Jump to content
William Maley

Cadillac News: Spying: Cadillac ATS-V, Now With No Camo!

Recommended Posts

Feast your eyes on this. Left Lane News got their hands on new spy shots which show off the upcoming Cadillac ATS-V Coupe with no camouflage at all.

The ATS-V looks to our eyes as being a CTS-V that has been left in the wash for a bit too long. The front has an aggressive front splitter that appears to be made out of carbon fiber, along with mesh grilles for the front clip. There is a hood bulge with an air vent to help cooling. Around back is a spoiler sitting on the trunk lid. The pictures also reveal the ATS-V having massive disc brakes, possibly carbon ceramic.

One item still up in the air is what powers the ATS-V. All signs appear to be pointing to TT 3.6 with 425 horsepower.

All we'll be revealed in due time when the ATS-V debuts next month at the LA Auto Show.

Source: Left Lane News

William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First impression was H'mmm nice but something is just not right. Then I figured it out. I do not like the front top grill with what looks to me to be an after thought of Chrome around the grill. It looks cheap and does not scream performance but Chromed mid tear car. I am sadly not impressed. This car should have just stayed monochromatic and if they wanted Chrome, left it to the rims, Door Handles at most.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's getting there.  But it is not as impressive in the photos as the new M4 I saw in-person at the grocery store parking lot today.

 

Let's see how that match-up stacks up in a Car & Driver comparison.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would hold on before judging on these photos.

 

1. It is taken at 300 mm at f5.6, which possibly means at that super-telephoto level, the image will look compressed.

2. The angle from top is possibly not the best one to shoot a car as the plan view dominates the profile and sides.

3. Lighting creates an illusion - Bright sunlight and white do not go well.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would hold on before judging on these photos.

 

1. It is taken at 300 mm at f5.6, which possibly means at that super-telephoto level, the image will look compressed.

2. The angle from top is possibly not the best one to shoot a car as the plan view dominates the profile and sides.

3. Lighting creates an illusion - Bright sunlight and white do not go well.

If they are a pro photographer, then their 300mm lens should be an APO lens so there is minimal distortion and this should be pretty accurate.

 

Cadillac needs to realize that not every car needs to be blinged out with Chrome. Performance auto's are better looking monochromatic IMHO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I would hold on before judging on these photos.

 

1. It is taken at 300 mm at f5.6, which possibly means at that super-telephoto level, the image will look compressed.

2. The angle from top is possibly not the best one to shoot a car as the plan view dominates the profile and sides.

3. Lighting creates an illusion - Bright sunlight and white do not go well.

If they are a pro photographer, then their 300mm lens should be an APO lens so there is minimal distortion and this should be pretty accurate.

 

Cadillac needs to realize that not every car needs to be blinged out with Chrome. Performance auto's are better looking monochromatic IMHO.

 

 

It is not the distortion from optics but it is the illusion (compression) from physics. A telephoto lens will compress objects closer than a normal range lens would.

 

wntlines.jpg

 

Oh please tell me where is distortion here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like all three.

Some guy on another site said "forte Koup, is that you"? Lmao. And sort of true.

I sat in a new ATS coupe last weekend. I fit like a glove. And it's so much easier to get in and out of. The car has no useful backseat to speak of, however, and it is bland and safe. 25 Cadillacs in a row and they all blend into each other now.

New CTS AWD for 40g, wish I could! But here is the deal, between the dead looks, too high prices, and lack of space and room in nearly all Cadillacs, this is why Caddy is trending down.

They need to sex up the whole model lineup fast. Add crossovers. Manage pricing better and give us some room ! I would bring the ATSL to the states and make that the sedan offering and use it to lure people back to the brand. I would clean up the CTS and make sure the CT6 launch is not botched.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again with the 'back seat room' fallacy? Over @ BMW & MB, the critics are more worried about 'back seat in handling with less overall legroom'… hmmm; which the better spot to be in?

 

ATS-V spy pic is clearly distorted, not going to go by that one.

On another forum a number of the wags are laughably calling the sides of the ATS 'bland/ boring' meanwhile holding up the BMW4 as 'the way to do it', when a simple glance shows they both have the same elements & conceptual approach to the sides respectively. IE; front fender edge becomes belt line, declining character line going forward thru the doorhandles, 'flat' wheel well lips, and two lower, more dramatic flares at the rocker.  

 

Isn't Cadillac up 20% over the last 2 years? That's 'up', not "down".

 

Here's to hoping the new logo goes the way to New Coke, but much faster.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only thing I don't like is the rear spoiler, but guess the extra downforce is a necessity...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I would hold on before judging on these photos.

 

1. It is taken at 300 mm at f5.6, which possibly means at that super-telephoto level, the image will look compressed.

2. The angle from top is possibly not the best one to shoot a car as the plan view dominates the profile and sides.

3. Lighting creates an illusion - Bright sunlight and white do not go well.

If they are a pro photographer, then their 300mm lens should be an APO lens so there is minimal distortion and this should be pretty accurate.

 

Cadillac needs to realize that not every car needs to be blinged out with Chrome. Performance auto's are better looking monochromatic IMHO.

 

 

It is not the distortion from optics but it is the illusion (compression) from physics. A telephoto lens will compress objects closer than a normal range lens would.

 

wntlines.jpg

 

Oh please tell me where is distortion here?

 

Yes your right compression not distortion, course home sick now so my mind sure is not working, but thanks for posting the comparison for all of us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on what you want to compress and make not as impressive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JUST DO IT CADILLAC.  COuld be part of renaming it from ATS to CT3 or CT4.  It looks better too.

 

There's a bit of awkwardness at the top of the window of the rear door, the curve was flattened a bit too much, but otherwise this would benefit Caddy huge.

 

Cadillac_ATS_vs_ATS-L.jpg

 

cadillac-ats-l-china-21.jpg?109b36

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I don't like is the top grille looks too small, and the lower air intake under the bumper is huge.  Other cars use that styling cue also, it looks bad on all them.  Why make your grille tiny, when that is a focal point, and make the air intake huge.

 

Not a fan of black wheels on any car, but I am sure they have silver ones too, so not worried about that.  The engine and performance data will be interesting to see how it compares to the Germans.  The Lexus IS-F sucks, so I guess not much to worry about there, unless Lexus learns how to give a car torque.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love that added room of the ATS-L that should be here in America.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JUST DO IT CADILLAC.  COuld be part of renaming it from ATS to CT3 or CT4.  It looks better too.

 

There's a bit of awkwardness at the top of the window of the rear door, the curve was flattened a bit too much, but otherwise this would benefit Caddy huge.

 

 

 

 

ATS-L looks good. Its front fascia and grill are different, too, and I like it more than the SWB ATS's front end.

 

But why get an ATS-L when you can get a CTS for 320i money? The deals on CTS are amazing, and I'm surprised it's not selling any better. I'd seriously consider one if I were in the market for a 5-series sized car:

 

kri2o.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think prospective ATS buyers would find it far more significant that the competition has less FRONT legroom than the ATS. Quick, someone 'shop some lines over a 3-series sedan's front door, and let the incessant harping begin.

Edited by balthazar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Trucar doesn't, seemingly, include the cost of options.

How they 'calculate' a new 'actual transaction price' MSRP without such, I've yet to learn.

You configure a vehicle with the options you want, and they give you a quote for that vehicle as-equipped. Click on "Options."

 

TrueCar provides a useful baseline price for car shopping. I configure cars on TrueCar to match what the dealer has in stock, then email the internet sales department to beat the TrueCar price. On every occasion, it's worked. Makes sense, as TrueCar charges dealers $299 per transaction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's an unusual price... my area is $10k more than that.

I guess my area is very competitive. There are 17 Cadillac dealers within 60 miles of here. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks pow, I wasn't processing their site correctly.

 

Now I see verification of exactly what I've been stating here. 2014 mercedes s550 RWD with the middle option package they give there to chose from, reveals a car that MSRP's for 119,095, but that car's average transaction price is 108,230, or $11,270 off sticker.

 

Like I said; MB moves their (retail) s-classes by offering a free smart four two in the deal. In other words; appealing to the value shopper by giving a 5-digit discount. They 'hide' this by only offering 'factory' incentives around a mere 3,000.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are many claims to the effect that the ATS-V will be powered by the 3.6 Bi-Turbo. GM has not disclosed anything to this regard, so that is speculation at this point. Whether it is educated speculation or not, we'll find out soon enough at the LA Autoshow.

 

Still, it brings back the entire debate on whether the 3.6TT is a better engine than the LT1. And, in this regard, there should be very little argument. If it does indeed use the twin turbo V6, what GM has done is basically chose the heavier, bulkier, laggier, more expensive, lower performance engine in hope that it'll somehow have greater appeal in a performance car.

 

The LT1 is the superior engine in every respect, I mean EVERY. There are plenty of myths out there such as...

 

  • The 3.6 Bi-Turbo is smaller displacement so it should be lighter or more compact? (False; the 3.6 is heavier and taller)
  • The 3.6 Bi-Turbo has better fuel economy? (False, the 3.6 in the CTS-V has similar city MPG and worse Highway MPG)
  • The turbos endow the 3.6 with better low end torque? (False, the 3.6 makes less torque at every point torqur curve from 0 rpm to the rev limit)

 

Here are the cold hard facts.

  • Weight: LF3 3.6TT = 485lbs -- LT1 6.2 = 465lbs
  • Power: LF3 3.6TT = 420bhp -- LT1 6.2 = 460bhp
  • Torque: LF3 3.6TT = 430lb-ft -- LT1 6.2 = 465lb-ft*
  • Turbolag LF3 3.6TT = some -- LT1 6.2 = none
  • Size: LF3 3.6TT = taller -- LT1 6.2 = lower profile
  • MPG: LF3 3.6TT = 17/25 -- LT1 6.2 = 17/30**
  • Service: LF3 3.6TT = complex -- LT1 6.2 = simple
  • Cost: LF3 3.6TT = expensive -- LT1 6.2 = less so
  • Prestige/perception: = Debatable / depends on buyer

* Not just higher maximum torque, but higher torque is EVERY point on the torque curve from 0 rpm to the rev limit.

 

** Based on the EPA numbers for CTS V-sport and Stingray. Projected numbers for the ATS-V is 18/26 using the LF3 vs 16/28 using the LT1 given that the ATS is a lighter car than the CTS and a heavier car than the Stingray.

 

Here are the two engine's torque and power curves superimposed for a crystal clear comparison.

 

ILq50m.jpg

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By dfelt
      Howdy all, took my Escalade in for routine service, got an XT5 as a loaner for the day and stopped to check out the two XT4's they had sitting by the service center.
      First impression, WOW, this is actually nicer looking than the 2018 XT5 I have as a loaner. XT5 needs the interior of the XT4 as it shows it is dated. Sorry for the fuzzy pictures, my screen is cracked and I did not realize how fuzzy some of the pics are.
      First sat in the front passenger side, have about 3 inches above my 6'6" 300lb body, plenty of leg room, very comfy.

      Next I did the David test, jumped out and got in the back seat to see how I fit. Very hard doing a selfie, legs have to straddle the seat, no knee room, but then I expected that. Head room was about an inch or so, tight but doable for short trips. Have to bend forward to watch the head, otherwise people over 6' will smack their head getting in and out. Will say that I really like the Kona interior with Black and wood accents. Very nice.


      I have to say that I liked the rear heated seats and USB port.

      From the back seat, pretty easy to see the front dash. Love the buttons plus the touch screen in this CUV.

      Went around to the drivers side, have to say very comfy. Probably one of the best seat setups yet for Cadillac.

      This XT4 is the Sport addition, had the white tail lights that I really like. But found one other thing and I have to say, I did not think it would be any big deal till I tried it and OMG, I want it on my next auto.

      As you can see here in the seat adjustments, the massage seat. WOW, talk about awesome along with a very adjustable lumbar support and the multi-positional seat adjustments. Massage is worth it.
      So then I took a look under the Hood, Turbo is the engine as we all knew, tight package, but clean in the layout for AWD / FWD bias.

      I will say this auto is sharp looking and way better in person than in pictures.

      Was walking around it and decided to pop open the gas cap, discovered a surprise that I think Cadillac is hiding.
      What do you see here?

      ?
      ?
      ?
      ?
      ?
      ?
      ?
      Give up? Well, around the gas filler is a rubber boot. Most people would not think anything about it, but the engineer in me wondered why the weird C to the left. Pressing in revealed to the feel a rectangle top to bottom plastic outline. Pulling the boot up a little to look under that rubber is what appears to be I think a socket to hold a Plugin port for a Hybrid. Think about this, that opening is much wider than it needs to be just for Gas fueling only and why would you want a port up on the drivers side front fender. It just makes sense to have both the charging port and gas port under one lid.
      I realize I could be totally wrong on this, but it does have me thinking about why a tall Rectangular plastic houseing on the left side of the gas filler hole and the width of this panel. Plugin Hybrid, EV, I do wonder! 🤔
      There was a White Premium Luxury with the Sky roof and it was nice, but I do not like the red tail lights after seeing the white ones. Rims on the Premium I do not like as much as the Sport rims too.


      This Metallic Black XT4 Sport edition is really nice.

      Seeing it next to my 2018 XT5 Loaner, Cadillac has a home run on their hands and it should sell very well. I cannot see how they will get the XT4 lights onto the XT5 without some body metal changes, but then they might just consider a more radical update to get it inline as if the XT6 comes with them, then the XT5 will be the odd duck out. Yet I know some say that difference might not be a bad thing.
      One thing I do know is that Cadillac has delivered a luxury compact CUV to the market and I am excited to see how it sells.
      I will also state this here, @balthazar is right on about Cadillac DOES NOT need an XT3 below this for the market. Leave that to Chevrolet and Buick. Cadillac should focus on their CT4 and XT4 Auto's and above in standard, V-Sport, V editions and have the Halo auto and coupes. That is perfect for them. Plus, lets take the Escalade to the V-Sport and V edition level. They really need to do this pronto.
    • By dfelt
      What does everyone make of this photo?

      Jalopnik story
      According to Jalopnik, an anonymous tipster emailed in photo's of a key fob and clearly proved it is from Cadillac by flipping the fob over to show the Cadillac logo on the back. The interesting thing is that the new leader of Cadillac has been busy rolling back all of the former leaders car focused stuff and refocusing on CUVs. Yet when asked about a new Halo auto and if the mid-engine corvette could be used as a base, the response was we will have something much more interesting and special for Cadillac.
      Now with that said, we get pictures of this fob which would show a frunk and trunk plus a retractable roof. Is it possible that Cadillac could go AWD EV Halo on us?
      What do you all think is going on here? Is it the fob to an EV Halo car, Hybrid Halo car, Mid-Engine ICE Halo?
       
    • By William Maley
      Cadillac was one of the first brands to launch a subscription service. Called Book, the service allowed users to access Cadillac's lineup including the Escalade and CTS-V for a monthly fee. But only a year after it launched the program, General Motors is pulling the plug.
      The Wall Street Journal broke the news this afternoon, learning from sources that the company will end operations of Book by the end of the year. Subscribers will have a 30-day window from the time they notified to turn in their vehicles. A GM spokesman confirmed the closure.
      According to sources, certain aspects of Book proved to be quite costly. A key example was some of the back-end technology used to support the service "made some customer-service functions tedious and time-consuming, adding costs for the company." This move comes a few days after GM announced that it would be offering voluntary buyouts to 18,000 salaried workers.
      Analysts say car subscriptions bring a number of headaches with trying to deal with the logistics of keeping vehicles repaired, cleaned, and delivering them within a short time frame.
      “Some of these services will even transfer your stuff from car to car, from your phone charger to your kid’s stroller. The problems posed in offering that level of service at scale are vast,” said Ivan Drury, senior analyst with Edmunds.com.
      The GM spokesman told the Wall Street Journal that the program could restart in the future.
      “We are hitting the pause button for a brief time to make some tweaks to Book [by Cadillac] based on our learnings,” he said.
      Cadillac isn't the only brand that is rethinking the whole subscription model. Hyundai closed down their program which offered Ioniq Electrics only in California, though the brand is planning a revamped version to appear in the future. Lincoln is looking into making changes to their service which offers off-lease vehicles.
      Source: Wall Street Journal (Subscription Required)
    • By William Maley
      Cadillac was one of the first brands to launch a subscription service. Called Book, the service allowed users to access Cadillac's lineup including the Escalade and CTS-V for a monthly fee. But only a year after it launched the program, General Motors is pulling the plug.
      The Wall Street Journal broke the news this afternoon, learning from sources that the company will end operations of Book by the end of the year. Subscribers will have a 30-day window from the time they notified to turn in their vehicles. A GM spokesman confirmed the closure.
      According to sources, certain aspects of Book proved to be quite costly. A key example was some of the back-end technology used to support the service "made some customer-service functions tedious and time-consuming, adding costs for the company." This move comes a few days after GM announced that it would be offering voluntary buyouts to 18,000 salaried workers.
      Analysts say car subscriptions bring a number of headaches with trying to deal with the logistics of keeping vehicles repaired, cleaned, and delivering them within a short time frame.
      “Some of these services will even transfer your stuff from car to car, from your phone charger to your kid’s stroller. The problems posed in offering that level of service at scale are vast,” said Ivan Drury, senior analyst with Edmunds.com.
      The GM spokesman told the Wall Street Journal that the program could restart in the future.
      “We are hitting the pause button for a brief time to make some tweaks to Book [by Cadillac] based on our learnings,” he said.
      Cadillac isn't the only brand that is rethinking the whole subscription model. Hyundai closed down their program which offered Ioniq Electrics only in California, though the brand is planning a revamped version to appear in the future. Lincoln is looking into making changes to their service which offers off-lease vehicles.
      Source: Wall Street Journal (Subscription Required)

      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×