4.8%
    4 Toyota 4Runner 4.7%
    5 GMC Yukon XL 4.2%
    6 Chevrolet Tahoe 3.5%
    7 GMC Yukon 3.0%
    8 Toyota Avalon 2.6%
    9 Toyota Tacoma 2.5%
    10 Honda Accord 2.3%
    10 Honda Odyssey 2.3%
    11 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 2.2%
    12 Ford F-150 2.1%
    13 GMC Sierra 1500 2.0%

    Cars:

    1.    Toyota Avalon     
    2    Honda Accord    
    2    Honda Odyssey   
    3    Ford Taurus    
    4    Chevrolet Impala    

    4    Toyota Camry    
    4    Nissan Maxima   
    5    Toyota Sienna    
    6    Honda Civic    


    6    Dodge Grand Caravan   
    6    Subaru Legacy    
    7    Nissan Quest    


    7    Subaru Outback    
    7    Toyota Prius  


    8    Mercedes-Benz S-Class    
    8    Subaru Forester  

     

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I call shenanigans on the Tacoma.  That's only after they've had a full frame replacement due to rot.  One of my tenants who garaged his 7 year old Tacoma had to do the full frame replacement.  It was never right after that and he traded it on a Silverado.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I call shenanigans on the Tacoma.  That's only after they've had a full frame replacement due to rot.  One of my tenants who garaged his 7 year old Tacoma had to do the full frame replacement.  It was never right after that and he traded it on a Silverado.

    This... Toyota trucks and SUVs are known to have bodies and frames that rust right out from under and around the engine. Props to the engine lasting for 250K+, but if the rest of the car is crumbling away what the hell are U driving? My dad has a 1990 Chevy truck that has never been redone in any way (including the damn paint that is primer colored at this point) and well over 500K.. still running... Like a champ. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    57 minutes ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    This... Toyota trucks and SUVs are known to have bodies and frames that rust right out from under and around the engine. Props to the engine lasting for 250K+, but if the rest of the car is crumbling away what the hell are U driving? My dad has a 1990 Chevy truck that has never been redone in any way (including the damn paint that is primer colored at this point) and well over 500K.. still running... Like a champ. 

    My neighbors had an F150 that had that beat by that 425,000 miles we were talking about....i wanted to watch it hit a million, but they moved to another state.

    20 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Both of my parents' F-150s are contributing to the numbers in that list though. 

    As much as it pains me to admit that certain members and former members might be right about anything....the Ford F-150 is one heck of an amazing product.

    I would  still prefer GMC please...preferably a dually with a diesel...

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 6/5/2017 at 8:46 PM, smk4565 said:

    First off, a 2008 Lexus could not break down, that is a Camry engine, so it can go 500,000 without an oil change or any service of any kind, they are that good.

    Seriously though, I think people are more willing to buy an American SUV than an American sedan.  Not sure why people give one a stigma and not the other.  I bet the Lexus driving neighbors wouldn't consider a LaCrosse or a CTS, partly because they would think a Lexus sedan is more reliable, yet they will buy an Acadia.  

    This is a challenge Cadillac has to overcome to get sedan buyers back.   And the fact that a lot of people continued to buy American SUVs long after they swore off sedans for the CamCords even going back to the 90s, is all the more reason Cadillac needs more crossovers.  

    As a former owner of a ES300, please allow me to tell you how completely full of crap you are if you think that engine can handle such neglect and is "that good". It isn't btw and I had six months of sludge to prove it.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    55 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    As a former owner of a ES300, please allow me to tell you how completely full of crap you are if you think that engine can handle such neglect and is "that good". It isn't btw and I had six months of sludge to prove it.

    It is a joke.  because Toyota fans think their cars are maintenance free.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    49 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    It is a joke.  because Toyota fans think their cars are maintenance free.

    I get that but apparently you missed the irony given that you have shown the same tendencies where Mercedes is concerned. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Very interesting as I am seeing more and more of these lists dominated by the Hyundai/Kia/Genesis product lines. Autotrader's Best New Cars of 2024 - Autotrader
    • My latest quest is a possible upgrade of my turntable. Right now I run a Fluance RT 82.   I just upgraded my CD game with an Audiolab 6000 CDT.    I am enjoying a ton of Vinyl right now. Classical, some jazz albums almost free. older albums often sound quite good and can be picked up quite cheaply.       
    • I am not aware of travel cases for internal drives. Usually you have the drive and once you have made sure you own static electricity is discharged on your body, open the computer and unplug the power cable and data cable to the HD. Then you unscrew the screws holding the drive in. Put the drive into an Anti-Static bag and then usually into a box that has foam padding on all sides to protect the drive and then tape it up to close it.  With both drives in their proper storage bags, you can then have both drives in between foam insulation for handling any dropping of the box, etc. Pack them in a box and tape shut, should then easily handle going through your carry on or checked in luggage. To ship a hard drive, you need to: Secure the hard drive in its original packaging or anti-static bag. If you don't have an anti-static bag, place the drive into a zipped freezer bag to prevent any moisture getting into the drive during transit. Sandwich the drive between foam or wrap it in bubble wrap to absorb any minor shocks. Put the hard drive in a padded shipping box. Close and seal the box. Label your package. Amazon.com : hard drive shipping box This is pretty much all you need.
    • Either a co-pilot first time landing or something truly went wrong on the plane.
    • The incoming rectangular lamps on many GM cars in that era made them much more attractive.  They made a big difference. Now, as far the powerplant went, the notion of 500 cubic inches was mindboggling even during the malaise era.  If you want to see someone's jaw drop, tell a European that their engines have 8200 cc or 8.2 liters.  For those who aren't driving the occasional Mustang or Camaro you see, they freak out at anything over 2,500 or 3,000 cc.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings