Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

Mopar(ty) On: Dodge's SRT performance division to stay the course

Intrepidation

By Intrepidation
in Chrysler

 Share

Recommended Posts

Intrepidation

Intrepidation

Posted
Posted

arnell11.jpg

After learning that General Motors would be disbanding its High Performance Vehicle Operations team to focus on less performance-oriented projects, our thoughts naturally turned towards Ford's SVT and Chrysler's SRT groups. Would Detroit's other automakers follow GM's lead and kill off their fellow speed divisions? Apparently not. Ford has gone on record stating that the SVT program will continue on in its current capacity and now Chrysler has

announced that it will continue to develop SRT versions of its volume sellers.

In a posting on Chrysler's Red Letter Dodge blog, Steve Bartoli, Chrysler's vice president for global product planning, had a few choice comments regarding the future of the Pentastar's SRT models, saying, "We are working on a sedan as we speak. We will look at many styling options." Admittedly, that's short on detail, but it does portend good things to come for fans of big HEMI engines and fat rear tires.

Autoblog

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Satty Newbie

Satty

Posted
Posted

Ford is keeping SVT in their current capacity? Meanign doing nothing? The last Ford vehicle to carry the SVT badge was the freaking Focus. I understand SVT did some work on the GT500, but other than that, are the Taurus SHO and Fusion Sport considered SVT products?

Anyways, maybe we'll get an Avenger SRT, that'll.....do something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Intrepidation

Intrepidation

Posted
  • Author
Posted
You mean they still make the Avenger? Jesus, I haven't seen one in quite a while, haven't seen an ad for one either.

Would you bother to advertise a car that's near the bottom of the segment and sells mostly to fleets? Pontiac would/does, but you know.

I see them around. It's a wasted opportunity. Better powertrains and interior are the car's only really shortcomings, if you like the way it looks (which I do for the most part).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lamar Newbie

Lamar

Posted
Posted
I cannot believe Chrysler came out with the Avenger in the first place.

I can't blame them for putting the car in their lineup, as a midsize family sedan is all but a staple these days.

However, I (and most others) WILL blame them for making the car a ball of crap.

My wife and I accompanied a friend of ours on a car-shopping excursion. When we went to a Dodge dealership, I told her to test the Charger and steer aWAY from the Avenger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CMG Newbie

CMG

Posted
Posted
I cannot pretend that I understand the inner workings of Chrysler. This is a company with people who looked at the Caliber and thought, "Yes, people will buy this."

Am I on crack, or are you guys on crack...?

Take a Toyota Corolla, or a Pontiac Aztec, or a Mazda 323, or a Ford Fiesta, etc etc etc....

I wouldn't look twice at any of them, I don't like their stying, I think they are terrible to drive and would prefer to not have any one of them for a daily driver.

They still sell Corollas, Aztecs, 323s, Fiestas etc, and IN GREAT NUMBERS.

Transportation is just transportation for millions of people, obviously.....?

:AH-HA_wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Intrepidation

Intrepidation

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The Caliber, like other Damiler era cars, aren't fundamentally bad cars, they're just unfinished or cost cut to hell in the interior. If the Caliber reviewed a new interior (which I don't know why it didn't but the Jeeps did), better noise isolation, and maybe some time around the track, it would be much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CMG Newbie

CMG

Posted
Posted (edited)
They still sell 323s? Is it still 1991? 'Cause if it is, I'm way too young to have this hair in my special place.

Who said they believe you have hair in your bum? (Is that your "special place?!?!)

Cars over the years have sold for all sorts of reasons, CHEAP PRICE being a really good motivator. :AH-HA_wink:

ALL cars are not "enthusiast" cars, and poor excuses for cars have sold well over time, 20 years ago, 10 years ago, and today. In large numbers.

Trust me.

(Here! ;) )

79_Honda_RH_Rr.jpg

Edited by CMG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings