Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
NINETY EIGHT REGENCY

U.S. Government Looking Into Cell Phone Blocking Tech in Cars to Save Lives

Recommended Posts

U.S. Government Looking Into Cell Phone Blocking Tech in Cars to Save Lives

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 07, 2010

11.jpg

In response to the ever growing number of deaths and injuries attributable to distracted driving, the U.S. Department of Transportation is investigating technology that would effectively disable driver’s cell phones in their cars.

On MSNBC’s Morning Joe breakfast show, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood stated: "There's a lot of technology out there now that can disable phones and we're looking at that. That's one way. But you have to have good laws, you have to have good enforcement, and you have to have people take personal responsibility. That's the bottom line."

The semi-official announcement comes as the DoT launches a new online video campaign called, “Faces of Distracted Driving”, where victims speak about how it has changed their lives. Mr. LaHood went on to state that the deadly phenomenon has claimed 5,500 lives in the last year, with 500,000 more injured.

Paul Atchley, a scientist as the University of Kansas, thinks the true numbers could be much higher, and that things will only get worse:

"When we ask young drivers about drunk driving, they say that judges should throw the book at drunk drivers, but not the person texting while driving. The bottom line is that people want to use these devices. And things are going to get worse before they get better."

There are no federal laws in the U.S. that limit the use of a cell phone while driving, though many states do prohibit texting. Others have made it illegal to use a cell phone without a headset / voice dialing.

It is unlikely that cell phone jammers will be built into cars, as the Federal Communications Commission has made these illegal (for obvious reasons). The DoT is therefore seeking a software solution that could use cell phone towers to estimate a car’s speed.

Mr. Atchley, however, is convinced this won’t work, as these methods are voluntary and the software is not difficult for tech savvy users to work around. Instead, Atchley believes we must change people’s attitudes.

Though given the failings of similar campaigns against speeding and drunk driving, this may not be as easy as it first seems.

By Tristan Hankins

link:

http://carscoop.blogspot.com/2010/12/us-government-looking-into-cell-phone.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, absolutely not.

a) Passengers often want/need to talk on cell phones.

b) My phone rings, I can pull over. I do a lot of business that depends on my cell phone, don't mess with people's businesses.

c) I get in an accident, I better be able to call someone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Make the driver's ed programs tougher and make the test tougher. Make people prove they are smart enough to drive rather than added more complexities to cars.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to save lives, ban driving. Simple. You need to cost benefit analysis to see if the massive inconvenience (and monetary cost) of mandatory cell-blocking technology is worth the expected number of lives saved. You can't just wave your hands and say "you can't put a price on life" because I'm pretty sure no one thinks banning cars is a reasonable thing to do. Unfortunately government is not very good at reasoned analysis when you have the impassioned moral police enraged.

BTW this same "at any cost" thinking is what got us TSA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>>"you have to have people take personal responsibility"<<

Isn't that exactly what I do when I talk & drive?

I also do a lot of my business via the phone.

You (Gov.) want my tax money? I have to earn it first.

Fact of the matter is- not EVERYONE is 'distracted' by operating a car & a radio, a car & a NAV screen or a car & a phone.

Edited by balthazar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Make the driver's ed programs tougher and make the test tougher. Make people prove they are smart enough to drive rather than added more complexities to cars.

i agree, but you're talking 2 different levels of gov.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We  Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×