Jump to content
William Maley

Tesla's Posts A $282 Million Loss In the First Quarter

Recommended Posts

Despite posting $1.1 billion in revenues for the first quarter ($1.6 billion under non generally accepted accounting principles - GAAP), Tesla reported a net loss of $282 million for the quarter. Compared to the last quarter, Tesla made less in revenue, but the loss was slightly less. Tesla credits this to a careful watching of its spending. Tesla notes that its cash on hand - $1.4 billion - "does not include any meaningful cash flow from Model 3 reservations," but a fair chunk of that reservation money was used to repay back a $430 million credit line.

 

This isn't the big news as it lines up with what analysts were expecting. It was Tesla's announcement of moving its timeline to produce 500,000 vehicles a year from 2020 to 2018.

 

“Increasing production fivefold over the next two years will be challenging and will likely require some additional capital, but this is our goal and we will be working hard to achieve it,” Musk said in a letter to shareholders.

 

This is most likely due to the strong demand for the Model 3 which at the time of this writing has 400,000 reservations.

 

Tesla also reiterated plans to produce 80 to 90,000 vehicles for 2016. In the first quarter, Tesla built 15,510 vehicles - 12,851 Model S sedans and 2,659 Model X crossovers. The latter model has been having a number of issues from windshield suffering from 'double vision' distortion to the falcon doors not closing. When asked about the quality issues during the call with analysts, Musk said he has a sleeping bag near the production line that he uses “quite frequently.” We're assuming that he is watching the production line to see if there are any issues coming up.

 

Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), Autoblog, Tesla

 


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12851 Model S's is 51,404 annually. Tesla sold 52,580 last year, of which around 52,375 were Model S's.

Model X was predicted to be at a 750 unit/wk production rate, but perhaps quality issues are still a major hurdle, as Model X production in the first quarter is still only about 200 units/wk. Or maybe Jan/Feb were unusually low.

 

Musk wants to sell 90,000 units this year but is only on pace to build 62,000.

 

Would really like to know what kinds expansions are going on behind the scene to make this prediction plausible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't that bad of a loss, but at some point they need to get this production up.  I think buyers and the share holders are still willing to wait, but if this time next year they are losing money and struggling to fill orders, there might be some revolt.  On the flip side, if Elon can meet his 90,000 unit goal and the 500,000 by 2020 or whatever he is shooting for, they could hit it big and make money hand over fist.  It will be interesting to see how it plays out, I hope they succeed, I like the idea of more wide spread electric cars (good electric cars, not crap like the Leaf).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sergio Marchionne would get pillored for making such sales predictions. But at least FCA turned a profit last quarter.

  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the problem I see with what math you use Balth for the "on pace" determination is that it isn't forward looking, because you're not accounting for the growth rate. What I mean is the factor by which the production rates grow.

 

Two years ago Tesla delivered 25,000 vehicles. The next one, 50,000. This one, perhaps 80,000 to 90,000.

 

From there...I think it's pretty clear they're gonna need a fairly sizable infusion of cash from somewhere. Probably an equity offering.

 

Hey, all the Tesla patents are out there. It's not like Sergio doesn't have the means to actually follow through copying Tesla and making a Model 3 much sooner. That alone would be far smarter than investing in anything Fiat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's straightforward; the 'math' is based on the just-released Q1 number from Tesla. 

They may indeed hit 80-90K this year, we'll see. 90K is obviously almost doubled from '15.

The growth rate is very incremental. With 2016 25% in the books, they are actually down on Model S sales.

 

Double sales again in '17 and Tesla could see 175K.

But doubling it again in '18 is 'only' 350K, or a far cry from "500K".

It's really a towering claim ("500K by 2018"). 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, but it's not adjusted for the growth rate.

 

You don't base production numbers from one quarter. It gives you a distorted number for a company still expanding its production capabilities.

 

Otherwise, what, based on Q1 2014, you'd expect them to continue to build only 25,000 cars in 2015?

 

If you don't account for the growth rate, basically the exponential factor, it is NOT straightforward, because you get really a meaningless number.

 

 

And where did I say 500k was easily possible? Of course it's gonna be hard. But they can do it, if they get the cash infusion needed to do so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh, I get what you're saying now.

You are correct; of course Q1 does not necessarily indicate 2016's total sales, but that's why I said 'on pace for'...

 

...because I'm not aware there's much of a 'growth rate' going on. Model S is down slightly, and Model X may have just gotten to stated production goals, when it was supposed to be that out of the gate in Sept. The established pattern @ Tesla, and likewise; my point- is that the timetables & totals are always behind stated goals. I was boggled when  Musk moved that goal up BY TWO YEARS recently.

 

I'll go out on a limb here and say there's NO WAY Tesla reaches even 375,000 units (75% of the stated 500K) by the end of 2018.

Edited by balthazar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe Tesla will hit 250K units by 2018 only half of his prediction and I think late 2018 to early 2019 for Tesla 3 models to be delivered.

 

I also will state that GM Chevy BOLT will eat MANY of the Pre Orders once it is out and people can drive it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's good. Elon Musk- many people think he has a big ego - he does. But he wants other Electric cars to suceed in as so much as even supplanting Tesla, and making sure the industry changes, and moves even further forward.

 

Yeah, electric is mired in own problems, like the carbon emissions of building batteries....but at this point we all know making any car is filthy and polluting.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12851 Model S's is 51,404 annually. Tesla sold 52,580 last year, of which around 52,375 were Model S's.

Q2 numbers are out.

Q1 Model S sales : 12,851.

Q2 Model S sales : 12,420.

 

Q1 Model X : 204

Q2 Model X : 2400.

 

That's a to-date half-year sales total of 27,875.

 

Musk wants to sell 90,000 units this year but is only on pace to build 62,000.

 

Adjusted sales pace for 2016 : 55,750.

 

Musk stated he wanted to sell 90,000 in 2016.

 

Not seeing the exponential 'sales growth' so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

12851 Model S's is 51,404 annually. Tesla sold 52,580 last year, of which around 52,375 were Model S's.

Q2 numbers are out.

Q1 Model S sales : 12,851.

Q2 Model S sales : 12,420.

 

Q1 Model X : 204

Q2 Model X : 2400.

 

That's a to-date half-year sales total of 27,875.

 

 

 

Musk wants to sell 90,000 units this year but is only on pace to build 62,000.

 

Adjusted sales pace for 2016 : 55,750.

 

Musk stated he wanted to sell 90,000 in 2016.

 

Not seeing the exponential 'sales growth' so far.

 

Nope EV is for long term thinkers and long term owners of auto's, with cheap gas many people who only see an auto as a 2-3 year ownership before trading it in on the newest thing is going to hurt EV sales.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sergio Marchionne would get pillored for making such sales predictions. But at least FCA turned a profit last quarter.

Real easy to turn a profit when you get to rely on Jeep and RAM to make up for the rest of your $h!ty Italian product. If only Musk had that to fall on.

Edited by surreal1272

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 75 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online



  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Back in the summer, Volvo opened its first plant in South Carolina where it would be producing the all-new S60 sedan. The original plan was to export half of the S60s built to other markets. But the current trade dispute between the U.S. and China has caused Volvo to change their plans.
      Anders Gustafsson, president of Volvo Cars USA said at a meeting of the Automotive Press Association in Detroit that the automaker is changing the focus of the South Carolina factory to build S60s for the U.S. market. A small number of S60s will still be exported to Europe.
      “We’ll go at this change not with a smile, but we know what we need to do. We have a global manufacturing structure that helps us maneuver in these tough waters,” said Gustafsson.
      Back in July, Volvo announced that it would be sourcing XC60s destined for the U.S. from Europe. Previously, XC60s heading to the U.S. were coming from China. The move is expected to take place in January. Right now, Volvo is absorbing the 27.5 percent tariff on Chinese auto imports on the XC60. But Gustafsson said that is taking a big toll on their profits.
      “We are absorbing the tariffs, and that really is what you saw in our financial results. But we can, under no circumstances, absorb tariffs in the long run. It’s huge,” he said.
      The tariffs could also affect future plans for the South Carolina plant. Volvo is planning to have production of the next-generation XC90 take place in the U.S. beginning in 2022. This would increase the number of workers from 1,200 to 3,900. Volvo will export some XC90s to Europe, but also considering exporting some China at a loss.
      "We might need to make the XC90 in another country too, if tariffs keep up," said Gustafsson.
      Source: Bloomberg (Subscription Required), Motor Trend
    • By William Maley
      Back in the summer, Volvo opened its first plant in South Carolina where it would be producing the all-new S60 sedan. The original plan was to export half of the S60s built to other markets. But the current trade dispute between the U.S. and China has caused Volvo to change their plans.
      Anders Gustafsson, president of Volvo Cars USA said at a meeting of the Automotive Press Association in Detroit that the automaker is changing the focus of the South Carolina factory to build S60s for the U.S. market. A small number of S60s will still be exported to Europe.
      “We’ll go at this change not with a smile, but we know what we need to do. We have a global manufacturing structure that helps us maneuver in these tough waters,” said Gustafsson.
      Back in July, Volvo announced that it would be sourcing XC60s destined for the U.S. from Europe. Previously, XC60s heading to the U.S. were coming from China. The move is expected to take place in January. Right now, Volvo is absorbing the 27.5 percent tariff on Chinese auto imports on the XC60. But Gustafsson said that is taking a big toll on their profits.
      “We are absorbing the tariffs, and that really is what you saw in our financial results. But we can, under no circumstances, absorb tariffs in the long run. It’s huge,” he said.
      The tariffs could also affect future plans for the South Carolina plant. Volvo is planning to have production of the next-generation XC90 take place in the U.S. beginning in 2022. This would increase the number of workers from 1,200 to 3,900. Volvo will export some XC90s to Europe, but also considering exporting some China at a loss.
      "We might need to make the XC90 in another country too, if tariffs keep up," said Gustafsson.
      Source: Bloomberg (Subscription Required), Motor Trend

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      For the past couple of years, Tesla has been offering an $8,000 "full self-driving" feature for their Autopilot system. But you couldn't use this feature as Tesla had not yet activated this feature. Basically, you were buying a system that Tesla promised would come online sometime in the near future. But that is not happening as Tesla has pulled the option for the time being.
      Last night, Tesla CEO Elon Musk tweeted the option has been taken off due to it causing "too much confusion".
      Since Tesla began offering the option in October 2016, the company has seen a number of top managers and engineers leave the Autopilot program. A number of owners who paid for the $8,000 option have filed a class-action lawsuit, "alleging they were deceived into buying a feature that didn’t exist."
      However, this feature isn't going away. Bloomberg obtained an internal email where Musk told employees they needed about 100 more people to join an internal testing program that is linked to full self-driving feature. 
      Source: Bloomberg

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      For the past couple of years, Tesla has been offering an $8,000 "full self-driving" feature for their Autopilot system. But you couldn't use this feature as Tesla had not yet activated this feature. Basically, you were buying a system that Tesla promised would come online sometime in the near future. But that is not happening as Tesla has pulled the option for the time being.
      Last night, Tesla CEO Elon Musk tweeted the option has been taken off due to it causing "too much confusion".
      Since Tesla began offering the option in October 2016, the company has seen a number of top managers and engineers leave the Autopilot program. A number of owners who paid for the $8,000 option have filed a class-action lawsuit, "alleging they were deceived into buying a feature that didn’t exist."
      However, this feature isn't going away. Bloomberg obtained an internal email where Musk told employees they needed about 100 more people to join an internal testing program that is linked to full self-driving feature. 
      Source: Bloomberg
    • By William Maley
      Tesla finds itself without a chairman of the board as Elon Musk has stepped down due to a settlement with Securities and Exchange Commission. A possible replacement for Musk could be James Murdoch, chief executive of 21st Century Fox and a member of Tesla's board according to a report from the Financial Times.
      The SEC is wanting the next chairperson to be independent and not beholden to Musk. Murdoch is the closest thing as he has more financial independence than another candidate, Antonio Gracias. The FT report says Gracias' venture capital firm, Valor Equity Partners was an early investor into Tesla, though it had sold its shares when Tesla had its IPO. Gracias is also a stakeholder in Musk's SpaceX, which clouds his independence. 
      That isn't to say Murdoch's independence is clear either as he is friends with Musk, and has sided with him on a number of decisions.
      Sources tell the FT that Tesla is also looking outside of the company for a possible replacement.
      Tesla didn't respond for comment, but Elon Musk took to Twitter last night to respond.
      "This is incorrect," he wrote.
      Source: Financial Times (Subscription Required), Bloomberg

      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×