Jump to content
Create New...

If they Build them,They will come


Recommended Posts

I'm thinking More in the Design sense. Designs that would sell.


First

2000 Buick Lacrosse,and 2003 Chevrolet SS. Similar design themes, and Dimensions. Nice Op for Platform Sharing.

Posted Image

Posted Image

1999 Chevrolet Nomad. Sharp, unique Design theme. Design would transfer well to a Coupe Platform mate.

Posted Image


2004 Holden Torana. Crisp modern design.Build it on an AWD version of Delta 2. Would Fit nicely As an AWD sport compact.

Posted Image

Edited by Ghost Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2000 Buick Lacrosse,and 2003 Chevrolet SS. Similar design themes, and Dimensions. Nice Op for Platform Sharing.


The SS should be the next large Chevrolet IMO and the Lacrosse would be an excellent halo for Buick as long as it kept all it's oddities like the clam shell hood, and the suicide doors.

1999 Chevrolet Nomad. Sharp, unique Design theme. Design would transfer well to a Coupe Platform mate.


I've always thought GM should've produced this. I'd almost like to see a sporty Pontiac version more though.

2004 Holden Torana. Crisp modern design.Build it on an AWD version of Delta 2. Would Fit nicely As an AWD sport compact.


Agreed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I loved the '99 Nomad concept when it came out, mostly cause it had several '69 Camaro influences to it, but now in hindsight the Kappa Nomad was a better looking and more sophisticated design. ---- As far as comparing the Concept LaCrosse to the production, I guess it could be like comparing the Lamborghini Diablo to a base Toyota MR2. Not even close. If the production LaCrosse was a hardtop and had 95% of the concept's styling I'd buy one even if it was FWD. What a sexy car! The production version makes me shudder it's so "Camry-esque". ---- The Torana and SS sedan need to be produced EXACTLY in every detail... possibly wiht the exception of the SS getting the LS7 and a beefed up fully manual trans to back it up. The Torana was simply an amazing idea for a 5-door wiht Muscle car DNA and the SS harkened back to the days of the hardtop/bubbletop cars while looking like an exotic. Why both of these cars are not hitting the streets is beyond me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GM did make this...

Posted Image
Posted Image
...they should've made more of them.


Buick figures if it can bring the Regal Cielo in for a price approaching that of conventional convertibles (about $5000 more than the solid-roof models), there's enough of a market for a unique four-door convertible to make production worthwhile. For anyone who loves driving top down but needs the practicality of a sedan, the Regal Cielo makes a lot of intuitive sense. And there hasn't been a four-door domestic convertible available since the '67 Lincoln Continental.

-Car and Driver, March 2000

Sigh...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They just should have never stopped building the Cutlass Convertible. It was a large convertible that had just as much trunk space as a sedan, with the 3.4 DOHC engine, it could embarass V6 Mustangs of the same vintage and keep pace with the V8s. It was a great car and even though I have the CTS now, I still miss it often.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know a few of these actually were built but not in their true un-watered down form. The first one makes me all warm and fuzzy inside. :wub:

(incomplete list, GM only)

Posted Image

1965 Chevrolet Mako Shark II

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

BTW: Did I mention I HATE most Crossover/SUVs?

Posted Image

Posted Image

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the '01 Borrego:


This one was a no brainer, but GM chose not to for some reason... It could STILL work as a Chevrolet or Pontiac.

I'd STILL love to see GMC go Terradynne and Terracross (Acadia maybe? Terracross was Lambda if I rememeber correctly)

I loved the Cielo and Regal Cielo as well.

GM experimented with a lot of stuff they never put into production the two affore mentioned included. By watching their concepts they were the HOTTEST company in the industry. To bad all that innovation was for nothing

Caddy 16 AND Cien should both have been made.


Agreed!!!

I also think the Oldsmobile Recon could've done a lot for Olds along with the Profile and Alpha.

Hell, IMO we should still be building Fierros and Corvairs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of those GM concepts and the lincolns I'd love to have as a production

Some more Non GM:

Chrysler 300 Hemi C
Posted Image
Posted Image

Plymoth Pronto Spyder (is it just me, or do certain aspects of this car resemble the Sky a bit?)
Posted Image

Mercury Messenger (Couger anyone?)
Posted Image
Posted Image

Ford 427
Posted Image
Posted Image

2004 SVT Lightning Concept
Posted Image


Certain details of the Magnum concept that never made it but I feel should have been brought over to the production
-Larger wheels (it's a big car, the production wheels look too small IMO)
-Head lights (the HID Projecotrs from the concept just look damn mean)
Posted Image
Posted Image
Looks like the ground effects went toward the SRT-8
Posted Image

Edited by Decka
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The above non-GM concepts all deserve to be built, they look great. The Messenger reminds me a bit of an Olds though in the front end (am I dreaming? It reminds me of something...). The Lincolns are sooo damn gorgeous. The Zephyr concept looks so production-ready... the lower bumper details, front and rear, look great. The taillamps look... Lincoln. The production car's tails look... Volvo. I like the roadster's retro, signature Lincoln front end. I hope it appears on the production Aviator, as on the concept, and spreads to all Lincolns. Come on Ford, you've got to move fast to save Lincoln... your oldest luxury brand! I'd sell off either Volvo, Jaguar or Aston Martin and shore up your legacy... Ford, Mercury, Lincoln.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings