Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In a class that is highly competitive such as the compact luxury sedan segment, trying to make yourself stand out is a tough ask. Some can do it just on reputation, while others must rely on price, design, features, or overall drivability. Infiniti is using technology to have their Q50 sedan stand out in this crowded field. We spent a week in the Q50S 3.7 to see if any of this new technology makes a difference.

 

In terms of styling, the Q50S sits right in the middle of the compact luxury sedan spectrum. It isn’t as shocking as the Lexus IS, but it isn’t boring as a BMW 3-Series. The overall design is reminiscent of the Q70 (formally known as the M37/35h/56) with a narrow grille, a sculpted hood that rises and falls, and a distinctive character line running from the front fender to the rear. This particular Q50S was fitted with 19-inch Rays wheels finished in black and looked quite sharp. It should be noted the wheels are part of a Performance Wheel package that also swaps the standard run-flat tires for a set of summer performance tires.

 

The Q50S’s interior is very scrumptious with leather and soft plastics seemingly lining every surface, and a small amount of wood trim around the center stack. Front seat passengers get supportive seats with power adjustments and the ability to cool and heat. The driver gets a couple of more adjustments in the form of adjustable seat bolsters and a manual extension for the thigh. Rear seat passengers will find plenty of headroom, but legroom is somewhat limited thanks to a tall transmission tunnel.

 


2015 Infiniti Q50S 12



A key feature of the Q50 is Infiniti’s InTouch infotainment system. The system is comprised of two screens; the top one handles navigation and key information about the vehicle, while the bottom one handles audio, climate, vehicle settings, and other functions. Now before you start thinking the dual screen setup is going to be a catastrophe like the system used in Acura vehicles, it isn’t. The difference is that Infiniti uses two touchscreens, unlike the one touchscreen and the other screen being controlled by a knob like a number of Acura models. Using the system was a breeze thanks a simple layout and quick performance. There are a couple of downsides to the InTouch system. First is the navigation system which is looking very dated when compared to other models in the compact luxury class. Second is the bottom screen that washes out in sunlight.

 

In terms of power, the Q50 comes with either a 3.7L V6 or a hybrid powertrain that pairs the V6 with an electric motor. Our tester boasted the V6 with 328 horsepower and 269 pound-feet of torque. This is paired to a seven-speed automatic transmission. The V6 is very potent as it will pull hard during acceleration and feels eager to get up to speed. But the V6 isn’t the smoothest or most refined at higher rpms as many of its competitors. The seven-speed automatic transmission delivers quick and smooth shifts. In terms of fuel economy, the Q50 with the V6 is rated at 20 City/29 Highway/23 Combined. Our week of driving saw an average of 21.2 MPG.

 

The Q50S boasts a sport-tuned suspension which gives it a button-down feeling on the road. In corners, the Q50 shows excellent control of body motions. Agility is also tops as the Q50S seamlessly moves from corner to corner. The ride is on the firm side, letting in some bumps into the cabin. Noise isolation is excellent.

 


2015 Infiniti Q50S 10


 

Now the Q50 has one other key item that Infiniti is quick to point out and that is the optional Direct Adaptive Steering system. Unlike most systems where the system is mechanical-based, Direct Adaptive Steering uses a drive-by-wire system that transmits electrical impulses from the steering wheel to the front wheels, causing them to turn. Infiniti has also fitted an electric motor to mimic weight when turning. At first, I thought I was driving a normal steering system as it had good weight and feel for a sporty sedan. It was only when I parked the car and played around with the wheel did I realize something was different. The steering wheel moved very fast and with no feel. It was then I realized I had the drive-by-wire system.

 

After spending a week with the Direct Adaptive Steering system, I’m a bit mixed. Not with the system itself, I actually didn’t have any complaints about the steering feeling disconnected to the road or having enough weight as other reviews. I found it to be like any other steering system. But I find myself wondering if this was done because Infiniti sees the future of steering going to this, or if they did this just for the sake of differentiation?

 

The Infiniti Q50S is a good compact luxury sedan, but it relies too much on technology as a crutch. Yes, it's amazing that the dual-screen infotainment system works very well, but so does a single screen and a controller. The drive-by-wire steering system is a really cool piece of technology, but does it bring any real improvement? If you take the technologies away, you have a sedan that is very competent. But in a class that is highly competitive and models are constantly improving, competent isn’t good enough.

 

Infiniti needs to go back to drawing board and figure out how to take a model from competent to a real contender. The bones are there in the Q50, they need a bit more finessing and less tech.

 

Disclaimer: Infiniti Provided the Q50S 3.7, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas

 

 

Year: 2015
Make: Infiniti
Model: Q50 3.7
Trim: S
Engine: 3.7L DOHC 24-Valve V6
Driveline: Seven-Speed Automatic, Rear-Wheel Drive
Horsepower @ RPM: 328 @ 7,000
Torque @ RPM: 269 @ 5,200
Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 20/29/23
Curb Weight: 3,675 lbs
Location of Manufacture: Tochigi, Japan
Base Price: $43,650
As Tested Price: $54,055 (Includes $905.00 Destination Charge)

 

Options:
Technology Package - $3,200
Deluxe Package - $3,100
Performance Wheel Package - $1,800
Navigation Package - $1,400


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This car is sized and priced closer to the mid-sizers, it is quite the tweener.  That wouldn't be a bad thing if Infiniti had a Q40 below this for around $35k.  At least you get a V6 in the base Q50, but $54k for a Q50 seems like a lot, you could get a Q70 with limited options for that price.  When Infiniti moved the G37 up in size and price, they sort of forgot to move the Q70 up and get a new entry level car.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely looks evolved from the G35 and G37 on the outside.  Bland and generic inside.   As far as entry level goes, Europe has the Q30 hatchback (FWD on the Merc A-class platform).   I assume the US will get it or a sedan derivative...

Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely looks evolved from the G35 and G37 on the outside.  Bland and generic inside.   As far as entry level goes, Europe has the Q30 hatchback (FWD on the Merc A-class platform).   I assume the US will get it or a sedan derivative...

 

Nope, we're only getting the Infiniti QX30 apparently. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Definitely looks evolved from the G35 and G37 on the outside.  Bland and generic inside.   As far as entry level goes, Europe has the Q30 hatchback (FWD on the Merc A-class platform).   I assume the US will get it or a sedan derivative...

 

Nope, we're only getting the Infiniti QX30 apparently. 

 

Hmmm...well, small premium CUVs seem to be a growth niche, probably will sell better than the Q30 would.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to the Q50... I've driven it a few times, and it fails to elicit any passion at all. Like a white collar middle manager who has been in their job for 15 years, the Q50 is competent at everything it does but excels at nothing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could one get any more of a Bland Expressionless, Passionless auto?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could one get any more of a Bland Expressionless, Passionless auto?

A Toyota would be worse, I would think..  Seems like it would be an ok 3-series alternative for a commuter lease...if you aren't hung up on the brand..

 

I've known a few Infiniti owners, they seemed happy w/ them, mostly were former Nissan fans that stepped up.  One guy had a G37 coupe that experienced a manual transmission failure, which sounded really odd to me, though..

Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Social Stream

  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      I’ll admit that I have an unabashed love for the Mazda MX-5 Miata. This plucky roadster proves you don’t need gobs of power to provide a big grin when driving. A combination of well-sorted chassis, steering, and slick gearbox does the trick. But Mazda has decided to add a bit more power for the 2019 model, along with including a more powerful four-cylinder and a hardtop option. I’m curious to see if these changes can make the Miata better or worse.
      The model seen here is the RF - short for retractable fastback. Press the switch and the roof panels begin an origami folding exercise into the trunk. The result is a targa that provides the open-air feeling, minus a large amount of wind noise. It doesn’t hurt that roof pillars are styled in such a way that gives off a rakish look, no matter whether the top is up or down. Under the hood lies a revised 2.0L Skyactiv four-cylinder with 181 horsepower and 151 pound-feet of torque - up 26 and 3 respectively. A six-speed manual is standard, while an automatic is optional. The small bump makes for a huge improvement in overall acceleration. Just leaving a stop, I was surprised how much pull the engine had as it got to 45 about a half-second quicker than the last Miata.   A key change is Mazda bumping the redline to 7,500 rpm, which allows the engine to fully flex its muscle. This became apparent when I needed to pass a vehicle and found that I didn’t need to drop down a gear to get the power needed.  The six-speed manual is still a joy to work with short and precise throws and a direct feeling clutch pedal. Even when stuck in traffic, doing the motions didn’t feel like a hassle. Average fuel economy for the week landed around 32 mpg, even though I was winding the engine out and playing through the gears just because it is so much fun. My tester was the Club model that adds a sport-tuned suspension with Bilstein shock absorbers, and a front shock tower brace. This firms up the suspension and provides improve handling on the limit. But out on the backroads, I couldn’t tell there was any real difference in handling between this and the 2016 MX-5 Grand Touring I drove a few years back. Maybe there was slightly less body roll in the RF, but both vehicles had similar characteristics when going into a turn. If I drove both of them on a track, then I think the differences would become more apparent. There is a downside to the Club’s suspension, a very harsh ride. Just making a quick trip to the store was a bit much as the suspension would transmit every little bump and imperfection to the backside of those sitting inside. Another item fitted to my tester was a set of Recaro bucket seats. They come as part of an option package that also adds Brembo Brakes and some cool-looking BBS wheels finished in black. The seats have increased bolstering to hold you in during an enthusiastic drive. But the lack of padding makes them uncomfortable for longer trips. On paper, the RF is an expensive proposition when put against the soft-top: $32,345 vs. $25,730. That massive difference is due to Mazda not offering the base Sport model on the RF. But put the soft-top Club against the RF and the difference shrinks to just over $2,000. Be forewarned that the RF can get expensive. That package I mentioned earlier with the Recaro seats? That will set you back $4,670, bringing the as-tested price to just over $38,000. Mazda’s improvements for the 2019 MX-5 Miata for the most part help, allowing it to become more fun to drive and somewhat easier to live with. That said, the additional cost of the hardtop will depend on whether or not you think it is worth the benefits of possibly being an all-seasons car. Disclaimer: Mazda Provided the MX-5 Miata RF, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas
      Year: 2019
      Make: Mazda
      Model: MX-5 Miata RF
      Trim: Club
      Engine: 2.0L SkyActiv-G DOHC 16-Valve with VVT Four-Cylinder
      Driveline: Six-Speed Manual, Rear-Wheel Drive
      Horsepower @ RPM: 181 @ 7,000
      Torque @ RPM: 151 @ 4,000
      Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 26/34/29
      Curb Weight: 2,453 lbs
      Location of Manufacture: Hiroshima, Japan
      Base Price: $32,345
      As Tested Price: $38,335 (Includes $895.00 Destination Charge)
      Options:
      Brembo with Black Roof - $4,670.00
      Interior Package for M/T - $425.00

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      I’ll admit that I have an unabashed love for the Mazda MX-5 Miata. This plucky roadster proves you don’t need gobs of power to provide a big grin when driving. A combination of well-sorted chassis, steering, and slick gearbox does the trick. But Mazda has decided to add a bit more power for the 2019 model, along with including a more powerful four-cylinder and a hardtop option. I’m curious to see if these changes can make the Miata better or worse.
      The model seen here is the RF - short for retractable fastback. Press the switch and the roof panels begin an origami folding exercise into the trunk. The result is a targa that provides the open-air feeling, minus a large amount of wind noise. It doesn’t hurt that roof pillars are styled in such a way that gives off a rakish look, no matter whether the top is up or down. Under the hood lies a revised 2.0L Skyactiv four-cylinder with 181 horsepower and 151 pound-feet of torque - up 26 and 3 respectively. A six-speed manual is standard, while an automatic is optional. The small bump makes for a huge improvement in overall acceleration. Just leaving a stop, I was surprised how much pull the engine had as it got to 45 about a half-second quicker than the last Miata.   A key change is Mazda bumping the redline to 7,500 rpm, which allows the engine to fully flex its muscle. This became apparent when I needed to pass a vehicle and found that I didn’t need to drop down a gear to get the power needed.  The six-speed manual is still a joy to work with short and precise throws and a direct feeling clutch pedal. Even when stuck in traffic, doing the motions didn’t feel like a hassle. Average fuel economy for the week landed around 32 mpg, even though I was winding the engine out and playing through the gears just because it is so much fun. My tester was the Club model that adds a sport-tuned suspension with Bilstein shock absorbers, and a front shock tower brace. This firms up the suspension and provides improve handling on the limit. But out on the backroads, I couldn’t tell there was any real difference in handling between this and the 2016 MX-5 Grand Touring I drove a few years back. Maybe there was slightly less body roll in the RF, but both vehicles had similar characteristics when going into a turn. If I drove both of them on a track, then I think the differences would become more apparent. There is a downside to the Club’s suspension, a very harsh ride. Just making a quick trip to the store was a bit much as the suspension would transmit every little bump and imperfection to the backside of those sitting inside. Another item fitted to my tester was a set of Recaro bucket seats. They come as part of an option package that also adds Brembo Brakes and some cool-looking BBS wheels finished in black. The seats have increased bolstering to hold you in during an enthusiastic drive. But the lack of padding makes them uncomfortable for longer trips. On paper, the RF is an expensive proposition when put against the soft-top: $32,345 vs. $25,730. That massive difference is due to Mazda not offering the base Sport model on the RF. But put the soft-top Club against the RF and the difference shrinks to just over $2,000. Be forewarned that the RF can get expensive. That package I mentioned earlier with the Recaro seats? That will set you back $4,670, bringing the as-tested price to just over $38,000. Mazda’s improvements for the 2019 MX-5 Miata for the most part help, allowing it to become more fun to drive and somewhat easier to live with. That said, the additional cost of the hardtop will depend on whether or not you think it is worth the benefits of possibly being an all-seasons car. Disclaimer: Mazda Provided the MX-5 Miata RF, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas
      Year: 2019
      Make: Mazda
      Model: MX-5 Miata RF
      Trim: Club
      Engine: 2.0L SkyActiv-G DOHC 16-Valve with VVT Four-Cylinder
      Driveline: Six-Speed Manual, Rear-Wheel Drive
      Horsepower @ RPM: 181 @ 7,000
      Torque @ RPM: 151 @ 4,000
      Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 26/34/29
      Curb Weight: 2,453 lbs
      Location of Manufacture: Hiroshima, Japan
      Base Price: $32,345
      As Tested Price: $38,335 (Includes $895.00 Destination Charge)
      Options:
      Brembo with Black Roof - $4,670.00
      Interior Package for M/T - $425.00
    • By Drew Dowdell
      The latest CEO at Nissan, Hiroto Saikawa, is out-of-office permanently as of September 16th after yet another financial scandal rocks the company.  Saikawa is the second Nissan CEO to be tainted by financial misconduct allegations. 
      Allegedly, Saikawa received improper payments with regards to the sale of Nissan stock. The payments were after the date of the sale of the stock was altered and netted Saikawa additional hundreds of thousands of dollars. Saikawa has not yet been charged with a crime. Saikawa originally said he would stay on until a replacement was found, but abruptly changed course and formally resigned today.
      The temporary replacement will be Chief Operating Officer Yasuhiro Yamauchi until a permanent replacement has been found. There are currently ten candidates for the positions and Nissan says it is considering outsiders and non-Japanese. 
       

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      The latest CEO at Nissan, Hiroto Saikawa, is out-of-office permanently as of September 16th after yet another financial scandal rocks the company.  Saikawa is the second Nissan CEO to be tainted by financial misconduct allegations. 
      Allegedly, Saikawa received improper payments with regards to the sale of Nissan stock. The payments were after the date of the sale of the stock was altered and netted Saikawa additional hundreds of thousands of dollars. Saikawa has not yet been charged with a crime. Saikawa originally said he would stay on until a replacement was found, but abruptly changed course and formally resigned today.
      The temporary replacement will be Chief Operating Officer Yasuhiro Yamauchi until a permanent replacement has been found. There are currently ten candidates for the positions and Nissan says it is considering outsiders and non-Japanese. 
       
    • By Drew Dowdell
      NISSAN DIVISION
      AUGUST
      AUGUST
      Monthly
      CYTD
      CYTD
      CYTD
       
      2019
      2018
      % chg
      2019
      2018
      % chg
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Nissan Division Total
      118,045
      101,580
      16.2
      862,243
      909,150
      -5.2
      Versa
      2,817
      3,145
      -10.4
      54,219
      54,301
      -0.2
      Sentra
      11,393
      13,314
      -14.4
      137,657
      148,352
      -7.2
      Altima
      22,403
      14,925
      50.1
      142,416
      154,732
      -8.0
      Maxima
      3,548
      2,724
      30.2
      22,467
      29,263
      -23.2
      LEAF
      1,117
      1,315
      -15.1
      8,063
      9,123
      -11.6
      Juke
      0
      13
      -100.0
      10
      691
      -98.6
      370Z
      214
      254
      -15.7
      1,692
      2,427
      -30.3
      GT-R
      41
      90
      -54.4
      242
      433
      -44.1
      Total Car
      41,533
      35,780
      16.1
      366,766
      399,322
      -8.2
      Kicks
      7,058
      3,876
      82.1
      42,897
      6,814
      529.5
      Frontier
      5,888
      4,573
      28.8
      50,851
      50,856
      0.0
      Titan
      2,589
      4,661
      -44.5
      22,857
      31,932
      -28.4
      Pathfinder
      4,223
      4,889
      -13.6
      45,221
      43,894
      3.0
      Armada
      1,716
      1,775
      -3.3
      22,102
      22,514
      -1.8
      Rogue
      41,629
      33,400
      24.6
      242,851
      275,137
      -11.7
      Murano
      9,462
      9,619
      -1.6
      41,888
      54,968
      -23.8
      Quest
      0
      0
      n/a
      0
      2
      -100.0
      NV
      2,503
      1,415
      76.9
      13,815
      10,905
      26.7
      NV200
      1,444
      1,592
      -9.3
      12,995
      12,806
      1.5
      Total Truck
      76,512
      65,800
      16.3
      495,477
      509,828
      -2.8
      North American produced
      87,847
      77,298
      13.6
      685,167
      694,935
      -1.4
      Car
      41,278
      35,423
      16.5
      364,822
      395,771
      -7.8
      Truck
      46,569
      41,875
      11.2
      320,345
      299,164
      7.1
      Import
      30,198
      24,282
      24.4
      177,076
      214,215
      -17.3
      Car
      255
      357
      -28.6
      1,944
      3,551
      -45.3
      Truck
      29,943
      23,925
      25.2
      175,132
      210,664
      -16.9
       
      INFINITI
      AUGUST
      AUGUST
      Monthly
      CYTD
      CYTD
      CYTD
       
      2019
      2018
      % chg
      2019
      2018
      % chg
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Infiniti Total
      9,185
      10,796
      -14.9
      80,903
      92,713
      -12.7
      Infiniti Q50
      1,888
      2,551
      -26.0
      18,120
      24,105
      -24.8
      Infiniti Q60
      384
      674
      -43.0
      3,182
      6,121
      -48.0
      Infiniti Q70
      182
      306
      -40.5
      2,047
      3,102
      -34.0
      Infiniti QX30
      208
      662
      -68.6
      2,931
      6,079
      -51.8
      Infiniti QX50
      1,833
      2,449
      -25.2
      12,258
      13,124
      -6.6
      Infiniti QX60
      3,495
      2,870
      21.8
      29,190
      27,966
      4.4
      Infiniti QX70
      0
      66
      -100.0
      6
      925
      -99.4
      Infiniti QX80
      1,195
      1,218
      -1.9
      13,169
      11,291
      16.6
      Total Car
      2,454
      3,531
      -30.5
      23,349
      33,328
      -29.9
      Total Truck
      6,731
      7,265
      -7.4
      57,554
      59,385
      -3.1
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      NISSAN GROUP
      AUGUST
      AUGUST
      Monthly
      CYTD
      CYTD
      CYTD
       
      2019
      2018
      % chg
      2019
      2018
      % chg
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      TOTAL VEHICLE
      127,230
      112,376
      13.2
      943,146
      1,001,863
      -5.9
      Total Car
      43,987
      39,311
      11.9
      390,115
      432,650
      -9.8
      Total Truck
      83,243
      73,065
      13.9
      553,031
      569,213
      -2.8
      Selling days
      28
      27
       
      206
      205
       
      # # #
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...