Jump to content
Create New...

TCC unveils Yukon and Yukon Denali early!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Denali keeps the "electric shaver" grille. The grille should be less trapezoidal. It's too narrow towards the bottom. Could use a touch of chrome over the rear license plate provision as well. Other than that, I like it. The subtle shaping of the taillights is cool. I'm glad the tacky cladding is gone. The fullsizers have always shared interiors, so it doesn't bother me that this is just modded from the already-classy Chevy. As long as the Eskie has a unique inner lining.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the official GMC site:
http://www.gmc.com/newvehicles/2007yukon/index.jsp

[post="25289"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


You really see the "Big Envoy" look in that picture of the silver Yukon. Those pictures make it look a LOT better than the initially released ones.

And that interior is just AMAZING!

Also, I really liked the blacked-out taillights on the Denali. Nice touch, GM! Edited by bowtie_dude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really see the "Big Envoy" look in that picture of the silver Yukon.  Those pictures make it look a LOT better than the initially released ones.

And that interior is just AMAZING!

Also, I really liked the blacked-out taillights on the Denali.  Nice touch, GM!

[post="25293"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


Yeah, but the nav does not look nearly as good as it did in the original pics (http://www.gminsidenews.com/naias/GMT900/Yukon/yukh9.jpg) . Here it looks more like what they already have on the market. i am wondering if this pic on the GMC site is of the nav from a Envoy Denali? Edited by envoy03
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, did anyone see the mileage specs of the Yukon on the website? Or do we just not want to comment on them.

How in the hell do they figure 21mpg combined? I see 21 mpg on the highway and I 15 in the city. You add them together, divide by 2, and you get an average or combined mileage. Am I wrong in thinking that that is how you get a combined mpg?

Oh, wait a minute. I think I've figured it out. GM figure combined mileage by saying 99% is highway and 1% is city. That's how they get the 20.5 and 20.1!! Silly me! :rolleyes:


ENGINES
4.8L V8
• 290 hp
• 290 lb-ft torque
• 15 mpg city/ 19 mpg highway*
ENGINES
5.3L V8
• 320 hp
• 340 lb-ft torque
• 15 mpg city/ 21 mpg highway (2WD)*
• 15 mpg city/ 20 mpg highway (4WD)*
ENGINES
6.2L V8 (Denali Only)
• 380 hp
• 415 lb-ft torque
• 13 miles city/ 19 miles highway*


*Based on GM® testing. Official EPA figures not yet available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I like what I see so far. The Yukon & Tahoe are really nice. :) I like how these vehicles remain GM in appearance but, look more refined than Toyotas. This makes me really excited to see what other future GM products will look like. In one word, WOW
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those figures appear to be with all 8 cylinders working, otherwise there would be a more dramatic difference between the other two engines, gas mileage-wise.

[post="26372"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


That doesn't make sense. Why would GM shoot themselves in the foot by reporting low numbers? Edited by Derek77
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings