Jump to content
Create New...

I need a bigger barn


Recommended Posts

That restored and towing a Formula Ford would be perfect for me...

If I could drive fast worth a damn.

Let me stand corrected...

That towing a bass boat....hmmm...

Would make a great weekend vehicle.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given how good the underhood looked on Camino's wagon, I think just the opposite...we can all go work as apprentices under Camino and learn the art of resto.

Then we can restore our own cars, and Camino can play with Zora and Arkus.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Camino:

Pardon me for being rude, but I just don't get your fascination with these

B-rated 1970s examples of GM's first signs of decline. I can think of

exactly 14 BETTER exmples of ElCaminos.

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Camino:

Pardon me for being rude, but I just don't get your fascination with these

B-rated 1970s examples of GM's first signs of decline. I can think of

exactly 14 BETTER exmples of ElCaminos.

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

Matter of opinion, I guess.

Anyways, Camino is not the only one who likes that style...

I would love to have a Camino or Mali Wagon around those years (70s).....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, I love all of the El Camino bodystyles. My current fascination with the '73-77 examples is just that, my current fascination.

Those years represent the fourth gen El Camino, and I view them as having a different sort of value vs. the other gens.

I have also owned 3rd and 5th gen Caminos.

The 3rd gens are my favorites, but they are not quite so affordable as the others.

And yeah, your inclusion of '61-'63 in your list gave me a chuckle, 68.

As much as I wish they had happened, they did not.

I once saw a photo of a '63 that was a GM promo-style model - so perhaps. like the G8ST, they came close to existing.

66Stang: No danger of thrown wrenches for my direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good, because I have a thing for both the 73-77 and the newer 78-87 El Camino's as well.

Had a friend who had an 86 or so El-Camino in black that was a nice truck.

But for me, the 64 and 65 bodystyle is the best looking. I like the clean, simple dashboard of that bodystyle, and it's got a cleaner profile from the side IMHO.

I would love to find a clean example as a weekend driver someday. Also sharp are the 61-66 Series of fullsize Chevrolet trucks.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not only has a Phantom-Camino been done of EACH of those three years

but it's EXACTLY what amino loves to do, phantom cars that SHOULD

have existed but didn't.

Another great Phantom Camino would e a '64 FULL SIZE Camino, or better

yet a FULL SIZE '65 Impala fastback based one. Be still my heart. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I once saw a photo of a '63 that was a GM promo-style model - so perhaps. like the G8ST, they came close to existing.

Never sen that, would LOVE to.

But either way one thing the car-show circuit has taught me:

If there is a Phantom arm-chair car-nuts have ever thought of,

someone, somewhere has done it.

Like the dozens of awesome wagons wearing GTO-Judge, HEMI,

Shelby Cobra & GS-X Stage III emblems and many times GUTS.

Either way, the only reason why I'm driving an '84 Mercedes

instead of a '37 Plymouth Bustleback or '59 Buick Electra 255

Riviera Six-widow is CO$T.

And yes, I do understand that is a factor but the way I see it:

$4000 solid project + $20,000 restoration on a '70 ElCamino

is a better investment than:

$300 project '77 ElCamino + $20,000 restoration.

You know me Camino, not trying to be a jerk. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've liked the El Camino and Sprint/Caballero for a long time, even looked for a decent late '70's to early '80s when I was shopping for my first car (no luck). I recently went to look at one I passed ont he side of the road for sale - an '83 El Camino. The body was decent (looked like it was stored in the barn it was parked next to, if not the larger tractor garage), the interior seemed to be in really good shape, no idea of the mileage or what was under the hood, but it was a bench seat model with roll-up windows & manual locks and the owner was asking $6,000 for it :mind-blowing: No way was it worth that much, and even at half that price I'd still be walking away. I don't know how long it's been sitting there (maybe a month), but I'll keep an eye on it to see when it sells.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
First of all, I love all of the El Camino bodystyles.

*grins devilishly*

I bet you wouldn't if one of those generations were FWD ;). he he he

Good, because I have a thing for both the 73-77 and the newer 78-87 El Camino's as well.

Me, too!

I almost bought an '87 El Camino as a daily driver ... but didn't because I thought the guy was asking a bit too much for a vehicle that needed new tires and a few other things, including a new heater core.

*shrugs*

Cort | 35swm | "Mr Monte Carlo"."Mr Road Trip" | pig valve.pacemaker ...Chitown #2 = 07/25/09

WRMNshowcase.legos.HO.models.MCs.RTs.CHD = http://www.chevyasylum.com/cort

"The curves around midnight aren't easy to see" ... Rosanne Cash ... 'Runaway Train'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings