Jump to content
Server Move In Progress - Read More ×
Create New...

Foreign Car Dealers’ Association Angry with Obama's 'Buy American' Message


Recommended Posts

Thats what ticks me off so much! They killed how many of our soldiers in the war, but yet we go ahead and let them sell their garbage over here and make a killing on it. If I was a Veteran I would be disgusted that my own country basically betrayed me!

No German cars too then right? The Brits killed us too, so no British cars either. Uhm... we fought Italy as well... nothing from them. French cars suck so doesn't matter if we don't get those... lets see... uh... Well there's Australia and South Korea.

Allright! So we can buy South Korean, Australian, and American cars!

Anyways, really, you guys like to push the "Necessity is the mother of all invention" even along the lines of fuel regulation and air pollution regulation. So along the same lines of artificial needs, having foreign competition here is an "artificial need" so your same "Necessity is the mother of all invention" line should hold true.

As Ford is showing, it is definitely possible to be able to compete with Japan, even on uneven footing. And guess what? If Ford is successful in their gambit they will be a FAR BETTER company than Toyota could ever be because Ford has to be far more resourceful and efficient in its processes to compete... and once the playing field begins to level more as globalization progresses, Ford will be in the dominant global position over Toyota who had to rely somewhat on their own government to "move forward" whereas Ford has only themselves to rely on.

Edited by Teh Ricer Civic!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But to what degree are Japanese protectionists rather than extremely nationalistic? There is a difference, same outcome, but still a difference.

It's not a matter of the Japanese general population favoring japanese cars. Detroit doesn't even get a chance to compete. Cars imported to Japan have to pass tests and examinations that domestically produced cars do not. The Japanese LOVED the B-bodies and Chevy Astros. They had an active gray market import program to bring these cars to the island. It cost them a fortune to do because of the inspections.... the same inspections GM would have to go through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not a matter of the Japanese general population favoring japanese cars. Detroit doesn't even get a chance to compete. Cars imported to Japan have to pass tests and examinations that domestically produced cars do not. The Japanese LOVED the B-bodies and Chevy Astros. They had an active gray market import program to bring these cars to the island. It cost them a fortune to do because of the inspections.... the same inspections GM would have to go through.

Now can GM get around these restrictions by BUILDING them in Japan? Or is that not allowed either?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No German cars too then right? The Brits killed us too, so no British cars either. Uhm... we fought Italy as well... nothing from them. French cars suck so doesn't matter if we don't get those... lets see... uh... Well there's Australia and South Korea.

Allright! So we can buy South Korean, Australian, and American cars!

Anyways, really, you guys like to push the "Necessity is the mother of all invention" even along the lines of fuel regulation and air pollution regulation. So along the same lines of artificial needs, having foreign competition here is an "artificial need" so your same "Necessity is the mother of all invention" line should hold true.

As Ford is showing, it is definitely possible to be able to compete with Japan, even on uneven footing. And guess what? If Ford is successful in their gambit they will be a FAR BETTER company than Toyota could ever be because Ford has to be far more resourceful and efficient in its processes to compete... and once the playing field begins to level more as globalization progresses, Ford will be in the dominant global position over Toyota who had to rely somewhat on their own government to "move forward" whereas Ford has only themselves to rely on.

Do you really know why Ford is doing well today? Seriously?

They mortgaged EVERYTHING just before the credit markets imploded even though they didn't need the money at the time. They have solid platforms to put their cars on... but so does GM.

Anyone here think the Fusion is that much better a platform than the Epsilon? Anyone? How about the Taurus being a better platform than the Zeta? Bueller? Bueller? How many out there are going to find the MKS to be a better car than the CTS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now can GM get around these restrictions by BUILDING them in Japan? Or is that not allowed either?

That I do not know. When Toyota doesn't import and more cars to the US and builds them all here, then I'll care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you really know why Ford is doing well today? Seriously?

Anyone here think the Fusion is that much better a platform than the Epsilon?

I'd say those are pretty equivalent.

How about the Taurus being a better platform than the Zeta?

Invalid comparison, but the Taurus is certainly better and more modern than it's GM equivalent, the W-body Impala.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now can GM get around these restrictions by BUILDING them in Japan? Or is that not allowed either?

The answer is no, because renting/selling to, and supplying a foreign competitor of a Japanese Corp. will get you drummed out of town. The obstacles are in every facet of doing business there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say those are pretty equivalent.

Invalid comparison, but the Taurus is certainly better and more modern than it's GM equivalent, the W-body Impala.

Why is a Zeta v. Taurus an invalid comparison? Just because the Zeta is RWD? Think a NG Taurus and NG Charger/300c aren't going to get cross shopped?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is a Zeta v. Taurus an invalid comparison? Just because the Zeta is RWD? Think a NG Taurus and NG Charger/300c aren't going to get cross shopped?

Well, NA-market Zeta sedans are now defunct with Pontiac's demise (unless a Chevy version of the G8 appears in the future). The W-body lives on. I certainly wouldn't cross shop FWD vs. RWD models, but some may.

Edited by Cubical
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No German cars too then right? The Brits killed us too, so no British cars either. Uhm... we fought Italy as well... nothing from them. French cars suck so doesn't matter if we don't get those... lets see... uh... Well there's Australia and South Korea.

Allright! So we can buy South Korean, Australian, and American cars!

Anyways, really, you guys like to push the "Necessity is the mother of all invention" even along the lines of fuel regulation and air pollution regulation. So along the same lines of artificial needs, having foreign competition here is an "artificial need" so your same "Necessity is the mother of all invention" line should hold true.

As Ford is showing, it is definitely possible to be able to compete with Japan, even on uneven footing. And guess what? If Ford is successful in their gambit they will be a FAR BETTER company than Toyota could ever be because Ford has to be far more resourceful and efficient in its processes to compete... and once the playing field begins to level more as globalization progresses, Ford will be in the dominant global position over Toyota who had to rely somewhat on their own government to "move forward" whereas Ford has only themselves to rely on.

Exactly :neenerneener: lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The answer is no, because renting/selling to, and supplying a foreign competitor of a Japanese Corp. will get you drummed out of town. The obstacles are in every facet of doing business there.

It should be interesting to hear what these obstacles are, and if they still exist. Until recently, Ford owned 33.9% of Mazda - which supplied engines, platforms, and engineering to Ford. Renault still owns 44.3% of Nissan - which has a French CEO.

Frankly GM never put much effort into Japan. They could have produced a locally-designed and produced car, but with Japan's historically weak economy, tiny car market, and periodic recessions, why bother? China, Eastern Europe, and South America had far more potential customers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not a matter of the Japanese general population favoring japanese cars. Detroit doesn't even get a chance to compete. Cars imported to Japan have to pass tests and examinations that domestically produced cars do not. The Japanese LOVED the B-bodies and Chevy Astros. They had an active gray market import program to bring these cars to the island. It cost them a fortune to do because of the inspections.... the same inspections GM would have to go through.

US import regulations are just as anal, requiring a whole host of agencies' approval - NHTSA, EPA, etc. It's practically impossible to import a European car into the US, though not the other way around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

US import regulations are just as anal, requiring a whole host of agencies' approval - NHTSA, EPA, etc. It's practically impossible to import a European car into the US, though not the other way around.

Not the same by a longshot. It isn't a simple matter of meeting regulations, it is a system of intentional obstacles.

However, given the spot they are in now, that all may change in a hurry.

There will be pain all around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings