Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mercedes-Benz USA July Sales Hit All-Time High Of 28,523 Units, Up 3.6%
 
ATLANTA, Aug. 2, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- Mercedes-Benz USA (MBUSA) today reported record July sales of 28,523 vehicles, increasing 3.6% from the 27,526 vehicles sold during the same month last year. Mercedes-Benz Vans also reported best-ever July sales with 3,272 units, and smart reported 493 units, up 11.8%, bringing MBUSA grand total to 32,288 vehicles for the month, up 7.2% from last year.
 
"We are continuing to see strong momentum build into the third quarter, fueled by the recent launch of three of our dream cars," said Dietmar Exler, president and CEO of MBUSA. "The S-Class Cabriolet, SL and SLC Roadsters, teamed with strong momentum for the all-new E-Class helped us set a new record for July."
 
Mercedes-Benz volume leaders in July included the C-Class, E-Class (including the CLS) and GLE model lines. The C-Class took the lead at 6,304, followed by the E-Class at 5,225. The GLE, rounded out the top three with 4,412 units sold.
 
Mercedes-AMG high-performance models sold 1,565 units in July, up 68.1% from last year (931), with a total of 12,510 units sold year-to-date (up 79.3%).
 
Separately, Mercedes-Benz Certified Pre-Owned (MBCPO) models recorded sales of 10,517 vehicles in July, an increase of 8.8% from last year (9,669). On a year-to-date basis, MBCPO sold 70,863 vehicles, an increase of 3.4%.
 

MERCEDES-BENZ USA 
Sales -- July 2016

 

Mercedes-Benz 
Passenger Vehicles

Jul-16

Jul-15

Monthly %

YTD 2016

YTD 2015

Yearly %

             

B-CLASS

50

196

-74.5%

360

1,368

-73.7%

             

CLA

2,284

2,439

-6.4%

15,895

18,542

-14.3%

             

C-CLASS

6,304

6,384

-1.3%

43,609

49,721

-12.3%

             

E-CLASS/CLS

5,225

6,131

-14.8%

27,683

31,184

-11.2%

             

S-CLASS

1,783

1,415

26.0%

10,276

12,047

-14.7%

             

SLC/SLK

238

324

-26.5%

1,975

2,404

-17.8%

             

SL

279

330

-15.5%

2,077

2,531

-17.9%

             

AMG GT

57

89

-

735

696

-

             

*SLS AMG

-

0

-

1

27

-

             

GLA

1,502

2,040

-26.4%

14,317

14,353

-0.3%

             

GLC/GLK

3,411

2,318

47.2%

26,802

16,153

65.9%

             

GLE/M-CLASS

4,412

3,851

14.6%

29,598

26,811

10.4%

             

GLS/GL

2,670

1,755

52.1%

15,550

14,693

5.8%

             

G-CLASS 

308

254

21.3%

2,422

1,962

23.4%

             

TOTAL

28,523

27,526

3.6%

191,300

192,492

-0.6%

             

Vans1

3,272

2,163

51.3%

19,034

15,697

21.3%

             

smart

493

441

11.8%

3,086

4,065

-24.1%

             

MBUSA 
Combined Total

Jul-16

Jul-15

Monthly %

YTD 2016

YTD 2015

Yearly %

             

GRAND TOTAL

32,288

30,130

7.2%

213,420

212,254

0.5%


1Mercedes-Benz, Freightliner Sprinter and Metris Vans are sold and marketed in the U.S. by Mercedes-Benz USA and Daimler Vans USA, respectively.

*out of production

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

S-Class is up 26%. I think you might mean the E-Class, that's down, but that has more to do with limited supply and the new model change over now in effect.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So SUV's and Vans is what is holding MB together. Not their so called vaunted cars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So SUV's and Vans is what is holding MB together. Not their so called vaunted cars.

 

But SUVs are also holding a number of other automakers together. See Buick, Volvo, Mazda, and Audi to name a few.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So SUV's and Vans is what is holding MB together. Not their so called vaunted cars.

 

But SUVs are also holding a number of other automakers together. See Buick, Volvo, Mazda, and Audi to name a few.

 

True, but then we have those that also continue to say MB is all about the superior cars to everyone else. If this was true then their cars would still be selling like gangbuster rather than dropping double digits in comparison to the SUV/CUV. 

 

I just think this proves that MB is at the same wims of the public that everyone else is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Year to date Mercedes has 102,301 car sales, which is 53.5% of their 191,300 total.  I doubt any other luxury car maker has that much volume in cars or that high a percentage, except maybe BMW since they sell so many 3-series.  Most luxury brands are SUV dependent, although Benz crossovers are the best also, so not surprising that they are all surging in sales.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And are SUV's based off the same platforms as cars; only being jacked up and adding plastic body cladding that is supposed to look macho, but folds in half by being hit by a twig - ARE THOSE NOT CARS?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check 'Year To Date'.

 

Not too bad, BMW recently redid the 7 Series, and it isn't growing either.

 

All flagship sedans are down.  All sedans are down, for the most part.

 

If any sedan is gaining, it's probably because it's fresh and the competitors are now in the middle of their product cycle.

 

It is expected for sales to eventually tail off in the product cycle. The Buick Lacrosse has been on sale for a wile now too. It's also down year to date. Where is the excuse for an all new model?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The ATS, CTS, XTS and CT6 combined for 5,285 sales, the E-class has 5,225.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet for Cadillac to succeed in terms of sales, and Cadillac does want sales, they'd become the Camry of luxury tier as well.

 

In their home market, it is embarrassing for any American make to be outdone by any competitor, especially foreign branded ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet for Cadillac to succeed in terms of sales, and Cadillac does want sales, they'd become the Camry of luxury tier as well.

 Not if they're not the "NUMBA1 ALLTIME SALES KING!!" IE: the CAMRY.

 

In their home market, it is embarrassing for any American make to be outdone by any competitor, especially foreign branded ones.

Nah; now everybody's on the 'global' bandwagon, and just like Mercedes massive fleet & livery sales in Germany (not to mention all the commercial trucks & vans) doesn't bother those that buy the high end models, consumers at large have zero interest in how many are sold in the segment vs. competitors.

 

And while it may at first seem like those are contradictory answers, my point is trumpeting that you sell thousands & thousand more than anyone else in the segment is not befitting of a true luxury brand, but then again; Mercedes has chosen to forsake that in the name of volume. IOW; it's not a reason to buy a luxury product, esp when it gets to be at the level of mainstream. But there's acres & acres of space between Cadillac's sales levels & Mercedes.

The consumer doesn't care about actual numbers relative to other brands… but "BIGGEST MONTH EVAH", repeatedly, smacks of hucksterism. 

General Motors should stop reporting monthly Cadillac sales and only issue annual… tho I suspect that's some sort of federal mandate or the like. 

Edited by balthazar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So in this thread Mercedes was criticized for their sedan sales being down, and also criticized for selling too many E-class sedans!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I don't agree with contradictory statements, but I don't like sales trumpeting, but it isn't Mercedes that's doing it. I have rarely seen a Mercedes commercial or any advert referencing large sales volume, but the CLA which I hate did have that super bowl, low price, high cleavage ad. Very good, the cleavage part.

 

But it's not like Mercedes doesn't try to make their cars exclusive.

 

Add up all the incentives, they're still the priciest of the lot, and like most luxury vehicles, depreciate quickly.

 

I would say that Mercedes should raise prices or cut incentives, to fatten transaction prices - something I wholly say Cadillac should do as well, atleast for certain models.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So in this thread Mercedes was criticized for their sedan sales being down, and also criticized for selling too many E-class sedans!

 

• MB has pushed so hard for volume that their product in the U.S. has become commonplace & ubitquitous; not hallmarks of a luxury item. Or at least they are around me.

 

• The mention of their car sales sliding heavily was a dig directly at you, SMK; glad you caught it. ;)

 

- - - - -

Does anyone know if public releases of monthly sales is legal requirement? They have to be reported I believe, but to whom??

Edited by balthazar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

S-Class is up 26%. I think you might mean the E-Class, that's down, but that has more to do with limited supply and the new model change over now in effect.

 

 

Yeah but of course U would ignore the fact that now Benzo is combining CLS and E-Class sales. $h! if this is cool.. why not just combine CTS and ATS sales? And before someone says it.. the CLS interior volume is almost less overall than an ATS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The ATS, CTS, XTS and CT6 combined for 5,285 sales, the E-class has 5,225.

 

 

Correction.. the E-Class and CLS are a combined 5225. I will also add that the E-Class can be had for $329 per month.. Cheap ass $h!. f@#k Mercedes.  Takes a wee bit of splash away from your celebration. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they combined it because it is the same chassis and wheelbase, but also since BMW combines 3 and 4 series, even though E-class is a different segment.  I don't know why the combined it really, CLS sales aren't much, but they have other cars that only sell 250 a month.

 

You can lease a rear drive 2016 E-class for $499 a month (36 months) and $5,300 down.  A 2017 E300 4Matic ($55,575 MSRP) is $569 a month with $5,263 due.  Not $329 a month.  A Cadillac CT6 1SD package ($60k MSRP) lease is $579 for 39 months $4,719 due at signing.  These are the advertised lease specials on the company websites, they are basically the same.

 

To Sauv's point about raising prices, Mercedes is already the highest priced car in almost every segment they are in, no reason to go higher.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Casa!

 

Good $h! sherlock, I don't care whether they add sales numbers or not, you always do that with GMC and Buick, yet how will that justify the Lacrosse being down 35%?

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they combined it because it is the same chassis and wheelbase, but also since BMW combines 3 and 4 series, even though E-class is a different segment.  I don't know why the combined it really, CLS sales aren't much, but they have other cars that only sell 250 a month.

 

You can lease a rear drive 2016 E-class for $499 a month (36 months) and $5,300 down.  A 2017 E300 4Matic ($55,575 MSRP) is $569 a month with $5,263 due.  Not $329 a month.  A Cadillac CT6 1SD package ($60k MSRP) lease is $579 for 39 months $4,719 due at signing.  These are the advertised lease specials on the company websites, they are basically the same.

 

To Sauv's point about raising prices, Mercedes is already the highest priced car in almost every segment they are in, no reason to go higher.

I HATE hearing "lease specials" because those are always the "ultra low" mileage leases meaning something like 8-10k miles a year or so. Change that to something more realistic and it jumps $25-50/month if not more if you drive a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want to burst people's bubbles, but if Cadillac was solely about low volumes and high ATPS, they would never allow for any compromise in the CT6, they should have superflous options like CC brakes that their V Models don't need, and they would be priced into the stratosphere.

 

But they won't do it, because they want these SALES.

 

It is embarrassing to be outsold in their home market, and atleast the German brands don't have any competition from America in Europe at all. It's not even fair. 

 

Here though, there's too much on the line, and Cadillac better pucker up and be in it for sales and profits at the same time. 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EVERY VEHICLE encompasses compromises.

 

You have to pony up for the AMG option on the S-class to get CC brakes there. Non-AMG Ss don't have them.

Is that a compromise, because there is (not yet) a CT6-V and what equipment it may have is totally unknown. Hell, the TTV8 isn't out yet.

 

Cadillac NEVER needs to approach the mainstream production levels of MB. They were too high in the late '70s, Cadillac's traditional volume level is the low 200s in the last 50 yrs. That's where they should level off at; 200-250K in the U.S. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Social Stream

  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      The past couple of years has seen a lot of talk about consumers are turning away from cars towards trucks and utility vehicles. U.S. automakers have responded to this trend by announcing cuts to their car lineup - General Motors being the latest one. But other automakers are being more cautious.
      Jim Lentz, CEO of Toyota North America told a gathering at the Detroit Economic Club last week that car sales are reaching the point of bottoming out - just under 30 percent in November sales. Unlike the American brands, Lentz isn't giving up on cars as they represent more than 4 million compact, midsize, and near-luxury cars sold to buyers.
      "There’s no way I’m going to walk away from that. We are always going to have a bias toward passenger cars,” said Lentz.
      The Associated Press reports that sales of passenger cars "are on pace to be 800,000 vehicles below 2017, while truck and SUV sales should increase by the same amount."
      Source: Associated Press

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      The past couple of years has seen a lot of talk about consumers are turning away from cars towards trucks and utility vehicles. U.S. automakers have responded to this trend by announcing cuts to their car lineup - General Motors being the latest one. But other automakers are being more cautious.
      Jim Lentz, CEO of Toyota North America told a gathering at the Detroit Economic Club last week that car sales are reaching the point of bottoming out - just under 30 percent in November sales. Unlike the American brands, Lentz isn't giving up on cars as they represent more than 4 million compact, midsize, and near-luxury cars sold to buyers.
      "There’s no way I’m going to walk away from that. We are always going to have a bias toward passenger cars,” said Lentz.
      The Associated Press reports that sales of passenger cars "are on pace to be 800,000 vehicles below 2017, while truck and SUV sales should increase by the same amount."
      Source: Associated Press
    • By William Maley
      It is already tough for a number of people to afford a new vehicle as the average transaction price keeps rising. According to Kelly Blue Book, the average transaction price for November rose 2.1 percent to $36,978. This isn't being helped by American automakers deciding to stop producing cars due to changing consumer tastes. This was brought to light last week when General Motors announced that it would be cutting a number of cars including the Chevrolet Cruze. Most automakers and dealers believe consumers will move towards utility vehicles, but some dealers believe that consumers may defect from American automakers because they don't offer the vehicle they are looking for.
      Chad Martin, a Bowling Green, Ky., dealer tells Automotive News that consumers feel the "affordability pinch" when automakers decide to drop cars to focus more on utility vehicles. For the most part, consumers "generally seem to be shopping for a particular type of vehicle, such as compact cars." Remove them out of your lineup and consumers are likely going to look elsewhere.
      "What this is going to mean is, you're going to see a somewhat higher defection rate because you don't have the product lineup that particular consumer wants," said Martin.
      Another big hurdle facing consumers who want to stick with the domestics is pricing. Martin explained that there is more than a $5,000 difference in pricing between compact crossovers and compact sedans. 
      Obviously, the consumer is going to have to absorb that $5,000 difference," said Martin.
      The numbers from Kelly Blue Book tell the story.
      Compact Car Average Transaction Price: $20,458 Subcompact Crossover/SUV Average Transaction Price: $24,210 Compact Crossover/SUV Average Transaction Price: $28,765 Jeremy Acevedo, Edmunds' manager of industry analysis agrees with the sentiment said by some dealers that consumers loyal to a segment may look elsewhere.
      "It's easy for shoppers to move from a Cavalier to a Cobalt to a Cruze. But it's a whole different ballgame moving from a car to an SUV."
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      It is already tough for a number of people to afford a new vehicle as the average transaction price keeps rising. According to Kelly Blue Book, the average transaction price for November rose 2.1 percent to $36,978. This isn't being helped by American automakers deciding to stop producing cars due to changing consumer tastes. This was brought to light last week when General Motors announced that it would be cutting a number of cars including the Chevrolet Cruze. Most automakers and dealers believe consumers will move towards utility vehicles, but some dealers believe that consumers may defect from American automakers because they don't offer the vehicle they are looking for.
      Chad Martin, a Bowling Green, Ky., dealer tells Automotive News that consumers feel the "affordability pinch" when automakers decide to drop cars to focus more on utility vehicles. For the most part, consumers "generally seem to be shopping for a particular type of vehicle, such as compact cars." Remove them out of your lineup and consumers are likely going to look elsewhere.
      "What this is going to mean is, you're going to see a somewhat higher defection rate because you don't have the product lineup that particular consumer wants," said Martin.
      Another big hurdle facing consumers who want to stick with the domestics is pricing. Martin explained that there is more than a $5,000 difference in pricing between compact crossovers and compact sedans. 
      Obviously, the consumer is going to have to absorb that $5,000 difference," said Martin.
      The numbers from Kelly Blue Book tell the story.
      Compact Car Average Transaction Price: $20,458 Subcompact Crossover/SUV Average Transaction Price: $24,210 Compact Crossover/SUV Average Transaction Price: $28,765 Jeremy Acevedo, Edmunds' manager of industry analysis agrees with the sentiment said by some dealers that consumers loyal to a segment may look elsewhere.
      "It's easy for shoppers to move from a Cavalier to a Cobalt to a Cruze. But it's a whole different ballgame moving from a car to an SUV."
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
    • By William Maley
      A new report from Automobile Magazine says that smart is living on borrow time and could disappear by 2026 at the earliest.
      According to various sources, Renault will be pulling out of partnership when the current Twingo/ForFour ends production. The two models share the same architecture in an effort to save costs. Without a partner, Mercedes-Benz isn't as keen to keep smart around.
      A key question is whether or not Mercedes-Benz will produce a new model with a three-pointed star to compete against the likes of the Mini Cooper and Audi A1. A decision by the board needs to happen by 2021 when it must sign off the next-generation A-class, Why? That's because the new model will use the same platform as the next-generation A-Class. Automobile says the platform will replace the current MFA2 and allow for a "fully scalable, all-new convergence layout" - thus allowing an even smaller vehicle.
      But there is a possible twist. Chinese automaker Geely owns a 9.7 percent stake in Daimler, and could become a replacement partner if a business case could be made for an electrified brand.
      Source: Automobile Magazine

      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×