Jump to content
Create New...

GM Crash Test Video from 1968


Recommended Posts

WOW, That made me crack up laughing with all the flaying dummies falling out of the auto's. yea I know it is not funny, but those cars sure sucked for protecting the people inside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, most of those cars were not BOF.

They were unibody.

I don't think it would t make a difference either way, since regardless of how they were built, I'm willing to bet money they didn't do a good job absorbing the energy and controlling passenger movement.

Of course they did do a good job at keeping themselves intact. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it would t make a difference either way, since regardless of how they were built, I'm willing to bet money they didn't do a good job absorbing the energy and controlling passenger movement.

Of course they do do a good job at keeping themselves intact. :lol:

Well, they weren't even too good at that - those early unibodies were pretty weak structurally. When the floorboards would rot out, some literally folded in half.

But we are talking about cars built when seatbelts were an option, and steel dashboards were the norm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being 43 years old and actually having spent time in Junkyards when I was a kid and wrecked examples of these cars were everywhere...

Yes, even though they may suck in other ways...cars of the era were not that safe.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do we know for sure this is a GM research video? I see no GM cars atall anywhere. Wouldn't it behoove them to use their own stuff for relevancy to their mission?

yeah, isn't this more likely to be a Chrysler vid?

but I know that GM participated in the development of early crash test dummies....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, isn't this more likely to be a Chrysler vid?

but I know that GM participated in the development of early crash test dummies....

I saw one Pontiac, the rest were Chryco and Ford.

But maybe that was part of the plan, to make the competition look bad?

Also all of the cars are pre '68, some of them quite a bit earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard GM researchers were credited with inventing crash test dummies... can anyone confirm or deny? Also, if this was made in 1968... why use obsolete cars? It would seem to me the research would not be current, sort of a waste, really, NOT to have the newest cars in the tests. Edited by ocnblu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did it occur to anyone that cutting 90% of the roof and removing all 4 doors might have played a BIT of a part in how the cars crumpled and how easily the doors popped open on those with doors ???

We also don't know the speeds- the one toward the end looks like that Ford is doing 80 when it rear end the other & the flames pour out. Duh.

This is one of the most loaded 'crash test' vids I've seen- not sure at all of the purpose.

And as Camino said- the MoPars were all unibody- Except for Imperial, ChryCo went Unibody for '60.

Chrysler used to build some beefy frames, but the Unibody, as evidenced by the production cars-- seemingly was moved to in order to save steel costs... :wink:

Edited by balthazar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did it occur to anyone that cutting 90% of the roof and removing all 4 doors might have played a BIT of a part in how the cars crumpled and how easily the doors popped open on those with doors ???

We also don't know the speeds- the one toward the end looks like that Ford is doing 80 when it rear end the other & the flames pour out. Duh.

This is one of the most loaded 'crash test' vids I've seen- not sure at all of the purpose.

And as Camino said- the MoPars were all unibody- Except for Imperial, ChryCo went Unibody for '60.

Chrysler used to build some beefy frames, but the Unibody, as evidenced by the production cars-- seemingly was moved to in order to save steel costs... :wink:

I was wondering about the roof and door thing too - then it occured to me that a film camera of the time was as big as a Hemi V8!

They couldn't have taken many of those shots if the roof and doors were in their proper places.

I also remember that some of the Chryco cars of that era actually would bend due to the power of the monster hemis - early unibodies had some definite drawbacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if this is footage of the development of the dummies themselves and not actual testing of the cars? You don't really need the newest car available to test the dummy, just something cheap you don't mind cutting up and crashing. That might explain the date and model discrepancy..... also, some of the cars have the initials UCLA stenciled on the side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if this is footage of the development of the dummies themselves and not actual testing of the cars? ....

Now THIS makes sense. Structurally compromising cars & then attempting to judge crash-worthiness is something nutty enough to have come from NBC news. :wink:

>>"I also remember that some of the Chryco cars of that era actually would bend due to the power of the monster hemis - early unibodies had some definite drawbacks."<<

This would have to be the '64 426s - the 'early' Hemi's ended after the '58MY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Random point of interest:

1958 DeSoto Adventurer frame : 318 lbs

1958 Chrysler 300-D frame : 474 lbs

I doubt there's even 175 lbs of 'structural' channel in a '60 Unibody.

Not sure I can tell you what my Buick's frame weighs. The guy who did a little chassis work cut the 'K' section out, and that alone weighs 70 lbs and it's no more than 3.5' x 3.5'. I flipped the remains by myself by tipping it over on the floor, and that was a struggle for even me. It's fully boxed FRT to RR, I couldn't guess. Shoulda balanced it on a bathroom scale....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, when you go on the "GM Test Track" ride at Epcot in Walt Disney World, the que line basically tells you about the development of the test dummies by General Motors, even showing you the range of dummies available (children, women & men of various sizes and weight classifications, including pregnant women).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings