Jump to content
Create New...

Spy Shots: 2011 Chevrolet Orlando


NINETY EIGHT REGENCY

Recommended Posts

Spy Shots: 2011 Chevrolet Orlando

Chevrolet confirmed early last year that it would bring a production version of 2008’s Orlando concept vehicle to North American markets sometime in 2011, reversing an earlier decision to only sell the vehicle overseas.

The Orlando is based on the same front-wheel drive Delta platform that underpins cars like the 2011 Chevrolet Cruze and Volt plug-in hybrid, and despite its compact proportions the upcoming crossover will be able to seat seven.

Being based on the Delta platform means the Orlando will most likely enter production at the same Hamtramck plant in Detroit that will build the Cruze and Volt sedans. However, the new crossover will be a crucial model in Chevrolet’s global lineup, with production planned for Europe and South Korea as well.

These latest spy shots capture a 2011 Orlando prototype undergoing cold weather testing in Europe. They reveal that the production Orlando will keep the boxy design, swept-back roof, and blunt front-end of the concept, although it appears that the sliding door and split tailgate configuration of the show car has been dropped in favor of a conventional four-door body and vertically lifting tailgate.

Expect a similar powertrain lineup to the one in the Cruze for North American markets, which means a range of four-cylinder gasoline engines in both naturally aspirated and turbocharged forms. A plug-in hybrid version using the Voltec system borrowed from the Volt may also make an appearance according to previous comments from GM vice chairman and former product planner Bob Lutz.

link:

http://www.motorauthority.com/blog/1041978_spy-shots-2011-chevrolet-orlando

Edited by NINETY EIGHT REGENCY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did I ask why you said it was "looking good" I guess you like all the coverings that hide the fine lines, Ok then, why did you say it was "LOOKING GOOD" when you can't see it.

I have no use for a 7 passenger mini van 6 passenger, 5 passenger mini van. I have no use for any van of any size.

  • Disagree 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did I ask why you said it was "looking good" I guess you like all the coverings that hide the fine lines, Ok then, why did you say it was "LOOKING GOOD" when you can't see it.

I have no use for a 7 passenger mini van 6 passenger, 5 passenger mini van. I have no use for any van of any size.

633826997169454400-coolstorybro.jpg

  • Agree 1
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Equinox, Traverse, Tahoe, Suburban. Do we really need another Chevy crossover/SUV?

This is different than all of those, more of a small MPV. No CUV/SUV affectations. And it's a global model, like the Spark, Aveo and Cruze.

Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe this will be replacing the HHR...it's more of an MPV I think.

It may take the place in the line up but it will never replace the HHR. I think they will lose about half of the buyers of the HHR. When you take away the special styling to look like all the other people movers and you remove any performance options that takes out most HHR buyers.

The only thing that will make it do well here is if it is cheap.

This will be great in Europe where these kinds of vehicles do well and require the 3rd seat. Most people in the state that want a 3rd seat want a bigger vehicle.

I just don't see it selling in the numbers the HHR did here unless they go heavy on fleet sales.

This is kind of like the 1957 Nomad getting replaced with the 1958 Nomad. Just another wagon.

I know GM needs normal cars but the odd ones are the ones that make GM different.

Edited by hyperv6
  • Agree 1
  • Disagree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll reserve my opinion until I see the production version which I would assume will drop at either Chicago or New York? Regardless I think it will fill a nice niche in North America and will make up for the loss of the Uplander/SV6 which when combined were in the top ten sales of vehicles in Canada from 2005-09. Even so I wish GM would compete in the Minivan Segment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

You guys are all full of yourselves.

Yes, GM does need a CUV style minivan. I thought this might be it, but the door changes alone

blow that image away! .... and they still have not learned how to make a flat level floor with

2nd row seats folded! What is really needed is an updated Astro, with sliding doors on both sides,

the dutch door rear end, which nobody else had, and the drive train upgrades of current models!

There still is a minivan market out there, that you try to deny! Over ONE MILLION SOLD!!!!

Ask Chrysler, Toyota, Honda, and Kia if there isn't a market there.....

Now if GM will get its head out of its' a--, and realize familys need multipurpose vehicles!

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are all full of yourselves.

Yes, GM does need a CUV style minivan. I thought this might be it, but the door changes alone

blow that image away! .... and they still have not learned how to make a flat level floor with

2nd row seats folded! What is really needed is an updated Astro, with sliding doors on both sides,

the dutch door rear end, which nobody else had, and the drive train upgrades of current models!

There still is a minivan market out there, that you try to deny! Over ONE MILLION SOLD!!!!

Ask Chrysler, Toyota, Honda, and Kia if there isn't a market there.....

Now if GM will get its head out of its' a--, and realize familys need multipurpose vehicles!

I agree with your point, that GM needs to re-enter the minivan market with a competitive product. My wife wishes we could buy a minivan, but since GM or Ford don't make one I won't consider any others. She tried to convince me to consider a Dodge or Chrysler, but I just can't seem to like them (looked at both of them at the 2010 Philly Auto Show). I wish GM got back into the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are all full of yourselves.

Yes, GM does need a CUV style minivan. I thought this might be it, but the door changes alone

blow that image away! .... and they still have not learned how to make a flat level floor with

2nd row seats folded! What is really needed is an updated Astro, with sliding doors on both sides,

the dutch door rear end, which nobody else had, and the drive train upgrades of current models!

There still is a minivan market out there, that you try to deny! Over ONE MILLION SOLD!!!!

Ask Chrysler, Toyota, Honda, and Kia if there isn't a market there.....

Now if GM will get its head out of its' a--, and realize familys need multipurpose vehicles!

Another "we need the Astro back" thread.....banghead.gif

Don't get me wrong, I like the Astro twins...my mom has one, and she loves it. Damn things are rocks, and I'd still consider one in a heartbeat...

That said, welcome to a few decades ahead, my friend. There are few people who use Vans the way they used to. Gas prices alone are not going to make that feasible.......

The future in Vans is the Ford transit. Gm should think about that, I would think. Heck, this might be my mom's next "van".

They need to be flexible, and easy to care for. Good on gas. Interchangable interior.

Small will be the way to go.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will be an addition to the lineup, NOT a suitable replacement for the HHR. There will be a hole left in the lineup when the HHR is gone. And good luck fitting anyone with legs into the third row. That space would have been better utilized as cargo area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 34 Guests (See full list)

  • Chevy Estimated Range for Silverado EV Work Truck Raised to 450 miles

    When Chevrolet initially took the wraps off the Silverado EV last year, GM had estimated up to a 400 mile range based on its own calculations.  As the Silverado EV has made its way through development, it went for EPA certification and came back with 50 miles more than GM's estimate.  With this new EPA certification, the Silverado EV has an over 100-mile advantage over its only on-sale competitor the F-150 Lightning Extended Range (320 miles). The Silverado EV will launch first in WT trim with t

    Chevrolet

    All New 2024 Toyota Tacoma Yearns For Adventure

    The Toyota Tacoma has been the best-selling mid-size pickup in the U.S. for nearly 20 years. Holding such an important place in the lineup, Toyota has been very conservative with updates in the past.  The outgoing generation ran for a full 7 years, but even that was based on a platform that dates all the way back to 2004.  For 2024, the Tacoma sheds the old platform entirely and joins the Tundra and Sequoia on Toyota's new TNGA-F global truck platform.  The 2024 Tacoma is the latest (and final)

    Toyota

    The Ford Ranger Raptor Finally Comes to the US

    After years of being forbidden fruit offered only in overseas markets, Ford has finally deemed the Ranger Raptor worthy enough to bring to the U.S. The biggest reason for the U.S. not getting the prior version was its standard diesel power and the inability of the platform to take a sizable V6 engine. When Ford redesigned the 2024 Ranger (read more about the 2024 Ford Ranger here), they made sure to alter the engine bay and chassis to accommodate a V6. Powering the Ranger Raptor is a 3.0-li

    Ford


×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we notice you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search