Jump to content
Create New...

1950s GM cars trivia


Recommended Posts

~ What makes the 1958 model year General Motors cars

different from The 1950-1957 & 1959-up cars from GM?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've almost answered the question...

55-57 was in a sense one generation of

car while 59-60 was another generation

but the 58s were one year only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 1958s were longer, wider and heavier than the 1960-1957 models. The 1959's were a longer, lower and wider than the 1958s because some marketing research said that was what consumers wanted. I think it was also part of Bill Mitchel's push to put all the vehicles on the same basic bodies. IIRC it put the Ford folks into a panic since GM was coming out with two different bodies in two years, which was unheard of at the time.

Do you mean 1950 - 1957 models?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've almost answered the question...

55-57 was in a sense one generation of

car while 59-60 was another generation

but the 58s were one year only.

I know the '58 Chevy and '58 Pontiac were completely different from their '57s, but weren't the '58 B-O-Cs (or some of them) updated '57s?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the '58 Chevy and '58 Pontiac were completely different from their '57s, but weren't the '58 B-O-Cs (or some of them) updated '57s?

I thought that too. The B-O-C were just updated sheetmetal and minor hardware changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Revised frames & greenhouses are the most obious one year only item.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure about chassis's for B-O-C, but all sheetmetal & all interiors were changed for '58. Even some glass features changed (B & O dropped the 3-piece backlight). Additionally, many other features, such as transmissions & brakes were also new in some instances... but in general it could be said, yes: the '58 Buick-Olds-Cadillac were more refreshes than complete redesigns.

However, in that everything you see from '57-58 is markedly different, I would still call them all 1-year only designs.

'58 has another distinction: the last year you could push-start a GM automatic car.

Edited by balthazar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Balthazar:

How is it possible to push start an automatic pre-59?

What is the mechanical explanation to this?

I would think the torque converter is what makes push starting an issue...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>"How is it possible to push start an automatic pre-59? What is the mechanical explanation to this?"<<

Not an expert here, but I've both read and unintentionally experienced this: pre-'59 HydraMatics still have a rear pump in the trans that enable's push-starting.

>>"Could you push start a Dynaflow? "<<

Yes: the directions are in the B-59 owner's manual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Balthy:

Could you give me a quick synopsis?

I've yet to buy an owner's manual for my B-59,

even a reprint would be fine if I find one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Synopsis of push-starting a B-59?

"Place control shift lever in Neutral (N) until car speed reaches approximately 15 MPH, then shift into Low (L). Continue to increase car speed until engine cranks. After engine starts, return control lever to Neutral (N) for engine to warm up. It is safer to push car than tow it."

TwinTurbine's L is a plantery gear, independant of the 'D' stator blades...ie: TT cars do not accelerate thru L when in D.

Original shop & owner's manuals are n eBay frequently- usually $15 for the OM and maybe 45 for the SM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Synopsis of push-starting a B-59?

"Place control shift lever in Neutral (N) until car speed reaches approximately 15 MPH, then shift into Low (L). Continue to increase car speed until engine cranks. After engine starts, return control lever to Neutral (N) for engine to warm up. It is safer to push car than tow it."

TwinTurbine's L is a plantery gear, independant of the 'D' stator blades...ie: TT cars do not accelerate thru L when in D.

Original shop & owner's manuals are n eBay frequently- usually $15 for the OM and maybe 45 for the SM.

ah, so it's not something you and 2 friends do by foot...unless you're facing down hill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks Balthazar.

That's crazy that the B-59 can be push-started... I had no idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

kind of a cool feature, though. Probably a lot of people in the 1950's were used to push starting cars as they had just switched from 6v to 12v systems. I think Ford switched in 56, not sure what year G.M. and Chrysler switched.

The B-59 of course came with 12V but I wonder if people expected to be able to push start a car?

I think Volkswagen used 6v into the sixties IIRC.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Powerglide cars with rear pumps can be push started to, I've done it myself. I think the consensus is 15-20mph, depending on the gears.

1958 Chevys were a one year only deal because the "opposition" came out with long low cars in 1957. 1959 cars were rushed out in response.

What did the early 1955 Chevy V8 cars come produced WITHOUT?

If you KNOW, you won't need a hint.... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CMG: oil filters?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, my buddy Duffy who lives in Arizona & daily drives a

1961 Rambler American has the oil filter "option". :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not overlooked... a number of motors in this time period had optional oil filters... '58 Pontiac 370, for example. Earlier, no oil filter was commonplace- there's none on my '46-48 Ford flathead.

It was introduced as soon as possible, as there was no PROVISION for an oil filter. It showed up late the very same year with the filter provision, and never was produced without an oil filter provision again. First year for an engine the company would be built on (IMO) wasn't intended to have NO oil filter option? That woulda been crazy, would it not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems so today, but again- having NO oil filter was commonplace prior to the 1950s (my '46-48 Ford Flathead has no PROVISION for a filter), and having a filter standard was common after the 1950s... making the '50s a decade of 'oil filter transition'.

There were oiling issues with the early 265 anyway- I believe the overall system got re-engineered... adding a filter was undoubtedly part of that re-engineering rather than 'fixing an oversight'. Sorry to douse your glee over 'another GM mistake'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uppers only, right? : lower arms are still forged in '59.

Correct! :AH-HA_wink: By the way - I LOVE the B-59. It may be my next car. At the Goodguys event in Des Moines there was a Candy Apple Red over white interior Lesabre that was so beautiful I simply stared at it - I was in such awe, I forgot to snap a picture or two of it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My bad; you just seemed... full of glee. No offense intended.

Not at all.

I've built a bazillion Chevys! I just like the weird trivia, I thought it was a lesser known thing for most people nowadays!

:cheers:

I remember somebody also said something about a Pontiac suspension A arm being a Corvette piece of some sort, that it was in a Hollander interchange manual. I don't know the answer (IF there is one) but does anybody else know? Mid 60's rings a bell...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct! :AH-HA_wink: By the way - I LOVE the B-59. It may be my next car. At the Goodguys event in Des Moines there was a Candy Apple Red over white interior Lesabre that was so beautiful I simply stared at it - I was in such awe, I forgot to snap a picture or two of it!

Well as of April 2007 the number of B-59s on this forum has DOUBLED.

Balthazar's Invicta 2dr ht has been joined by my LeSabre 2dr post.

I absolutely love that car, I'd take a bullett for it, and that's saying a

lot for a non-hardtop!

Posted Image

Edited by Sixty8panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember somebody also said something about a Pontiac suspension A arm being a Corvette piece of some sort, that it was in a Hollander interchange manual. I don't know the answer (IF there is one) but does anybody else know? Mid 60's rings a bell...?

Only thing that springs to mind here is that 1 of the 6 cars in the '60s Pontiac Banshee series of concepts/prototypes used some Corvette suspension pieces, but that certainly would not have been in Hollanders. I have never heard of a RPO Pontiac and the vette sharing anything, tho.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These twin concept cars were made by GM.

One was painted orange metallic and the

other was green metallic. Between the two

of them they had 16 cylinders but neither

had a V8. Name the car(s)....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I KNOW that Balthy knows.... anyone else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If some overglorifed hemi powered Mopar econobox

is worth $2mill this is worth more than $3.8mill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If some overglorifed hemi powered Mopar econobox

is worth $2mill this is worth more than $3.8mill.

What "Hemi powered Mopar econobox" POSSIBLY sold for "$2mill"..????

"Hemi econobox" is an oxymoron to begin with, doesn't even make SENSE...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A 1960s Plymouth Belevedere or some downsized Dodge

from the early 1970s in relative terms was the Neon or

Caliber of its day.... an econobox. :P

Trying to make a point of how production cars that were

made in the millions but have a specual motor can be

worth millions, then surely something this special is worth

more than double that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings