Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Review: 2020 Lexus UX 200 F-Sport

      When is a crossover, not a crossover?

    Like it or not, crossovers are becoming the de facto choice for many buyers and automakers are responding. There is now a wide variety of crossovers available: From large three-row models to small, compact vehicles perfect for urban environments. The latter is what we’ll be focusing on this review with the latest entrant into subcompact luxury crossover class, the 2020 Lexus UX 200 F-Sport. It’s a late arrival to the class, but as I found out with the Volvo XC40 last year, that isn’t a bad thing. So how does the most affordable Lexus model stack up to the competition?

    Crossover or Hatchback on Stilts?

    It feels odd to think of the UX being more of a hatchback with a taller ride height than a crossover, but allow me to make my case. To start, the overall shape reminds me more of the Toyota Corolla Hatchback than the NX and RX crossovers. The roofline is a perfect example as the shape is similar to Corolla than any Lexus crossover. Second is when you get inside the UX. You may think that you step up to get inside, but it’s the opposite. The lower position might cause you to think that you lose out on the visibility gain with a higher ride height, but that isn’t the case as you have excellent visibility around most of the vehicle. The rear is difficult to see out of due to the thick pillar and it is recommended to order the optional backup camera.

    The UX 200 does make its presence known to everyone due to some bold design choices. Upfront lies the latest iteration of Lexus’ spindle grille along with some deep cuts in the bumper to give the model an aggressive attitude. The side profile features unique sculpting on the doors and the roof steeply raked towards the back. A vibrant color palette such as this orange on my tester only adds to the bold ideal.

    A Small, Premium Interior

    Lexus has mostly nailed the UX’s interior appointments with soft-touch materials featuring stitching on the dash, metal-like buttons for the climate control system, and contrasting stitching for the seats. The only part which slightly ruins this luxury feeling is the cheap-feeling door panels. Leatherette upholstery is used on the seats and it feels quite nice when sitting on them. F-Sport models get heavily bolster front seats which may make some larger people uncomfortable. Power adjustments for the front come standard on all UX models and allows both driver and passenger to find a comfortable position.

    The rear seat is quite snug for two people, while three is severely pushing it. Legroom can range from ok to non-existent if a tall person happens to be sitting upfront. Headroom is decent for most people, even with the optional sunroof. Cargo space is about average for the class with 21.7 cubic feet with the rear seats up. A tall lift-over height does make it a pain to load heavy items into the vehicle.

    Infotainment System is Better, But Still Frustrating

    The base infotainment system is a 7-inch screen, while a larger 10.25-inch screen is available as an option. Controlling each screen is Lexus’ Remote Touch system. The touchpad controller is unwieldy because you need to pay attention to the screen while making a selection. Otherwise, you’ll end up selecting a different function or setting than what you had originally aimed for. Lexus has added a touchscreen to the recently refreshed RX for 2020 and I can only hope this appears on other Lexus models down the road.

    One change that will be a welcome relief to Android users is that Lexus has added Android Auto compatibility to the system, bringing Lexus in line with most competitors with offering this and Apple CarPlay.

    Mediocre Performance Except In Fuel Economy

    Under the hood of the UX 200 is a 2.0L inline-four producing 169 horsepower and 151 pound-feet of torque. This is paired with CVT and front-wheel drive. If you want AWD, then your only option is the UX 250h which pairs the 2.0L with a hybrid system. The 2.0 really struggles at high speeds as evidenced by a 0-60 time of 8.9 seconds. Competitors in the class are at least are a second or two quicker. The engine also has a noticeable drone that appears when you are accelerating hard. But around town, the 2.0 feels quite punchy with excellent get-up and minimal fuss.

    Where the UX does well is in fuel economy. EPA figures are 29 City/37 Highway/33 Combined for the UX 200. My average for the week landed around 31 on a 60/40 mix of highway and city driving.

    I’m wondering if the UX could fit the 2.5L four-cylinder from the Toyota Camry. It would improve overall performance with a slight hit to fuel economy.

    Surprising Handling Characteristics

    Going for the F-Sport version like my test vehicle will net you a revised suspension setup. Going around bends, the UX shows little body roll and quick reactions. The only item that falters is the steering which feels very rubbery and doesn’t encourage enthusiastic driving. For normal driving duties, the UX’s ride quality is on the complaint side with a few bumps making their way inside. I do wish Lexus had done more to keep tire noise from coming inside, especially at highway speeds

    The Price Is Right

    With a starting price tag of $32,300 for the base UX 200, this makes it the most affordable model in the class. It also happens to be very good value as it comes with the Lexus Safety System+ 2.0 as standard. This suite of active safety features includes forward-collision warning, automatic emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, and automatic high beams. The UX 200 F-Sport seen here comes with an as-tested price of $41,285 and that’s with the optional navigation system, windshield deicer, heads-up display, and power tailgate. To get something similar on the competition, you’ll need to spend a few extra thousand dollars.

    The 2020 UX 200 makes a very compelling case for itself in the subcompact luxury crossover class. This is due in part to its low price and a long list of standard equipment. A competent handling package in the F-Sport and decent fuel economy figures help bolster the model further. But there are areas Lexus needs to address, primarily the engine and infotainment system. The good news is that Lexus has the necessary solutions to both these issues in the form of the infotainment system from the RX and borrowing the 2.5L four-cylinder from the Camry. It would move the UX from being somewhere in the competent class to one that can compete for class honors.

    Disclaimer: Lexus Provided the UX 200, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas

    Year: 2020
    Make: Lexus
    Model: UX
    Trim: 200 F-Sport
    Engine: 2.0L 16-Valve DOHC VVT-i Four-Cylinder
    Driveline: CVT, Front-Wheel Drive
    Horsepower @ RPM: 169 @ 6,600
    Torque @ RPM: 151 @ 4,800
    Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 29/37/33
    Curb Weight: 3,307 lbs
    Location of Manufacture: Miyawaka, Fukuoka, Japan
    Base Price: $40,260
    As Tested Price: $41,285 (Includes $1,025.00 Destination Charge)

    Options:
    Navigation System with 10.3-in Color Multimedia Display - $2,200.00
    F-Sport Premium Package - $975.00
    Power Rear Door w/Kick Sensor - $600.00
    Premium Paint - $595.00
    Parking Assist, Rear Cross Traffic Alert w/Braking - $565.00
    Blind Spot Monitor - $500.00
    Head Up Display (HUD) - $500.00
    Heated F Sport Steering Wheel w/Paddle Shifters - $150.00
    Windshield Deicer - $100.00
    Wireless Charger - $75.00


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    3 hours ago, dfelt said:

    You must be driving one of those camo craptastic Prius with 52 mpg to get 400 miles in 5 min.

    ??? That's how long it takes me to gas up the truck.  2019 Cheverlay Collarada Z71 with a 3.6L gasoline powered V6 injun.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 2/29/2020 at 4:39 PM, balthazar said:

    Except there’s zero business case for a teeny Cadillac SUV below the XT4. The 4 is in the sweet spot of the CUV segment, strong enough to pull from above & below it. 
    Its nonsensical to propose duplicate SUVs separated by 4 inches in length- there’s no buyer who needs those less 4 inches, and the money is MUCH better spent making an existing entry better the 1,000 other CUVs out there.

    How is there no business case for being able to charge 15k more for a Trax? 

    On 3/1/2020 at 12:17 AM, balthazar said:

    Once hyundai is building cars that can be cross-shopped with mercedes, you know the Apocolypse is near.

    Hyundai Genesis prior to Genesis becoming its own brand... 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    How is there no business case for being able to charge 15k more for a Trax? 

    Just reading it phrased that way not only makes me nauseous, it nearly defines the problem.

    Cadillac does not have the budget room to bring to market something that ultimately will be a degrader of image for Cadillac. It would be FAR better to put that development money into the other existing lines, upgrades & packages, not a too-small me-too mini-CUV.

    This is a circa 160K unit brand, not 300,000. Pick & choose your segments and hit them as hard as possible. Big picture.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Just reading it phrased that way not only makes me nauseous, it nearly defines the problem.

    Cadillac does not have the budget room to bring to market something that ultimately will be a degrader of image for Cadillac. It would be FAR better to put that development money into the other existing lines, upgrades & packages, not a too-small me-too mini-CUV.

    This is a circa 160K unit brand, not 300,000. Pick & choose your segments and hit them as hard as possible. Big picture.

    Well, they're far from hitting each segment as hard as possible so they might as well try and get into more segments. 

    Edited by ccap41
    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, ccap41 said:

    Well, they're far from hitting each segment as hard as possible so they might as well try and get into more segments. 

    That is how GM ended up in BK back in 2008-10: too many cars in too many niches and the sales did NOT justify the investment.  Cadillac should improve their USP and not chase every little niche.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    That is how GM ended up in BK back in 2008-10: too many cars in too many niches and the sales did NOT justify the investment.  Cadillac should improve their USP and not chase every little niche.

    Haven't they already done this with the XT4, XT5, and XT6? Aren't those rebadged versions of Chevy, GMC, and/or Buick? 

    Oh, and Escalade. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Toyota sold 17,000 UX’s last year and 49,000 of it’s platform mate the CH-R.  And they probably sell more than that in Asia.  It is a small segment but it is growing, and Cadillac will probably only sell 17k CT4’s this year and that car actually costs some money to build, definitely costs more than a rebadged Trax would.
     

    Probably the only reason there isn’t an XT3 is so that it doesn’t overlap the Buick Encore/GX.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Toyota sold 17,000 UX’s last year and 49,000 of it’s platform mate the CH-R.  And they probably sell more than that in Asia.  It is a small segment but it is growing, and Cadillac will probably only sell 17k CT4’s this year and that car actually costs some money to build, definitely costs more than a rebadged Trax would.
     

    Probably the only reason there isn’t an XT3 is so that it doesn’t overlap the Buick Encore/GX.

    You have just answered your own question as to why Cadillac does not have an XT3. NO NEED since Buick has this covered and Luxury buyers are not interested in such a small micro auto.

    Only posers who care about a badge more than luxury comfort would buy this and while BMW and MB do not have other brands to sell, they have gone from a Luxury only to covering from cheap entry level to luxury to compete with GM Chevrolet/Buick-GMC/Cadillac.

    Nothing Else needs to be said.

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Only posers who care about a badge more than luxury comfort would buy this

    Couldn't the same be said for Escalade buyers when there's a Yukon Denali? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, ccap41 said:

    Couldn't the same be said for Escalade buyers when there's a Yukon Denali? 

    Yes you could say that if you want to ignore the differences both externally and internally to the auto.

    That is where the rub lays, MB has to cover all versions from Eco entry level auto to uber luxury auto and tends to try and charge a premium for a plastic coated auto at the bottom level when there are far better auto options out there.

    SMK pushes an agenda ignoring why Cadillac DOES NOT need an auto like an XT3. So many here have stated with the other GM brands, you have the bottom end covered and Cadillac should focus on mid to full size luxury and not waste R&D resources on the bottom end served by Buick / GMC.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, riviera74 said:

    That is how GM ended up in BK back in 2008-10: too many cars in too many niches and the sales did NOT justify the investment.  Cadillac should improve their USP and not chase every little niche.

    10,000 upvotes, my friend!

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Yes you could say that if you want to ignore the differences both externally and internally to the auto.

    That is where the rub lays, MB has to cover all versions from Eco entry level auto to uber luxury auto and tends to try and charge a premium for a plastic coated auto at the bottom level when there are far better auto options out there.

    SMK pushes an agenda ignoring why Cadillac DOES NOT need an auto like an XT3. So many here have stated with the other GM brands, you have the bottom end covered and Cadillac should focus on mid to full size luxury and not waste R&D resources on the bottom end served by Buick / GMC.

    But, there's just a styling difference between an Escalade and a Denali. You're paying a premium for the badge the same way one would for a GLA. 

    The one distinctive thing you get in an Escalade over the Denali is SuperCruise. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, ccap41 said:

    Couldn't the same be said for Escalade buyers when there's a Yukon Denali? 

    Sure...

    But..as @riviera74 and @dfelt have stated.  And like you also have made a comparison with Mercedes Benz and the GLA...

    Cadillac, should NOT enter Buick and Chevrolet air space.  The Yukon Denali enters Cadillac airspace and THAT is OK for Buick. Buick NEEDS cars in the upper echelon that touch Cadillac prestige to retain Buick luxury status.  Chevrolet could enter Buick airspace to attract buyers in the Chevy showrooms. Halo cars like the Corvette and high speed Camaros (ZL1s and the like) were always expensive and entered Cadillac airspace. And those cars helped sell the rest of the Chevrolet line-up of Biscaynes and Bel Airs and Chevelles which also made Chevrolet introduce a new niche. The "SS" muscle car trims of their family grocery getters. And those "SS" trims entered Pontiac and Oldsmobile airspace.  And the same thing happened over at Pontiac with their GTO and Trans Am offerings, but Pontiac also had personal luxury coupes to sell. And the same thing over at Oldsmobile and so forth and so forth...

    Zoom over to 2020.  Same thing. Only that Pontiac and Oldsmobile do not exists anymore. 

    Cadillac has been cheapened to sell more cars. That would be a 1980s mistake.  The dealership network has to understand that Cadillac at one time, sold cars on the merit of LUXURY, PRESTIGE and QUALITY. By down pricing and selling Cadillac, LUXURY, PRESTIGE and QUALITY also goes DOWN. THAT is the nature marketing. And its done NATURALLY. When cars being sold at the SAME price level and NICHE MARKETS as even your OWN entry level, family haulin' brands, your own pricing DICTATES what MARKET you are gonna be playing in. What airspace you are filling...  You (GM/Cadillac) is DEFINING that space...

    Mercedes is lucky and unlucky at the same time as M-B for a time now, has to do all that on ONE brand.  Its a curse but a blessing.  A curse because their marketing AND engineering has to be top notch.  A blessing because if their marketing AND engineering is top notch, their luxury cars are the best, and THAT sells their lower end cars. If they sputter on one of the two, then both luxury and entry level go to hell.

    Cadillac does NOT NEED that headache... 

    All Cadillac needs to do is just be...CADILLAC. The rest follows ON ITS OWN.

    Mercedes had to INVENT slogans like: "Engineered like no other" or 'Nothing but the best" 

    Mercedes had to CONVINCE buyers that that is true. But they also had to deliver on that promise. 

    Cadillac ONLY has to deliver on the goods.  Cadillac invented only ONE slogan.  "The Standard of the world"  after they won the Dewar award almost 100 years ago. After that, Cadillac ONLY played in Cadillac airspace and "engineered their cars like no other" and were truly "nothing but the best" and the PEOPLE came up with this slogan "Its the Cadillac of..."

    By occupying high priced Chevrolet airspace, and low to mid-level Buick airspace...do you (CCAP) actually think that the Cadillac version will be at Cadillac levels of prestige, LUXURY and especially QUALITY?  

    I personally dont think so....

    The Cadillac Escalade is NOT at a Chevrolet Tahoe level or Yukon Denali level...but the Yukon Denali is at Escalade levels of luxury, prestige and quality.  But for Cadillac playing in Buick and especially Chevrolet airspace...one gets the OPPOSITE reaction towards Cadillac.

    Ive said this before....

    When a Cadillac ATS is sold SIDE BY SIDE, PRICE FOR PRICE, (more or less) with a Chevrolet Impala, with the Impala getting a more powerful engine than the entry level ATS and the SAME engine with a mid level ATS, with the IMPALA seemingly getting a NICER interior than the CADILLAC ATS...than its no bueno for Cadillac and its image....

    But lets not fool ourselves. The Escalade truly is a Cadillac. The Chevrolet Tahoe is no where NEAR the Escalade...

    BUT...the Tahoe is probably gonna be a MORE luxurious,  better quality vehicle than a possible Cadillac XT3... And THAT leads to PRESTIGE...which shoots Cadillac in the foot by trying to sell vehicles it has NO BUSINESS selling in the first place. 

    Let Buick handle that niche.  If Cadillac "needs" a small CUV like a XT3, then the XT3 NEEDS to have a PRICE TAG, that BEFITS a CADILLAC which in turns needs to have the ENGINEERING, TECH, LUXURY that BEFITS a Cadillac... Which means it needs to be EXPENSIVE as HELL...to support all that!!!

    And maybe a small CUV that is expensive as hell might not sell in high numbers enough for Cadillac to invest in...which means Cadillac might cheapen all those qulaities and THAT is no bueno...

    And if Cadillac wont do that, and if Cadillac might NOT sell enough expensive as hell XT3s, then either way...Cadillac needs to stay the hell out of that market.

    Mercedes on the other hand...has that luxury to play with.  Produce and sell luxury vehicles and produce and sell entry level stuff. The luxury stuff is celebrated by folk just because and that alone sells the entry level stuff. 

    GM has Buick.  

    Different brands, Mercedes and Cadillac.

    Mercedes and  Cadillac were a force in the luxury market pre 1940s. 2 World Wars forced Mercedes to be what it is today.  Entry level, luxury and trucks. Military and commercial.   GM was that too.  But GM had other brands...

    GREED and STUPIDITY made Cadillac be what they are today. It works for Mercedes because war and the fight to survive made Mercedes re-invent itself.  GREED and STUPIDITY ultimately made Cadillac fight for survival and the now need to survive...and be more like Mercedes. 

    Mercedes might have copied Cadillac in the 1960s and 1970s to regain their place in the luxury world, Cadillac did not need to sell more lower priced cars like Mercedes did... and THAT is what is STILL killing Cadillac.  That DUMB ideology that Cadillac needs to be in EVERY garage in all facets of North American life. It does NOT. Cadillac only needs to sell to the stupidly, filthy rich!!!

    Great rant?

    Stupid rant?

    Give me a break. Im still sick (but getting better)  and I havent talk cars for a while...  :)  

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Agree 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, dfelt said:

    You have just answered your own question as to why Cadillac does not have an XT3. NO NEED since Buick has this covered and Luxury buyers are not interested in such a small micro auto.

    Only posers who care about a badge more than luxury comfort would buy this and while BMW and MB do not have other brands to sell, they have gone from a Luxury only to covering from cheap entry level to luxury to compete with GM Chevrolet/Buick-GMC/Cadillac.

    Nothing Else needs to be said.

    But an XT3 would be more luxurious than a Buick and have Super Cruise.  
     

    If it is about R&D dollars and they want to spend the money on EV’s then I can see that as a better use of resources.  A small EV Cadillac would make more sense, especially from a weight and packaging standpoint.

    As for the UX, if it was a hybrid at this price point it wouldn’t be as much of a rip off and Lexus buyers would be able to brag about driving a hybrid even if the car sucks, it still gives them a reason to buy.

    Edited by smk4565
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 3/1/2020 at 9:43 AM, ocnblu said:

    No, but if we do, it's great knowing how easy it is getting going again, fully replenished.

    400 miles of new possibilities in five minutes. 

    Yeah it just sucks when you have the convenience of refilling your car at home while you sleep and not have to deal tweeters and crackheads while you spend five minutes pumping that flammable liquid.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 2/28/2020 at 12:51 PM, surreal1272 said:

    No, no, no, and yet more no! Too many better options over this overdressed (and uglier) version of a RAV4.

    I appears I had the UX and the NX crossed up. It’s the equally hideous NX thats the RAV4 twin.

    3 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Toyota sold 17,000 UX’s last year and 49,000 of it’s platform mate the CH-R.  And they probably sell more than that in Asia.  It is a small segment but it is growing, and Cadillac will probably only sell 17k CT4’s this year and that car actually costs some money to build, definitely costs more than a rebadged Trax would.
     

    Probably the only reason there isn’t an XT3 is so that it doesn’t overlap the Buick Encore/GX.

    So the CT4 will sell a tick less than the A Class did in 2019 (which only sold just over 17K units). Nice to know Cadillac won’t be the only ones struggling to move certain sedans. 

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    I appears I had the UX and the NX crossed up. It’s the equally hideous NX thats the RAV4 twin.

    So the CT4 will sell a tick less than the A Class did in 2019 (which only sold just over 17K units). Nice to know Cadillac won’t be the only ones struggling to move certain sedans. 

    A Class is pretty much designed for the European market, looks like it sold almost 200K units there last year (though I'd imagine many if not most would pick a hatchback in Europe) , sales elsewhere are gravy.

     

     

    Edited by frogger
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    But, there's just a styling difference between an Escalade and a Denali. You're paying a premium for the badge the same way one would for a GLA. 

    The one distinctive thing you get in an Escalade over the Denali is SuperCruise. 

    That is where you are wrong, there is more than a styling difference, there is also as SMK loves to talk about on the high end of MB, interior material differences between Cadillac and GMC. Far more differences than I will waste time listing here, but there is if you really have spent time looking at the two.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    That is where you are wrong, there is more than a styling difference, there is also as SMK loves to talk about on the high end of MB, interior material differences between Cadillac and GMC. Far more differences than I will waste time listing here, but there is if you really have spent time looking at the two.

    Oh no, I've read them.

    SuperCruise and a superior sound system. Oh and you get a mini-fridge. 

    https://www.motortrend.com/news/2021-cadillac-escalade-vs-gmc-yukon-denali-chevy-tahoe-high-country-differences-comparison/

    "

    What Does The Escalade Have The Yukon/Tahoe Don't?

    Only 2021 Cadillac Escalade buyers can opt for an onboard refrigerator-freezer or night vision. And 2021 GMC Yukon/XL Denali buyers are the only ones who can purchase a power-sliding center console. Motoring said console aft 10 inches (via an unmarked button on the center roof console) opens up a space to store a purse or parcel, moves the cupholders on the rear of said console closer to occupants of the rear captain's chairs (the option isn't offered with a middle-row bench seat), and exposes a drawer in the bottom of the console in which to store valuables. When the console's motored forward and the key is away from the vehicle, it would take a lot of vicious crowbarring to access what's in that drawer.

    "

    It's basically the definition of putting lipstick on a pig. I'm not saying the end product is bad in any way. It's just also a vehicle for people who love status symbols...because the Denali exists. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, frogger said:

    A Class is pretty much designed for the European market, looks like it sold almost 200K units there last year (though I'd imagine many if not most would pick a hatchback in Europe) , sales elsewhere are gravy.

     

     

    Talking about US sales since that is what SMK is referring to.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    52 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Oh no, I've read them.

    SuperCruise and a superior sound system. Oh and you get a mini-fridge. 

    https://www.motortrend.com/news/2021-cadillac-escalade-vs-gmc-yukon-denali-chevy-tahoe-high-country-differences-comparison/

    "

    What Does The Escalade Have The Yukon/Tahoe Don't?

    Only 2021 Cadillac Escalade buyers can opt for an onboard refrigerator-freezer or night vision. And 2021 GMC Yukon/XL Denali buyers are the only ones who can purchase a power-sliding center console. Motoring said console aft 10 inches (via an unmarked button on the center roof console) opens up a space to store a purse or parcel, moves the cupholders on the rear of said console closer to occupants of the rear captain's chairs (the option isn't offered with a middle-row bench seat), and exposes a drawer in the bottom of the console in which to store valuables. When the console's motored forward and the key is away from the vehicle, it would take a lot of vicious crowbarring to access what's in that drawer.

    "

    It's basically the definition of putting lipstick on a pig. I'm not saying the end product is bad in any way. It's just also a vehicle for people who love status symbols...because the Denali exists. 

    Considering in the past the Pleather versus leather differences, cloth differences, wood versus plastic wood, etc. I have to think there will be more of a difference than what MT has to say, there has been in the past. You also have that huge super screen dash which Yukon does not get.

    Be interesting to see them side by side and truly compare.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cadillac might as well make an XT3 for the China market.  China is Cadillac's biggest market, it sells more vehicles there than in the US, and they don't sell the Escalade there.  There is no legacy of large cars (or desire for large cars) or sentimentality for old model names there.  GM has been losing market share in China for a few years now, they might as well bring new models to try to attract buyers.

     

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, frogger said:

    Cadillac might as well make an XT3 for the China market.  China is Cadillac's biggest market, it sells more vehicles there than in the US, and they don't sell the Escalade there.  There is no legacy of large cars (or desire for large cars) or sentimentality for old model names there.  GM has been losing market share in China for a few years now, they might as well bring new models to try to attract buyers.

     

    THIS idea actually makes sense.  Smaller cars because of engine displacement taxes is a sound idea indeed.  Buick China outsells Buick USA by 4 to 1, hence why Buick is focused there.  It would be completely ridiculous for a small Cadillac to be sold here, especially in crossover form.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, surreal1272 said:

    Yeah it just sucks when you have the convenience of refilling your car at home while you sleep and not have to deal tweeters and crackheads while you spend five minutes pumping that flammable liquid.

    I haven't had to deal with such trash as that, maybe you should try a different gas station next time you fill up the giant gas powered station wagon you just bought.  I do like your Flex if I haven't already said.

    • Haha 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    I haven't had to deal with such trash as that, maybe you should try a different gas station next time you fill up the giant gas powered station wagon you just bought.  I do like your Flex if I haven't already said.

    LOL! Then consider yourself lucky. I avoided those particular places like the plague in Phoenix and here in NC. Just saying that its an issue in a lot of places these days and the convenience of just letting your EV charge up overnight at home cannot be discounted just because one hates EVs.

     

    And thanks. Really happy with the ride, especially since I performed the Sync2 to Sync3 upgrade. World of difference there.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, regfootball said:

    Parking Assist, Rear Cross Traffic Alert w/Braking - $565.00
    Blind Spot Monitor - $500.00

    be nice if this were standard on a lexus

    AMEN to that!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • My latest quest is a possible upgrade of my turntable. Right now I run a Fluance RT 82.   I just upgraded my CD game with an Audiolab 6000 CDT.    I am enjoying a ton of Vinyl right now. Classical, some jazz albums almost free. older albums often sound quite good and can be picked up quite cheaply.       
    • I am not aware of travel cases for internal drives. Usually you have the drive and once you have made sure you own static electricity is discharged on your body, open the computer and unplug the power cable and data cable to the HD. Then you unscrew the screws holding the drive in. Put the drive into an Anti-Static bag and then usually into a box that has foam padding on all sides to protect the drive and then tape it up to close it.  With both drives in their proper storage bags, you can then have both drives in between foam insulation for handling any dropping of the box, etc. Pack them in a box and tape shut, should then easily handle going through your carry on or checked in luggage. To ship a hard drive, you need to: Secure the hard drive in its original packaging or anti-static bag. If you don't have an anti-static bag, place the drive into a zipped freezer bag to prevent any moisture getting into the drive during transit. Sandwich the drive between foam or wrap it in bubble wrap to absorb any minor shocks. Put the hard drive in a padded shipping box. Close and seal the box. Label your package. Amazon.com : hard drive shipping box This is pretty much all you need.
    • Either a co-pilot first time landing or something truly went wrong on the plane.
    • The incoming rectangular lamps on many GM cars in that era made them much more attractive.  They made a big difference. Now, as far the powerplant went, the notion of 500 cubic inches was mindboggling even during the malaise era.  If you want to see someone's jaw drop, tell a European that their engines have 8200 cc or 8.2 liters.  For those who aren't driving the occasional Mustang or Camaro you see, they freak out at anything over 2,500 or 3,000 cc.
    • Thank you for the response. I want to reinstall them into the computers, especially the "newer" one.  The old one has been a real champ.   The reason for not leaving them in the desktop is that the basic tower might have to be transported ... and not by me.  That means it will be out of my possession for a while.  Since the HDs would be traveling with me, they'll have to get scanned through airport security a time or two.  I'm guessing that shouldn't mess with the data.   I've already backed up the C drive on several large 1 TB portable hard drives.  I don't want to touch the basic functions and files on the computers since I don't know how that all works.  I stay away from the drives and files I am not familiar with. I tend to donate other things to charity.   I did give the Regal I once owned to charity.   A good friend told me that, about a month or two later, he saw it being driven around the city by its new owner and we had a good laugh. This is what I want to do.  I'm just trying to figure out if the guy or gal at Office Depot can size a case based on looking up the unit and the HD in it.  Any ideas on that part?  Or should I do that and approximate the size and weight of the part to get the cases?
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings