Jump to content
Create New...

L.A. Times: Dan Neil Reviews the CTS


bobo

Recommended Posts

Here are a few paragraphs from Dan Neil's review of the Cadillac CTS:

My favorite piece of recent movie dialogue comes from the animated tour de force "Ratatouille." The ruthless food critic Anton Ego has just had his heart melted by the little rodent chef at Gusteau's, causing him to reevaluate his work, his purpose: "In many ways the work of a critic is easy," he writes in his column. "We risk very little and enjoy a position over those who offer up their work and their selves to our judgment. . . . But there are times when a critic risks something and that is in the discovery and the defense of the new."

So here's a new thought, worthy of defending: Cadillac makes a better car than BMW or Mercedes or Lexus or Infiniti, and that car is the 2008 CTS. No other car in the mass market, with so much at stake for its makers, dares so much as this expressive and audacious bit of automotive avant-gardism. In a segment that lives and dies by European benchmarks, the CTS sets fire to the bench and throws it through the shopkeepers' window.

I've climbed all over the CTS and everywhere I found things to admire. Under the hood, the strut-tower brace is a lovely bow of brushed aluminum, cast in one piece with the connective braces. The tail lamps feature a crazy glowing filament, an optical fiber as thick as your pinkie. The front suspension lower control arms are beautiful alloy castings. The switchgear is artfully integrated into the consoles instead of being plunked into the cockpit in big ugly rectangles. I especially like the personal climate controls that live in the console rail by the dash, and the premium French stitching (real thread!) on the leather-like dash and door panels. The people who built this car clearly scored victory over victory over the folks in accounting.

The base price for the CTS is $32,990 (equipped with a 3.6-liter, 263-hp V6) but the car doesn't really come into its own until it gets the optional 304-hp, 3.6-liter V6: a direct-injection engine, the first for Cadillac (though Audi has had the technology for years). The bigger engine adds an additional $1,550. Our test car was equipped with the stouter engine, mated to GM's own six-speed automatic with manual-shift mode; and the $2,980 summer tire package, including: directional HID (high intensity discharge) headlamps, 18-inch alloy rims, Michelin Sport Pilot 2 tires, limited-slip differential and stiffer springs, firmer struts and bigger anti-roll bars to tie it all together. With the exotic audio/navigation system including a 40-gig hard drive on board, our tester retailed at $45,105. That's a huge amount of car for the money.

For now, it's time to celebrate. Cadillac has built a ripping car here -- fast, fun, exuberant in style and substance. To the extent that imitation of one product concedes the superiority of another, the CTS surrenders not an inch. It feels like a fundamentally self-defined car. Chalk one up for the home team.

Full article:

Linky

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now can we start a 'Death Watch' series for the media bias dragon?

What a shock. GM puts out creative, unique, solid vehicle. Glowing reviews follow.

And small correction: The LA Times isn't anti-GM, California is!

For the last time.. no!

There are still plenty of "head up our asses" reviews out there. GM doesn't have to win every review, the review just has to be fair.

You didn't see us getting up in arms when the malibu placed 3rd in one review because even though it didn't win, the review was still fair.

It's the unfair ones we're pissed at.... and they are still out there..... like that USAToday review of the Malibu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giving credit where it is due is the sign of acceptance, that does not mean that the reviewers are pro GM again.

Like finding itzy bitzy faults and harping them to death, and still mentioning not so good predecessors of current GM vehicles is still a trait going on with the media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now can we start a 'Death Watch' series for the media bias dragon?

What a shock. GM puts out creative, unique, solid vehicle. Glowing reviews follow.

And small correction: The LA Times isn't anti-GM, California is!

Ha ha yup, and don't forget about GM's "crappy" products snagging 4 nominations in the 2008 North American Car and Truck of the year...take that Anti-GM media!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the unfair ones we're pissed at.... and they are still out there..... like that USAToday review of the Malibu.

That is 100% GM's fault for not having a properly inspected and completely 100% operational car available for media drives.

Assuming the gentleman wasn't making up the incidents, all of those cars should have been perfect. Better to keep writers out of the cars than to have less than perfect examples for review. The GM PR machine failed, not the author of the article. When you have such a narrow margin for error, you must have every controllable aspect taken care of first and foremost. GM clearly didn't.

I'd fire every staffer that was present and didn't pull those cars that were misbehaving---there's just no excuse. The test cars are generally run hard and fast---they should have been prepared with multiple vehicles and a pit crew of engineers and mechanics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there's nothing for someone to complain about in a car (like the CTS), then they really can't write a review that bashes it. GM's other cars aren't quite as good, hence they have stuff to bash them for (see Malibu: no NAV, no dual-zone climate, no 6-speed on the 4cyl yet, no bluetooth, etc).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there's nothing for someone to complain about in a car (like the CTS), then they really can't write a review that bashes it. GM's other cars aren't quite as good, hence they have stuff to bash them for (see Malibu: no NAV, no dual-zone climate, no 6-speed on the 4cyl yet, no bluetooth, etc).

Oh, you mean like when Car and Driver tested the 3-series against the G35, CTS, and some others... and the BMW broke down on them 3 times; one of which was an ABS system failure which sent them into a spin.... but it still took 1st place and they still sung it's praises.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, you mean like when Car and Driver tested the 3-series against the G35, CTS, and some others... and the BMW broke down on them 3 times; one of which was an ABS system failure which sent them into a spin.... but it still took 1st place and they still sung it's praises.....

That's two different things. Obviously, all 3-Series don't break down three times in one test-period. If they did, they wouldn't sell like they do. The Malibu, on the other hand, lacks NAV, bluetooth, dual-zone climate, etc., whether you want them or not. The Malibu lacks those features, period. Not all 3-Series break down all the time. I'm guessing since that is a rare occurrence they gave it a pass and looked at the vehicle when it was in working condition. Almost all vehicles break down at some point, after all. Not saying the 3-Series should have been given the gold, but I'm guessing it was given the 1st spot because of how it worked when it was working.

Basically, what I'm saying is that any review can rightly bash the Malibu for not having the features it lacks that many cars in its class have. That's like the 3-Series breaking down every time someone tested it and none of them caring about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Add "no rear seat armrest" to the features lacking in the Malibu. Sorry, but that's just one pathetic oversight.

On the CTS though...when I looked at a few in LA, I noticed that the screws were exposed in the rear cupholders. Is that for real, or is there an insert that was removed for the show? Having exposed screws in a place for drinks (and spills) is not very smart.

That said, that was my only complaint...and I'm not easily impressed.

Edited by Croc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm the one driving, i could give a crap if the people in the back get an armrest.

the only thing i have heard consistently about bmw's, never buy one, lease one new only, because the repair bills will kill you, and are inevitable.

nice cars, but certainly will put you in the poor house with all sorts of repairs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Add "no rear seat armrest" to the features lacking in the Malibu. Sorry, but that's just one pathetic oversight.

On the CTS though...when I looked at a few in LA, I noticed that the screws were exposed in the rear cupholders. Is that for real, or is there an insert that was removed for the show? Having exposed screws in a place for drinks (and spills) is not very smart.

That said, that was my only complaint...and I'm not easily impressed.

Someone removed the insert. The inserts are removable and can go right into the dishwasher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a thought. Could it be that the American press expects more from American car makers because they think they should be best and when they were aweful they came down harder than if they would on a Asian or European car?

Edited by K.C.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And small correction: The LA Times isn't anti-GM, California is!

Los Angeles is Chevy's largest market.

Los Angeles is GMC's largest market.

Toyota's most profitable sales district isn't California, but rather the southeast (Alabama, Florida, etc.)

Your delaership sells 3 HHRs a month, mine sells 3 in an afternoon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Los Angeles is Chevy's largest market.

Los Angeles is GMC's largest market.

Toyota's most profitable sales district isn't California, but rather the southeast (Alabama, Florida, etc.)

Your delaership sells 3 HHRs a month, mine sells 3 in an afternoon.

But...California is the most populous state...so its no surprise that many GM products are sold in CA. Unfortunately for GM, the rest of the country is trending towards California's Percentages---The Southeast may be a Toyota strength, but California is in pretty close lockstep.

I'm not sure what the 3 HHR reference is, but I'll assume the implication is that my Chevy store is doing less new volume? We're 15% above projections for about 8 quarters running...how many GM stores can say that? But that's not the issue--the fact is that Californians' turned on the Domestics first and the rest of the country has followed suit, just like many trends, it hits the coasts first...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But...California is the most populous state...so its no surprise that many GM products are sold in CA. Unfortunately for GM, the rest of the country is trending towards California's Percentages---The Southeast may be a Toyota strength, but California is in pretty close lockstep.

I'm not sure what the 3 HHR reference is, but I'll assume the implication is that my Chevy store is doing less new volume? We're 15% above projections for about 8 quarters running...how many GM stores can say that? But that's not the issue--the fact is that Californians' turned on the Domestics first and the rest of the country has followed suit, just like many trends, it hits the coasts first...

Usually the weak do sellout first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually the weak do sellout first.

Coming from a man hell bent on bringing the Stars & Bars back, that really must mean something to those left-coasters.....or does that mean that the 100's of GM stores that closed their doors permanently in the last few years are sellouts?

Can't you just enjoy a few moments of good vibes from a positive Neil review? Trust me, there will be little good news coming out of the 2.8's PR machines in the next year. Pundits are talking about a 15 million unit market--wanna guess where the lost sales will disproportionately come from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happened to the GM Death Watch? Oh... it's still going... It's on 157 now...

How’s this for a long term view, from a Business Week article dated May Ninth, 2005: “The only question is whether that reckoning comes in the next year, if models developed by Vice-Chairman Robert A. Lutz fall flat; in 2007, when the union contract comes up for negotiation; or perhaps in five years, when GM may have burned through its substantial cash cushion.” So really, we only have part three of the prognosis to go.

When this dies... then maybe I'll let up on the media bias.

:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coming from a man hell bent on bringing the Stars & Bars back,

LOL, I'm 'hellbent on bringing the stars and bars back' simply because it's my avatar?

that really must mean something to those left-coasters.....or does that mean that the 100's of GM stores that closed their doors permanently in the last few years are sellouts?
Gotta trim the fat somehow.

Can't you just enjoy a few moments of good vibes from a positive Neil review?

I did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, I'm 'hellbent on bringing the stars and bars back' simply because it's my avatar?

Gotta trim the fat somehow.

I did.

Just in case you'd like the facts to get in the way, check out the latest sales percentages from CA (AN, dec 24):

Toyota 28.8

Honda. 14.6

GM. 13.6

Nissan. 8.5

Ford. 8.4

Chrys. 6.5

That's frightening...

Make sure those deckchairs are arranged just right, fog...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, I'm 'hellbent on bringing the stars and bars back' simply because it's my avatar?

Gotta trim the fat somehow.

I did.

Just in case you'd like the facts to get in the way, check out the latest sales percentages from CA (AN, dec 24):

Toyota 28.8

Honda. 14.6

GM. 13.6

Nissan. 8.5

Ford. 8.4

Chrys. 6.5

That's frightening...

Make sure those deckchairs are arranged just right, fog...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Oh, you mean like when Car and Driver tested the 3-series against the G35, CTS, and some others... and the BMW broke down on them 3 times; one of which was an ABS system failure which sent them into a spin.... but it still took 1st place and they still sung it's praises.....

Don't you mean BMW and Driver? I agree with a lot of the stuff that they write, but they are rather Euro Biased.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just in case you'd like the facts to get in the way, check out the latest sales percentages from CA (AN, dec 24):

Toyota 28.8

Honda. 14.6

GM. 13.6

Nissan. 8.5

Ford. 8.4

Chrys. 6.5

That's frightening...

Make sure those deckchairs are arranged just right, fog...

...and an iceberg?

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm the one driving, i could give a crap if the people in the back get an armrest.

the only thing i have heard consistently about bmw's, never buy one, lease one new only, because the repair bills will kill you, and are inevitable.

nice cars, but certainly will put you in the poor house with all sorts of repairs.

My parents would beg to differ.

Their '04 330 convertible is their first BMW.....and it has like 50K miles on it and there hasn't been a single thing go wrong with it.....<fingers crossed.>

Also, every BMW I have had recently has been just about flawless (granted I didn't keep them as long or with as many miles.)

Finally, remember whether you buy OR lease the BMW, all maintenance is covered (including brakes) for 4 years/50,000 miles. AND, you don't have to bring it in until the service indicator tells you to.

Funny thing....my CTS has a service indicator too....and it ranges from about 10K-12K miles between services (which is really good.) However, EVERY time I go into my lame Cadillac dealer, they are STILL trying to convince me to bring it in EVERY 3K miles for an oil change.

....idiots....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But...California is the most populous state...so its no surprise that many GM products are sold in CA. Unfortunately for GM, the rest of the country is trending towards California's Percentages---The Southeast may be a Toyota strength, but California is in pretty close lockstep.

I'm not sure what the 3 HHR reference is, but I'll assume the implication is that my Chevy store is doing less new volume? We're 15% above projections for about 8 quarters running...how many GM stores can say that? But that's not the issue--the fact is that Californians' turned on the Domestics first and the rest of the country has followed suit, just like many trends, it hits the coasts first...

....and the "Southeast" is a Toyota distributor.....not a "region" in typical auto company speak. The largest Toyota stores in the country ARE in southern California. And it's true....like Enzl said....you have to look at sales percentages and market share to talk apples-to-apples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just in case you'd like the facts to get in the way, check out the latest sales percentages from CA (AN, dec 24):

Toyota 28.8

Honda. 14.6

GM. 13.6

Nissan. 8.5

Ford. 8.4

Chrys. 6.5

That's frightening...

Make sure those deckchairs are arranged just right, fog...

....AND that's GM (and Ford, Chrysler) with their dominence (even in CA) of the SUV and pickup markets...!

Yikes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings