Sign in to follow this  
NINETY EIGHT REGENCY

The Next Big Debate: Hardware or software?

4 posts in this topic

The Next Big Debate: Hardware or software?

by Dan Roth (RSS feed) on May 21st 2010 at 4:33PM

More tech in your car? Oh, that's inevitable. But automakers are trying to figure out the best way to implement it. There are two main architectures currently; tethered and embedded. Ford's SYNC is an example of a tethered tech-integration system that uses Bluetooth to connect to mobile devices consumers already own and carry with them. General Motors' OnStar system is an embedded setup that builds the technology into the car. Going forward, the consensus seems to be that we're going to see systems that combine elements of both.

A tethered system is typically less costly than an embedded alternative, and it works with equipment you already own and know how to use. Systems like Sync can extend the functionality of your gear and is an attractive option to tech-savvy consumers. The lower cost makes it possible to proliferate these kind of features into more models, instead of just being a high-end feature. However, embedded systems offer advantages of their own. With communications hardware built in to the vehicle, performance is more reliable, and safety can be enhanced by tying in to the vehicle's crash sensors and stability control to automatically call for help if it detects a severe accident.

True to the cliche, it seems that the young'ins are more comfortable with tethered systems, while older generations prefer embedded systems. OnStar is already starting to do this, opening up the system in Chevrolet Volt applications with a mobile app that lets drivers connect to their car even when they're away from it. The future likely holds a system that combines aspects of both, enhancing safety, beating back obsolescence and drawing on the strength of each technology to deliver the best experience as cars continue to become more sophisticated.

link:

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/21/the-next-big-debate-hardware-or-software/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Z-06    493

How about making cars for what they are meant to be - Driven. Leave those hardware and software distractions at home, make them fuel efficient, light, fun to drive, and easy to maintain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
loki    286

How about making cars for what they are meant to be - Driven. Leave those hardware and software distractions at home, make them fuel efficient, light, fun to drive, and easy to maintain.

yes. return to cable driven throttles at the expense of a few pounds, at most, and possible great inefficiencies in quick throttle changes.

it's like how refrigerators have become internet appliances... really?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this