Jump to content
  • Greetings Guest!

    CheersandGears.com was founded in 2001 and is one of the oldest continuously operating automotive forums out there.  Come see why we have users who visit nearly every day for the past 16+ years. Signup is fast and free, or you can opt for a premium subscription to view the site ad-free.

William Maley

Ford News: Spying: Checking Out the 2018 F-150 Facelift and Diesel Engine

Recommended Posts

While Ford is introducing an updated 3.5L EcoBoost V6 and ten-speed automatic for the 2017 F-150, the 2018 F-150 is more interesting to us. This is because Ford will be giving their full-size truck a facelift and a diesel engine. Thanks to Car and Driver, we're able to get a closer look via a set of spy shots.

We'll begin with the facelift. Ford has done a decent job with the camouflage, but we can pick out a new grille design that seems to mimic the F-Series super duty. Expect new headlights, along with new taillights and wheel choices.

We have reported previously on the venturi exhaust and a video with the noises of a diesel engine . Now we have more proof of the diesel engine. Thanks to a Ford engineer leaving the hood open, we have gotten our first clear look at the diesel engine. We can't tell much about the engine aside from there being a mess of hoses and wires. You might be asking how we know this is a diesel. Two key items give it away; a diesel fuel inlet behind the fuel filler door and a sign taped inside saying"Diesel Fuel Only!"

Everyone believes the diesel engine in question is a 3.0L turbodiesel V6 that is used in the Range Rover and Range Rover Sport TD6 models. This engine produces 254 horsepower and 440 pound-feet of torque.

Source: Car and Driver


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This would be an excellent choice.  after having owned a TDI VW, I would not mind a diesel F150!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I loved the idea before Ram did it and I love that Ram was the first to do the small/economical yet still useful diesel in their half ton. I would expect nothing less from Ram's competition and that this will also be a great engine choice. I just hope there isn't a ridiculous price jump going from base engine to this one. When it's $4200 more than the base engine and $3100 more than their top engine I don't like that so much. But if that's how they have to price it, I understand. I don't like it, but I understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ram needs to update their truck really soon or they'll quickly descend into irrelevance.  They're the oldest truck out there now I think.  Ford adding a light-duty diesel will take away one of the big selling points for Ram. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

Ram needs to update their truck really soon or they'll quickly descend into irrelevance.  They're the oldest truck out there now I think.  Ford adding a light-duty diesel will take away one of the big selling points for Ram. 

If I remember, Ram will be updating/redesign the Ram 1500 for 2018.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect the Ram could live on another 10 years with ththe current body and interior.  All it needs is a Hellcat option and a Maserati V6 superlegeraquadfiglio package.  Problem solved.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's probably the plan. Hellcat everything and it hides their shortcomings for another 5-10 years. I'm actually surprised they didn't hellcat the 200 and Dart to make them relevant. Instead they just axed them..weird..

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This truch just keeps tightening the noose around competitors, and I am not a huge Ford fan. But consider-

They offer a traditional V8 in addition to their turbo-gas 6's (even though they are more impressive on paper than in reality), they now have a diesel on the way, they have a true hardcore off-road monster, they have a full-on luxury sedanesque equipped halo model, and everything in between. It's no wonder their sales numbers are hard to catch.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just drove a '17 Lariat FX4 w/ the 5.0 a few days ago on a ride and drive event for Nissan, and it S*** on the Titan. I think it had an edge over the Silverado, as well. They're pricing has gotten insane, though.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, William Maley said:

If I remember, Ram will be updating/redesign the Ram 1500 for 2018.

Meh, diesel. But it should be a mileage champ.

Compared to the Ram ED: At least 700 lbs lighter, safer, more efficient/powerful diesel engine, more cargo capacity and towing, 10-speed transmission along with stat-stop tech. This truck will beat Ram ED rated 21/29 mpg.

 

Opps. Not sure how I quoted you. I hit reply at bottom of comments

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, FordCosworth said:

Meh, diesel. But it should be a mileage champ.

Compared to the Ram ED: At least 700 lbs lighter, safer, more efficient/powerful diesel engine, more cargo capacity and towing, 10-speed transmission along with stat-stop tech. This truck will beat Ram ED rated 21/29 mpg.

 

Opps. Not sure how I quoted you. I hit reply at bottom of comments

Yeah, but you're comparing a future Ford product to a current Ram product at the end of its lifecycle. If the Ram will be new for 2018, the same time this F150 diesel arrives, then none of those comparisons you made will matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the ram at the end of its product cycle? It wouldn't surprise me if this goes till 2020 which means it's old but not the end of the cycle. By then Ford and GM will have new $h! again. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest HoosierDad

Lightweight and 10 speeds with the Diesel should make it the mileage champ. I doubt Ram will top all that with next upgrade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Guest HoosierDad said:

Lightweight and 10 speeds with the Diesel should make it the mileage champ. I doubt Ram will top all that with next upgrade.

Until the next RAM comes out, that is just here-say. They do have their work cut out for them though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how much advantage a 10-speed will have over an (excellent) 8-speed at this point in a diesel. Ford isn't even promising huge gains in fuel economy over the 6-speed in the Gas powered ones.  The gear ratio spread will only be a tiny bit wider for Ford.

We really are getting to peak gear ratios now.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

I'm not sure how much advantage a 10-speed will have over an (excellent) 8-speed at this point in a diesel. Ford isn't even promising huge gains in fuel economy over the 6-speed in the Gas powered ones.  The gear ratio spread will only be a tiny bit wider for Ford.

We really are getting to peak gear ratios now.

http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/car-technology/g6813/10-things-to-know-about-the-new-ford-gm-10-speed-automatic-transmission/

This was a really neat read on the new trans. I thought it was impressive reading how much shorter their spread is compared to some of the others out there and their mileage claim compared to the others as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ccap41 said:

http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/car-technology/g6813/10-things-to-know-about-the-new-ford-gm-10-speed-automatic-transmission/

This was a really neat read on the new trans. I thought it was impressive reading how much shorter their spread is compared to some of the others out there and their mileage claim compared to the others as well.

That's the only puzzling thing about this 10-speed to me.  I almost wonder if there shouldn't be two versions of it... one with a wider spread and one with a normal spread.  The Ecoboost V6es are engines that I believe would really be able to put a wide gear ratio spread to good use. With their torque available way down low they should be able to hold 10th gear at low RPM unlike the 2.4 in the Chryslers.  I can understand keeping the spread normal for a V6 F-150 that isn't an ecoboost... but if you've got the torque, use it. The Camaro ZL-1 I'm sure would do well with a tall 10th gear too. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

That's the only puzzling thing about this 10-speed to me.  I almost wonder if there shouldn't be two versions of it... one with a wider spread and one with a normal spread.  The Ecoboost V6es are engines that I believe would really be able to put a wide gear ratio spread to good use. With their torque available way down low they should be able to hold 10th gear at low RPM unlike the 2.4 in the Chryslers.  I can understand keeping the spread normal for a V6 F-150 that isn't an ecoboost... but if you've got the torque, use it. The Camaro ZL-1 I'm sure would do well with a tall 10th gear too. 

That was exactly what I thought when I read it as well. I guess for the 5.0 it makes more sense but it will be in more ecoboosts be it 2.7 or 3.5 than 5.0s so I don't really understand it either. But they claim anything past 7.4 wouldn't really benefit for their use..

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 0 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online



  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Ford's original plan for the GT was to build the model for two years, with 250 units being built each year. Then Ford extended the production run to four years and expanded the total number of vehicles built to 1,000. So how is Ford doing on their production targets for the GT? According to Motor Authority, they haven't gone as planned.
      This information was first brought to light by a GT message board claiming Ford didn't reach their 250 unit goal for 2017. Motor Authority reached out to Ford and a spokesman confirmed that only 137 GTs were built last year. Why the delay?
      "This is a hand-built supercar, which we are committed to deliver flawlessly. We built into our process an extended ramp-up due to several factors such as global homologation testing and supplier constraints," the spokesman said in a statement.
      Multimatic, the company that is building the GT for Ford explained they "hadn't built cars on this scale before" and it them some time to meet its goal of building one car per work day. The company only reached this goal in the middle of last year. Issues with suppliers and minor issues also played a role. Multimatic did say that everything is on schedule for the full run of 250 vehicles for 2018.
      At the current pace, this would only mean Ford would produce 888 Its, 112 units short from their original goal. The Ford spokesman said they are sticking with their goal of 1,000 vehicles. This likely means Ford will extend production one more year to meet it.
      Source: Motor Authority

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Ford's original plan for the GT was to build the model for two years, with 250 units being built each year. Then Ford extended the production run to four years and expanded the total number of vehicles built to 1,000. So how is Ford doing on their production targets for the GT? According to Motor Authority, they haven't gone as planned.
      This information was first brought to light by a GT message board claiming Ford didn't reach their 250 unit goal for 2017. Motor Authority reached out to Ford and a spokesman confirmed that only 137 GTs were built last year. Why the delay?
      "This is a hand-built supercar, which we are committed to deliver flawlessly. We built into our process an extended ramp-up due to several factors such as global homologation testing and supplier constraints," the spokesman said in a statement.
      Multimatic, the company that is building the GT for Ford explained they "hadn't built cars on this scale before" and it them some time to meet its goal of building one car per work day. The company only reached this goal in the middle of last year. Issues with suppliers and minor issues also played a role. Multimatic did say that everything is on schedule for the full run of 250 vehicles for 2018.
      At the current pace, this would only mean Ford would produce 888 Its, 112 units short from their original goal. The Ford spokesman said they are sticking with their goal of 1,000 vehicles. This likely means Ford will extend production one more year to meet it.
      Source: Motor Authority
    • By William Maley
      The Ford Fusion will be going away in due course as part of the company's plan to put more focus on utility vehicles and trucks. But that doesn't mean the Fusion name will heading to the trash bin.
      Bloomberg has learned from sources that Ford is planning to move the Fusion name to a new wagon that will compete with the Subaru Outback. The new model will also use the same mechanical underpinnings as the current Fusion - leading us to believe that it will be some version of the Mondeo wagon sold in Europe. Ford spokesman Mike Levine declined to comment on the new model, but did say the Fusion name would continue "because of its awareness, positive imagery and value with consumers.”
      Ford needs a way to keep their current sedan buyers returning their showroom after the Fusion sedan drops out. Analysis done by Kelly Blue Book revealed the less than half of Fusion owners are loyal to the brand. KBB also found that the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 were the most popular SUV models that Fusion owners would consider.
      “Ford has a hard time moving people from their cars to SUVs,” said Michelle Krebs, a senior analyst with Autotrader.
      Source: Bloomberg (Subscription Required)

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      The Ford Fusion will be going away in due course as part of the company's plan to put more focus on utility vehicles and trucks. But that doesn't mean the Fusion name will heading to the trash bin.
      Bloomberg has learned from sources that Ford is planning to move the Fusion name to a new wagon that will compete with the Subaru Outback. The new model will also use the same mechanical underpinnings as the current Fusion - leading us to believe that it will be some version of the Mondeo wagon sold in Europe. Ford spokesman Mike Levine declined to comment on the new model, but did say the Fusion name would continue "because of its awareness, positive imagery and value with consumers.”
      Ford needs a way to keep their current sedan buyers returning their showroom after the Fusion sedan drops out. Analysis done by Kelly Blue Book revealed the less than half of Fusion owners are loyal to the brand. KBB also found that the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 were the most popular SUV models that Fusion owners would consider.
      “Ford has a hard time moving people from their cars to SUVs,” said Michelle Krebs, a senior analyst with Autotrader.
      Source: Bloomberg (Subscription Required)
    • By William Maley
      Ford's latest ST model, the 2019 Edge ST will be arriving at dealers later this summer with a base price of $43,350 (including destination). According to CarsDirect, the ST is $1,585 more expensive than the Edge Sport it replaces. But you're getting more car for the money.
      To begin, the Edge ST has a 2.7L EcoBoost V6 producing 335 horsepower and 380 pound-feet of torque. The Sport's 2.7L EcoBoost only produced 315 hp and 350 lb-ft. There's also a new eight-speed automatic with rev-matching, retuned suspension, and a more aggressive body kit.
      An optional Performance Brake Package that brings forth larger brake rotors and red calipers will add $2,695 to the base price. But as CarsDirect notes, you'll need to add Equipment Group 401A to get the brake package. 401A includes a number of comfort and convenience features such as heated and ventilated front seats; 180-degree camera, hands-free liftgate, navigation, and Ford's CoPilot+ suite of driver aids for an additional $5,585.
      Source: CarsDirect

      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.