Jump to content
Create New...

That Eighties Funk


Blake Noble

Recommended Posts

Lot of J-body bashing in this thread... as much as the FWD revolution of

the 1980s is IMHO the WORST Automotive trend of all time!!!! I will say

that the J-body, esp. the 1980s Cavalier/Sunbird/Skyhawk/Firenza had

several good things going for them, there was a LOT of variety... 2dr &

4dr sedans, convertibles, fastbacks, wagons, their styling was far better

than most "economy cars" of the era and you therefore did not look like

you bought the absolute cheapest econobox even in a $7000 J2000 or

a $9500 Cavalier Type-10.

And there was the availability of an auto and STICKS, several motors

incl. V6s and turbocharged fours....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

When the L car came out, GM devoted two assembly plants to it's production (that's how popular it was then), both the Wilmington, Delaware and Linden, New Jersey assembly plants built this car, along with the Beretta. Both Linden and Wilmington built the Corsica hatchback, until Wilmington started producing the nearly identical Pontiac Tempest L car (Canada only), and production of the Corsica hatchback was shifted to Linden.

The Tempest had a luggage rack on the trunk and Pontiac wheels, dart on the grille and on the steering wheel, metric dash, and Daytime Running lights way before any US cars had DRL's. The tempest was always a 2 tone car.

pontiactempestyq0.jpg

pontiactempest1991zr3.jpg

Edited by Pontiac Custom-S
Link to comment
Share on other sites

pontiactempestyq0.jpg

pontiactempest1991zr3.jpg

Yechh. That car screams "damaged reputation." :nono:

Well, that and this particular "Pontiac ..."

1992PontiacLemans0404.jpg

Please, don't get me ranting on the LeMans. I had a friend when I was about six and his mother drove one of those. By far one of the ghastliest-sounding four-pot engines ever made. I don't think Chery could design a car that would look any cheaper than it did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yechh. That car screams "damaged reputation." :nono:

Well, that and this particular "Pontiac ..."

1992PontiacLemans0404.jpg

Please, don't get me ranting on the LeMans. I had a friend when I was about six and his mother drove one of those. By far one of the ghastliest-sounding four-pot engines ever made. I don't think Chery could design a car that would look any cheaper than it did.

Like I said, The L car was so popular at one point in time, GM had two assembly plants devoted to its production, damaged? Nah, not by 80's standards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said, The L car was so popular at one point in time, GM had two assembly plants devoted to its production, damaged? Nah, not by 80's standards.

Yeah, it was popular at one time..so were the J-cars..they were still mediocre $h!e...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Umm, I got news for ya, I don't exactly see these daily in the Detroit area, in fact I can't remember the last time I saw any of these around here.

That's one sucky thing about living in Southern California......(AAS and I were talking about this yesterday at the car show.)

Because it's been SO import-dominated.....for SO long......you never see any GM cars, say from early-80's to mid-90's....that are in any good kind of condition. Cars like the 6000 STE....or the Skyhawk Sport/Hatch Turbo......or ANY Buick T-Type for that matter......or said Corsica or Beretta.....especially the Beretta GTZ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always liked the Corsica, it was a tank, you could do anything to it and it still kept going. The 91 interior refresh was a godsend though. It's been what 12 model years after they rolled off the line, and I still see them all over, when I'm in the USA.

So very true.

A neighbor around the corner has a 93, and he beats the crap out of it every day. and with 150k, it keeps starting up every day....

Before my buddy got his beater Taurus, he had a Corsica (94, I believe) He had 218k on the clock, and had not replaced that much on the car (fuel pump, starter...)but the engine and trans are still in pretty good shape.

He gave it to a friend, and last I heard, it's still going.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lot of J-body bashing in this thread... as much as the FWD revolution of

the 1980s is IMHO the WORST Automotive trend of all time!!!! I will say

that the J-body, esp. the 1980s Cavalier/Sunbird/Skyhawk/Firenza had

several good things going for them, there was a LOT of variety... 2dr &

4dr sedans, convertibles, fastbacks, wagons, their styling was far better

than most "economy cars" of the era and you therefore did not look like

you bought the absolute cheapest econobox even in a $7000 J2000 or

a $9500 Cavalier Type-10.

And there was the availability of an auto and STICKS, several motors

incl. V6s and turbocharged fours....

Amen. :yes::)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amen. :yes::)

Eh... Though I will admit, if it weren't for $h!ty build quality, reliability issues(I'm many of you will disagree, but my family's track record speaks for itself), and overall being just $h!ty... They weren't bad cars. Driving the Sunfire back to back with the Cutlass and and its like stepping into an Aston Martin by comparison. :P

Edited by blackviper8891
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's one sucky thing about living in Southern California......(AAS and I were talking about this yesterday at the car show.)

Because it's been SO import-dominated.....for SO long......you never see any GM cars, say from early-80's to mid-90's....that are in any good kind of condition. Cars like the 6000 STE....or the Skyhawk Sport/Hatch Turbo......or ANY Buick T-Type for that matter......or said Corsica or Beretta.....especially the Beretta GTZ.

At one time, way back when, I had an Olds Achieva SCX W41.......remember that car? Limited production, track-tuned suspension (supposedly...lol) and the 190hp Quad4. I can't remember the last time I saw any Achieva, even a ratted-out Achieva here....much less a nice-condition SCX coupe....

I suppose that's one of the few cool things about Oklahoma, we don't have the salty sea air, and we never get winter weather to speak of, so no salt on the roads really. We do however get a lot of sunshine. There are still alot of older cars running around, and cool cars too. We just put a new motor in a, I think it was an '86 Toronado, the little one. Cool car, today we had a '66 Impala with 34,000 miles on it, in for new oil pan gasket and a few other leaks. I get to see alot of nice cars, thanks to our weather.

Edited by gmpartsgirl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ford Tempo. I had the misfortune of driving that hunk of junk for a while as a work vehicle.

Yeah, I am going to have to go with the Tempo on this as well. Probably the worst car I have ever driven (and that includes my own horrible 1987 Le Baron GTS Turbo). The body structure on the Tempo felt like it was taped together; when you hit a bump or an expansion joint, it didn't vibrate - it wobbled. Scary, scary stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I am going to have to go with the Tempo on this as well. Probably the worst car I have ever driven (and that includes my own horrible 1987 Le Baron GTS Turbo). The body structure on the Tempo felt like it was taped together; when you hit a bump or an expansion joint, it didn't vibrate - it wobbled. Scary, scary stuff.

As bad as some of the GM FWDers were, the Tempo/Topaz were worse, I think. I had a good experience w/ a diesel Escort, though. As far as Chrysler, the K-cars seemed to be a mixed bag...I knew kids in my high school in '87/88 that had '83-84 Dodge 400s/LeBarons that were falling apart..

I've never been much of a FWD fan, but as far as the '80s, I've long liked the styling and overall design '79-85 E-bodies (Riviera/Toronado/ElDorado) and the '80-85 Seville...and the later C- and H- body, esp. the coupes (the Electra, slick LeSabre and 88 coupes, etc). Too bad they didn't do an '87-90 Bonneville coupe. It seems that for the most part, in the '70s and '80s, GM was at it's best with larger cars.

Edited by moltar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh... Though I will admit, if it weren't for $h!ty build quality, reliability issues(I'm many of you will disagree, but my family's track record speaks for itself), and overall being just $h!ty... They weren't bad cars. Driving the Sunfire back to back with the Cutlass and and its like stepping into an Aston Martin by comparison. :P

Well, now that you mention luxury cars....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As bad as some of the GM FWDers were, the Tempo/Topaz were worse, I think. I had a good experience w/ a diesel Escort, though. As far as Chrysler, the K-cars seemed to be a mixed bag...I knew kids in my high school in '87/88 that had '83-84 Dodge 400s/LeBarons that were falling apart..

I've never been much of a FWD fan, but as far as the '80s, I've long liked the styling and overall design '79-85 E-bodies (Riviera/Toronado/ElDorado) and the '80-85 Seville...and the later C- and H- body, esp. the coupes (the Electra, slick LeSabre and 88 coupes, etc). Too bad they didn't do an '87-90 Bonneville coupe. It seems that for the most part, in the '70s and '80s, GM was at it's best with larger cars.

Agreed. Anyone I knew who had a K car had issues with it...

Not to go too off topic, but I don't think Chrysler has had a good compact..period. :scratchchin:

Breeze, Neon....though I have to say that Shadow (in it's many forms), seems to have broken that mold. I still see quite a few out there... :yes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings