Jump to content
dfelt

FORD Replaces 4 year old 2.2 Liter Diesel with 2.0 Liter EcoBlue Diesel

Recommended Posts

G. David Felt
Staff Writer Alternative Energy - www.CheersandGears.com

 

FORD Replaces 4 year old 2.2 Liter Diesel with 2.0 Liter EcoBlue Diesel 

 

post-12-0-85294400-1461778891_thumb.jpg

 

According to multiple site, but not found on FORD own corporate web site, FORD is replacing their 4 year old 2.2 Liter Diesel with a new Clean Sheet 2.0 Liter I4 Diesel that is a game changer among all the Diesel gate scandals hitting Europe.
 
 
 
 
According to these reports there will also be a 1.5 Liter EcoBlue Diesel. These engines are built to produce 20% greater torque at 1250 rpm, Certified to meet the Euro 6 Emission standards that go into effect September 2016 and is a global engine to be used everywhere including the US market.
 
Initial tune will come in 3 versions from 103 to 167 HP with performance versions up to 236HP. No comment on actual Torque numbers other than to say it will be north of 250 LB-Ft of the old 2.2 liter engine. Expect this to be found in just about all auto lines according to ford statements on these sites.
 
FORD Press Release

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are these slated for US work? Like, will most of the smaller US lineup receive one of these? Fiesta, Focus, Fusion, Escape, maybe Edge? Then the more obvious Transit Connect. 

 

The name is "whatever" to me.. It will be economical and if they keep the pieces blue like the picture then it is Eco AND Blue ;) 

 

I'd take one to the tune of 180hp and 275tq in my Escape. I know I'd no longer have something quick but I'd have something that would probably get 35mpg highway. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are these slated for US work? Like, will most of the smaller US lineup receive one of these? Fiesta, Focus, Fusion, Escape, maybe Edge? Then the more obvious Transit Connect. 

 

The name is "whatever" to me.. It will be economical and if they keep the pieces blue like the picture then it is Eco AND Blue ;)

 

I'd take one to the tune of 180hp and 275tq in my Escape. I know I'd no longer have something quick but I'd have something that would probably get 35mpg highway. 

For the cost of Diesel, it better be higher than 35, These engines need to be in the 40's for MPG or better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Are these slated for US work? Like, will most of the smaller US lineup receive one of these? Fiesta, Focus, Fusion, Escape, maybe Edge? Then the more obvious Transit Connect. 

 

The name is "whatever" to me.. It will be economical and if they keep the pieces blue like the picture then it is Eco AND Blue ;)

 

I'd take one to the tune of 180hp and 275tq in my Escape. I know I'd no longer have something quick but I'd have something that would probably get 35mpg highway. 

For the cost of Diesel, it better be higher than 35, These engines need to be in the 40's for MPG or better.

 

I don't drive a car though.. and AWD. Currently my 2.0 is rated 28mpg and I think the 1.6 is/was rated at 30mpg. Both AWD form. So 35 would seem about right, right? I mean FWD a 5mpg jump is pretty significant. 

 

I guess it would have to surpass the CX-5 handily and 35 wouldn't cut it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a startling about-face for Ford. Still, good on them for realizing that boosted gas engines aren't the be-all and end-all.

 

Im confused on how this is  " about-face ".

 

This engine is replacing a diesel already in the Ford lineup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a startling about-face for Ford. Still, good on them for realizing that boosted gas engines aren't the be-all and end-all.

 

On what premise?

 

Ford never said "Never Diesel" in the U.S. In fact, their V.P of Supply chain said Ford's actually seeing how well other diesel products do in the states. The Cruze diesel is still a unicorn, and dieselgate has shaken the entire diesel engine lineup decisions of many companies.

 

And we still don't know what it'll be put in. If it's a mid-size truck engine, then cool. If it's for the U.S. Transit (prolly not) but Transit Connect.

 

If it's in a Focus or Fusion, well Ford already makes diesel variants of its cars, just doesn't sell them here. 

 

Anyways, good try to put a spin on something that can't be spun.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's be realistic here. Ford was beating the EcoBoost horse to death while GM and Mopar added diesels to their lineups and reaped the rewards.

This is a huge about-face for Ford. But better late than never.

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't know what products it will be available in yet.

 

And why would it matter? It's not a diesel engine one would expect in a light truck style vehicle. 

 

It's 2.0 litres of displacement. Probably not meant for a diesel pickup.

 

So how is it an about-face?

 

The absurdity of what you are saying is right up there.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's be realistic here. Ford was beating the EcoBoost horse to death while GM and Mopar added diesels to their lineups and reaped the rewards.

This is a huge about-face for Ford. But better late than never.

In North America, FCA and GM added one diesel in their lineup, just like Ford.

FCA - Ram1500

GM - Colorado/Canyon ( No Cruze diesel )

Ford - Transit

Edited by FordCosworth
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't know what products it will be available in yet.

 

And why would it matter? It's not a diesel engine one would expect in a light truck style vehicle. 

 

It's 2.0 litres of displacement. Probably not meant for a diesel pickup.

 

So how is it an about-face?

 

The absurdity of what you are saying is right up there.

Last time I checked, car and truck sales all added to a total amount. So no-my point is perfectly legit. Also, Cruze diesel.

But doubtless absurdity abounds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

We don't know what products it will be available in yet.

 

And why would it matter? It's not a diesel engine one would expect in a light truck style vehicle. 

 

It's 2.0 litres of displacement. Probably not meant for a diesel pickup.

 

So how is it an about-face?

 

The absurdity of what you are saying is right up there.

Last time I checked, car and truck sales all added to a total amount. So no-my point is perfectly legit. Also, Cruze diesel.

But doubtless absurdity abounds.

 

 

 

Yup, Ford sure sells quite the number of diesel Super Duties and diesel Transits.

 

And there is NO diesel Cruze model ATM ( beside leftovers that collect dust on the lot ). It was a sales failure ( about 2% ) and was discontinued.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Let's be realistic here. Ford was beating the EcoBoost horse to death while GM and Mopar added diesels to their lineups and reaped the rewards.

This is a huge about-face for Ford. But better late than never.

In North America, FCA and GM added one diesel in their lineup, just like Ford.

FCA - Ram1500

GM - Colorado/Canyon ( No Cruze diesel )

Ford - Transit

 

No Cruze? There was until this year and another is coming in 2017. The only reason for the gap is obviously because of the new model coming out.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's just semantics. We all know what's what. GM and Mopar made the initial inroads with modern diesels in NA and reaped the rewards. Ford is just following in what is now a proven path. And hey, like I said-better late than never.

As for the HD trucks argument: Ford was late to that party as well-at least as far as getting a RELIABLE diesel...

Edited by El Kabong
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's just semantics. We all know what's what. GM and Mopar made the initial inroads with modern diesels in NA and reaped the rewards. Ford is just following in what is now a proven path. And hey, like I said-better late than never.  :bowdown:  :gm_logo:

 

Lol Posts like this are the reason for my downvotes. 

 

Complete and total fanboyisms. There were some more above but this was the best of them. 

Edited by ccap41
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's just semantics. We all know what's what. GM and Mopar made the initial inroads with modern diesels in NA and reaped the rewards. Ford is just following in what is now a proven path. And hey, like I said-better late than never. :bowdown::gm_logo:

Lol Posts like this are the reason for my downvotes.

Complete and total fanboyisms. There were some more above but this was the best of them.

That ain't fanboism. That's the truth.

Funny that you show the GM emoji, but I also specified Mopar.

Or maybe that just says it all about Fordies.

I'm going with that because the facts seem to bear it out. Downvoting me based on YOUR tunnel vision.

Sheesh. Sad sad sad

Edited by El Kabong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

It's just semantics. We all know what's what. GM and Mopar made the initial inroads with modern diesels in NA and reaped the rewards. Ford is just following in what is now a proven path. And hey, like I said-better late than never. :bowdown::gm_logo:

Lol Posts like this are the reason for my downvotes.

Complete and total fanboyisms. There were some more above but this was the best of them.

That ain't fanboism. That's the truth.

Funny that you show the GM emoji, but I also specified Mopar.

Or maybe that just says it all about Fordies.

I'm going with that because the facts seem to bear it out. Downvoting me based on YOUR tunnel vision.

Sheesh. Sad sad sad

 

So is GM a follower as well because we know they weren't the first here with a small diesel. How about Mopar? VW/BMW/MB have had small diesels way before the past 2-3 years.. But Ford is the follower.. you're right.  :duh:

 

THAT is why I called you a rabid fanboy. You blindly look past the real "originators" and pump your golden children up as if they were the first to bring small diesels here. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just quit while you're ahead. I busted you on your tunnel vision, because you're a hater. Your own posts bear it out. Now, read my sig:

Edited by El Kabong
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GM Actually had small Diesels far before many of the auto companies. Perfect example is the outstanding Isuzu 4 banger Diesel they sold in the Chevy Love Truck during the 70's and even before that as Isuzu is the world leader in Diesel engine tech. So if we want to bow down to a company that really put out some amazing diesels and built for GM the Duramax Diesel, then look to Isuzu.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just quit while you're ahead. I busted you on your tunnel vision, because you're a hater. Your own posts bear it out. Now, read my sig:

Busted me on tunnel vision?

You're so full of it. You're so far up the General's ass you won't admit that VW/BMW/MB brought the small economical diesels(displacement between 2.0-3.0 liters) over here prior to your little golden children. I'm not even pumping up Ford. I'm just letting you know that you're not right that Ford is following GM and Mopar when the whole damn industry has made the shift and GM/FCA weren't the first ones.

 

dfelt, I know what you're talking about and w/o any research on my end you're probably spot on correct but those were the days of $h!, dirty diesels that people didn't like to hear or smell. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Yes, the diesels were dirty but Chevy did sell a ton of them as I know since I owned a 1976 Series 5 Luv Truck in both gas and diesel form. Those engines lasted almost a million miles each and I rebuilt both and sold them at a profit in the late 80's.

 

Guys lets also keep it civil. I know we all have our favorite brand but also need to agree to disagree at times. Please state your point and move on. No need to personally attack each other.

 

Please I do not want Drew to have to close down a interesting thread due to personal attacks. 

 

Keep it professional and your honest feeling about the products as I and others do appreciate your faith in a product line. Without our drive to support each company which has good and bad products at various times throughout the years this would not allow forums to grow and be a solid source of info.

 

Thank you,

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

Yes, the diesels were dirty but Chevy did sell a ton of them as I know since I owned a 1976 Series 5 Luv Truck in both gas and diesel form. Those engines lasted almost a million miles each and I rebuilt both and sold them at a profit in the late 80's.

 

Guys lets also keep it civil. I know we all have our favorite brand but also need to agree to disagree at times. Please state your point and move on. No need to personally attack each other.

 

Please I do not want Drew to have to close down a interesting thread due to personal attacks. 

 

Keep it professional and your honest feeling about the products as I and others do appreciate your faith in a product line. Without our drive to support each company which has good and bad products at various times throughout the years this would not allow forums to grow and be a solid source of info.

 

Thank you,

 

Sorry his d-baggery just get's old like Wing's did. The blindness...The blindness. 

 

Delete this post if necessary, no skin off my back. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

It's just semantics. We all know what's what. GM and Mopar made the initial inroads with modern diesels in NA and reaped the rewards. Ford is just following in what is now a proven path. And hey, like I said-better late than never. :bowdown::gm_logo:

Lol Posts like this are the reason for my downvotes.

Complete and total fanboyisms. There were some more above but this was the best of them.

That ain't fanboism. That's the truth.

Funny that you show the GM emoji, but I also specified Mopar.

Or maybe that just says it all about Fordies.

I'm going with that because the facts seem to bear it out. Downvoting me based on YOUR tunnel vision.

Sheesh. Sad sad sad

 

 

Actually, GM is pretty late to the party on light-duty diesels in North America as well.  All of the Germans have offered diesels for years, Jeep was selling diesels in the Liberty in 2005 and Grand Cherokee in 2007 with not one, but three different diesels. 

Ford's car diesels in Europe have a good reputation already, they just don't sell them in the US.  That's a marketing decision, not a technical one, so there is no "catching up" on Ford's part here.    I agree that Ford should sell this new 4-cylinder in the US, but hey, I don't sit in the corner office in Dearborn.   I think GM should sell the "whisper-diesel" in the US too... but again, no chair for me in the RenCen.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

It's just semantics. We all know what's what. GM and Mopar made the initial inroads with modern diesels in NA and reaped the rewards. Ford is just following in what is now a proven path. And hey, like I said-better late than never. :bowdown::gm_logo:

Lol Posts like this are the reason for my downvotes.

Complete and total fanboyisms. There were some more above but this was the best of them.

That ain't fanboism. That's the truth.

Funny that you show the GM emoji, but I also specified Mopar.

Or maybe that just says it all about Fordies.

I'm going with that because the facts seem to bear it out. Downvoting me based on YOUR tunnel vision.

Sheesh. Sad sad sad

 

 

Actually, GM is pretty late to the party on light-duty diesels in North America as well.  All of the Germans have offered diesels for years, Jeep was selling diesels in the Liberty in 2005 and Grand Cherokee in 2007 with not one, but three different diesels. 

Ford's car diesels in Europe have a good reputation already, they just don't sell them in the US.  That's a marketing decision, not a technical one, so there is no "catching up" on Ford's part here.    I agree that Ford should sell this new 4-cylinder in the US, but hey, I don't sit in the corner office in Dearborn.   I think GM should sell the "whisper-diesel" in the US too... but again, no chair for me in the RenCen.

 

I Vote for DREW to have a Seat at both FORD and GM. This way we get real world traveler input into what should be sold here. 

 

I agree both FORD and GM should have their diesels here in the US.

 

I fear though that due to the Diesel gate issues with Euro manufactures and mpg issues out of Japan that we will see a push away from the Diesel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today.
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Ford and General Motors have differing views on autonomous vehicles. GM is planning on launching a number of Chevrolet Bolt EVs in various urban markets in 2019 for a ride-hailing service. Ford, on the other hand, is taking a different approach in terms of powertrain and use.
      Ford's top sales executive, Jim Farley said their autonomous vehicle - due in 2021 - will be a hybrid vehicle with a focus on commercial applications. Farley explained that going with a hybrid powertrain would allow their vehicles to stay on the road longer thanks to a longer range when compared to EVs. The company expects their autonomous vehicles to be on the road for roughly 20 hours a day. Using an electric vehicle for this type of task doesn't make business sense as they would need to recharge constantly.
      "Anytime you're not carrying goods and people, you're losing money. The most important thing is uptime and profitability. What we see is the [hybrid] is a much better cost-of-ownership model," said Farley.
      The constant recharging also brings up another negative for electric vehicles, frequent replacement of the batteries due to increased degradation.
      Ford has already announced a pilot program with Domino's pizza to do deliveries in a self-driving plan. Next year, Ford will this commercial idea to the test by putting a fleet of vehicles in a "yet-to-be-named test city" with a number of partners.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Ford and General Motors have differing views on autonomous vehicles. GM is planning on launching a number of Chevrolet Bolt EVs in various urban markets in 2019 for a ride-hailing service. Ford, on the other hand, is taking a different approach in terms of powertrain and use.
      Ford's top sales executive, Jim Farley said their autonomous vehicle - due in 2021 - will be a hybrid vehicle with a focus on commercial applications. Farley explained that going with a hybrid powertrain would allow their vehicles to stay on the road longer thanks to a longer range when compared to EVs. The company expects their autonomous vehicles to be on the road for roughly 20 hours a day. Using an electric vehicle for this type of task doesn't make business sense as they would need to recharge constantly.
      "Anytime you're not carrying goods and people, you're losing money. The most important thing is uptime and profitability. What we see is the [hybrid] is a much better cost-of-ownership model," said Farley.
      The constant recharging also brings up another negative for electric vehicles, frequent replacement of the batteries due to increased degradation.
      Ford has already announced a pilot program with Domino's pizza to do deliveries in a self-driving plan. Next year, Ford will this commercial idea to the test by putting a fleet of vehicles in a "yet-to-be-named test city" with a number of partners.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
    • By William Maley
      Earlier this year, we reported that Ford would be investing $700 million into their Flat Rock, MI plant for two new models - an electric crossover in 2020 and an autonomous vehicle following a year later. Those plans have changed as Ford will move production of the electric crossover to Cuautitlan, Mexico.
      This information comes from an internal Ford memo obtained by Automotive News last night. Flat Rock will become an “AV center of excellence”. AV, in this case, being autonomous vehicles.
      “This allows us to bring this exciting new vehicle to global customers in a more effective way to support our overreaching business goals,” the memo says.
      Ford spokesman Alan Hall confirmed the move to both Automotive News and The Detroit News last night. Hall said the company sees "a bigger opportunity" for their upcoming autonomous vehicle. Ford will be investing an additional $200 million to Flat Rock over the next few years in addition to the already announced $700 million.
      Part of the reason for Ford moving the production of the electric crossover down to Mexico is lower production costs, allowing the company to make a little more profit. Electric vehicles have low-margins when it comes to making money.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), The Detroit News

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Earlier this year, we reported that Ford would be investing $700 million into their Flat Rock, MI plant for two new models - an electric crossover in 2020 and an autonomous vehicle following a year later. Those plans have changed as Ford will move production of the electric crossover to Cuautitlan, Mexico.
      This information comes from an internal Ford memo obtained by Automotive News last night. Flat Rock will become an “AV center of excellence”. AV, in this case, being autonomous vehicles.
      “This allows us to bring this exciting new vehicle to global customers in a more effective way to support our overreaching business goals,” the memo says.
      Ford spokesman Alan Hall confirmed the move to both Automotive News and The Detroit News last night. Hall said the company sees "a bigger opportunity" for their upcoming autonomous vehicle. Ford will be investing an additional $200 million to Flat Rock over the next few years in addition to the already announced $700 million.
      Part of the reason for Ford moving the production of the electric crossover down to Mexico is lower production costs, allowing the company to make a little more profit. Electric vehicles have low-margins when it comes to making money.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), The Detroit News
    • By William Maley
      Truck manufacturers love to boast how they are the best in terms of power, towing, and payload. Every few months, one of them will announce some changes to put them at the top of the pile. Case in point is Ford.
      Today, the blue oval announced that the 2018 F-Series Super Duty features a slightly tweaked 6.7L PowerStroke turbodiesel V8 with 450 horsepower and 935 pound-feet of torque - an increase of 10 for both figures. The increase is due to a new cylinder head design, and optimized fuel and turbo boost calibrations. This puts Ford at the top when it comes power figures for heavy-duty trucks.
      Ford claims this increase gives the Super Duty best-in-class figures for both payload and towing.
      Max Payload: 7,360 pounds Max Gooseneck Towing: 34,000 pounds* Max Towing with a conventional hitch: 21,000 *The figure is for the all-new 2WD version of the F-450 Super Duty.
      How long Ford can claim best-in-class is something we'll be keeping a close eye on.
      Source: Ford
      Press Release is on Page 2


      KING OF WORK: 2018 FORD SUPER DUTY IS AMERICA’S MOST POWERFUL, MOST CAPABLE HEAVY-DUTY PICKUP TRUCK EVER
      For the most demanding pickup truck customers, the 2018 Ford F-Series Super Duty works harder thanks to its newly upgraded 6.7-liter Power Stroke® V8 diesel engine offering best-in-class 450 horsepower and 935 lb.-ft. of torque Super Duty continues as the heavy-duty champ, owning key capability claims in the segment: horsepower, torque, gooseneck towing, conventional towing and payload F-450 4x2 Crew Cab pickup joins Super Duty lineup for 2018, delivering best-in-class 34,000-pound towing capacity with properly equipped gooseneck connections DEARBORN, Mich., Dec. 5, 2017 – Ford, America’s truck leader for 40 straight years, delivers for customers once again for 2018, creating America’s most powerful and capable heavy-duty pickup trucks ever – thanks to best-in-class horsepower and torque from a newly upgraded 6.7-liter Power Stroke® diesel engine.
      “Super Duty customers expect the best, and for 2018 we’re giving our customers even more power and torque from our 6.7-liter Power Stroke diesel – delivering the most horsepower and torque available among all heavy-duty pickups,” said Todd Eckert, Ford truck group marketing manager. “Plus, our new F-450 pickup now includes a 4X2 model, enabling our customers to get more done with the segment’s best payload and towing.”
      The 2018 Super Duty continues to deliver Built Ford Tough durability, capability, and functionality while now owning five key best-in-class heavy-duty truck segment claims:
      Best-in-class 450 horsepower (a 10 horsepower improvement over 2017) Best-in-class 935 lb.-ft. of torque (a 10 lb.-ft. improvement over 2017) Best-in-class 34,000 pounds of gooseneck towing, when properly equipped (a 1,500-pound improvement for the new F-450 4x2 model) Best-in-class 21,000-pound conventional hitch towing Best-in-class 7,360-pound payload capacity Upgrades to the 2018 Ford 6.7-liter Power Stroke engine include redesigned cylinder heads for added strength under higher loads, plus optimized fuel and turbo boost calibrations to take advantage of the increased cylinder head capacity for increased horsepower and torque.
      Ford is the only heavy-duty truck manufacturer that designs and builds its own diesel engine and transmission combination – ensuring the powertrain works seamlessly with all chassis components and vehicle calibrations. This approach enables Ford engineers to optimize vehicle performance across the entire lineup and to further refine the powertrain to the specific needs of the customer.
      34,000 Pounds of Towing Force
      For those who rely on their pickups to haul big trailers to get the job done, the new F-450 Super Duty 4x2 dual-rear-wheel truck is now available for both retail and fleet customers – offering greater strength, efficiency and durability.
      Leveraging the benefits of a high-strength steel box frame, integrated gooseneck hitch mounts, and added load capacity thanks to Ford’s proprietary high-strength, military-grade, aluminum-alloy body, the 2018 F-450 4x2 tows even more with its lighter, more efficient driveline. The result is the most capable, robust and efficient Super Duty tow machine ever, delivering a best-in-class 34,000 pounds of gooseneck towing capacity.
      The 2018 Super Duty F-450 4x2 dual-rear-wheel pickup will be available this winter in XL, XLT, Lariat and Platinum series offerings. Base MSRP is $52,830, which includes $1,295 destination and delivery charges.  

      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Who's Online (See full list)

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We  Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×