Jump to content
NINETY EIGHT REGENCY

1992 Chrysler Imperial promotional video

Recommended Posts

Problem is that it looked like a Dodge Dynasty with covered headlights.   It also had about as much horsepower as a food blender, while their so called competition had V8s.    I do like the Imperial name though, sounds way cooler than 300.  They should bring back Imperlal, Intrepid, Crossifre, or use a concept name like Chronos.  Those names sound powerful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Problem is that it looked like a Dodge Dynasty with covered headlights.   It also had about as much horsepower as a food blender, while their so called competition had V8s.    I do like the Imperial name though, sounds way cooler than 300.  They should bring back Imperlal, Intrepid, Crossifre, or use a concept name like Chronos.  Those names sound powerful.

 

Chrysler always did have a knack for good names.

 

Only the Seville had a V8.  The Continental was running a V6 (with only 10 more horsepower) at the time as was the Park Ave, but the Park Ave could be had with the supercharged V6 which was certainly worth the upgrade.  The Park Ave Utlra would have been the most powerful car of the group. (Even the Cadillac V8 was only making 200 hp to the Park Ave's 205 hp), and with strong low-end torque. 

 

It's strange, the earlier models had a SOHC 24 Valve 3.0 Liter V6, but it was later replaced with a much more powerful and torquey pushrod 3.8 liter V6 that made 215 ft-lb at very civilized 2750 rpm instead of the 172 ft-lb at 3600 rpm of the SOHC unit.  It's almost like someone at Chrysler knew how to improve the car by switching to a pushrod engine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 3.0 liter Imperial was really weak.  Cadillac had the Northstar in 1993, that blew away anything Chrysler or Lincoln had.  

 

Dodge has good names too, like Charger, Magnum, Hellcat, Avenger, Stealth.  Who ever was in the naming department of Dodge/Chrsyler did a fantastic job.  Too bad the people actually designing and building the cars did not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We  Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×