Jump to content
William Maley

Ford News: Ford Performance Considers RS Versions of their Crossovers

Recommended Posts

It is unlikely that the Focus RS will be the only Ford model sporting the RS badge, although which models will follow have been up for debate. The chief of Ford Performance has hinted that the brand's crossovers could go under the RS treatment.

"I think customers love performance. I think the definition of what that means for an SUV might be different than what it means for a Focus or for a Fiesta. But I think that we’ve seen, even in the US and globally, that people like aggressive-looking cars, they like sporty, they want the power and pick-up and engine improvement, so I think the answer is yes. SUV customers would appreciate performance, for sure," said Dave Pericak, head of Ford Performance to Car Dealer Magazine.

Pericak goes on to say that he believes there are "no real credible (performance SUVs)." (Though we are sure the likes of BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Porsche would like to have a conversation with him about this -WM).

"If you look at the SUV market right now, there aren’t too many credible performance SUVs out there. here are people who have made partial attempts at it and there are different things that have happened, but there are no real credible ones. So, I think that’s an area of some opportunity, for sure."

Car Dealer Magazine speculates that the Kuga (Escape to us) could be the most likely candidate, followed by the EcoSport and Edge.

Source: Car Dealer Magazine


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, there are no real credible Performance SUV's. My Chevy Trailblazer AWD SS was the the last of real performance SUV's and before that was the GMC Typhoon.

Sorry but the AMG and M series lack so much. Close is the Durango and GC SRT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, dfelt said:

I agree, there are no real credible Performance SUV's.  

Cayenne Turbo S...zero to 60 in 3.8 sec, 570hp.. not exactly lacking in the performance department. 

Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Easy for him to say when they haven't made an attempt.   Lets see him come close to the Porsche offerings in performance and refinement for daily use.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by frogger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They could do something outrageous like an Expedition Shelby GT350.   Use the same engine, offer a Track Pack..

Which would be a great opportunity for Chevy to release ZL1-spec Tahoes and Suburbans... ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

They could do something outrageous like an Expedition Shelby GT350.   Use the same engine, offer a Track Pack..

Which would be a great opportunity for Chevy to release ZL1-spec Tahoes and Suburbans... ;)

Nothing like Supercharged Small Block V8 Awesomeness! :metal: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been saying for a couple years that Cadillac needs performance crossovers.  This market is about to be the next one to explode , because he is right in people want performance, people like aggressive and sporty looking vehicles.  People bought Camaros, Mustangs, M3's, SS Chevy's and all that stuff in the 90s and 2000s.  There were Regal GS, Grand Prix GTP, Taurus SHO, etc.  They were making performance oriented family sedans.  Now everyone wants crossovers, but I think they'll still want performance variants once they are offered.  Just because buyers abandoned coupes and are now abandoning sedans, doesn't mean they don't still like power.

Where this guys is delusional is in saying there aren't any credible performance crossovers, because the Tesla Model X does 0-60 faster than a Ford GT.  Porsche has the Macan and Cayenne as mentioned above, BMW the X5, Jaguar the F-pace with 380 hp and soon to be 500 hp, Alfa Romeo has a 505 hp SUV, and AMG has like 5 or 6.  He needs to get out a bit more and look at what is going on in the market.  If he'd like to clarify and say none of the EcoSport, Escape or Edge competitors have performance variants, then I am all for that.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mercedes-Benz-ML55_AMG-2000-1600-03.jpg

Performance crossover started in late 1999 with this equipped with a 342 hp, 376 lb-ft torque V8 (a Corvette that year was 345 hp, 350 lb-ft).  Mercedes invented the performance crossover now nearly 20 years later, Audi, BMW, Ford, and who knows who else all want to jump on the band wagon.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, dfelt said:

I agree, there are no real credible Performance SUV's. My Chevy Trailblazer AWD SS was the the last of real performance SUV's and before that was the GMC Typhoon.

Sorry but the AMG and M series lack so much. Close is the Durango and GC SRT.

Up, the GC ST8, upcoming Durango SRT, GC Trackhawk, the Mercedes AMG, Porsche,  and BMW M badged SUVs would simply tear a trailblazer SS apart in every performance measure.  Hell, the 1st gen GC SRT8 that was sold alongside the TB SS was a better performer......

Anyways, this makes total sense.  CUV/SUVs are the current trend and they would probably sell every one they could build. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Stew said:

Up, the GC ST8, upcoming Durango SRT, GC Trackhawk, the Mercedes AMG, Porsche,  and BMW M badged SUVs would simply tear a trailblazer SS apart in every performance measure.  Hell, the 1st gen GC SRT8 that was sold alongside the TB SS was a better performer......

Anyways, this makes total sense.  CUV/SUVs are the current trend and they would probably sell every one they could build. 

Very true, that is why GM needs to bring back a modern TB SS and Typhoon to keep everyone on their Toes! :metal: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Stew said:

Up, the GC ST8, upcoming Durango SRT, GC Trackhawk, the Mercedes AMG, Porsche,  and BMW M badged SUVs would simply tear a trailblazer SS apart in every performance measure.  Hell, the 1st gen GC SRT8 that was sold alongside the TB SS was a better performer......

Anyways, this makes total sense.  CUV/SUVs are the current trend and they would probably sell every one they could build. 

About the Trailblazer SS...

It could actually um...tow. You know, the UTILITY part in the Sport Utility Vehicle nomenclature.

The GC SRT8 in 2005/2006 was not able to haul shyte. Just ass!

I have no idea what the GC SRT 8 and Trailhawk does today with the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S in the towing department, but I do know the Mercedes AMG and the BMW X5M and X6M tow shyte! The regular BMW X5 and X6 hardly tows!

So...all these performance SUVs...will they actually be doing any hard work?

Or are they only badge accomplishments with performance numbers that could be bettered with cars sold to idiot badge snobs that think they are safer in SUVs and FALSELY calling themselves "car enthusiasts"!

YES! YES!

They are REAL car enthusiasts that APPRECIATE performance oriented trucks and SUVs...

I AM ONE OF THESE TYPES!

PS: The Typhoon and Syclone SUVs were the first, @smk4565

Dodge actually had the 'Lil Red Express truck in the '70s to replace the muscle car offerings, so the idea was there 30 years BEFORE Mercedes Benz!

 

 

 

Edited by oldshurst442

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the modern SRTs are like 5000+ pounds for towing?  i will need to double check.  Still, the Typhoon couldn't tow either, but damn were they fun to drive!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Typhoon and Cyclone were body on frame.  They were the first performance trucks.  Mercedes had the first performance crossover.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Stew said:

I think the modern SRTs are like 5000+ pounds for towing?  i will need to double check.  Still, the Typhoon couldn't tow either, but damn were they fun to drive!

Thanx for the info on the MODERN SRT!

I thought so that it could tow.

The Porsche Cayenne is where Im in awe! Why? Because it hauls ass, its a VERY GOOD off-roader and I THINK it even tows DECENTLY! It does all 3! EΧΑCTLY what a performance SUV SHOULD be doing!

The GMC offerings failed in the market place because they were the first (actually 2nd) performance trucks and SUVs and becuase they couldnt do what trucks should be doin' in the first place, people were confused with their purpose.

Like I said, today, we are accustomed to these, but, if a performance automotive enthusiast wants REAL speed and handling, the car is still the performance champion. Why? PHYSICS!

Its cool that Ford and M-B and Porsche and BMW and Audi and Bentley and others want to offer us these, how successful will these be anyway?

Its a niche of a niche...

Performance machines of any kind dont really sell in high numbers.

SUVs sell, but to soccer moms and dads.

Dads that love speed still buy Porsche 911s by the ton load!

Fake badge "enthusiasts" buy AMG or M.  ESPECIALLY the SUVs.

About Ford doing a RS Escape to attract soccer dad?

If soccer dad was not enticed by a sedan in the first place, good luck in selling a Escape RS to him!

 

 

 

Edited by oldshurst442

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

Typhoon and Cyclone were body on frame.  They were the first performance trucks.  Mercedes had the first performance crossover.  

SEMANTICS!

To me, CUVs and SUVs that are family grocery getters like the Mercedes-Benz ML, or the MODERN TAHOE, BOF or UNIBODY, they are really just tall STATION WAGONs!

The Audi Quattro in the 1980s and the AMC Eagle wagon are the precursors to what we call crossovers toady that offer AWD or 4x4!   Blend in an Oldsmobile Vista Cruiser 455 with the Lil Red Express Dodge, both BOF and this is why we had BOF Syclones and Trailblazer SS and Dodge Ram SRT-10s and Ford Lightnings and Unibody Grand Cherokee SRT8s, Porsche Cayennes and M-L AMGs!

Like muscle cars, this is an evolutionary process that started several decades, not just one specific model on a singular model year!

 

 

 

Edited by oldshurst442
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ford saying there have been no credible performance SUV's??? Lol, that's just rich.

Aren't these guys having legal action taken against them for their track-oriented sports cars having tranny overheating issues??

 

Talk about looking like a damn fool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

Typhoon and Cyclone were body on frame.  They were the first performance trucks.  Mercedes had the first performance crossover.  

Distinction without a difference. Mercedes did not invent the idea of putting a high performance engine in a plebian model... Not by a longshot..

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could buy a Dodge Ramcharger with AWD & a 440 in 1974.
Yeah, naturally the power levels were down by '74 (only rated at 350 TRQ), but upping that was easy.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG ECOSPORT RS TOO FREAKIN WICKED YO

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, smk4565 said:

Mercedes-Benz-ML55_AMG-2000-1600-03.jpg

Performance crossover started in late 1999 with this equipped with a 342 hp, 376 lb-ft torque V8 (a Corvette that year was 345 hp, 350 lb-ft).  Mercedes invented the performance crossover now nearly 20 years later, Audi, BMW, Ford, and who knows who else all want to jump on the band wagon.  

WRONG WRONG WRONG!!!

1992 GMC Typhoon AWD

http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/classic-cars/a26217/1992-gmc-typhoon-first-drive-flashback/

Before this the little Red Truck by Dodge!

Learn your performance history! American Auto companies were doing performance way before MB even figured out how to do luxury!

2003 Chevrolet did their SS AWD & 2wd trucks that could do performance and still haul like a real truck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/24/2017 at 3:54 PM, dfelt said:

I agree, there are no real credible Performance SUV's. My Chevy Trailblazer AWD SS was the the last of real performance SUV's and before that was the GMC Typhoon.

Sorry but the AMG and M series lack so much. Close is the Durango and GC SRT.

The AMG Mercedes lack something? Maybe a little off road-mess but they have balls out the ass. 

On 3/24/2017 at 4:20 PM, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

They could do something outrageous like an Expedition Shelby GT350.   Use the same engine, offer a Track Pack..

Which would be a great opportunity for Chevy to release ZL1-spec Tahoes and Suburbans... ;)

Terrible engine choice for a massive vehicle.. lack of torque. It would sound glorious though. 

21 hours ago, smk4565 said:

Mercedes-Benz-ML55_AMG-2000-1600-03.jpg

Performance crossover started in late 1999 with this equipped with a 342 hp, 376 lb-ft torque V8 (a Corvette that year was 345 hp, 350 lb-ft).  Mercedes invented the performance crossover now nearly 20 years later, Audi, BMW, Ford, and who knows who else all want to jump on the band wagon.  

They've had the AMG G Wagen for like 15 years already, haven't they?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For what it's worth the Range Rover Sport Superchaeged can tow 7700lbs @ 500hp 

The big Rover S/C can as well. 

Edited by ccap41

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

12 hours ago, ccap41 said:

Terrible engine choice for a massive vehicle.. lack of torque. It would sound glorious though. 

 

650lb-ft is 'lack of torque'?   

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

 

650lb-ft is 'lack of torque'?   

I assumed when you said "GT350" you meant 5.2 which is something like 470lb-ft but needs revs badly to do that. 

Are you talking about the old s/c 5.8?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

I assumed when you said "GT350" you meant 5.2 which is something like 470lb-ft but needs revs badly to do that. 

Are you talking about the old s/c 5.8?

I thought you meant the Camaro ZL1 spec in the comment you quoted.    The Shelby 5.2 has 429ft lbs of torque, which is plenty enough for a sporty SUV....not talking about towing capacity torque.

Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 81 Guests (See full list)



  • Social Stream

  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Acura's crossover lineup has been a bright spot for the Japanese automaker. For example, the redesigned RDX has been setting monthly sales records for sixth straight months since being launched in June. According to Automotive News, deliveries of the RDX "are outpacing 2017 by 22 percent." A fair number of automakers would take this as a sign to continue building out their crossover lineup. But Acura will instead focus on their car lineup.
      "We don't know what's going to happen in the future. What's critical is that we stay disciplined and balanced. [We'll] do our best to hit home runs with our sedans also," said Acura General Manager Jon Ikeda.
      Acura wants to emulate the success of the RDX onto their sedans. That means bringing a more aggressive design and adding more performance to their three sedans - the ILX, TLX, and RLX.
      But what about the CDX?!
      For a time, we have been hearing murmurs about Acura possibly bringing over the CDX from China. The CDX shares the same platform as the Honda HR-V, but features an extroverted design.  But an Acura spokesman tells Automotive News that the RDX "can reach down into that smaller segment with its pricing and sway consumers with its added room."
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Acura's crossover lineup has been a bright spot for the Japanese automaker. For example, the redesigned RDX has been setting monthly sales records for sixth straight months since being launched in June. According to Automotive News, deliveries of the RDX "are outpacing 2017 by 22 percent." A fair number of automakers would take this as a sign to continue building out their crossover lineup. But Acura will instead focus on their car lineup.
      "We don't know what's going to happen in the future. What's critical is that we stay disciplined and balanced. [We'll] do our best to hit home runs with our sedans also," said Acura General Manager Jon Ikeda.
      Acura wants to emulate the success of the RDX onto their sedans. That means bringing a more aggressive design and adding more performance to their three sedans - the ILX, TLX, and RLX.
      But what about the CDX?!
      For a time, we have been hearing murmurs about Acura possibly bringing over the CDX from China. The CDX shares the same platform as the Honda HR-V, but features an extroverted design.  But an Acura spokesman tells Automotive News that the RDX "can reach down into that smaller segment with its pricing and sway consumers with its added room."
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
    • By William Maley
      It is no secret that buyers are gobbling up SUVs and crossovers, nor is it that automakers are introducing new and redesigned models. Take a look at the New York Auto Show this week where a number a new models (Toyota RAV4 and Subaru Forester) and concepts (Lincoln Aviator) made their debut.
      According to automotive consultancy firm LMC Automotive, there are currently 63 mainstream crossover and SUV models, and 53 luxury models. By 2023, LMC is projecting 90 models for both mainstream and luxury. But this prompts a question - how much is too much?
      “I think everyone has read the same tea leaves - right now there seems to be insatiable demand,” said Cadillac president Johan de Nysschen to Reuters.
      “Everyone is going into these segments with compelling new entries and that means there are going to be winners and there are going to be losers.”
      Already, there are signs this boom could be heading downward. LMC Automotive is forecasting a slow growth for SUVs and crossovers in 2018 and continuing through 2025.
      “There are still some legs left to grow in the SUV market, but growth is slowing and will eventually level off. This is a bright spot in the market, which is why everyone is flocking to it with new product,”  said Jeff Schuster, LMC’s senior vice president of forecasting.
      A key reason comes down to the large number of SUV and crossovers that will be going off-lease and entering the market, proving a less expensive option for buyers. Cox Automotive forecasts that 40 percent of the roughly 4 million nearly new vehicles expected to come off lease this year will be SUVs and crossovers. The number is expected to rise to 44 percent.
      “Now that you’re seeing more SUVs starting to come off lease, that will automatically put pressure on new SUV pricing,” said Karl Brauer, executive publisher forKelley Blue Book.
      There are those who don't buy this argument though. Sam Fiorani, vice president of global vehicle forecasting with AutoForecast Solutions says there is still room to grow if automakers dive into different niches such as sporty models and limited editions.
      “The market is not yet saturated and there are all kinds of niches that have yet to be filled. We’re five or 10 years from even thinking about market saturation.”
      Various automakers claim there is always more room for products, provided they can stand out.
      “There are clearly a lot of entrants, but we are going to differentiate ourselves with a completely different look to our brand," said Lincoln president Joy Falotico at the New York Auto Show.
      But Karl Brauer points out a simple fact: “Simple math suggests that you’ll have more models with lower volume.”
      “You can’t have that many SUVs on the market and have all of them grow volume. Some of them are going to have to give,” explained Brauer.
      Source: Reuters

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      According to a new report from Automobile, the Audi R8 supercar will not have a third-generation model. The report says the R8 is a slow seller and Audi has decided it wouldn't be worth the money to develop a new one. The model will depart in 2020 when the replacement for the Lamborghini Huracán arrives - the R8 shares the same platform and engine.
      Audi has pulled the plug on a successor to the R8 e-tron and a supercar project known as Scorpion. The latter project would have used a V8 that would be made up of four 1.2L Ducati motorcycle engines.
      At least other performance projects seem to be on track. The upcoming RS4 and RS5 will use a new 2.9L twin-turbo V6 producing 450 horsepower. This engine is almost nearing its power ceiling as Automobile says the maximum power it can achieve is 470. There is the possibility of a plug-in hybrid powertrain using this engine along with an 85 kW electric motor to produce even more power - although, there are no scheduled plans to add this to either model.
      The next-generation RS6 and RS7 will retain the 4.0L twin-turbo V8 found in the current models.
      On top of Audi's RS offerings will be the RS Q8 due in 2020. Basically a coupe-styled version of the Q7, the RS version will use the same 4.0L twin-turbo V8 found in the upcoming Lamborghini Urus that produces 641 horsepower.
      Source: Automobile

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Volkswagen recently held an event for journalists and investors to talk about the upcoming Jetta. But the company also gave a preview of their product plans for the near future. According to Autoblog, those plans include two new crossovers.
      The first will be a five-seat model that will slot between the Tiguan and Atlas. Volkswagen North America CEO President and CEO Hinrich Woebcken described it as 'coupe-like'. We're assuming this model will compete with the likes of the Ford Edge and Nissan Murano. The second will slot below the long-wheelbase Tiguan (what we get in the U.S.). This could either be the short-wheelbase Tiguan or a new model that was hinted by Volkswagen's director of development, Dr. Frank Welsch back in September.
      It comes as no surprise that Volkswagen is planning to expand their crossover offerings. During his presentation, Woebcken showed that light truck sales increased a whopping 51 percent year-to-date, compared to 1 percent for car sales.
      Still, Volkswagen is planning to walk away from sedans just yet. 2018 will see the new Jetta and launches of the Arteon and Passat GT. Down the road, Volkswagen will introduce a new Jetta GLI and redesigned Passat.
      Source: Autoblog

      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...