Jump to content
Create New...

For 661 shuttered GM dealerships, the road back won't be easy


Recommended Posts

For 661 shuttered GM dealerships, the road back won't be easy

Lawsuit continues; emotions still raw

BY TIM HIGGINS

FREE PRESS BUSINESS WRITER

Hundreds of dealers given a second chance at keeping their General Motors franchises have about two months to prove to the company that they've met the requirements to start selling Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC vehicles again.

Key on the to-do list: Dealers who received payments to close their GM franchises must repay the money and prove they have enough credit lined up to buy new GM cars and trucks to sell, a copy of the agreement obtained by the Free Press says.

Dave Kring, a Petoskey dealer, said he already has completed the steps required to get his Cadillac franchise back. "Right now we're just waiting for the switch to be flipped so we can start ordering" new product, he said. "We can't wait."

For others, however, burying the hatchet will take longer. "I'm extremely frustrated," said Steve LaBelle, a Massachusetts Chevrolet dealer who's unhappy with GM.

During its bankruptcy, GM moved to close about 2,000 dealerships, saying they were not needed. Earlier this month, however, GM offered 661 of the 1,160 dealers fighting the loss of their franchises the chance to get them back.

GM, whose U.S. sales are up 13% this year, is fighting aggressively for sales as it bounces back from bankruptcy.

Many challenges

Though General Motors is trying to get past problems with dealers as quickly as possible, Steve LaBelle's lawsuit filed in Massachusetts shows how complicated the process is for the automaker.

LaBelle was one of the 1,160 GM dealerships to file for arbitration, to fight to keep from losing his Chevrolet franchise. In the meantime, GM allowed a dealer from a neighboring community to move into LaBelle's sales area, according to the lawsuit filed in early March.

LaBelle, whose dealership is in Bridgewater, Mass., a town about 45 minutes south of Boston, is trying to get an injunction to keep that competitor from selling new GM vehicles until his arbitration is resolved.

It's a complicated situation inherited by Mark Reuss, who became GM president of North America in December, following a management shake-up that included Fritz Henderson resigning as CEO and Chairman Ed Whitacre assuming chief executive duties.

Reuss quickly signaled that improving relations with dealers was one of his top priorities. At the National Automobile Dealers Association's annual meeting in February, he said he wanted to settle as many of the arbitration cases as possible outside of court.

A few weeks later, he announced that GM was offering 661 GM dealers the opportunity to be reinstated. The rest remain in arbitration and face a June 14 deadline that can be extended by 30 days.

LaBelle received one of those offers, according to court filings. Those records give new insight into what GM is asking of those dealers to stay, and LaBelle's response illustrates the raw emotions that remain.

"I'm extremely frustrated," LaBelle told the Free Press by telephone. "I think Mark Reuss is trying to right a lot of the wrongs. ... I think a lot of the old regime that still is there is trying to defend the decisions they made."

The rules: Repay and remodel

LaBelle was promised $250,000 to wind down his dealership. But if he wants to stay as a GM dealer, he now must come up with a line of credit, present $400,000 in working capital and repay GM the $56,000 of the wind-down money he already received, according to court filings.

The letter said he won't be able to order any new vehicles until all of the wind-down money has been repaid.

There also are requirements on what the store must look like. Furthermore, he must withdraw the arbitration claim by April 30.

"I'm not going to sign their letter of intent until they provide me with a customary and usual letter of intent," he said.

While declining to discuss the specifics of LaBelle's situation, Ryndee Carney, a GM spokeswoman, said the terms of his letter of intent were similar to those sent to the 661 dealers offered a chance at reinstatement. Some of the details would be tailored to each dealer's situation.

Carney said LaBelle's lawsuit has "has little or nothing to do with the arbitration process." But she agreed that the case illustrates the complicated nature of GM's dealer arbitration process, especially given the variances in franchise laws among the states.

"This type of thing, in the best of times, is complicated," she said. "That's why it's been so important for us to address each one of these cases individually."

Offer gets mixed reception

Joe Godfrey, of Godfrey Chevrolet Buick in Cadillac, was one of those dealers, facing the loss of his Buick franchise until he received GM's letter offering reinstatement.

"I'm very pleased. ... My family goes way back with Buick," he said.

Godfrey said he was required to return money that GM already had paid him to wind down the Buick franchise -- he wasn't losing his Chevy line.

"I've already sent them a check," he said.

Furthermore, he said, GM gave him an extension on when he must update his facilities. "They've been reasonable," Godfrey said. "They said, 'Times are tough, your road is going to be torn up in front of you. You don't have to do it this year.' "

The decision to fight GM over the dealer process was difficult for many, however.

Allan Rose, a small Buick-Pontiac-GMC dealer in Gloversville, N.Y., said he decided not to appeal the decision because of the cost of arbitration and troubles getting financing for inventory.

Plus, he figured if his dealership had won an appeal, he would be required to spend about $150,000 or more to update his facilities to meet new GM requirements.

"My gut is that I could have beat General Motors on this had it gone to arbitration," he said. "But when you're going to sell 45 or 50 cars a year, what the hell am I going to win?"

link:

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100329/BUSINESS01/3290331/1331/For-661-shuttered-GM-dealerships-the-road-back-wont-be-easy&template=fullarticle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 55 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Chevy Estimated Range for Silverado EV Work Truck Raised to 450 miles

    When Chevrolet initially took the wraps off the Silverado EV last year, GM had estimated up to a 400 mile range based on its own calculations.  As the Silverado EV has made its way through development, it went for EPA certification and came back with 50 miles more than GM's estimate.  With this new EPA certification, the Silverado EV has an over 100-mile advantage over its only on-sale competitor the F-150 Lightning Extended Range (320 miles). The Silverado EV will launch first in WT trim with t

    Chevrolet

    All New 2024 Toyota Tacoma Yearns For Adventure

    The Toyota Tacoma has been the best-selling mid-size pickup in the U.S. for nearly 20 years. Holding such an important place in the lineup, Toyota has been very conservative with updates in the past.  The outgoing generation ran for a full 7 years, but even that was based on a platform that dates all the way back to 2004.  For 2024, the Tacoma sheds the old platform entirely and joins the Tundra and Sequoia on Toyota's new TNGA-F global truck platform.  The 2024 Tacoma is the latest (and final)

    Toyota

    The Ford Ranger Raptor Finally Comes to the US

    After years of being forbidden fruit offered only in overseas markets, Ford has finally deemed the Ranger Raptor worthy enough to bring to the U.S. The biggest reason for the U.S. not getting the prior version was its standard diesel power and the inability of the platform to take a sizable V6 engine. When Ford redesigned the 2024 Ranger (read more about the 2024 Ford Ranger here), they made sure to alter the engine bay and chassis to accommodate a V6. Powering the Ranger Raptor is a 3.0-li

    Ford


×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we notice you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search