Jump to content
  • Greetings Guest!

    CheersandGears.com was founded in 2001 and is one of the oldest continuously operating automotive forums out there.  Come see why we have users who visit nearly every day for the past 16+ years. Signup is fast and free, or you can opt for a premium subscription to view the site ad-free.

Sign in to follow this  

Jalopnik: CNBC's Phil LeBeau Can't Make EcoBoost Point With Talking Heads [I Feel Gassy]

Recommended Posts

Ford's EcoBoost engine line uses turbochargers and direct injection to match the performance of much larger engines while returning better fuel economy. Good luck getting that point across to Mike Barnacle and Morning Joe, Mr. LeBeau.

What we find particularly amusing about this clip is the question "Would you pay $3,000 for better fuel economy?" Well, that answer has been proven over and over again as yes, with the Prius, Insight, Civic hybrid, etc. You most certainly pay a premium for those hybrids in order to get higher fuel economy. However, there's a level of status from the eco-green movement that comes with buying those badged bi-powered cars.

The better question is: are people willing to pay for better fuel economy in the rip-snorting 300-plus HP range without the pretty hybrid badging? Will the public buy into a turbo V6 replacing a V8, getting the same power and better fuel economy? Questions like those are, apparently, best answered by looking at the cupholders.


full?d=H0mrP-F8Qgo full?d=yIl2AUoC8zA full?i=fErNeb7zhXU:AfGF2MY_Q7k:D7DqB2pKE full?i=fErNeb7zhXU:AfGF2MY_Q7k:V_sGLiPBp

View the full article

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Uhm, there are naturally aspirated V6es today that are putting out more power than many of the V8s of just 5 years ago. People could totally buy into the idea of getting a V6, turbo or not, that puts out the power of a V8.

Hell, if Ford wanted to keep the Panthers around for another decade, they could replace the aged V8 with the base 3.5 V6 from the Taurus and STILL have better power.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

correct me if i am wrong but case in point

800px-1987_Buick_Grand_National.jpg greater than IMG_5851.jpg

800px-1987_Buick_Grand_National.jpg greater thango-cartwheelsand1987IrocZ006.jpg

My dad was disappointed recently when i informed him that the new v6 camaro out powered his 94 by a solid 25hp. likewise its dumbfounding to realized that the 3.6 direct inject is as powerful as a STOCK LS1!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets



Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.